On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear all,
Is it possible to send message to Tuscany? I've got this Interactive
Voice Response program made by a vendor and it is able to send a
message to a socket. Now, can tuscany receive those message from a
certain
Joshua Jackson wrote:
Dear all,
Is it possible to send message to Tuscany? I've got this Interactive
Voice Response program made by a vendor and it is able to send a
message to a socket. Now, can tuscany receive those message from a
certain port and then send back the response to the IVR ?
Hi Ant,
thanks for your interest in EILF. For general information about EILF
please see http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/eilf/.
Any chance you could somehow repeat your question at the EILF newsgroup
?
Nice to hear EILF is looking at Tuscany, better OSGi integration is
something that would be
Evo Eftimov, iSec Consulting, www.isecc.com wrote:
Hello, our company is considering using Tuscany SCA container as part of an
end-to-end SOA solution.
Can a customer support representative contact me to discuss details like
subscription packages for support etc
Regards
Evo
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi guys,
I have taken a look at the tuscany's sample. But I'm quite confused
here, does tuscany enforce you to call a Java method in some way?
Please CMIIW. Because what I'll receive from the IVR is only a message
in
Hi guys,
I have taken a look at the tuscany's sample. But I'm quite confused
here, does tuscany enforce you to call a Java method in some way?
Please CMIIW. Because what I'll receive from the IVR is only a message
in a String format from a socket and then I'll process this message
and the give it
On 3/14/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So you could say that a binding.socket dispatches message processing to a
method called process(message) for example. You are not expecting the
message arriving from the
Hi,
Thanks for the advice, it seems that the missing bundle activator
was the basic problem, but then it started to get really funny (-;
First, I just used the itest/osgi-tuscany bundles and got
an error missing .componentType side file .componentType.
Ok, that seemed to be one step further.
Hi Joshua
More comments in line
Regards
Simon
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3/14/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So you could say that a binding.socket
Hi
First of may I say that I have been extremely impressed with the support on
this forum.
Simon, you are correct with the overview of the pattern except that the number
of progress messages returned would be configurable.
I am analysing the use of SCA in the ground segment of a space
Thank you all that participated on the chat, this was very productive time.
Below is the IRC log:
* rfeng ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has
joined #tuscany
lresende slaws, yt ?
* halehM ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #Tuscany
slaws hi
lresende slaws, i have a question for you, but i guess we should
start
On 3/14/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the advice, it seems that the missing bundle activator
was the basic problem, but then it started to get really funny (-;
First, I just used the itest/osgi-tuscany bundles and got
an error missing .componentType side
Hi,
Luciano and me have been trying to run the SCA calculator sample on the
Google Android platform, that is a platform for mobile devices. As the
Android platform apps are written in Java language, we tried to run the Java
SCA calculator sample on it.
Although the apps for Android are coded in
Good summary Adriano, I haven't had success yet trying to run
Calculator sample application on the Android environment. Below are
some issues I noted
- Looks like our calculator sample dependency has grown out of
control, and is now requiring node, databinding, axiom, etc
- The service locator
After today's IRC chat, looks like people would be using the weekend
for some extra work, so current plans is to wait untill Monday, March
17 to cut the 1.2 branch.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As suggested on the following thread [1], I'd like to
15 matches
Mail list logo
