Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v3] QE IO: Add initial data to pin configuration + read/write functions

2008-02-05 Thread David Saada
> David, any word on this? I'm trying to aggressively stay on top of > patches for 1.3.3 > > Andy Sorry - had loads of work here, will try to squeeze it in today. David. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy a

[U-Boot-Users] how to use mtdparts command in uboot

2008-02-05 Thread nagi reddy chitta
Hi All, I am working on a project where my processor is MIPS and my NOR flash size is 32MB. So for i am managing all MTD partitions statically in Linux and the system is working fine. Now we are planning to change the mtd management to UBoot, so that i can add/delete/modify the partitions using

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] spi: Kill spi_chipsel table and introduce spi_setup()

2008-02-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
so the new SPI interface has this API: - void spi_init(void); - int spi_setup(int cs, unsigned int max_hz, unsigned int mode); - int spi_xfer(int cs, int bitlen, uchar *dout, uchar *din); - int spi_cs_is_valid(int cs); - void spi_cs_activate(int cs); - void spi_cs_deactivate(int cs); there i

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/6] [new uImage] Removed dead ramdisk code on microblaze architecture

2008-02-05 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Marian, do you have git repository with your changes? I would like to see what is changed from previous state. I have some changes in my internal repository which modified linux booting with using ramdisk too. Regards, Michal Simek > Microblaze do_bootm_linux() includes ramdisk processing co

Re: [U-Boot-Users] OR1200 (OpenRISC) Support?

2008-02-05 Thread Jeremiah Frick
Well, I'm hoping to start work on creating CPU support for the OR1200 as soon as possible, so maybe I can help fulfill that dream of yours Detlev. ;) I'm new to the world of U-boot, so I'll probably be asking questions along the way. Detlev Zundel wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > >>> I have a pro

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] PPC440EPx: Reconfigure PLL for 667MHz processor

2008-02-05 Thread Mike Nuss
On PPC440EPx without a bootstrap I2C EEPROM, the PLL can be reconfigured after startup in order to change the speed of the clocks. This patch adds the option CONFIG_667MHZ. If set, it will set the clocks to run at full speed on a 667MHz PPC440EPx without the need for an external EEPROM. Signed-off

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] QE: Move FDT support into a common file

2008-02-05 Thread Andy Fleming
On Jan 17, 2008 8:25 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Move the flat device tree setup for QE related devices into > a common file shared between 83xx & 85xx platforms that have QE's. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks!

[U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx.git

2008-02-05 Thread Andy Fleming
are found in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-mpc85xx.git Kumar Gala (1): QE: Move FDT support into a common file Timur Tabi (1): 85xx,86xx: Determine I2C clock frequencies and store in global_data common/fdt_support.c | 48 -- cp

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v3] QE IO: Add initial data to pin configuration + read/write functions

2008-02-05 Thread Andy Fleming
On Jan 28, 2008 10:21 AM, David Saada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > No problem. If there's nothing else, I'll repost the patch with this > > > change (hopefully the last time). > > > > No, I think that's the only issue I have. Well, that and the fact > that I > > can > > never apply your patc

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] spi: Kill spi_chipsel table and introduce spi_setup()

2008-02-05 Thread Ben Warren
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > No need to add an extra layer of indirection and externals all over > the place. Just let the board code define two functions, > spi_cs_activate() and spi_cs_deactivate, and use them to do any > board-specific magic with the chipselects. > > Not all drivers may need thos

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] MPC85xx KGDB support

2008-02-05 Thread Andy Fleming
On Nov 1, 2007 9:16 PM, Chen Gong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- > cpu/mpc85xx/Makefile |4 +- > drivers/serial.c | 28 +++ > include/configs/MPC8548CDS.h |3 +- > lib_ppc/kgdb.c | 62 > +- > 4

Re: [U-Boot-Users] OR1200 (OpenRISC) Support?

2008-02-05 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Wolfgang, >> I have a project I'm working on that I think u-Boot would be perfect >> for.  The core processor architecture is the OpenCores OR1200 RISC >> platform, however, and I see it doesn't appear to be part of the >> standard release of u-boot.  My question is this--has anyone worked on >

[U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL][SH] Please pull git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-sh.git/

2008-02-05 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
The following changes since commit 2c5260f711168d5ee91c70ddbb7d897013eefc46: Ladislav Michl (1): ARM: AT91RM9200 based boards config cleanup are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-sh.git master Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (1): sh: Fix register address of SH7

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] spi: Kill spi_chipsel table and introduce spi_setup()

2008-02-05 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 13:28 +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > No need to add an extra layer of indirection and externals all over > the place. Just let the board code define two functions, > spi_cs_activate() and spi_cs_deactivate, and use them to do any > board-specific magic with the chipselect

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] spi: Kill spi_chipsel table and introduce spi_setup()

2008-02-05 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
No need to add an extra layer of indirection and externals all over the place. Just let the board code define two functions, spi_cs_activate() and spi_cs_deactivate, and use them to do any board-specific magic with the chipselects. Not all drivers may need those extra functions however. If that's

[U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] AVR32 fixes

2008-02-05 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
Hi Wolfgang, Please pull from git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-avr32.git master to receive the following fixes. The "avr32-fixes" branch used for testing is now gone, and will be re-created as needed. Please use "master" instead. Btw, one of the nice things about the new workflow is that after re

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Fix missing code flash sizefor M5485EVB

2008-02-05 Thread Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
Hi TsiChung, I'm using the actual master head of the git-tree... then I think without the patch set. luigi On lun, 2008-02-04 at 16:44 -0700, Liew Tsi Chung wrote: > Luigi, > > Is the problem you encountered after you implemented the "Move > PPC and M68K ramdiskloading to a common routin

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/4:resubmit] ppc4xx: HCU4/5. Cleanups

2008-02-05 Thread Niklaus Giger
- Fix some coding style violations. - Use in/out_u16/32 where appropriate. - Use register names from ppc405.h. - Fix trace useage for Lauterbach. - Remove obsolete generation HCU2. - Renamed fixed_hcu4_sdram to init_ppc405_sdram. Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/netstal/

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/4: resubmit] ppc4xx: HCU4/5. Cleanups

2008-02-05 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Niklaus Giger wrote: > - Fix some coding style violations. > - Use in/out_u16/32 where appropriate. > - Use register names from ppc405.h. > - Fix trace useage for Lauterbach. > - Remove obsolete generation HCU2. > - Renamed fixed_hcu4_sdram to init_ppc405_sdram. One co

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] do not use cmd_reset uninitialized in cfi_flash.c

2008-02-05 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Michael Schwingen wrote: > > Michael, could please you provide a patch? > > Yes, but it may take some days - I probably need to run the tests on a > board that has socketed flash, using a special test case that really > puts the flash in the middle of a command cycle an

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] do not use cmd_reset uninitialized in cfi_flash.c

2008-02-05 Thread Michael Schwingen
Stefan Roese wrote: >> I think I can run tests on a small set (~5-10 different AMD-commandset >> and 2 intel-commandset, all 16 bit) flashs, but that still leaves the >> (small) possibility that there are flash roms that behave different. >> > > Right. But it will be an improvement to the curr

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/4: resubmit] ppc4xx: HCU4/5. Cleanup configs

2008-02-05 Thread Niklaus Giger
- hcu4.h: Removed define of CONFIG_PPC405GPr - Corrected phy addresses - Fix boot variables - Respect line length of 80 chars Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/configs/hcu4.h | 26 -- include/configs/hcu5.h | 47 +++---

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/4: resubmit] ppc4xx: HCU4/5. Fix make O=../xx

2008-02-05 Thread Niklaus Giger
Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Makefile|2 ++ board/netstal/hcu4/Makefile | 12 board/netstal/hcu5/Makefile | 10 -- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 0f6cc59..b3a1d2f 1

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/4: resubmit] ppc4xx: PPC405GPr fix missing register definitions

2008-02-05 Thread Niklaus Giger
Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/ppc405.h |8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/ppc405.h b/include/ppc405.h index b5ad38f..cbfe89e 100644 --- a/include/ppc405.h +++ b/include/ppc405.h @@ -784,6 +784,14 @@ #define reset

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/4: resubmit] ppc4xx: HCU4/5. Cleanups

2008-02-05 Thread Niklaus Giger
- Fix some coding style violations. - Use in/out_u16/32 where appropriate. - Use register names from ppc405.h. - Fix trace useage for Lauterbach. - Remove obsolete generation HCU2. - Renamed fixed_hcu4_sdram to init_ppc405_sdram. Signed-off-by: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/netstal/