Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-17 Thread Blainerb473





cd wrote:2. The power which 
celestial bodies are supposed to exert on terrestrial; as the influence 
of the planets on the birth and fortunes of men; an exploded doctrine of 
astrology.

Blainerb: The heavens do not compel or even 
influence, they symbolize--they are the handwriting of God, showing us 
his glory and his wisdom. Some ancient people actually worshipped planets, 
stars, constellations, as if they were gods--but the truly wise, such as the 
wise men who followed the star to find the Messiah and worship him, will find 
the heavens all testify of the truths of Christ--as do all things. Your 
wisdom, cd, is from what you perceive as being popular and widely 
accepted. The truth is seldom that. 
Blainerb

In a message dated 2/15/2006 4:37:11 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  cd: David my 
  advice- for what its worth- is to leave this astrology garbage alone -as God 
  said to do.
  
  2. The power which celestial bodies are 
  supposed to exert on terrestrial; as the influence of the planets on the birth 
  and fortunes of men; an exploded doctrine of astrology.
  
  a 46:9 Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and 
  there is none like me, 
  Isa 46:10 Declaring 
  the end from 
  the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not 
  yet 
  done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: 
  
  Deu 4:19 And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the 
  sun, and the moon, and the stars, 
  even all the 
  host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them, and serve them, which the 
  LORD thy God hath divided unto all nations under the whole heaven. 
  
  




Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-17 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 2/15/2006 6:23:13 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cd: I am 
  surprised and disappointed that you would be any part of this 
  sinDavid.

cd, 
If what you say is correct, the wise men of the east who used astrological 
symbolism to locate the birth place of Christ were sinners. Maybe 
you need to review what the Bible really says--between the lines, at 
least.
Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-17 Thread Dean Moore








- Original Message - 
From: 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/17/2006 12:19:07 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller



cd wrote:2. The power which celestial bodies are supposed to exert on terrestrial; as the influence of the planets on the birth and fortunes of men; an exploded doctrine of astrology.

Blainerb: The heavens do not compel or even influence, they symbolize--they are the handwriting of God, showing us his glory and his wisdom. Some ancient people actually worshipped planets, stars, constellations, as if they were gods--but the truly wise, such as the wise men who followed the star to find the Messiah and worship him, will find the heavens all testify of the truths of Christ--as do all things. Your wisdom, cd, is from what you perceive as being popular and widely accepted. The truth is seldom that. 
Blainerb
cd: Blaine you are arguing with a dictionary Definition of Astrology in the above. Think about it. The wise men knew the sign for the birth of Christ-that is a long way from predicting the future as laid out in the stars. What you are doing is the same as wichcraft-This type of star reading came from Babylon.

In a message dated 2/15/2006 4:37:11 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

cd: David my advice- for what its worth- is to leave this astrology garbage alone -as God said to do.

2. The power which celestial bodies are supposed to exert on terrestrial; as the influence of the planets on the birth and fortunes of men; an exploded doctrine of astrology.

a 46:9 Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, 
Isa 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: 
Deu 4:19 And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the sun, and the moon, and the stars, even all the host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them, and serve them, which the LORD thy God hath divided unto all nations under the whole heaven. 




Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-17 Thread Dean Moore








- Original Message - 
From: 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/17/2006 12:34:29 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller


In a message dated 2/15/2006 6:23:13 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cd: I am surprised and disappointed that you would be any part of this sinDavid.

cd, 
If what you say is correct, the wise men of the east who used astrological symbolism to locate the birth place of Christ were sinners. Maybe you need to review what the Bible really says--between the lines, at least.
Blainerb
cd: I already covered the Christ/wise men issue.But as concerning the Biblical stance on astrology-why wouldI need to read between the lines when thishas clear words in the below passage of Isaiah. You are in trouble stargazer,better leave it alone or else move to a warm climate so you can get used to the heat. Why consult the stars for the future and not consult God who is the only one who knows the future (ie the end from the beginning)-that is same as playing a whore for another god Blaine?


Isa 47:13 Thou art wearied in the multitude of thy counsels. Let now the astrologers, the stargazers, the monthly prognosticators, stand up, and save thee from these things that shall come upon thee. 
Isa 47:14 Behold, they shall be as stubble; the fire shall burn them; they shall not deliver themselves from the power of the flame: there shall not be a coal to warm at, nor fire to sit before it. 

Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-15 Thread Blainerb473



In a message dated 2/13/2006 3:55:37 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Funny. I just don't see David as ever having been young. 
  :-)
  
  jd
  
  -- 
Original message -- From: "David Miller" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  You guys are just upset you didn't 
get ahold of me when I was young and  ignorant. Maybe if you had 
encountered me when I was 8, you could have  played me like 
playdough.   Surely you both understand that if I appear 
incorrect and immoveable to you,  then you likely appear incorrect 
and immoveable to me. It works both ways.  It is the nature of one 
who studies and forms opinions. The godly will  consider such 
comments as a compliment concerning integrity, so thank you  for the 
compliment. :-)   David Miller   p.s. Blaine... my astrological sign is pices. I guess that 
astrology isn't  helping you be too predictive after all. 
:-) 

Thank you David, I have wondered about that. Pisces 
is my opposite sign, and, being the sign of transition 
from Winter to Spring, is next to Aries,the sign that ushers in Springtime 
(1st degree Aries is also the first day of Spring). I believe all things are written in the stars--the 
trick is in reading them accurately.:) I try, and 
sometimes get pretty close to people by doing so. But humans are so 
complex!! Astrology helps, but is not, of course, infallible. But 
thanks for being open--lots of people will not divulge their birth info to me, 
probably think by doing so I might form unjustified opinions of them. 
:)

One thing, though, without precise birth info--date, time of day, and place 
of birth--you can't tell too much beyond generalities. The beauty of precise 
astrological analysis is that no two personalities can ever be the same--not 
even identical twins--which is a reality check for astrology few people 
understand.
Blainer


 - Original Message -  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] il.innglory.org  Sent: Monday, February 13, 
2006 2:07 PM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations 
re:David Miller   In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:02:28 P.M. 
Mountain Standard Time,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:   
I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are both incorrect and immoveable on 
 at least a portion of that which is under discussion. What I've got to 
 determine is whether or not it is worth the 'ink' to engage further 
with you  given what I've just said. I'm checking around with some 
who've read you  over time.   Lance.   
Yes, David is pretty fixed--he was probably born under one of the four fixed 
 signs--Leo, Taurus, Scorpio, or Aquarius. Or, he's one of those highly 
 independent Aries characters, who never admit to being wrong!! If I 
knew  for sure, I could read him better.  Blainerb  
 --  "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned 
with salt, that you may know how  you ought to answer every man." 
(Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org   If you do not want to 
receive posts from this list, send an email to  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend 
 who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and  he will be subscribed. 




Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-15 Thread Dean Moore



cd: David my advice- for what its worth- is to leave this astrology garbage alone -as God said to do.

2. The power which celestial bodies are supposed to exert on terrestrial; as the influence of the planets on the birth and fortunes of men; an exploded doctrine of astrology.

a 46:9 Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, 
Isa 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: 
Deu 4:19 And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the sun, and the moon, and the stars, even all the host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them, and serve them, which the LORD thy God hath divided unto all nations under the whole heaven. 




- Original Message - 
From: 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/15/2006 4:57:23 PM 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

In a message dated 2/13/2006 3:55:37 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Funny. I just don't see David as ever having been young. :-)

jd

-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  You guys are just upset you didn't get ahold of me when I was young and  ignorant. Maybe if you had encountered me when I was 8, you could have  played me like playdough.   Surely you both understand that if I appear incorrect and immoveable to you,  then you likely appear incorrect and immoveable to me. It works both ways.  It is the nature of one who studies and forms opinions. The godly will  consider such comments as a compliment concerning integrity, so thank you  for the compliment. :-)   David Miller   p.s. Blaine... my astrological sign is pices. I guess that astrology isn't  helping you be too predictive after all. :-) 

Thank you David, I have wondered about that. Pisces is my opposite sign, and, being the sign of transition from Winter to Spring, is next to Aries,the sign that ushers in Springtime (1st degree Aries is also the first day of Spring). I believe all things are written in the stars--the trick is in reading them accurately.:) I try, and sometimes get pretty close to people by doing so. But humans are so complex!! Astrology helps, but is not, of course, infallible. But thanks for being open--lots of people will not divulge their birth info to me, probably think by doing so I might form unjustified opinions of them. :)

One thing, though, without precise birth info--date, time of day, and place of birth--you can't tell too much beyond generalities. The beauty of precise astrological analysis is that no two personalities can ever be the same--not even identical twins--which is a reality check for astrology few people understand.
Blainer


 - Original Message -  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] il.innglory.org  Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:07 PM  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller   In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:02:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:   I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are both incorrect and immoveable on  at least a portion of that which is under discussion. What I've got to  determine is whether or not it is worth the 'ink' to engage further with you  given what I've just said. I'm checking around with some who've read you  over time.   Lance.   Yes, David is pretty fixed--he was probably born under one of the four fixed  signs--Leo, Taurus, Scorpio, or Aquarius. Or, he's one of those highly  independent Aries characters, who never admit to being wrong!! If I knew  for sure, I could 
read him better.  Blainerb   --  "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how  you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org   If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend  who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and  he will be subscribed. 



Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-15 Thread David Miller
Blaine, considering that I am an identical twin myself, I do understand how 
what you just said would be a reality check for astrology.  :-)

David Miller
Born March 3, 1960
4:50 am
Cleveland, Ohio.
In a snow blizzard that dumped 24 inches of snow.


 David Miller

 p.s. Blaine... my astrological sign is pices. I guess that astrology isn't
 helping you be too predictive after all. :-)

Thank you David, I have wondered about that.  Pisces is my opposite sign, 
and, being the sign of transition from Winter to Spring, is next to Aries, 
the sign that ushers in Springtime (1st degree Aries is also the first day 
of Spring).I believe all things are written in the stars--the trick is 
in reading them accurately. :)I try, and sometimes get pretty close to 
people by doing so.  But humans are so complex!!  Astrology helps, but is 
not, of course, infallible.  But thanks for being open--lots of people will 
not divulge their birth info to me, probably think by doing so I might form 
unjustified opinions of them.  :)

One thing, though, without precise birth info--date, time of day, and place 
of birth--you can't tell too much beyond generalities. The beauty of precise 
astrological analysis is that no two personalities can ever be the same--not 
even identical twins--which is a reality check for astrology few people 
understand.
Blainer



 - Original Message - 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] il.innglory.org
 Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:07 PM
 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

 In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:02:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are both incorrect and immoveable 
 on
 at least a portion of that which is under discussion. What I've got to
 determine is whether or not it is worth the 'ink' to engage further with 
 you
 given what I've just said. I'm checking around with some who've read you
 over time.

 Lance.

 Yes, David is pretty fixed--he was probably born under one of the four 
 fixed
 signs--Leo, Taurus, Scorpio, or Aquarius. Or, he's one of those highly
 independent Aries characters, who never admit to being wrong!! If I knew
 for sure, I could read him better.
 Blainerb
 
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-15 Thread Dean Moore

cd: I am surprised and disappointed that you would be any part of this sin
David.

 [Original Message]
 From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Date: 2/15/2006 6:45:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

 Blaine, considering that I am an identical twin myself, I do understand
how 
 what you just said would be a reality check for astrology.  :-)

 David Miller
 Born March 3, 1960
 4:50 am
 Cleveland, Ohio.
 In a snow blizzard that dumped 24 inches of snow.


  David Miller
 
  p.s. Blaine... my astrological sign is pices. I guess that astrology
isn't
  helping you be too predictive after all. :-)

 Thank you David, I have wondered about that.  Pisces is my opposite sign, 
 and, being the sign of transition from Winter to Spring, is next to
Aries, 
 the sign that ushers in Springtime (1st degree Aries is also the first
day 
 of Spring).I believe all things are written in the stars--the trick
is 
 in reading them accurately. :)I try, and sometimes get pretty close
to 
 people by doing so.  But humans are so complex!!  Astrology helps, but is 
 not, of course, infallible.  But thanks for being open--lots of people
will 
 not divulge their birth info to me, probably think by doing so I might
form 
 unjustified opinions of them.  :)

 One thing, though, without precise birth info--date, time of day, and
place 
 of birth--you can't tell too much beyond generalities. The beauty of
precise 
 astrological analysis is that no two personalities can ever be the
same--not 
 even identical twins--which is a reality check for astrology few people 
 understand.
 Blainer



  - Original Message - 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] il.innglory.org
  Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller
 
  In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:02:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are both incorrect and
immoveable 
  on
  at least a portion of that which is under discussion. What I've got to
  determine is whether or not it is worth the 'ink' to engage further
with 
  you
  given what I've just said. I'm checking around with some who've read you
  over time.
 
  Lance.
 
  Yes, David is pretty fixed--he was probably born under one of the four 
  fixed
  signs--Leo, Taurus, Scorpio, or Aquarius. Or, he's one of those highly
  independent Aries characters, who never admit to being wrong!! If I knew
  for sure, I could read him better.
  Blainerb
  
 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-13 Thread Blainerb473




In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:02:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are both 
  incorrect and immoveable on at least a portion of that which is under 
  discussion. What I've got to determine is whether or not it is worth the 'ink' 
  to engage further with you given what I've just said. I'm checking around with 
  some who've read you over time.
  
  Lance. 

Yes, David is pretty fixed--he was probably born underone of the four 
fixed signs--Leo, Taurus, Scorpio, or Aquarius.Or, he's one of those 
highly independent Aries characters, who never admit to being wrong!! If I 
knew for sure, I could read him better. 
Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-13 Thread Lance Muir



Someone else who notices! Thanks Blainerb!!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: February 13, 2006 14:07
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the 
  scenes conversations re:David Miller
  
  
  In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:02:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are 
both incorrect and immoveable on at least a portion of that which is under 
discussion. What I've got to determine is whether or not it is worth the 
'ink' to engage further with you given what I've just said. I'm checking 
around with some who've read you over time.

Lance. 
  
  Yes, David is pretty fixed--he was probably born underone of the 
  four fixed signs--Leo, Taurus, Scorpio, or Aquarius.Or, he's one 
  of those highly independent Aries characters, who never admit to being 
  wrong!! If I knew for sure, I could read him better. 
  Blainerb


Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

2006-02-13 Thread David Miller
You guys are just upset you didn't get ahold of me when I was young and 
ignorant.  Maybe if you had encountered me when I was 8, you could have 
played me like playdough.

Surely you both understand that if I appear incorrect and immoveable to you, 
then you likely appear incorrect and immoveable to me. It works both ways. 
It is the nature of one who studies and forms opinions.  The godly will 
consider such comments as a compliment concerning integrity, so thank you 
for the compliment.  :-)

David Miller

p.s.  Blaine... my astrological sign is pices.  I guess that astrology isn't 
helping you be too predictive after all.  :-)

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the scenes conversations re:David Miller

In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:02:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are both incorrect and immoveable on 
at least a portion of that which is under discussion. What I've got to 
determine is whether or not it is worth the 'ink' to engage further with you 
given what I've just said. I'm checking around with some who've read you 
over time.

Lance.

Yes, David is pretty fixed--he was probably born under one of the four fixed 
signs--Leo, Taurus, Scorpio, or Aquarius.  Or, he's one of those highly 
independent Aries characters, who never admit to being wrong!!  If I knew 
for sure, I could read him better.
Blainerb 

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.