, 2005 18:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not
be split
John wrote:
Sorry, Christine. Papa is worried about
you and us liberals.
LOL. I'm not worried about Christine one bit. I'm very proud of her, but
I
will protect her from traps, bad questions
John wrote:
So I was right! Papa is worried and
muct rush to the rescue.
No, John, you were not right. Worry is a sin. Protecting those under my
authority is not a sin. Surely you understand the difference.
By the way, Christine, being the humble woman of God that she is, greatly
ul 2005 06:57:50 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not be split
John wrote:
So I was right! Papa is worried and
muct rush to the rescue.
No, John, you were not right. Worry is a sin. Protecting those under my
authority is not a sin. Surely you
Lance wrote:
A David but who will protect her from you
(your errant epistemology - your errant theologizing
- your errant regulative beliefs)? But it's a little late
for that, isn't it?
Do you realize how terrible such comments sound to a conservative? Liberals
always attack the
As to your response hereunder, I concur.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: July 07, 2005 09:11
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not
be split
Lance wrote:
A David but who
John wrote:
LOL Davidyour argument worry
is a sin, therefore, it couldn't apply to me thingy
contrasted to your insistence that you are not a
perfectionist (sinless) salvantionist is rather humorrous.
I do not believe that perfection brings salvation, but rather that a Godly
-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:02:24 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not be split
John wrote:
LOL Davidyour argument "worry
is a sin, ther
Amen!
--- David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lance wrote:
A David but who will protect her from you
(your errant epistemology - your errant
theologizing
- your errant regulative beliefs)? But it's a
little late
for that, isn't it?
Do you realize how terrible such
A daughter's loyalty is a good thing.
Jd-Original Message-From: Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 07:35:39 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not be split
Amen!
--- David Miller [EMAIL
John wrote:
Let me ask you this: if I continue in an
addiction, or if I continue as a selfish person
- not seeing my own failings, am I saved or not?
Probably not, but the Lord ultimately is the judge. Justification comes
before the change, so it is possible for a repentent person to
David Miller wrote:
Lance wrote:
A David but who will protect her from you
(your errant epistemology - your errant theologizing
- your errant regulative beliefs)? But it's a little late
for that, isn't it?
Do you realize how terrible such comments sound to a
Might you venture an attempt at outlining the distinction between duality
and dualism?
- Original Message -
From: Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: July 05, 2005 15:50
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought
16:11
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not
be split
Hello, Judy, Thank you. Yes, I enjoyed my vacation
very much. :-)
I was fascinated to see dualism being discussed on TT:
I'm teaching on it this Wednesday night to the youth
group at church
EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: July 05, 2005 16:11
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not
be split
Hello, Judy, Thank you. Yes, I enjoyed my vacation
very much. :-)
I was fascinated to see dualism being discussed on TT:
I'm teach
I'm interested in Christines outline but I'm not sure
that it is for the same reasons as you
and Lance. What she has shared already is
actively walking after the Spirit which permeates
every part of our daily lives" which is life to
me.
OTOH your mentor TFT puts fortha whole other view
-
splitting apart that which ought not be split
I'm interested in Christines outline but I'm not sure
that it is for the same reasons as you
and Lance. What she has shared already is
actively walking after the Spirit which permeates
every part of our daily lives" which is
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 07:32:01 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jt refers to 'Einstein (as) the unbeliever'. He was not an
unbeliever. Nobody is an 'unbeliever'.
If Jesus remains a stumbling stone and/or a rock of
offense then he is an unbeliever who is not grafted in
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism -
splitting apart that which ought not be split
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 07:32:01 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jt refers to 'Einstein (as) the unbeliever'. He was not an
unbeliever. Nobody is an 'unbeliever'.
Lance wrote:
Might you venture an attempt at outlining the
distinction between duality and dualism?
Why? Isn't that kind of like asking someone to outline the distinction
between liberality and liberalism? If you think a point needs to be made,
make it.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
It is a good question. Christine is fully capable of a qualified answer.You disagree?
JD-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:45:46 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought
John wrote:
It is a good question. Christine is fully capable
of a qualified answer. You disagree?
Yes.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6)
I kinda thought you might. Sorry, Christine. Papa is worried about youand us liberals.
JD-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:08:37 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought
So I was right! Papais worried and muct rush to the rescue.
JD-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 18:39:37 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not be split
John wrote:
Sorry
Yse, I agere !!!
JD-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 18:42:13 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not be split
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I was right! Papais worried
Im cracking up
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005
5:42 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not be split
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
Too funny!
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005
5:46 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not be split
Yse, I agere
Ihave to come back to this, Judy. Your denial
of the relevance of the belowis itself a symptom of (another) dualism.
Reality is only one ballpark.The lensthrough which we see tends to
affect our vision of everything, the way we think about everything. We can be
alerted to the lens through
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
CC: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not be
split
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:42:26 -0400
I should add that a person who is born of the Spirit has a new nature
along with new desires. I do not
believe
Hi Perry;
I'd say it was a time of temptation, death is and has
always been an enemy and his flesh
sinless as it was would put up a fight. Still he
determined to finish the course. I agree
with you that this was not ajoyous time for
him. Still it is written "then said I, Lo, I come (in
the
Lance wrote:
Should you and your grandchild go out today for an
ice cream cone, would your enjoyment of this be
spiritual/carnal?
I think what Judy is talking about is a sort of faith
that permeates into all aspects of our life. In Luke 3
John the Baptist talks about this:
Luk 3:7 Then said
Amen!
Bless you Christine - You pop up again just when we
need you most :)
I was wondering where you had gone - hope you enjoyed
your holiday. jt
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 12:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lance wrote: Should you and your grandchild go out today
Hello, Judy, Thank you. Yes, I enjoyed my vacation
very much. :-)
I was fascinated to see dualism being discussed on TT:
I'm teaching on it this Wednesday night to the youth
group at church.
Blessings
--- Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amen!
Bless you Christine - You pop up again
)Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not be split
Lance wrote:
Should you and your grandchild go out today for an
ice cream cone, would your enjoyment of this be
spiritual/carnal?
I think what Judy is talking about is a sort of faith
that permeates into all aspects
there's a certain
magical quality in the air--are youwritingthis from the Disneyland
Hotel?
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 12:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Christine Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
||.. would your enjoyment of[ice cream cones]be
spiritual/carnal? [It's] a sort of faith that permeates
into all
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not be split
If there were no connection between the conceptual and the
lived then, you would both be fine but, there is.
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk
Too funny! iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 9:46
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism
- splitting apart that which ought not be split
, 2005 10:15 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart that which ought not
be split
Judy, how does the fact that Jesus asked if the cup could be removed, but
then said thy will be done? Was that a moment of weakness or resistance,
followed
How about sharing more of your lesson with us, Christine? iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christine Miller
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 2:11 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Dualism - splitting apart
38 matches
Mail list logo
