[twitter-dev] using whitelisted account for getting multiple user statuses

2009-07-21 Thread BG

My application retrieves status of multiple Twitter users. I have a
whitelisted account for a username. The Twitter API documentation
recommends that I use whitelisted IP Addresses to get the statuses.
However, my IP addresses change pretty often, so I would like to know
if it is possible to make more than 150 status requests using a
whitelisted account (OAuth).

If it isn't possible, what other options do I have?

Thanks,
BG


[twitter-dev] Re: Newbie to seek advice on the flow of a twitter app with OAuth

2009-07-21 Thread CG

you can use localhost ?  really ? just update the callback to
http://localhost/xxx ?


On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Andrew Baderaand...@badera.us wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:05 AM, CG learn@gmail.com wrote:

 Please ignore my question, I already solve it.

 It seems like it required a 'real' callback URL to accomplish the
 authentication.

 CG



 What do you mean by real? I'm able to authenticate using a localhost
 address for testing.


 Thanks-
 - Andy Badera
 - and...@badera.us
 - Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew+badera
 - This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private





[twitter-dev] Re: Keep getting suspended

2009-07-21 Thread sjespers

Thanks for looking in to this and for unsuspending my account.
Did you also confirm that the server I am working from is whitelisted?
How can I make sure that it is? If it's not, then I won't be able to
release my application because everyone will get suspended who uses it
then?

Thanks,
Serge

On Jul 20, 11:11 pm, Doug Williams d...@twitter.com wrote:
 Serge,
 Looking at the account I'm not quite sure why it was suspended. The
 records are inconclusive. I've unsuspended the account.

 For posterity's sake I'll repeat that whitelisting will not protect
 you from suspension. Whitelisting raises select REST API limits.

 Thanks,
 Doug



[twitter-dev] Re: Keep getting suspended

2009-07-21 Thread Doug Williams

Serge,
You can always verify the whitelisted status of your IP or user
through a call to account/rate_limit_status. For instance, here are my
results:

doug$ curl -u dougw:PASSWORD http://twitter.com/account/rate_limit_status.xml
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
hash
  reset-time type=datetime2009-07-21T08:29:35+00:00/reset-time
  remaining-hits type=integer19995/remaining-hits
  hourly-limit type=integer2/hourly-limit
  reset-time-in-seconds type=integer1248164975/reset-time-in-seconds
/hash

Notice the hourly rate limit of 2 indiciating my account is
whitelisted. Removing the authentication will give me the results for
my IP address:

doug$ curl http://twitter.com/account/rate_limit_status.xml?xml
version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
hash
  reset-time type=datetime2009-07-21T08:27:45+00:00/reset-time
  remaining-hits type=integer148/remaining-hits
  hourly-limit type=integer150/hourly-limit
  reset-time-in-seconds type=integer1248164865/reset-time-in-seconds
/hash

The hourly limit here is 150 indiciating my IP is not whitelisted.

For completeness, our rate limiting article is here [1]. Again,
whitelisting does not ensure your users will not get suspended.
Whitelisting only affects rate limits.

1. http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Rate-limiting

Thanks,
Doug


--
Do you follow me? http://twitter.com/dougw




On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:29 AM, sjespersse...@webkitchen.be wrote:

 Thanks for looking in to this and for unsuspending my account.
 Did you also confirm that the server I am working from is whitelisted?
 How can I make sure that it is? If it's not, then I won't be able to
 release my application because everyone will get suspended who uses it
 then?

 Thanks,
 Serge

 On Jul 20, 11:11 pm, Doug Williams d...@twitter.com wrote:
 Serge,
 Looking at the account I'm not quite sure why it was suspended. The
 records are inconclusive. I've unsuspended the account.

 For posterity's sake I'll repeat that whitelisting will not protect
 you from suspension. Whitelisting raises select REST API limits.

 Thanks,
 Doug




[twitter-dev] Re: Keep getting suspended

2009-07-21 Thread sjespers

Thanks. So I was able to verify that my server is whitelisted.
However, is 2 API calls enough for a proxy?
Let me explain. I'm building a Twitter client in Flash Lite. Flash
Lite currently only supports ActionScript2. Because there is no AS2
Twitter API, I'm using a server side API proxy. So, the Flash Lite app
connects to mtwit.net  mtwit.net connects to Twitter.com  mtwit
returns XML data to my app.

In theory, a limit of 2 means I can only support 133 concurrent
users (if they all leave the app running for an hour).

Thanks,
Serge


On Jul 21, 9:39 am, Doug Williams d...@twitter.com wrote:
 Serge,
 You can always verify the whitelisted status of your IP or user
 through a call to account/rate_limit_status. For instance, here are my
 results:

 doug$ curl -u dougw:PASSWORDhttp://twitter.com/account/rate_limit_status.xml
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
 hash
   reset-time type=datetime2009-07-21T08:29:35+00:00/reset-time
   remaining-hits type=integer19995/remaining-hits
   hourly-limit type=integer2/hourly-limit
   reset-time-in-seconds type=integer1248164975/reset-time-in-seconds
 /hash

 Notice the hourly rate limit of 2 indiciating my account is
 whitelisted. Removing the authentication will give me the results for
 my IP address:

 doug$ curlhttp://twitter.com/account/rate_limit_status.xml?xml
 version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
 hash
   reset-time type=datetime2009-07-21T08:27:45+00:00/reset-time
   remaining-hits type=integer148/remaining-hits
   hourly-limit type=integer150/hourly-limit
   reset-time-in-seconds type=integer1248164865/reset-time-in-seconds
 /hash

 The hourly limit here is 150 indiciating my IP is not whitelisted.

 For completeness, our rate limiting article is here [1]. Again,
 whitelisting does not ensure your users will not get suspended.
 Whitelisting only affects rate limits.

 1.http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Rate-limiting

 Thanks,
 Doug

 --
 Do you follow me?http://twitter.com/dougw



 On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:29 AM, sjespersse...@webkitchen.be wrote:

  Thanks for looking in to this and for unsuspending my account.
  Did you also confirm that the server I am working from is whitelisted?
  How can I make sure that it is? If it's not, then I won't be able to
  release my application because everyone will get suspended who uses it
  then?

  Thanks,
  Serge

  On Jul 20, 11:11 pm, Doug Williams d...@twitter.com wrote:
  Serge,
  Looking at the account I'm not quite sure why it was suspended. The
  records are inconclusive. I've unsuspended the account.

  For posterity's sake I'll repeat that whitelisting will not protect
  you from suspension. Whitelisting raises select REST API limits.

  Thanks,
  Doug


[twitter-dev] How to use Sign-in-with-Twitter in Web App with username and password ?

2009-07-21 Thread CG

Hi all,
  Sorry for a newbie question again but I am a bit confuse with the
Sign-in-with-Twitter feature ..

I came across some Twitter app , which let user key in their twitter
account and password , then authenticate the user via API call .

I came across also Sign-in-with-Twitter feature in Twitter developer
wiki which redirect user to https://www.twitter.com/oauth/authenticate


My question is , how should I code my web app home page  ?

Can I use the following logic ?

When user access the app home page
1. Getting a request token with cusumer key and secret,  redirect to
https://www.twitter.com/oauth/authenticate with passing in oauth_token
.

2. User will be redirected to appropriate page by twitter based on the
flow in http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Sign-in-with-Twitter

3. After authenticated, twitter will redirect user to the callback
URL.  (At this point , how do I get the user id ? call the
verify_credential ?)


With the above logic, user will be key in username and password at
twitter page, what about I would like to user to input username and
password at the page that I customize ?

Sorry for a long question but I really need some help , any hints is
much appreciated ..

Rgds,
  CG


[twitter-dev] Re: How to use Sign-in-with-Twitter in Web App with username and password ?

2009-07-21 Thread Paul Kinlan
Hi,
The numeric user id is part of the access token (I believe it is the first
part), however, on twollo.com I immediately call verify_credentials.json to
get the account details of the authenticating user.

Paul

2009/7/21 CG learn@gmail.com


 Hi all,
  Sorry for a newbie question again but I am a bit confuse with the
 Sign-in-with-Twitter feature ..

 I came across some Twitter app , which let user key in their twitter
 account and password , then authenticate the user via API call .

 I came across also Sign-in-with-Twitter feature in Twitter developer
 wiki which redirect user to https://www.twitter.com/oauth/authenticate


 My question is , how should I code my web app home page  ?

 Can I use the following logic ?

 When user access the app home page
 1. Getting a request token with cusumer key and secret,  redirect to
 https://www.twitter.com/oauth/authenticate with passing in oauth_token
 .

 2. User will be redirected to appropriate page by twitter based on the
 flow in http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Sign-in-with-Twitter

 3. After authenticated, twitter will redirect user to the callback
 URL.  (At this point , how do I get the user id ? call the
 verify_credential ?)


 With the above logic, user will be key in username and password at
 twitter page, what about I would like to user to input username and
 password at the page that I customize ?

 Sorry for a long question but I really need some help , any hints is
 much appreciated ..

 Rgds,
   CG



[twitter-dev] Re: Is it possible to control the source name

2009-07-21 Thread victor castleton

Thank you for the info; @ any rate is has slow down considerably, it seems
to be manageable for the time being. VJC

-Original Message-
From: twitter-development-talk@googlegroups.com
[mailto:twitter-development-t...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of victor
castleton
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:11 PM
To: twitter-development-talk@googlegroups.com
Subject: [twitter-dev] Re: Is it possible to control the source name


Hi, how do I  cut myself out of this group, or better yet control or change
the type of mail that I am getting? Can you help? 
Sincerely, Victor

-Original Message-
From: twitter-development-talk@googlegroups.com
[mailto:twitter-development-t...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
AccountingSoftwareGuy
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 7:46 PM
To: Twitter Development Talk
Subject: [twitter-dev] Is it possible to control the source name


Hi I am using the new oAuth method for communicating with the Twitter
API.  It appears the default behavior is to include the application
name as the source of a post.  For instance...

[date/time] from DynamicTweets

This is fine in most cases but in certain cases we want to make a post
look like it came from the web and not display our application name...
[date/time] from web

Is this possible, I've looked through many threads and I can't seem to
find a way to do this and the source= parameter doesn't seem to work.



[twitter-dev] encoding password

2009-07-21 Thread RV

Hi,

I have been using the twitter api for 2 weeks now and everything seems
to work, but i have 1 problem with a certain user to get his user
feed. Í'm using curl to retrieve the data but im getting the following
error:

?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
hash
  request/statuses/user_timeline.xml/request
  errorThis method requires authentication./error
/hash

Out of the 25 twitter users im collecting data from this one is the
only one that is giving me problem. I have checked if the supplied
username + password are correct and they are. There is one thing
though this user uses special character in his password (-sign). I've
tried urlencoding the password and using htmlentities, both resulting
in the same error. Does anyone know a sollution to this problem?

Best Regards,
RV


[twitter-dev] json - user.following

2009-07-21 Thread Stoned

Hi,

I am making a Twitter Mod for Garry's Mod (HL2 Modification).
When checking out the Tweets which I receive with json I was wondering
about this: http://gtweet.pastebin.com/m3b888a6

As you can see, some Tweets have the entry user.following = true /
false and some just don't have it.

Can anyone explain this or tell what user.following was ment to be?

Best Regards,
Stoned


[twitter-dev] Search API error {error:since_id too recent, poll less frequently}

2009-07-21 Thread matthew

I am polling the search API every 60 seconds and intermittently
receiving the following error:

{error:since_id too recent, poll less frequently}

Is this behavior to be expected or is there some problem?

Matthew Schrock


[twitter-dev] Re: 140 character limit overridden for Twitgoo?

2009-07-21 Thread Justin Hart

Hi, what app were you using?  Just the website?

On Jul 20, 4:20 pm, Abir abstar...@gmail.com wrote:
 Abraham: Thanks, but not sure I understand why the counter said 140
 when i was inputting but the post count is 133?

 On Jul 20, 3:11 pm, Abraham Williams 4bra...@gmail.com wrote:

  If you look at the status you will find that it only posted at 133
  characters.

 http://twitter.com/ABIRB123/status/2745931292
  Abraham

  On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 16:36, Abir abstar...@gmail.com wrote:

   Guys:

   Just posted this on Twitgoo.

   -It let me post a 140 character

   +

   -The URL

   it is an oryx antelope, it's just a stock image from my laptop's
   repository. why do this? well i am testing!http://twitgoo.com/1ke92

   Isn't the total limit 140 characters?  or are URL's not counted?  I am
   developing a service to buy and sell things on Twitter and this would
   be helpful to know.  Thanks

  --
  Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist |http://web608.org
  Hacker |http://abrah.am|http://twitter.com/abraham
  Project |http://fireeagle.labs.poseurtech.com
  This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.
  Sent from Madison, WI, United States


[twitter-dev] Search API error {error:since_id too recent, poll less frequently}

2009-07-21 Thread matthew

I am polling the Search API and intermittently receive the following
error:

{error:since_id too recent, poll less frequently}

Is this to be expected or this something going wrong on the server
side?

Matthew Schrock


[twitter-dev] Re: Search API error {error:since_id too recent, poll less frequently}

2009-07-21 Thread Chad Etzel

That usually happens when the search servers get out of sync and the
since_id tweet hasn't been indexed on the other server(s) yet, so it
thinks it's a tweet from the future.
-Chad

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, matthewjesc...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am polling the Search API and intermittently receive the following
 error:

 {error:since_id too recent, poll less frequently}

 Is this to be expected or this something going wrong on the server
 side?

 Matthew Schrock



[twitter-dev] Re: tex

2009-07-21 Thread Alex Payne

Please see http://help.twitter.com/ for questions about using Twitter over SMS.

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 20:07, canpaulcanpau...@gmail.com wrote:

 i have a metroPCS cell phone i cant get your texes whats up with that.




-- 
Alex Payne - Platform Lead, Twitter, Inc.
http://twitter.com/al3x


[twitter-dev] Re: Search API error {error:since_id too recent, poll less frequently}

2009-07-21 Thread matthew

Chad,

Good to know.  Thanks for your help.

Matthew

On Jul 21, 2:13 pm, Chad Etzel jazzyc...@gmail.com wrote:
 That usually happens when the search servers get out of sync and the
 since_id tweet hasn't been indexed on the other server(s) yet, so it
 thinks it's a tweet from the future.
 -Chad



 On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, matthewjesc...@gmail.com wrote:

  I am polling the Search API and intermittently receive the following
  error:

  {error:since_id too recent, poll less frequently}

  Is this to be expected or this something going wrong on the server
  side?

  Matthew Schrock


[twitter-dev] Re: using whitelisted account for getting multiple user statuses

2009-07-21 Thread Alex Payne

It's possible to apply whitelisted rate limits to authenticated
requests, whether the request is made with Basic Auth or OAuth. If the
requesting user is whitelisted, the higher rate limit will take
effect.

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 23:38, BGbinug...@gmail.com wrote:

 My application retrieves status of multiple Twitter users. I have a
 whitelisted account for a username. The Twitter API documentation
 recommends that I use whitelisted IP Addresses to get the statuses.
 However, my IP addresses change pretty often, so I would like to know
 if it is possible to make more than 150 status requests using a
 whitelisted account (OAuth).

 If it isn't possible, what other options do I have?

 Thanks,
 BG




-- 
Alex Payne - Platform Lead, Twitter, Inc.
http://twitter.com/al3x


[twitter-dev] Search API: since_id is now unreliable

2009-07-21 Thread Chad Etzel

Hi API Team,

A few of us have been discussing off list a funky behavior we have
been noticing and now users are starting to notice.

There is a problem for sites/apps like TweetGrid and TweetChat which
auto-refresh tweets based on the Search API using the since_id. People
are noticing that these sites are missing tweets when compared to
the search.twitter.com results page for the same query.

We believe what is happening is that the search servers are not
indexing tweets in a serial manner, and so a tweet with a higher id
may sneak into a search server and be indexed first before a tweet
with a lower id. This means that when the since_id is sent back from
the query (or derived from the first result in the results array),
using that since_id to refresh the query will miss lower id tweets
when they finally do get indexed. So the illusion of missing tweets
is created. You can run TweetGrid and TweetChat in separate tabs using
the same query and see that sometimes the results don't match up
because of this.

I'll try to give an example to be clear.

Let's say for the sake of simplicity that I'm searching for twitter
and that every 10th tweet in the public timeline matches. So, all
tweets ending in 0 match my query.

Search server 1 may index:

20
30
40
60
70

(notice missing 50)

At the same time, Search server 2 may index:

20
30
40
50

(notice hasn't indexed 60 or 70 yet)

I send a query and get a response from Server 1 and get a since_id of
70.  On my next request I use that since_id=70 and I'll never see
tweet 50.  Thus the missing tweets.

This is quite annoying, especially now that users are noticing and
complaining to us (the app devs) that are apps are broken.

I cannot think of a good work around for this that would be simple
enough to implement and be worth the effort.

Is this behavior something anyone else can confirm? Are tweets
supposed to be indexed/replicated serially by the search servers?

-Chad


[twitter-dev] Re: encoding password

2009-07-21 Thread Chad Etzel

If you are POSTing the user/pass down to a script that uses curl to
get the information, you should urlencode the username and password
before you POST them then urldecode them once received by the curl'ing
script.

An  sign in a variable will screw up your POST variables if not
escaped/encoded before being POSTed to another script.

-Chad

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:35 AM, RVthanato...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I have been using the twitter api for 2 weeks now and everything seems
 to work, but i have 1 problem with a certain user to get his user
 feed. Í'm using curl to retrieve the data but im getting the following
 error:

 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
 hash
  request/statuses/user_timeline.xml/request
  errorThis method requires authentication./error
 /hash

 Out of the 25 twitter users im collecting data from this one is the
 only one that is giving me problem. I have checked if the supplied
 username + password are correct and they are. There is one thing
 though this user uses special character in his password (-sign). I've
 tried urlencoding the password and using htmlentities, both resulting
 in the same error. Does anyone know a sollution to this problem?

 Best Regards,
 RV



[twitter-dev] Re: 140 character limit overridden for Twitgoo?

2009-07-21 Thread Abir

yes just the twitgoo website

On Jul 21, 8:38 am, Justin Hart onyxra...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi, what app were you using?  Just the website?

 On Jul 20, 4:20 pm, Abir abstar...@gmail.com wrote:

  Abraham: Thanks, but not sure I understand why the counter said 140
  when i was inputting but the post count is 133?

  On Jul 20, 3:11 pm, Abraham Williams 4bra...@gmail.com wrote:

   If you look at the status you will find that it only posted at 133
   characters.

  http://twitter.com/ABIRB123/status/2745931292
   Abraham

   On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 16:36, Abir abstar...@gmail.com wrote:

Guys:

Just posted this on Twitgoo.

-It let me post a 140 character

+

-The URL

it is an oryx antelope, it's just a stock image from my laptop's
repository. why do this? well i am testing!http://twitgoo.com/1ke92

Isn't the total limit 140 characters?  or are URL's not counted?  I am
developing a service to buy and sell things on Twitter and this would
be helpful to know.  Thanks

   --
   Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist |http://web608.org
   Hacker |http://abrah.am|http://twitter.com/abraham
   Project |http://fireeagle.labs.poseurtech.com
   This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.
   Sent from Madison, WI, United States


[twitter-dev] How many ID's are returned on API Call - blocks blocking ids

2009-07-21 Thread Tim

I'm wondering how many ids are returned when you ask for the
authenticated users blocked id's.

The other id calls return 5,000 per page, but I was unsure on blocks.

Thanks.


[twitter-dev] Re: Search API: since_id is now unreliable

2009-07-21 Thread Doug Williams
Chad,Your assessment is spot on.

At the heart of search there are a number of data stores that accept queries
(reads) while at the same time perform writes from an indexer. Heavy load --
large numbers of queries, large number of writes or both, or both -- can
cause the write replication between the indexer and various data stores to
grow inconsistent when a particular data store is blocked on a read.

Unfortunately there is no easy fix for this problem at the moment. The
search team has grown considerably in the last couple of weeks so as they
get up to speed, the feature set and stability of search should continue to
improve.

Thanks,
Doug



On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Chad Etzel jazzyc...@gmail.com wrote:


 Hi API Team,

 A few of us have been discussing off list a funky behavior we have
 been noticing and now users are starting to notice.

 There is a problem for sites/apps like TweetGrid and TweetChat which
 auto-refresh tweets based on the Search API using the since_id. People
 are noticing that these sites are missing tweets when compared to
 the search.twitter.com results page for the same query.

 We believe what is happening is that the search servers are not
 indexing tweets in a serial manner, and so a tweet with a higher id
 may sneak into a search server and be indexed first before a tweet
 with a lower id. This means that when the since_id is sent back from
 the query (or derived from the first result in the results array),
 using that since_id to refresh the query will miss lower id tweets
 when they finally do get indexed. So the illusion of missing tweets
 is created. You can run TweetGrid and TweetChat in separate tabs using
 the same query and see that sometimes the results don't match up
 because of this.

 I'll try to give an example to be clear.

 Let's say for the sake of simplicity that I'm searching for twitter
 and that every 10th tweet in the public timeline matches. So, all
 tweets ending in 0 match my query.

 Search server 1 may index:

 20
 30
 40
 60
 70

 (notice missing 50)

 At the same time, Search server 2 may index:

 20
 30
 40
 50

 (notice hasn't indexed 60 or 70 yet)

 I send a query and get a response from Server 1 and get a since_id of
 70.  On my next request I use that since_id=70 and I'll never see
 tweet 50.  Thus the missing tweets.

 This is quite annoying, especially now that users are noticing and
 complaining to us (the app devs) that are apps are broken.

 I cannot think of a good work around for this that would be simple
 enough to implement and be worth the effort.

 Is this behavior something anyone else can confirm? Are tweets
 supposed to be indexed/replicated serially by the search servers?

 -Chad



[twitter-dev] Help on posting a link on Twitter...

2009-07-21 Thread Travis Williams

I could really use some probably simple help on posting a Google Map
link to Twitter, which comes from an app of mine through the API.
Basically I'd want to post the entire link like this to twitter from
my app:

Here is the data I send twitter in the API:

is sharing the location for NAME.
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q?q=100.0,50.0%20%28SPOT%20NAME%29;

and twitter only posts:

MYACCOUNT is sharing the location for SPOT NAME. http://maps.google.com/maps...

http://maps.google.com/maps...; shows as a hyperlink, but the rest is
truncated/missing.  And the link takes you to http://maps.google.com/
maps?f=q and then stops.

Are there more characters I should replace in the data before I send
it to Twitter?  To replace the ?  or the in what I sent twitter and
forward?  I tried %25 instead of a ?, etc.

Please help.  Still picking up these HTML tricks!




[twitter-dev] Re: Help on posting a link on Twitter...

2009-07-21 Thread Tim

I'm assuming your link should have an  instead of a second ? .

Bad
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q?q=100.0,50.0%20%28SPOT%20NAME%29;

Good
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qq=100.0,50.0%20%28SPOT%20NAME%29;

On Jul 21, 2:53 pm, Travis Williams travw...@gmail.com wrote:
 I could really use some probably simple help on posting a Google Map
 link to Twitter, which comes from an app of mine through the API.
 Basically I'd want to post the entire link like this to twitter from
 my app:

 Here is the data I send twitter in the API:

 is sharing the location for 
 NAME.http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q?q=100.0,50.0%20%28SPOT%20NAME%29;

 and twitter only posts:

 MYACCOUNT is sharing the location for SPOT NAME.http://maps.google.com/maps...

 http://maps.google.com/maps...; shows as a hyperlink, but the rest is
 truncated/missing.  And the link takes you to http://maps.google.com/
 maps?f=q and then stops.

 Are there more characters I should replace in the data before I send
 it to Twitter?  To replace the ?  or the in what I sent twitter and
 forward?  I tried %25 instead of a ?, etc.

 Please help.  Still picking up these HTML tricks!


[twitter-dev] Re: Keep getting suspended

2009-07-21 Thread Bill Kocik



On Jul 21, 3:48 am, sjespers se...@webkitchen.be wrote:

 Because there is no AS2
 Twitter API, I'm using a server side API proxy. So, the Flash Lite app
 connects to mtwit.net  mtwit.net connects to Twitter.com  mtwit
 returns XML data to my app.

Is there some reason the app cannot connect directly to Twitter? I
understand there's no API (by which I think you mean existing
library), but Twitter's XML and JSON API isn't difficult to deal with
directly. I don't know enough about ActionScript to know if there's
some technical limitation requiring you to run a proxying app in the
middle.

 In theory, a limit of 2 means I can only support 133 concurrent
 users (if they all leave the app running for an hour).

I don't speak for Twitter, but that topic has come up on this list a
few times before, and it's easy to demonstrate mathematically (as
you've just done) that if you're doing auth'd requests on behalf of a
significant number of users, then there's an excellent chance
whitelisting is going to work against you rather than in your favor.


[twitter-dev] Registering our application as browser-based or desktop

2009-07-21 Thread Bradley Wagner

Hi,

I work on a Content Management System solution in which we're
currently trying to integrate Twitter. Here is the issue:

Our software is installed, so while it is browser-based there is not a
consistent URL to redirect people to and thus nothing that really
makes sense to fill out when registering our application.

That said, I'd like to avoid to requiring the users of our software to
visit a url and copy/paste a PIN to authorize our application to send
updates to their twitter accounts.

Is there a recommended way to do this? Where should that URL be
redirecting them to? It's my understanding that if they visit the URL,
an access token can be generated without the use of a pin (we're using
twitter4j for this part). I guess we could just redirect them to our
product's website or some page that says go back into our app and
click OK to enable the twitter connection.

Thanks,
Bradley


[twitter-dev] Re: Registering our application as browser-based or desktop

2009-07-21 Thread Hedley Robertson
If you set the oauth_callback with a value of oob, it will not redirect
the user, but provide the PIN style authorization behavior.

See this older post on the new style of calling these params:

http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-api-announce/browse_thread/thread/472500cfe9e7cdb9

Hope this helps.

Hedley

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Bradley Wagner bradley.wag...@gmail.comwrote:


 Hi,

 I work on a Content Management System solution in which we're
 currently trying to integrate Twitter. Here is the issue:

 Our software is installed, so while it is browser-based there is not a
 consistent URL to redirect people to and thus nothing that really
 makes sense to fill out when registering our application.

 That said, I'd like to avoid to requiring the users of our software to
 visit a url and copy/paste a PIN to authorize our application to send
 updates to their twitter accounts.

 Is there a recommended way to do this? Where should that URL be
 redirecting them to? It's my understanding that if they visit the URL,
 an access token can be generated without the use of a pin (we're using
 twitter4j for this part). I guess we could just redirect them to our
 product's website or some page that says go back into our app and
 click OK to enable the twitter connection.

 Thanks,
 Bradley



[twitter-dev] Updating the APIs authentication limiting policy

2009-07-21 Thread Doug Williams
Devs --A change shipped last week that limited the number of times a user
could access the account/verify_credentials method [1] in a given hour. This
change proved hasty and short-sighted as pointed out by the subsequent
discussion [2]. We apologize to any developer that was adversely
affected. Given the problems, we want to fix this in a
public and transparent manner.
Like most web services, we limit the number of attempts users can make to
login to
their accounts on Twitter.com to prevent brute force dictionary
attacks. This same security is not extended to the platform
and leaves accounts vulnerable to the same method of attack through the API.

The change we shipped to limit user accounts to 15 calls an hour to the
account/verify_credentials method [1] was intended to mitigate this risk. It
was thought to limit the number of tests a potential attack could run in the
hour, even in a distributed fashion. However, we only protected a single
resource which still leaves all other authenticated methods exposed as a
vector of attack (limited only by the API rate limit).

Our thinking is now that we will limit the total number of unsuccessful
attempts to access authenticated resources to 15 an hour per user per IP
address. If a single IP address makes 15 attempts to access a protected
resource unsuccessfully for a given user (as indicated by an HTTP 401), then
the user will be locked out of authenticated resources from that IP address
for 1 hour.

This scheme has all of the positive effects that we need, however we want to
make sure that we have thought through all of the potential problems on the
developer's side before we proceed with this change. Please contribute to
the subsequent discussion if you have an opinion or concern. Once we come to
an agreement, we will update with details and a timeline for shipping this
update.

1.
http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitter-REST-API-Method%3A-account%C2%A0verify_credentials
2.
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread/thread/b057014336ff502b

Regards,
Doug


[twitter-dev] Re: Too many requests in this time period. Try again later.

2009-07-21 Thread Doug Williams
Let's bring the discussion on the update to the new thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread/thread/2d68c74567bc9809

Thanks,
Doug




On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Doug Williams d...@twitter.com wrote:

 Martin,
 The change certainly went out prematurely which is admittedly a
 mistake on our end. I will have details tomorrow morning to share
 about our fix.

 Thanks,
 Doug




 On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Martin Omandermoman...@google.com
 wrote:
 
  Doug,
 
  Thanks for letting us know about the new request limit. I was worried
  something was wrong on my side. Like the others are saying; it would
  have been nice with a heads-up.
 
  Cheers,
 
  /Martin
 



[twitter-dev] Re: Updating the APIs authentication limiting policy

2009-07-21 Thread Scott

Thanks for the update Doug.  Does this still apply to OAuth apps?
Also, if a user goes through an app and unsuccessfully attempts to
login 15 times will that app be blocked from authenticating anybody
for an hour or just that user?  The previous change seemed to block
the entire app from making an authentication request on anybody once
the limit had been hit.


[twitter-dev] Re: Updating the APIs authentication limiting policy

2009-07-21 Thread Josh Perry

To be honest ever since the x-rate-limit HTTP headers were added we
removed the call to verify_credentials from our Twitter API layer.

Every time that our Twitter API layer does an HTTP request it
squirrels away the header values and any requests to our API from the
application for rate-limit information is just fulfilled from those
saved variables. So we don't need verify_credentials for rate-limit
information

Every time that our API does an HTTP request it watches for
unauthorized HTTP responses, so we don't need verify_credentials to
verify that our app is still authorized on the account or that the
user's password is still the same.

Every single twitter API method could be used to brute-force by
sending HTTP auth headers and watching the HTTP response, but you are
rate-limited to 150 requests/hour/ip, if this rate-limit is good
enough for all the other attack vectors it should probably be good
enough for verify_credentials. In fact verify_credentials is basically
a nop function, which IMHO really isn't needed any longer.

Josh

On Jul 21, 7:00 pm, Doug Williams d...@twitter.com wrote:
 Devs --A change shipped last week that limited the number of times a user
 could access the account/verify_credentials method [1] in a given hour. This
 change proved hasty and short-sighted as pointed out by the subsequent
 discussion [2]. We apologize to any developer that was adversely
 affected. Given the problems, we want to fix this in a
 public and transparent manner.
 Like most web services, we limit the number of attempts users can make to
 login to
 their accounts on Twitter.com to prevent brute force dictionary
 attacks. This same security is not extended to the platform
 and leaves accounts vulnerable to the same method of attack through the API.

 The change we shipped to limit user accounts to 15 calls an hour to the
 account/verify_credentials method [1] was intended to mitigate this risk. It
 was thought to limit the number of tests a potential attack could run in the
 hour, even in a distributed fashion. However, we only protected a single
 resource which still leaves all other authenticated methods exposed as a
 vector of attack (limited only by the API rate limit).

 Our thinking is now that we will limit the total number of unsuccessful
 attempts to access authenticated resources to 15 an hour per user per IP
 address. If a single IP address makes 15 attempts to access a protected
 resource unsuccessfully for a given user (as indicated by an HTTP 401), then
 the user will be locked out of authenticated resources from that IP address
 for 1 hour.

 This scheme has all of the positive effects that we need, however we want to
 make sure that we have thought through all of the potential problems on the
 developer's side before we proceed with this change. Please contribute to
 the subsequent discussion if you have an opinion or concern. Once we come to
 an agreement, we will update with details and a timeline for shipping this
 update.

 1.http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitter-REST-API-Method%3A-account%C2%A0ve...
 2.http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread...

 Regards,
 Doug


[twitter-dev] Re: Search API: since_id is now unreliable

2009-07-21 Thread Brooks Bennett

Thanks for posting this Chad!

Doug, please keep us updated on how things progress with this issue so
we can pass along guidance to our user-base. Hopefully the
improvements will come in the near-term.

Thanks for all that you guys do!

Brooks

On Jul 21, 3:45 pm, Doug Williams d...@twitter.com wrote:
 Chad,Your assessment is spot on.

 At the heart of search there are a number of data stores that accept queries
 (reads) while at the same time perform writes from an indexer. Heavy load --
 large numbers of queries, large number of writes or both, or both -- can
 cause the write replication between the indexer and various data stores to
 grow inconsistent when a particular data store is blocked on a read.

 Unfortunately there is no easy fix for this problem at the moment. The
 search team has grown considerably in the last couple of weeks so as they
 get up to speed, the feature set and stability of search should continue to
 improve.

 Thanks,
 Doug



 On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Chad Etzel jazzyc...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi API Team,

  A few of us have been discussing off list a funky behavior we have
  been noticing and now users are starting to notice.

  There is a problem for sites/apps like TweetGrid and TweetChat which
  auto-refresh tweets based on the Search API using the since_id. People
  are noticing that these sites are missing tweets when compared to
  the search.twitter.com results page for the same query.

  We believe what is happening is that the search servers are not
  indexing tweets in a serial manner, and so a tweet with a higher id
  may sneak into a search server and be indexed first before a tweet
  with a lower id. This means that when the since_id is sent back from
  the query (or derived from the first result in the results array),
  using that since_id to refresh the query will miss lower id tweets
  when they finally do get indexed. So the illusion of missing tweets
  is created. You can run TweetGrid and TweetChat in separate tabs using
  the same query and see that sometimes the results don't match up
  because of this.

  I'll try to give an example to be clear.

  Let's say for the sake of simplicity that I'm searching for twitter
  and that every 10th tweet in the public timeline matches. So, all
  tweets ending in 0 match my query.

  Search server 1 may index:

  20
  30
  40
  60
  70

  (notice missing 50)

  At the same time, Search server 2 may index:

  20
  30
  40
  50

  (notice hasn't indexed 60 or 70 yet)

  I send a query and get a response from Server 1 and get a since_id of
  70.  On my next request I use that since_id=70 and I'll never see
  tweet 50.  Thus the missing tweets.

  This is quite annoying, especially now that users are noticing and
  complaining to us (the app devs) that are apps are broken.

  I cannot think of a good work around for this that would be simple
  enough to implement and be worth the effort.

  Is this behavior something anyone else can confirm? Are tweets
  supposed to be indexed/replicated serially by the search servers?

  -Chad


[twitter-dev] Twitter credentials

2009-07-21 Thread raj

1.Is there any twitter api method (php) to get credentials both
username and password
2.How to use oauth_token returned in call back url, with this token is
there any way to get twitter credentials both username and password,
Thanks for your help in advance!


[twitter-dev] Re: Twitter credentials

2009-07-21 Thread Damon Clinkscales

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:32 PM, rajrajsmaru...@gmail.com wrote:

 1.Is there any twitter api method (php) to get credentials both
 username and password
 2.How to use oauth_token returned in call back url, with this token is
 there any way to get twitter credentials both username and password,

No.

-damon


[twitter-dev] Re: Twitter credentials

2009-07-21 Thread Petermdenton


Raj,
You might also want to describe what you are trying to do, and some  
can help you to understand the way they do it.


Thanks
Peter

On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:32 PM, raj rajsmaru...@gmail.com wrote:



1.Is there any twitter api method (php) to get credentials both
username and password
2.How to use oauth_token returned in call back url, with this token is
there any way to get twitter credentials both username and password,
Thanks for your help in advance!


[twitter-dev] Re: Updating the APIs authentication limiting policy

2009-07-21 Thread Jesse Stay
Josh, is there a way, without verify_credentials, to identify that users
have changed their Twitter passwords (and therefore you are no longer able
to authenticate for them)?  For client apps, I don't see this being as much
of a problem, but for server-based apps that run regular scripts on behalf
of users this could become a regular issue, which is why we were running it.
In addition, what is the best way with OAuth to identify the screen name of
an individual?  verify_credentials is the only way I'm aware of, unless
there's something I'm missing (which is probably very likely).  I'd love to
know if there's a better way.  A best practices doc on how to retrieve user
information, and how to best verify users have not changed their passwords
would certainly be useful I think.  I'd like to know how Twitter recommends
we do this.

Jesse

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Josh Perry j...@6bit.com wrote:


 To be honest ever since the x-rate-limit HTTP headers were added we
 removed the call to verify_credentials from our Twitter API layer.

 Every time that our Twitter API layer does an HTTP request it
 squirrels away the header values and any requests to our API from the
 application for rate-limit information is just fulfilled from those
 saved variables. So we don't need verify_credentials for rate-limit
 information

 Every time that our API does an HTTP request it watches for
 unauthorized HTTP responses, so we don't need verify_credentials to
 verify that our app is still authorized on the account or that the
 user's password is still the same.

 Every single twitter API method could be used to brute-force by
 sending HTTP auth headers and watching the HTTP response, but you are
 rate-limited to 150 requests/hour/ip, if this rate-limit is good
 enough for all the other attack vectors it should probably be good
 enough for verify_credentials. In fact verify_credentials is basically
 a nop function, which IMHO really isn't needed any longer.

 Josh

 On Jul 21, 7:00 pm, Doug Williams d...@twitter.com wrote:
  Devs --A change shipped last week that limited the number of times a user
  could access the account/verify_credentials method [1] in a given hour.
 This
  change proved hasty and short-sighted as pointed out by the subsequent
  discussion [2]. We apologize to any developer that was adversely
  affected. Given the problems, we want to fix this in a
  public and transparent manner.
  Like most web services, we limit the number of attempts users can make to
  login to
  their accounts on Twitter.com to prevent brute force dictionary
  attacks. This same security is not extended to the platform
  and leaves accounts vulnerable to the same method of attack through the
 API.
 
  The change we shipped to limit user accounts to 15 calls an hour to the
  account/verify_credentials method [1] was intended to mitigate this risk.
 It
  was thought to limit the number of tests a potential attack could run in
 the
  hour, even in a distributed fashion. However, we only protected a single
  resource which still leaves all other authenticated methods exposed as a
  vector of attack (limited only by the API rate limit).
 
  Our thinking is now that we will limit the total number of unsuccessful
  attempts to access authenticated resources to 15 an hour per user per IP
  address. If a single IP address makes 15 attempts to access a protected
  resource unsuccessfully for a given user (as indicated by an HTTP 401),
 then
  the user will be locked out of authenticated resources from that IP
 address
  for 1 hour.
 
  This scheme has all of the positive effects that we need, however we want
 to
  make sure that we have thought through all of the potential problems on
 the
  developer's side before we proceed with this change. Please contribute to
  the subsequent discussion if you have an opinion or concern. Once we come
 to
  an agreement, we will update with details and a timeline for shipping
 this
  update.
 
  1.http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitter-REST-API-Method%3A-account%C2%A0ve.
 ..
  2.http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread.
 ..
 
  Regards,
  Doug