Stefan Roese wrote: >> I think I can run tests on a small set (~5-10 different AMD-commandset >> and 2 intel-commandset, all 16 bit) flashs, but that still leaves the >> (small) possibility that there are flash roms that behave different. >> > > Right. But it will be an improvement to the current implementation, where a > random command is written as RESET command. And also an improvement to the > fixed AMD/Intel RESET command. So I vote for trying this solution. I'll test > on a few of mine platforms too. > > Michael, could please you provide a patch? > Yes, but it may take some days - I probably need to run the tests on a board that has socketed flash, using a special test case that really puts the flash in the middle of a command cycle and tests reset behaviour.
cu Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
