I was looking to a more integrated way to use the CheckStyle and PMD inside
the Eclipse IDE, instead of having to run it from the command line and then
manually parse the results and come back to fix them.
After a quick search, I found the following plugins :
CheckStyle :
I've spent the weekend getting the script container going again, see the
code in [1], its looking pretty good now. I think we should eventually be
able to use this one container to support all the script language components
instead of having separate containers for each language. Ideally script
Passed with +1's from jboynes, jmarino, isilval, rineholt and no -1's
I'll ask the IPMC to ratify this.
--
Jeremy
On Feb 21, 2007, at 6:34 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The parent pom and buildtools were recently updated and as these
are used by all other modules I think we should formally
On 2/25/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rfeng
Date: Fri Feb 23 22:26:55 2007
New Revision: 511225
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=511225
Log:
[sca-integration-branch] Add EJB reference binding
FYI,
I added support for SCA 1.0 service promotion syntax, i.e. the
promote attribute. The old SCA .95 style of using reference
elements will no longer be supported. I have also updated the unit
and integration tests to use the new syntax.
Jim
Hi,
Sorry for the confusion as I'm new to this situation. I meant to get the
code into SVN as a base for discussion. I chose the paticular branch simply
because I only need minor effort to get the code built.
I moved the code to my sandbox for now
On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
I was looking to a more integrated way to use the CheckStyle and
PMD inside
the Eclipse IDE, instead of having to run it from the command line
and then
manually parse the results and come back to fix them.
After a quick search, I found
The @Property annotation currently has two non-standard attributes:
public String override() default may;
public String xmlType() default ;
I have marked these as @Deprecated but have not removed them as there
are references in our implementation. I think it should be fairly
easy to
On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The @Property annotation currently has two non-standard attributes:
public String override() default may;
public String xmlType() default ;
I have marked these as @Deprecated but have not removed them as
there are references in our
We need to settle on a marshalling format for WireDefinitions as they
are propagated from the Controller/Master to a slave where they will
be constituted as Wires. Meeraj has been doing work on the
Marshallers and I started to implement part of the
I want to start getting the Contribution service integrated to the process
of running components, and I was thinking to give it a try by integrating
the service with the new DeafultSCAContatiner that some sample apps in the
integration branch is using. I think the idea is to stop using the
Jim,
As it is now, the marshaller framework only deals with marshalling and
unmarshalling physical change sets (PhysicalChangeSet class in SPI). A
physical change set is composed of zero or more physical component
definitions (sub types of PhysicalComponentDefinition in SPI) and zero or
more
On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:21 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The @Property annotation currently has two non-standard attributes:
public String override() default may;
public String xmlType() default ;
I have marked these as @Deprecated but have
I've been through the sca-api-r1.0 classes and tried to bring them in
line with the specification, including applicable errata :-) Apart
from one issue with @Property I think they are now in alignment.
It would be good if a couple of other people could review these so we
can release them.
On Feb 25, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jim,
As it is now, the marshaller framework only deals with marshalling
and unmarshalling physical change sets (PhysicalChangeSet class in
SPI). A physical change set is composed of zero or more physical
component definitions (sub
On Feb 25, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I've been through the sca-api-r1.0 classes and tried to bring them
in line with the specification, including applicable errata :-)
Apart from one issue with @Property I think they are now in alignment.
It would be good if a couple of other
On Feb 25, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
I want to start getting the Contribution service integrated to the
process
of running components, and I was thinking to give it a try by
integrating
the service with the new DeafultSCAContatiner that some sample apps
in the
integration
On Feb 25, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I've been through the sca-api-r1.0 classes and tried to bring them
in line with the specification, including applicable errata :-)
Apart from one issue with @Property I think they are now in
I'm little confused by this one. AIUI we have two configurations in
the physical world:
1) two co-located components connected by a wire
the PCS would contain two PCDs and a PWD for the connection
2) a component connected to the network via a binding
the PCD would contain a PCD with
Not sure about this DefaultSCAContainer thingy - that's not something
that's in trunk.
Based on the deployment model in the spec, contribution is totally
separate from running components. Contribution is about defining type
information in the domain, something that happens once (per type);
On Feb 25, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I'm little confused by this one. AIUI we have two configurations in
the physical world:
1) two co-located components connected by a wire
the PCS would contain two PCDs and a PWD for the connection
2) a component connected to the network
Hi Jim
I'm trying to get a simple end-to-end scenario working asap. In trunk, it
might take a week or so.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 2/25/07, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
I want to start getting the
On Feb 25, 2007, at 4:52 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Hi Jim
I'm trying to get a simple end-to-end scenario working asap. In
trunk, it
might take a week or so.
Why would it take that long since we have full samples online? We
could start with the loan application sample. I'm willing to
It would take me about a week, with help, it probably would be done
sooner... We could use the loan app, I was using the calculator sample app.
Let me merge the latest stuff I have to trunk.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 2/25/07, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For all of these:
cns:component
bns:reference and service
ins:interceptorName
the element is an extension-specific, unique, versioned identifier
for the component implementation type, binding, or interceptor
builder. Meeraj's unmarshalling framework is able to dispatch the to
the
On Feb 25, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
It would take me about a week, with help, it probably would be done
sooner... We could use the loan app, I was using the calculator
sample app.
Let me merge the latest stuff I have to trunk.
O.K. sounds cool. To start the app you'll need
On Feb 25, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
For all of these:
cns:component
bns:reference and service
ins:interceptorName
the element is an extension-specific, unique, versioned identifier
for the component implementation type, binding, or interceptor
builder. Meeraj's
On Feb 25, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
It would take me about a week, with help, it probably would be done
sooner... We could use the loan app, I was using the calculator
sample app.
Let me merge the latest stuff I have to trunk.
Jim, are you going to update java/sca/services, particularly the idl
sub-project ? The contribution service uses that to process wsdls and that
project still have references to parent.
public WSDLServiceContract load(
CompositeComponent parent,
ModelObject object,
On Feb 25, 2007, at 6:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Jim, are you going to update java/sca/services, particularly the idl
sub-project ? The contribution service uses that to process wsdls
and that
project still have references to parent.
public WSDLServiceContract load(
On Feb 25, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I've been through the sca-api-r1.0 classes and tried to bring
them in line with the specification, including applicable
errata :-) Apart from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475823
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1126:
---
I made a mistake by importing the code into Tuscany SVN without
Hi,
The Tuscany project (which is currently under incubation) recently received
a code donation from IBM under JIRA TUSCANY-1126
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1126). As indicated in the
issue, the contribution was from IBM to Apache as granted by the CCLA signed
on 9 February
33 matches
Mail list logo
