> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Arno Garrels
> Sent: 07 February 2007 17:08
> To: ICS support mailing
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
>
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
&
Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> Initialize means you assign it in an Intialization section, do you?
>
> There is no such technique in C++! I have an intermediate Pascal
> class but I did not notice this technique.
I was hoping you teached me how to do the same in C++, anyway make
sure this variab
gards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> Arno,
&g
riginal Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> Arno,
>>
>> - Original M
nt: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> Arno,
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "IC
Hello,
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> Arno,
>>
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Arno,
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 2:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in T
Arno,
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>
>> I did not
e).
>
> Already doing this.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> SZ
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Wilfried Mestdagh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "ICS support mailing"
>>> Se
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> Ok. Then there is
; To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 10:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> It is just a simple constant, why shouldn't it be 800 instead of
>>> 100??
>
L.Add(Result);
end;
This occurs in threadattach in the thread code I sent!
Best Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Wilfried Mestdagh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possi
first message of the thread).
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Wilfried Mestdagh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> It is just a simple constant, why shouldn't it be 800 instead of 100??
Because it is not the source of a bug. No need to change anything if it
is not buggy. Changing it and then your code works does not prove there
is a bug.
---
Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/
eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
--
From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> Hello Arno,
>
> I am not sure I understand how could more window handles in a s
,
>
> SZ
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
>
>
> Fastream T
;
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Despite all have been said, I still think that 100 messages/thread is
> low.
> It should be at least 400-600.
WH_MAX_MSG does not specify the maxim
[TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
> Regards,
>
> SZ
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket]
Despite all have been said, I still think that 100 messages/thread is low.
It should be at least 400-600.
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:39 PM
Subject: R
> What about using RegisterWindowMessage to let windows give you a
> value for
> the windows-message not beeing in use?
Messages are sent/posted either to a unique window handle
or to a unique thread-ID so the message numbers must neither
be unique in the application nor in the system. Commonly y
What about using RegisterWindowMessage to let windows give you a value for
the windows-message not beeing in use? Usually this procedure is used when
sending windows messages between applications. But I don't see a reason for
not using this inside the application also. If we give the windows messa
>> initialization
>>GWndHandlerMsgLow := WM_APP + 100;
>>
>> I hope this helps.
>>
>> ---
>> Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
>> http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>&
uot;
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> Yoiu also missed that this is a service application thread with no
>> other component than ICS! Even no GUI. I am unable to find the bug
r!!
>>
>> ---
>> Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
>> http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Francois, will you?
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> SZ
>>>
>>>
it be 800 instead of 100??
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> Fastream Technologies
rancois, will you?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> SZ
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 1:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in T
millions
of connections.
Francois, will you?
Best Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
>&g
rbyte/teamics.html
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Hello Arno,
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 1:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and soluti
Hello Arno,
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> Hello,
&g
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I use the following thread code:
>
> void __fastcall ReverseProxyClientThread::Execute()
> {
> // Place thread code here
> FreeOnTerminate = true;
>
> ...
>
> TIcsWndHandler *windowHandler = new TIcsWndHandler();
> windowHandler->MsgLo
31 matches
Mail list logo
