Re: [twitter-dev] Re: Basic Auth Deprecation

2010-04-14 Thread Dan Checkoway
Dean, Basic auth sends the password essentially in the clear (encoded, but trivially so). It's really in everybody's best interest NOT to use basic auth, but to switch to something less sniffable/repeatable. For example, here's a sample "credential" you're passing to twitter (HTTP header) when y

[twitter-dev] GET list memberships paging is broken?

2010-04-17 Thread Dan Checkoway
re if that's a related issue, or an intentional thing that has also affected the API, or what. Anyway, can twitter please fix paging on the "GET list memberships" API? Thanks, Dan Checkoway -- Subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/subscribe?hl=en

Re: [twitter-dev] Re: Mad about lists and cursors... please help

2010-04-17 Thread Dan Checkoway
+1 on needing this fix. Sorry for the duplicate report of this issue I slapped in another thread this morning. Thanks, Dan On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Mark McBride wrote: > Yes. A fix has been identified, and should be deployed in a few days > > Sent from mobile device > > > On Apr 17,

Re: [twitter-dev] Re: Snowflake: An update and some very important information

2010-10-19 Thread Dan Checkoway
I'm also patiently awaiting a response from twitter about this. Are the ids sane for 64-bit *signed* long? Dan On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:08 PM, jon wrote: > Hi, > > You wrote that the IDs are "unsigned" 64 bit ints, but the IdWorker is > pumping out java Longs which are signed. I'm assuming t

[twitter-dev] 4294967295

2010-12-14 Thread Dan Checkoway
Anybody else seeing user.listed_count occasionally coming back as 4294967295? That value just happens to equate to: 1 + (2 * Integer.MAX_VALUE) Sure looks like an unsigned version of -1 to me... Anyway, it's breaking twitter4j.TwitterStream stuff. I've mentioned that separately on the twitter4

Re: [twitter-dev] 4294967295

2010-12-14 Thread Dan Checkoway
time an event like this happened? > > Taylor > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Dan Checkoway > wrote: > > I know this is the weenie answer, but I haven't been able to track a > > specific offending JSON object down yet, since it only seems to happen on > >

Re: [twitter-dev] 4294967295

2010-12-14 Thread Dan Checkoway
> Hi Dan, > > Do you continue to see events like this happening? Can you provide a > recent example in as-provided JSON or XML? > > Thanks, > Taylor > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Dan Checkoway > wrote: > > Anybody else seeing user.listed_count occasionally c

Re: [twitter-dev] 4294967295

2010-12-17 Thread Dan Checkoway
his is being looked into. I'll update when I have news. > > Taylor > > On Tuesday, December 14, 2010, Dan Checkoway wrote: > > Yeah, you bet. Twitter4j isn't logging a timestamp when it happens, but > here are a handful of timestamps for unrelated stuff that got l

[twitter-dev] firehose exception: "the end of stream has been reached"

2010-12-17 Thread Dan Checkoway
Our app is using twitter4j 2.1.9-SNAPSHOT against the twitter firehose, and lately we are having problems with the stream "just ending" out of the blue. It happens several times a day lately with no rhyme or reason. Here's an example of what we see: Stream closed.TwitterException{exceptionCode=[a

Re: [twitter-dev] firehose exception: "the end of stream has been reached"

2010-12-20 Thread Dan Checkoway
; As Tom suggested, run through the Streaming Documentation linked to from > http://dev.twitter.com/pages/streaming_api and make sure you implement the > suggestions. > > Best, > @themattharris > Developer Advocate, Twitter > http://twitter.com/themattharris > > > O

Re: [twitter-dev] 4294967295

2010-12-22 Thread Dan Checkoway
know what the listed count is"? What happens if/when -4 starts popping out? I realize this is pretty low priority, but it's still a bug... Thanks, Dan On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Dan Checkoway wrote: > Check this out...today sometime between 4:01:43 AM PST and 4:01:53 AM PS

Re: [twitter-dev] 4294967295

2010-12-23 Thread Dan Checkoway
0, or otherwise. The team responsible for the low > level component causing the bug has a fix planned, but it can't be applied > until a few more dependencies are resolved. > > Thanks, > Taylor > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Dan Checkoway wrote: > >> I just w

Re: [twitter-dev] twurl with streaming API?

2010-12-26 Thread Dan Checkoway
Matt, Thanks for the --no-ssl trick, much appreciated! That was staring me right in the face with the --help output and I still managed not to see it. No worries, I'm only trying to use twurl for a test. We do use twitter4j for live firehose access. Thanks, Dan On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:54 A