DZ-Jay wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2006, at 03:24, Francois PIETTE wrote:
>> The time frame to complete will be a few days.
>
> Sounds very reasonable.
Only it becomes slower and slower, the last message
I got (David Lewis, subject Testing (NM)) took one
day. The message from Johnnie Norsworthy, subject
"
Johnnie Norsworthy wrote:
> Is the newest version of ICS capable of https:
ICS-SSL is available, but it is not yet freeware.
It's planed to release it as freeware without source
code since March 2006, but I don't know when it will
be done.
Currently it includes many SSL-enabled components:
HTTP c
Test (I send this message 9th november 10:00, +0100).
Regards Bjørnar
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno Garrels
> Sent: 9. november 2006 09:06
> To: ICS support mailing; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Why is this lis
Jack wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a TCP socket client. In some cases, OnDataReceived()
There's no such event in ICS named OnDataReceived.
> gets fired for multiple times with ErrCode = 0, but when I call
> Receive() the return value is always -1 so the application can
> not read any data back.
Arno Garrels wrote:
> Jack wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a TCP socket client. In some cases, OnDataReceived()
>
> There's no such event in ICS named OnDataReceived.
>
>> gets fired for multiple times with ErrCode = 0, but when I call
>> Receive() the return value is always -1 so the applicat
> Anybody out there anymore?
Sure !
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of ICS (Internet Component Suite, freeware)
Author of MidWare (Multi-tier framework, freeware)
http://www.overbyte.be
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/list
> > > I do have a problem with ICS HTTP server I am not able to solve. My
> > > application is ruinning all the time. The server refuses to answer
> > > some time. It happened irregulary - mostly once in one month so it's
> > > pretty dificuly to catch ... There is 401 error message on the client
>
I can't afford to add any more expense to the project for hire I am
working on right now, but I am sure I'll be donating to the SSL work
for my personal projects in the future. Is is good to know it is
available and *does* indeed work.
For this project I was able to get Indy 9 to work. Indy 10 did
I've written a fairly simple server app using the TWSocket component.
The app listens on port 80 for packets with a particular structure, and
sends a reply. I've tested it with up to 12 clients connected, all sending
requests as fast as possible, and all works well.
As soon as I connect a real c
I've written a fairly simple server app using the TWSocket component.
The app listens on port 80 for packets with a particular structure, and
sends a reply. I've tested it with up to 12 clients connected, all sending
requests as fast as possible, and all works well.
As soon as I connect a real c
Johnnie Norsworthy wrote:
> for my personal projects in the future. Is is good to know it is
> available and *does* indeed work.
>
> For this project I was able to get Indy 9 to work. Indy 10 did not and
> I could never find a reason why it didn't. This is similar to other
> mysterious Indy quirks
> I'm really puzzled as to what could be going on here, and
> have no idea how to begin to debug/fix it.
Not easy to figure what the problem can be.
First it is possible that the sniffer doesn't see all the packets. You could
try using SocketSPY (see the "usermade" page at ICS website) to intercep
Dave R wrote:
> Time Remote Port Local Port Flags Notes
>
> --- 24997 -> 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Len=0 MSS=1460
>
> 0.0 24997 <- 80 [SYN ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Len=0 MSS=1460 Win=65535
So far so good.
> 0.2 24997 -> 80 [RST ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=0 Len=0
Here the client should not send RST ACK, but ACK.
>
Seems like a firewall problem to me.
On 11/9/06, Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave R wrote:
>
> > Time Remote Port Local Port Flags Notes
> >
> > --- 24997 -> 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Len=0 MSS=1460
> >
> > 0.0 24997 <- 80 [SYN ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Len=0 MSS=1460 Win=65535
>
> So far so good.
>
> >
Hello Arno,
Thanks for the reply. It turned out that there's some data in the
buffer and my code didn't pick it up, because the code calculate
the protocol data wrong. Once it's fixed, this problem stopped
happening. Although I am still curious why the error -1, but I
didn't bother to trace it dow
15 matches
Mail list logo
