It WORKS! Good idea! Thanks.
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Maurizio Lotauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 and IE bug
> Scrive Fastream T
Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> Ok. How do you propose to make it separate headers? I do not remember seeing
>
> a thing like that either on the net or on the RFC.
WWW-Authenticate: Digest qop="auth", realm="...", nonce="..."
WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="..."
Bye,
- Original Message -
From: "Maurizio Lotauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 3:51 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 and IE bug
> Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
&g
Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Maurizio Lotauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 5:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC261
Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Maurizio Lotauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 5:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 an
- Original Message -
From: "Maurizio Lotauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 and IE bug
> Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
&g
Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Maurizio Lotauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 2:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 an
- Original Message -
From: "Maurizio Lotauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 and IE bug
> Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
&g
Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At the moment there is a problem with Java JRE1.4.2_10 (the latest version).
>
> It simply keeps on asking for username/pwd even though the right input is
> supplied. I think it does not like the "comma hack" we did to work with IE.
> Any idea
al Message -
From: "Maurizio Lotauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 2:02 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 and IE bug
> Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [...]
>
>&
Scrive DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (Sorry for my last message, I click "Send" before I wrote anything on it!)
No problem :-)
> Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
>
> > Are you sure? I quickly reread the rfc and it say that more that one
> challange
> > could be specified in the header, but a challenge
Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> I fully agree. However we need to support both standards otherwise we would
> be sacrificing 80% of the surfers.
So at this point why don't write each challenge in different header? In that
case you should not write it in a "wrong" way
Scrive DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> > Scrive DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you both for your replies. I found the problem myself: IE6 has a
> bug
> >>> that makes it expect a comma before Realm="...".
>
Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Maurizio Lotauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need
Scrive DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> > Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Firefox and Opera tolerates the comma well. You can try here:
> >> http://www.fastream.net/beta/NetFileServer.exe (8.0.8B2). Just add a user
>
> >> from HTTP->Users and th
- Original Message -
From: "DZ-Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 and IE bug
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> - Original Message -
> I have read the RFC but as I wrote half an hour ago, it is the MS guys that
> did not read it well. Or perhaps they developed when the RFC was a draft
> which has later been changed.
My comment was directed at Maurizio.
>> Conclusi
(Sorry for my last message, I click "Send" before I wrote anything on it!)
Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> Are you sure? I quickly reread the rfc and it say that more that one
> challange
> could be specified in the header, but a challenge is defined as
>
> challenge = auth-scheme 1*SP 1#auth-para
- Original Message -
From: "DZ-Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 and IE bug
> Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
>> Scrive DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> Scrive DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
>>> Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [...]
>
24.01.2006 13:31:57 From Remote
HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required..WWW-Authenticate: Digest Basic
realm=localhost/%3E
Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> Scrive DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Thank you both for your replies. I found the problem myself: IE6 has a bug
>>> that makes it expect a comma before Realm="...".
>> That's really weird. Does adding the comma break it
- Original Message -
From: "Maurizio Lotauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 and IE bug
> Scrive DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
Hello,
- Original Message -
From: "Maurizio Lotauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 and IE bug
> Scrive DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Firefox and Opera tolerates the comma well. You can try here:
>> http://www.fastream.net/beta/NetFileServer.exe (8.0.8B2). Just add a user
>> from HTTP->Users and then assign the user to a path (C:\NFRoot is the
>
Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Firefox and Opera tolerates the comma well. You can try here:
> http://www.fastream.net/beta/NetFileServer.exe (8.0.8B2). Just add a user
> from HTTP->Users and then assign the user to a path (C:\NFRoot is the
> default) and point your browse
Scrive DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thank you both for your replies. I found the problem myself: IE6 has a bug
>
> > that makes it expect a comma before Realm="...".
>
> That's really weird. Does adding the comma break it on Firefox or
> Opera?
Scrive DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> > Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> >> 24.01.2006 13:31:57 From Remote
> >>
> >> HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required..WWW-Authenticate: Digest Basic
> >> realm=localhost/%3EFastream.com/, uri="localhost/%3EFa
IE bug and decided to keep it compatible to that as well as the
RFC.
Best Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "DZ-Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RF
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you both for your replies. I found the problem myself: IE6 has a bug
> that makes it expect a comma before Realm="...".
That's really weird. Does adding the comma break it on Firefox or
Opera? The RFC does not specify that a comma is required, o
xed the Digest code and sent to Francois. Hope he can
merge it well.
Best Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "DZ-Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with RFC2617 and IE bu
Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to fix digest authentication coded by Peter. We have a big
>> problem with Internet Explorer. In the setup below, you will see a web page
>> requested without first sending the "Authorizatio
Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to fix digest authentication coded by Peter. We have a big
> problem with Internet Explorer. In the setup below, you will see a web page
> requested without first sending the "Authorization:" header. Then the server
I t
Hello,
I am trying to fix digest authentication coded by Peter. We have a big
problem with Internet Explorer. In the setup below, you will see a web page
requested without first sending the "Authorization:" header. Then the server
responds with 401 and tells the client it prefers "Digest" auth
33 matches
Mail list logo
