DaveH:
If you go to www.mail2web.com , you can read all the mail
on your home computer.
Terry
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 1:13
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] further
revelation
DAVEH: Thanx
DavidH,
I am in no rush...I can wait for your response.
No, I did not see the History Channel special on the Bible. I would like
to have watched it, but do not get the HIstory Channel. May I assume you
watched it? Do you think it was, or at least made an attempt to be accurate,
or was it
Some of us dont think that
Catholics are usually Christians. Seems like a rarity to me. Usually they are
adulterers and/or liars in my experience. Izzy
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December
Well, then, I've had that myself more than once. I'm sure I'm not
unusual for that! Sure you don't want to define your meaning again? Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles P. Locke
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 10:39 PM
To:
David,
For the sake of TT'ers, how about you choose a name for REAL Christians,
so that we can all talk the same lingo without reinventing the wheel
every time we use the word. How about we use the capitalized word
Believers?
Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
The only problem I have with that is that there is a cult called The
Way. They are the wrong way, but nonetheless, some would identify you
with that cult. Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles P. Locke
Sent: Thursday, December 26,
Another nitpicker on TT. sigh Izzy
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002
1:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is
known by its fruits
On Fri, 27 Dec
Beach Be sure to apply sunscreen, as
none of us sitting here in the snow would pity you too much if you got
sunburned! J Izzy
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002
1:13 AM
To: [EMAIL
I don't think I can change the meaning of a word because one person claims
to have had a revelation.
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Law
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 09:19:26 -0600
Well, then, I've had that myself
Izzy wrote:
For the sake of TT'ers, how about you choose
a name for REAL Christians, so that we can all
talk the same lingo without reinventing the wheel
every time we use the word. How about we use
the capitalized word Believers?
Sure, I think that the term Believer readily refers to a true
Gary wrote:
you employed double negatives;
i eliminated them both for clarity
No, I did not employ a double negative. A double negative is where the same
phrase has two negatives where one negative modifies the next negative. The
two negatives you eliminated were from two separate phrases.
Laura wrote:
So a person can be a Christian and not follow Christ???
Yes. Trying to follow Christ, or thinking that you are following Christ, is
not the same thing as actually following Christ. Many people will say,
Lord, Lord, did we not do many wonderful things in your name? (Mat. 7:22).
Perry,
Do you mean to tell me that the Holy Spirit has never given you
information?
Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles P. Locke
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Law
I
Laura,
Then you are the one who thinks Hitler was
a Christian! ROFL!!! Izzy
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002
11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] a tree is
The International Standard Bible EncyclopediaCHRISTIAN -Search This Resource
kris'-chan, kris'-ti-an (Christianos):
1. Historicity of Acts 11:26
2. Of Pagan Origin
3. The Christian Attitude to the Name
4. Was "Christian" the Original Form?
5. The Christians and the Empire
6.
In a message dated 12/27/2002 11:51:59 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Laura,
Then you are the one who thinks Hitler was a Christian! ROFL!!! Izzy
Not me You can't become a Christian any way other than salvation Laura
Laura wrote:
Apparentlly our definition of Christian is different.
I don't believe a person becomes a Christian by
joining a church or even by saying they are a
Christian.
Does your church have church membership? Do you know of any churches that
have church membership?
Are there any church
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 13:28:27 -0500 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
the priesthood of all believers [i]s taught by Jesus Christ.
Gary wrote:
where'd you get this idea?
Matthew 23 for starters.
Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida USA
--
Let your speech be
In a message dated 12/27/2002 1:13:52 PM Central Standard Time, GJ Tabor writes:
I'm asking YOU to tell me what religion they are.
Suppose we consider a person who claims to follow Jesus Christ, who joins a
church, is baptized by that church, attends it regularly and all that, but
they are not
In a message dated 12/27/2002 1:13:52 PM Central Standard Time, GJ Tabor writes:
So, then am I correct in understanding that they are NOT using your
definition of Christian, but some other definition of Christian? Would you
say that your definition of "Christian" is in the minority or majority?
Izzy, I was waiting for you to ask that or a similar question. Thank you.
Of course the HS has given me information. He has convicted me of my sin. He
has shown me my need for a saviour. He has answered prayer by leading me to
the right path...all of a personal nature.
But he has never told me
Perry, Thanks. But I would still like to have a more concise definition
from you now that you have said there is personal vs other kinds of
revelation, if you don't mind. This might help us to define the kind of
revelation the mormons claim to have. Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Great post I agree totally
The long and short of it is that there is more than one kind of
revelation.
Personal revelation is one thing, and I think that if we are walking in
the
spirit we receive such. But, anytime anyone starts out by saying "God
told
me...", I become suspicious, especially
Izzy, please stick with me and read my entire post.
I do not believe that Joseph Smith received any revelations from God.
Either he made them up and subsequently came to believe them (perhaps in
order to keep from being lynched by the large number of followers his little
prank had collected),
Perry,
Well we certainly agree on THAT! The poor mormons are dupes of JS at
best--may God save them by His mercy.
However, I wonder if you cannot believe that the Lord could give further
revelation in this day via the Holy Spirit which IS be in agreement with
scriptures? I believe there are some
My father sent me this. --Marlin
Subject: FBI EYES
http://users.chartertn.net/tonytemplin/FBI_eyes/
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want
In a message dated 12/27/2002 4:16:02 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this what you mean when you call them heathens? Are they people who do
not acknowledge God?
No I don't mean that heathens are evil people but I think of them as nonbelievers. I think nonbelievers can be
Izzy,
One of the tenets of Christian theology is that the canon of scripture is
closed (as mentioned in Jude 3), and that there will be no more revelation
of the kind Joseph Smith purports to have received, i.e., revelation that
reveals anything more than the Bible reveals, contradicts the
28 matches
Mail list logo
