Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2011.03-rc1 released

Hi, 2011/2/3 Wolfgang Denk : > Hello  everybody: > > * U-Boot v2011.03-rc1 was released on Wed, 02 Feb 2011. > > * Release "v2011.03" is scheduled in 39 days - on March 13, 2011. > > Please help testing, and check if all your relevant patches have been > included. > > > Note that still a large num

Re: [U-Boot] Trouble running hello_world

Hi Alfred, Le 03/02/2011 01:35, Alfred Morgan a écrit : > Will someone code me a blinking LED hello_world.c or, since I have serial > working, a serial version I can try? What prevents you from coding this? You have the whole source code and you build your hello_world from the same tree that p

Re: [U-Boot] mach-type #define mismatch for lange51/efikamx

On Thursday 03 February 2011 07:32:02 Stefano Babic wrote: > On 02/03/2011 01:04 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > > Hey! > >> > >> iMX5: EfikaMX: Preliminary board support > >> > > u-boot-imx has: > > #define MACH_TYPE_MX51_LANGE51 2336 > > #define MACH_TYPE_MX51_LANGE52

Re: [U-Boot] Trouble running hello_world

Dear Alfred Morgan, In message <85926fd6-dc95-41c1-9034-64697d1a8...@54.org> you wrote: > > At least that narrows my problem down. If my problem is stdout not > being sent to serial then how could I easily confirm this happening or > not? Will someone code me a blinking LED hello_world.c or, sin

Re: [U-Boot] Berfore relocation.

Dear Lakshmi T, In message <002b01cbc370$fc2e0920$f48a1b60$@com> you wrote: > > I am very new to U-boot and trying to port u-boot onto MPC885 platform. > > I have done necessary changes in uboot and burned the Uboot binary in NOR > based FLASH. > > The code is executing from FLASH and am able t

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sh: sh7785lcr: Fix out of tree building

From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu --- board/renesas/sh7785lcr/Makefile |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/renesas/sh7785lcr/Makefile b/board/renesas/sh7785lcr/Makefile index b5c496f..e404fa6 100644 --- a/board/renesas/sh7

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Hello Sughosh, On Thursday 03 February 2011 12:19 PM, sughosh ganu wrote: > hi Aneesh, > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Aneesh V > wrote: > > Yes. These are variables that otherwise would go to BSS. I do this > because I need them before SDRAM initialization. One

[U-Boot] Berfore relocation.

Hai all . I am very new to U-boot and trying to port u-boot onto MPC885 platform. I have done necessary changes in uboot and burned the Uboot binary in NOR based FLASH. The code is executing from FLASH and am able to see console messages. And no messages are seen after the following U-Bo

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Hello Graeme, On Thursday 03 February 2011 02:31 AM, Graeme Russ wrote: [snip ..] >> Yes. These are variables that otherwise would go to BSS. I do this >> because I need them before SDRAM initialization. One of this is the gd >> structure. I allocate gd structure in .data that is in IRAM. >> Why I

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

hi Aneesh, On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Aneesh V wrote: > Yes. These are variables that otherwise would go to BSS. I do this > because I need them before SDRAM initialization. One of this is the gd > structure. I allocate gd structure in .data that is in IRAM. > Why I need gd before SDRAM? Be

Re: [U-Boot] mach-type #define mismatch for lange51/efikamx

On 02/03/2011 01:04 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hey! > >> iMX5: EfikaMX: Preliminary board support > > u-boot-imx has: > #define MACH_TYPE_MX51_LANGE51 2336 > #define MACH_TYPE_MX51_LANGE52 2337 > > u-boot-arm has: > #define MACH_TYPE_MX51_EFIKAMX 2336

Re: [U-Boot] [Patch V6 0/4] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

On 02/02/11 19:06, Tom Warren wrote: > Mike, > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: >> On 02/02/11 02:09, Tom Warren wrote: >>> I haven't seen any new feedback on this version (V6) of the patchset >>> since it was posted. >>> >>> Wolfgang, Mike, Peter, et al - are you happy wit

Re: [U-Boot] PCIE supported networking cards?

Disregard my previous email. I'm running into some issues trying to get PCIe working in u-boot. -Aaron On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 03:51:14 pm Aaron Williams wrote: > Thanks, > > I took the patch but it looks like it's unable to read the eeprom. It's > possible it may also have something to

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2011.03-rc1 released

>This omap timer fix never got applied >http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/76803/ was on vacation. I missed it. I'll apply it. --Sandeep ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2011.03-rc1 released

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hello  everybody: > > * U-Boot v2011.03-rc1 was released on Wed, 02 Feb 2011. > > * Release "v2011.03" is scheduled in 39 days - on March 13, 2011. > > Please help testing, and check if all your relevant patches have been > included. > > This

Re: [U-Boot] Trouble running hello_world

> Well, then your entry point is at 0c10 and you don;t have to try > other addresses. At least that narrows my problem down. If my problem is stdout not being sent to serial then how could I easily confirm this happening or not? Will someone code me a blinking LED hello_world.c or, since I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix to make U-Boot work with more USB sticks

We have our cache enabled since we're a cache coherent architecture so the performance is not due to cache (otherwise FAT would also be slow). The hub that's failing has a transaction translator built in whereas the ones that work do not. For some reason it fails trying to reset this hub. Grant

[U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: add more watchdog resets

Poke the watchdog in a variety of looping constructs, which could take a long time to complete. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood --- Jaap, does this resolve the watchdog problems you were seeing? drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |6 ++ drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c |2 ++ 2 files changed, 8 ins

Re: [U-Boot] PCIE supported networking cards?

Thanks, I took the patch but it looks like it's unable to read the eeprom. It's possible it may also have something to do with our PCIE implementation since I'm trying to bring that up with the updated u-boot. I also need to go through the code and make sure that the driver is 64-bit friendly s

[U-Boot] mach-type #define mismatch for lange51/efikamx

Hey! > iMX5: EfikaMX: Preliminary board support u-boot-imx has: #define MACH_TYPE_MX51_LANGE51 2336 #define MACH_TYPE_MX51_LANGE52 2337 u-boot-arm has: #define MACH_TYPE_MX51_EFIKAMX 2336 #define MACH_TYPE_MX51_LANGE52 2337 and linux ha

Re: [U-Boot] at91sam9263_nandflash build issues

On Wednesday 02 February 2011 20:43:00 Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:49:36 +0100 > > Marek Vasut wrote: > > diff --git a/config.mk b/config.mk > > index 5147c35..fe1d40c 100644 > > --- a/config.mk > > +++ b/config.mk > > @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ $(obj)%.s: %.c > > > > # If the list of o

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/14] tsec: arrange the code to avoid useless function declaration

On Jan 26, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Mingkai Hu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu Acked-by: Andy Fleming ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix bad padding of bootp request packet

This seems to pad to one byte longer than required Change-Id: I86a888a9f5f27356e260c0457d92468d5923a756 Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- net/bootp.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bootp.c b/net/bootp.c index 1a71786..87b027e 100644 --- a/net/bootp.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/14] tsec: use IO accessories to access the register

On Jan 26, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Mingkai Hu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu Acked-by: Andy Fleming ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] Pull request: nand flash

The following changes since commit 42d44f631c4e8e5359775bdc098f2fffde4e5c05: Prepare v2011.03-rc1 (2011-02-02 22:37:32 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nand-flash.git ..BRANCH.NOT.VERIFIED.. Alexander Holler (1): NAND: Fix saving of redundand envi

Re: [U-Boot] change email address in MAINTAINERS

Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, In message you wrote: > > I see. I remove this commit from my repository. You don't have to. git will ignore it automatically. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr

[U-Boot] [STATUS] v2011.03-rc1 released

Hello everybody: * U-Boot v2011.03-rc1 was released on Wed, 02 Feb 2011. * Release "v2011.03" is scheduled in 39 days - on March 13, 2011. Please help testing, and check if all your relevant patches have been included. Note that still a large number of ARM boards are broken. I hope many peopl

Re: [U-Boot] change email address in MAINTAINERS

Hi, 2011/2/3 Wolfgang Denk : > Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, > > In message <20110202073515.gb8...@chimagu.nigauri.org> you wrote: >> Applied, thanks. >> >> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:05:39AM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: >> > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda >> > --- >> >  This patch depends on "sh:

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Aneesh V wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On Wednesday 02 February 2011 07:07 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Hi Aneesh, >> >> Le 02/02/2011 14:17, Aneesh V a écrit : >>> Hello Wolfgang, Albert, >>> >>> On Tuesday 01 February 2011 03:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Aneesh

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm

Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4d48a0a0.8040...@free.fr> you wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > Please pull from u-boot-arm/master to go into rc1 of upcoming release. > > The following changes since commit 6f918bd46482f889f4d94623b09daf659a1974bd: > >Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-bo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Print compiler and linker version with the version command

Dear Alexander Holler, In message <1295393080-6510-1-git-send-email-hol...@ahsoftware.de> you wrote: > After years of unsuccessful research I've finally shamelessly stolen other > peoples intellectual properties to present the all-new and world-changing > updated version command: > - > U-Boot>> ve

[U-Boot] [U-boot] : TFTP download is getting Failed on MCF5485 Custom Board

Hi , We have a MCF5485 procesoor based custom board. But it's design is derived from M5485EVB board. 10% of boards are having TFTP download issue. TFTP donwload is getting failed. It has the boardcom BCM522 as PHY interface. we are using FEC0 of MCF5485. TFTP dowload is always getting failed while

Re: [U-Boot] change email address in MAINTAINERS

Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, In message <20110202073515.gb8...@chimagu.nigauri.org> you wrote: > Applied, thanks. > > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:05:39AM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda > > --- > > This patch depends on "sh: add support for sh7757lcr board". > >

Re: [U-Boot] change email address in MAINTAINERS

Dear Yoshihiro Shimoda, In message <4d48ade3.4070...@renesas.com> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda > --- > This patch depends on "sh: add support for sh7757lcr board". > > MAINTAINERS |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, W

Re: [U-Boot] Trouble running hello_world

Dear Alfred Morgan, In message <4ea4f7e8-6ea1-44d9-a087-04a4f2774...@54.org> you wrote: > > I did. I have not modified hello_world.c so I thought it wouldn't = > apply. Here is my nm output: > > $ nm -n examples/standalone/hello_world > 0010 N $d > 003c N $d > 0c10 t $a > 0c10

Re: [U-Boot] at91sam9263_nandflash build issues

On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:49:36 +0100 Marek Vasut wrote: > diff --git a/config.mk b/config.mk > index 5147c35..fe1d40c 100644 > --- a/config.mk > +++ b/config.mk > @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ $(obj)%.s: %.c > > # If the list of objects to link is empty, just create an empty built-in.o > cmd_link_o_targe

Re: [U-Boot] [Patch V6 0/4] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

Le 02/02/2011 18:06, Tom Warren a écrit : > Mike, > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: >> On 02/02/11 02:09, Tom Warren wrote: >>> I haven't seen any new feedback on this version (V6) of the patchset >>> since it was posted. >>> >>> Wolfgang, Mike, Peter, et al - are you happy

[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: Add cpu_secondary_init_r to allow for initialization post env setup

We can simplify some cpu/SoC level initialization by moving it to be after the environment and non-volatile storage is setup as there might be dependancies on such things in various boot configurations. For example for FSL SoC's with QE if we boot from NAND we need it setup to extra the ucode imag

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: Add cpu_late_init_r to allow for initialization post env setup

On Feb 2, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Haiying Wang wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 11:27 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >> +void cpu_late_init_r(void) >> +{ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_QE >> +uint qe_base = CONFIG_SYS_IMMR + 0x0008; /* QE immr base */ >> +qe_init(qe_base); >> +qe_reset(); >> +#endif >> +}

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add support for ASIX's AX88783 ethernet chip

On 01/31/2011 06:42 PM, Joe Xue wrote: > for more information about this chip, please check: > http://www.asix.com.tw/products.php?op=pItemdetail&PItemID=98;65;86&PLine=65 > > Signed-off-by: Joe Xue > Please add a version number to your patch to make easier tracking which is your last version.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: Add cpu_late_init_r to allow for initialization post env setup

On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 11:27 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > +void cpu_late_init_r(void) > +{ > +#ifdef CONFIG_QE > + uint qe_base = CONFIG_SYS_IMMR + 0x0008; /* QE immr base */ > + qe_init(qe_base); > + qe_reset(); > +#endif > +} You did not move qe_reset() inside qe_init() as you recomm

Re: [U-Boot] Trouble running hello_world

Wolfgang, > Did you read > http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/MyStandaloneProgramDoesNotWork I did. I have not modified hello_world.c so I thought it wouldn't apply. Here is my nm output: $ nm -n examples/standalone/hello_world 0010 N $d 003c N $d 0c10 t $a 0c10 T hello_world

[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: Add cpu_late_init_r to allow for initialization post env setup

We can simplify some cpu/SoC level initialization by moving it to be after the environment and non-volatile storage is setup as there might be dependancies on such things in various boot configurations. For example for FSL SoC's with QE if we boot from NAND we need it setup to extra the ucode imag

Re: [U-Boot] [Patch V6 0/4] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

Mike, On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On 02/02/11 02:09, Tom Warren wrote: >> I haven't seen any new feedback on this version (V6) of the patchset >> since it was posted. >> >> Wolfgang, Mike, Peter, et al - are you happy with the current patch? > > I'm Ok with the current

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix gunzip to work for any gzipped uImage size Signed-off-by: Catalin Radu

--- lib/gunzip.c | 16 ++-- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/gunzip.c b/lib/gunzip.c index 482a476..18cb45b 100644 --- a/lib/gunzip.c +++ b/lib/gunzip.c @@ -106,12 +106,16 @@ int zunzip(void *dst, int dstlen, unsigned char *src, unsigned long *lenp

Re: [U-Boot] MPC8xx malloc failing

Dear saugat mitra, In message you wrote: > > The project was started more than a year back and that time 2009.11 > was the latest version, so we are still continuing with the same. I can imagine that you dislike this, but you are learning a lesson the hard way now. If you have to maintain your

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Le 02/02/2011 15:01, Aneesh V a écrit : > Hi Albert, > > On Wednesday 02 February 2011 07:07 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Hi Aneesh, >> >> Le 02/02/2011 14:17, Aneesh V a écrit : >>> Hello Wolfgang, Albert, >>> >>> On Tuesday 01 February 2011 03:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Aneesh V,

[U-Boot] [PATCH] atmel nand patch CE don't care NAND

Hi, this patch fix the support for CE don't care nand Michael Trimarchi commit 0cb23ef858407a7a9de6e353e08394637c518c89 Author: Michael Trimarchi Date: Wed Feb 2 14:24:21 2011 +0100 Fix the CE for the NAND don't care Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nan

[U-Boot] omap3 mux enabling

Dear folks, I'm very new to this community, please pardon me if I'm going to ask something that seems obvious to the majority of you. As I've seen digging through the list archives in later months there was some discussions about mux state, and possible decoupling between u-boot and linux kernel i

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Hi Albert, On Wednesday 02 February 2011 07:07 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Aneesh, > > Le 02/02/2011 14:17, Aneesh V a écrit : >> Hello Wolfgang, Albert, >> >> On Tuesday 01 February 2011 03:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear Aneesh V, >>> >>> In message<4d47c1c9.1020...@ti.com> you wrote: >>

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Hi Aneesh, Le 02/02/2011 14:17, Aneesh V a écrit : > Hello Wolfgang, Albert, > > On Tuesday 01 February 2011 03:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Aneesh V, >> >> In message<4d47c1c9.1020...@ti.com> you wrote: >>> Why would that be necessary? Just put the BSS segment in SDRAM, and every

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Hello Wolfgang, Albert, On Tuesday 01 February 2011 03:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Aneesh V, > > In message<4d47c1c9.1020...@ti.com> you wrote: >> >>> Why would that be necessary? Just put the BSS segment in SDRAM, and >>> everything is fine, isn't it? >> >> SDRAM is initialized by the SP

Re: [U-Boot] MPC8xx malloc failing

Hi Wolfgang The project was started more than a year back and that time 2009.11 was the latest version, so we are still continuing with the same. On running the back trace I found that functions to be called were from - malloc env_relocate board_init_r trap_init To be more precise the code was dy

Re: [U-Boot] at91sam9263_nandflash build issues

Dear Marek Vasut, In message <201102020849.36451.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > The problem is clear from this IRC log, where "vickylinuxer" described his > grief > (so I included the log, the board really doesn't build). I also did a quick > and > dirty patch (follows the log, it might g

Re: [U-Boot] Trouble running hello_world

Dear Alfred Morgan, In message <30ada4e9-4366-4c21-a901-55d23c87e...@54.org> you wrote: > > I am having trouble executing anything using U-Boot. I have read the > U-Boot README and Manual. I have also tried to following the steps on > plugcomputer.org's wiki. I was feeling like I was beginning

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] MX31: qong: add watchdog

Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic --- board/davedenx/qong/qong.c | 12 include/configs/qong.h |1 + 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/davedenx/qong/qong.c b/board/davedenx/qong/qong.c index 8a81cfc..3ace6cd 100644 --- a/board/davedenx/qong/qon

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] MX31: add support for MX31 watchdog

The patch add CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG to be used with the internal watchdog timer of the MX31 processor. Two function are exported for the board maintainers: mxc_hw_watchdog_enable mxc_hw_watchdog_reset The board maintainer can decide to use mxc_hw_watchdog_reset as hw_watchdog_reset, o

Re: [U-Boot] spi subystem maintainer?

Dear Stefano Babic: > On 02/02/2011 08:23 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> Wanted to see if anyone had input on how to deal with the SPI >> controller on some of our newer parts. It expects command & data >> xfer's to happen together. However our current code does not call >> spi_xfer() that way. > > Wh

Re: [U-Boot] spi subystem maintainer?

On 02/02/2011 08:23 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Wanted to see if anyone had input on how to deal with the SPI > controller on some of our newer parts. It expects command & data > xfer's to happen together. However our current code does not call > spi_xfer() that way. Which is your concrete case ? sp

Re: [U-Boot] at91sam9263_nandflash build issues

On Wednesday 02 February 2011 09:16:46 Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear Marek Vasut, > Hi, > > The problem is clear from this IRC log, where "vickylinuxer" described > > his grief (so I included the log, the board really doesn't build). I > > also did a quick and dirty patch (follows the log, it mig

Re: [U-Boot] AT91: dataflash: was at91sam9263_nandflash build issues

Just noticed that the subject was wrong! ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] at91sam9263_nandflash build issues

Dear Marek Vasut, > The problem is clear from this IRC log, where "vickylinuxer" described his > grief > (so I included the log, the board really doesn't build). I also did a quick > and > dirty patch (follows the log, it might give you an idea where it breaks, but > it's a mess -- not all is