[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1494) Implement a functional SCA Policy Framework

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518083 ] gengshaoguang commented on TUSCANY-1494: Another point: It would be a big chanellge to provide component

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1511) Conversational - spec funnies and other improvements

Conversational - spec funnies and other improvements Key: TUSCANY-1511 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1511 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1512) SCA Binding - Combine local and remote implementations and extend to support ws protocol

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-1512: --- Assignee: Simon Laws SCA Binding - Combine local and remote implementations and extend

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1512) SCA Binding - Combine local and remote implementations and extend to support ws protocol

SCA Binding - Combine local and remote implementations and extend to support ws protocol - Key: TUSCANY-1512 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1512

Monitoring, logging and exceptions (again)

We talked about this before ( http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg16784.html) but didn't come to any conclusions. So, 1/ What is the requirement? 2/ What is the technical solution? 3/ When should we try and get it done? To get things going again here are some thoughts drawn

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1482) CompositeProcessor does not write out Property objects completely

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518117 ] gengshaoguang commented on TUSCANY-1482: You are right with the current Tusany assembly-xml. I shortly

[DAS] Column Converter - why not to associate with ResultDescriptor?

With JIRA-1465, ResultDescriptor can be set dynamically for DAS Commands which are created with DAS.createCommand(). Further on this, will it be helpful to associate ColumnConverter with ResultDescriptor? So, when there is no Config File, user will have a choice to use ColumnConveter on-the-fly

Re: SDO sequenced DataObject vs XSD sequence

Yes Pete, you are correct. The XML schema sequence concept fixes the order of elements in that sequence. The SDO Sequence concept is there to preserve the instance ordering of elements when the metadata does not fix it. Regards, Kelvin. On 03/08/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A

Re: Dynamic Type Definition...

I think you need the fix in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1408 that is part of the 1.0-incubating release which is currently being voted on. Regards, Kelvin. On 25/07/07, Upeka Bulumulle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Tuscany SDO version: Tuscany SDO 1.0 beta1. I'm trying

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1006) ChangeSummaryImpl.cachedSDOObjectChanges appears to not be thread safe

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518151 ] Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-1006: - I am working on a test that exposes this problem. Unfortunately, the

Re: Tuscany Subproject News Bulletin? Would it be useful?

On 8/7/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/6/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip i believe now that blog aggregation is the best structure for news. for this to be effective does require a consensus that committers are going to spend a little time regularly

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-961) DAS: Using deprected SDO method causes Type lookup failure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518156 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-961: There is no requirement to keep the Types for each DAS in separate

Re: Java SDO failing on tests

Adriano, are you still seeing this. Could you attach a zip of the stack traces please? Regards, Kelvin. On 03/08/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: java version 1.5.0_12 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TUSCANY-961) DAS: Using deprected SDO method causes Type lookup failure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518156 ] kgoodson edited comment on TUSCANY-961 at 8/7/07 6:53 AM: There is no SDO imposed

Re: [RDB DAS] Need to allow passing ResultDescriptor for dynamic Commands (Ref.JIRA-1355)

Please review JIRA-1465 patch for this Regards, Amita On 8/7/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops, I guess after the first maill, rest of the mails were not sent to dev list. Regards, Amita On 8/7/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, but I suggest the name

Re: Making the base artifact processor utilities more readily available

On 7/3/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: not completely trivial is definitely a better term :-). Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 10:55 AM Subject: Re: Making the base

Continuum failure

The Continuum build has failed with the following (probably the same as yesterday) but I did an update earlier today and, as far as I remember, It all went OK. I'm in the middle of a change at the moment so my build is failing for other reasons. Anyone else seeing this locally? Simon [INFO]

Re: Continuum failure

I see it occasionally. I just up'ed the sleep time in the testcase to see if that might fix it (following the suggestion on the ML yesterday). ...ant On 8/7/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Continuum build has failed with the following (probably the same as yesterday) but I did

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1509) Change TuscanySDO Native build system to use ant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brady Johnson updated TUSCANY-1509: --- Attachment: tuscanySDONative_ant.jar This is the first version of the ant build

[SDO Native] ant build system for SDO Native

Hello all, I just uploaded a patch for JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1509 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1509 Which is an enhancement bug for TuscanySDO Native to change the build system over to use ant instead of automake. This first version

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1509) Change TuscanySDO Native build system to use ant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brady Johnson updated TUSCANY-1509: --- Attachment: build.xml I accidentally uploaded the wrong version of the

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1513) TuscanySCA Natvie java schema files are loaded but never used.

TuscanySCA Natvie java schema files are loaded but never used. -- Key: TUSCANY-1513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1513 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug

[SCA Native] java implementation and interface schema files loaded but not used

Does anyone have any insight into why these files are loaded but never used in TuscanySCA Native: TuscanySCA Root dir/xsd/ sca-implementation-java.xsd sca-interface-java.xsd I created a JIRA for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1513 Their existence in the

Re: [SCA Native] preliminary ant build

I applied 7 today and will look at 8 now. Cheers On 07/08/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 2 outstanding patches uploaded for the TuscanySCA Native ant build: - tuscany_patch_update7_jira1438 - tuscany_patch_update8_jira1438

Release management for next release, was: SCA 0.92 release?

ant elder wrote: On 6/30/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the SCA 0.91 release now being voted on how about starting on 0.92? I've already been adding some things I'm interested in getting done to the next release wiki page -

Re: Tuscany Subproject News Bulletin? Would it be useful?

On 8/6/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip i believe now that blog aggregation is the best structure for news. for this to be effective does require a consensus that committers are going to spend a little time regularly blogging about new features. +1, we could have a

Re: [SDO Native] ant build system for SDO Native

Thanks. I'll get on the case soon. I really appreciate the effort you have put in to this. Cheers, On 07/08/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I just uploaded a patch for JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1509

Policy Attachments Resolution in the Assembly Model

Hi, Now that I have the basic policy model in place I am trying to link up this with the assembly model now. The policy intents and policy sets applicable for a domain are defined in the definitions.xml. There is a SCADefinitions processor that deals with reading and resolving the intents and

RE: [SCA Native] java implementation and interface schema files loaded but not used

This sounds reasonable. We can make this change for the M4 release. So basically it will be as follows: - sca.xsd is no longer needed. - deploy all core schemas to install_root/xsd - sca-implementation-java.xsd and sca-interface-java.xsd will not be a part of the core schemas and should only

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java DAS beta1 (RC3)

All the maven artifacts are now signed. On 8/6/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've verified the signatures for the src and bin distros and they seem fine. The License file mentions 'Apache Jackarta'... while I think it is 'Apache Jakarta'. Maybe this very minor thing could be

Propose to create a new Tuscany malling list

Currently we have couple places that can generate e-mail notification : - Apache Continuum build notifications (sucess/failure) - Traffic stats for Apache Tuscany Blog (daily/weekly) - Traffic stats for Apache Tuscany website (daily/weekly) - etc I don't want to pollute the dev or

Re: FW: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1376) C++ SDO spec portability: RefCountingPointer

I'll get on it. BIG patch ;-) Cheers, On 07/08/07, Michael Yoder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I uploaded a patch to address TUSCANY-1376. If someone could review and apply it that would be great. Thanks, Michael Yoder Rogue Wave Software, Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer -

Re: August Reports - deadline tomorrow

Just a friendly reminder, tomorrow is the deadline for the Board Reports, please add any updates to the draft report [1], and I'll post it tomorrow. [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Incubation+Board+Reports+-+August+2007 On 8/1/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: FW: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1376) C++ SDO spec portability: RefCountingPointer

Thanks Pete, I'll work on getting an updated patch uploaded tomorrow morning. Michael Rogue Wave Software, Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer - HydraSDO -Original Message- From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 3:29 PM To:

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1514) DataHelperImpl.toDate will report a NullPointerException

DataHelperImpl.toDate will report a NullPointerException - Key: TUSCANY-1514 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1514 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1006) ChangeSummaryImpl.cachedSDOObjectChanges appears to not be thread safe

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518331 ] Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-1006: - Agreed. I am planning to submit a patch for this issue in the near

Re: An erreta is needed for ServiceReference definition in the Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification V1.00

Please ignore my previous e-mail as I just found out the base CallableReference interface already has the getCallbackID() method. Sorry for the false alarm. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1514) DataHelperImpl.toDate will report a NullPointerException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518342 ] Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-1514: - If you have not already done so, you will likely need to explicitly