Re: [U-Boot-Users] ability to do simple math in u-boot shell?

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:45:35 -0600 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't seem to find anything that says we can do thus, but wondering > if there was any way to get simple math (addition) out of the u-boot > shell? Was looking for something like 'expr'. hush doesn't do expressions

[U-Boot-Users] ability to do simple math in u-boot shell?

I can't seem to find anything that says we can do thus, but wondering if there was any way to get simple math (addition) out of the u-boot shell? Was looking for something like 'expr'. - k - This SF.net email is sponsore

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add 'imload' command

'imload' provides a more direct means to load from an image file. Also created a load_image routine out of the code in do_bootm() that is shared between do_bootm() and do_imload(). Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Note, this is against the u-boot-testing new-image branch. comm

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [new uImage] Code available on new-image branch of u-boot-testing repo

On Feb 12, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> >> For example, I don't believe we have a way today to just decompress a >> uImage file. > > Um... it you try hard enough there is one. See > http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/HowCanILoadAndUncompress

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] 8xx: Add OF support to adder87x board

Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > Still ? Beats me Scott - you probably know better then I do - I really just > cloned some of the entries in the other board .h files - which seemed to make > sense at the time... > > I'll have a go at removing them for the next drop... They're leftovers from before we ha

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] 8xx: Add OF support to adder87x board

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:13:13 -0600 Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:12:24AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > > +#define OF_CPU "PowerPC,[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > +#define OF_SOC "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > Do we really still need

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ramdisk problem (once again?)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > The kernel.org tree does not recognize a ramdisk image in flash. > > Patches have been posted here since 2.4.17 times, but never made it > > upstream. See the archives ... > > > If you want to use it, put in ram before... Regards Michael ye

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] QE: Move FDT support into a common file

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> Thanks for applying this. I have one more patch for 1.3.2 that you may have >> missed: "85xx, 86xx: Determine I2C clock frequencies and store in >> global_data". >> It's in Andy Fleming's tree: >> http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: Expand CCSR space with more DDR controller registers.

Signed-off-by: James Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- in my git tree. include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h | 25 + 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/a

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [new uImage] Code available on new-image branch of u-boot-testing repo

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > For example, I don't believe we have a way today to just decompress a > uImage file. Um... it you try hard enough there is one. See http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/HowCanILoadAndUncompressACompressedImage Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX So

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

On 2/12/08, Ulf Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > Once I start using sam7 util, the bootstrap code has not been executed > >> > which means the SDRAM has not been initialized. I'll have to added the > >> > lowlevel init to do that, which I might try if nothing else works. > >> > > >> >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] QE: Move FDT support into a common file

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Thanks for applying this. I have one more patch for 1.3.2 that you may have > missed: "85xx, 86xx: Determine I2C clock frequencies and store in > global_data". > It's in Andy Fleming's tree: > http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Delete all env vars except read onlys

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I don't know of such a solution. But such a "feature" would be handy > sometimes. So perhaps this needs to get implemented as a new U-Boot command. > But you should be careful. Such a command should require probably a password, > to that users don't

Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot patch submission process

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > But to make things more confusing, I've seen you've applied other, less > important patches while the tree was broken. If you had taken the time > spent on one of those patches and applied one of the build fixes > instead (doesn't matter much which one

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

>> > Once I start using sam7 util, the bootstrap code has not been executed >> > which means the SDRAM has not been initialized. I'll have to added the >> > lowlevel init to do that, which I might try if nothing else works. >> > >> > >> You don't understand: >> >> - flash all arm9load & u-boot >>

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

Oops. It bounce back anyway. On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok > E Robertson wrote: > >> Can you send me your diff? > >> > > > > The diff I'm using is attached. > > Thanks. > > > I'm talking about your adding code. Don't use the mailing list for send > code. > > Regards Michael

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ramdisk problem (once again?)

Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hi, > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >> The problem: I can start a Linux kernel and its filesystem from flash >> (linux image made using mkimage, and filesystem in cramfs format). >> However, if I try to boot them from flash (this time both images have >> been c

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

Ok E Robertson wrote: >> Can you send me your diff? >> > > The diff I'm using is attached. > Thanks. > I'm talking about your adding code. Don't use the mailing list for send code. Regards Michael - This SF.net emai

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Delete all env vars except read onlys

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I am wondering if there is a way to delete all environment variables > but not the readonly ones. The common way to delete all variables > is to make the environment CRC invalid an do a reset. After reset > a saveenv saves a default environment. > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ramdisk problem (once again?)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > The problem: I can start a Linux kernel and its filesystem from flash > (linux image made using mkimage, and filesystem in cramfs format). > However, if I try to boot them from flash (this time both images have > been constructed using mkimage), the ke

Re: [U-Boot-Users] 440EPX is not booting from 1Gb/128MB NAND flash

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I got my idea from the current Linux MTD NAND drivers (and U-Boot btw). Here > the distinction between small page and large page devices is done this way: ... > That's why I still prefer my suggestion. Ok, thanks for checking. Best regards, Wolfgan

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

E Robertson ha scritto: > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> E Robertson wrote: >>> On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi, >> Do you try to >> load with a jtag in memory and execute it? >> >> > I don't have a jtag fitted for this as yet.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

E Robertson wrote: > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> That's exactly what I have but I always get this after about 24% : >>> >>> * >>> SEND-class command failed. >>> Packets sent: 69 >>> Retransmissions: 11 >>> Timeouts: 12 >>> Damag

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

> When you said new size, I take to mean the size of the binary images. > In that case boot the Bootstrap and uboot image size are smaller that > the prebuilt onces. > Bootstrap is written @ 0 and uboot @ 0x8000 (a 32K size). Bootstrap is > under 4K and uboot is under 185K. so I have lots of space.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > E Robertson wrote: > > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > Do you try to > load with a jtag in memory and execute it? > > > >>> I don't have a jtag fitted for this as yet. I'm using the sam7 util. >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

E Robertson wrote: > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> Do you try to load with a jtag in memory and execute it? >>> I don't have a jtag fitted for this as yet. I'm using the sam7 util. >>> >>> >>> >> Simple step: >> - flash the w

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

Hi >> >>> Is the new size compatible with the armboot? Do you skip LOW_LEVEL_INIT? >>> >> Yes, it is skipped. From what I understood Bootstrap does the >> necessary boot init tasks (althought I would rather put it in uboot). >> Do I need to changs this? >> >> > > > You

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

On 2/12/08, Ulf Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> So, do you change the text base? > >> > >> > >> >>> No I did not. I don't have a reason to. Why? > >> >>> > >> Is the new size compatible with the armboot? Do you skip LOW_LEVEL_INIT? > > > > Yes, it is sk

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > >> Do you try to > >> load with a jtag in memory and execute it? > >> > > > > I don't have a jtag fitted for this as yet. I'm using the sam7 util. > > > > > Simple step: > - flash the work system > - loady > put you version of u-boot and

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

>> >> Hi, >> >> >> So, do you change the text base? >> >> >> >>> No I did not. I don't have a reason to. Why? >> >>> >> Is the new size compatible with the armboot? Do you skip LOW_LEVEL_INIT? > > Yes, it is skipped. From what I understood Bootstrap does the > necessary boot init ta

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

Hi, > >> Do you try to >> load with a jtag in memory and execute it? >> > > I don't have a jtag fitted for this as yet. I'm using the sam7 util. > > Simple step: - flash the work system - loady put you version of u-boot and run go Regards Michael ---

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, it is skipped. From what I understood Bootstrap does the > > necessary boot init tasks (althought I would rather put it in uboot). > > Do I need to changs this? > > > > > No, > > I will try to help you. Do you check the new size, format,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

Hi, > Yes, it is skipped. From what I understood Bootstrap does the > necessary boot init tasks (althought I would rather put it in uboot). > Do I need to changs this? > > No, I will try to help you. Do you check the new size, format, etc... The new size fit in you flash, do you write somenthi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > E Robertson wrote: > > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > So, do you change the text base? > > > >>> No I did not. I don't have a reason to. Why? > >>> > Is the new size compatible with the armboot

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

Hi, E Robertson wrote: > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> So, do you change the text base? >>> No I did not. I don't have a reason to. Why? >>> Is the new size compatible with the armboot? Do you skip LOW_LEVEL_INIT? Regards Michael

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > >> So, do you change the text base? > >> > > > > No I did not. I don't have a reason to. Why? > > > > > Sorry I think that you talk about config.mk > board//config.mk > > TEXT_BASE = 0x21f0 > On the 9263 it is 0x23F0 and I believe I ch

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] 8xx: Add OF support to adder87x board

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:12:24AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > +#define OF_CPU "PowerPC,[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > +#define OF_SOC "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Do we really still need this? We should be able to search by compatible or device_type instead of using

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

Hi, >> So, do you change the text base? >> > > No I did not. I don't have a reason to. Why? > > Sorry I think that you talk about config.mk board//config.mk TEXT_BASE = 0x21f0 - This SF.net email is sponsored by:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > E Robertson wrote: > > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >>> Hi All, > >>> I made some changes to u-boot-1.1.5 atmel patch 1.5 and rebuild uboot. > >>> However, after rebuilding it would not run uboot. > >>> Has anyon

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] 8xx: Add FDT support to 8xx

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:11:42AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > + do_fixup_by_prop_u32(blob, "device_type", "cpu", 4, > + "timebase-frequency", bd->bi_busfreq / 8, 1); I don't think this is correct for 8xx... use get_tbclk(). -Scott --

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

E Robertson wrote: > On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Hi All, >>> I made some changes to u-boot-1.1.5 atmel patch 1.5 and rebuild uboot. >>> However, after rebuilding it would not run uboot. >>> Has anyone had this problem before? >>> >>> >> What type of

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

On 2/12/08, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Hi All, > > I made some changes to u-boot-1.1.5 atmel patch 1.5 and rebuild uboot. > > However, after rebuilding it would not run uboot. > > Has anyone had this problem before? > > > What type of changes? Makefile and config.mk files for my

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ide arm support

Hi, > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:58:23PM +0100, michael wrote: > >> The code is fill with ugly ifdef. >> > > That probably shouldn't be read as permission to add a few more... > > :(, ok >> Can you suggest me something better? >> > > Implement outsw for arm? > > ladis > > I

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ide arm support

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:58:23PM +0100, michael wrote: > The code is fill with ugly ifdef. That probably shouldn't be read as permission to add a few more... > Can you suggest me something better? Implement outsw for arm? ladis

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

Hi, > Hi All, > I made some changes to u-boot-1.1.5 atmel patch 1.5 and rebuild uboot. > However, after rebuilding it would not run uboot. > Has anyone had this problem before? > What type of changes? > If I rewrite the dataflash with the pre-built uboot image, then it > boots so I guess I might

[U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

Hi All, I made some changes to u-boot-1.1.5 atmel patch 1.5 and rebuild uboot. However, after rebuilding it would not run uboot. Has anyone had this problem before? If I rewrite the dataflash with the pre-built uboot image, then it boots so I guess I might be missing something. DataFlash is enabled

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [new uImage] Code available on new-image branch of u-boot-testing repo

On Feb 7, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka wrote: > >> Kumar Gala wrote: >>> Here is a rough patch to common/cmd_bootm.c that passed load_end >>> down to >>> the do_bootm_* commands. I haven't updated the lib_*/bootm.c at >>> this >>> point

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] fdt: Fixup compile error and add a new OF manipulation option

> > I was thinking that some sort of define would be the least invasive way of > > changing that with a view to the least amount of change being the most > > likely to be acceptable to other developers - not necessarily the best way > > to do the thing > > I think you have an older versio

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: Speed up get_ddr_freq() and get_bus_freq()

From: James Yang get_ddr_freq() and get_bus_freq() used get_sys_info() each time they were called. However, get_sys_info() recalculates extraneous information when called each time. Have get_ddr_freq() and get_bus_freq() return memoized values from global_data instead. Signed-off-by: James Yang

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] QE: Move FDT support into a common file

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> Move the flat device tree setup for QE related devices into >> a common file shared between 83xx & 85xx platforms that have QE's. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Applied, thanks. > > Best regards, > > Wol

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: Show DDR memory data rate in addition to the memory clock frequency.

From: James Yang Show the DDR memory data rate in addition to the memory clock frequency. For DDR/DDR2 memories the memory data rate is 2x the memory clock. Signed-off-by: James Yang Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- In my git tree as well. cpu/mpc85xx/cpu.c |9 ++--- 1

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: get_tbclk() speed up and rounding fix

From: James Yang Speed up get_tbclk() by referencing pre-computed bus clock frequency value from global data instead of sys_info_t. Fix rounding of result to nearest; previously it was rounding upwards. Signed-off-by: James Yang Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- In my git tree a

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] fdt: Fixup compile error and add a new OF manipulation option

Hi Jerry, On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Jerry Van Baren wrote: > I think you have an older version of fdt_support.c. Check the latest > version - the above check is no longer in there. That was a change that > went in towards the end of the last patch window. > >

[U-Boot-Users] Bug in cpu/74xx_7xx/speed.c ?

Hello, during test with the 1.3.1 Version of u-boot, i have noticed, that the calculation of the cpu speed for a 1GHz 750GX is wrong. Here is a patch to fix the problem, it is done the same way as for the other supported cpu's. Kind regards Reinhard Arlt -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: Re: ide arm support

Hi, > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Peter Pearse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 12 February 2008 09:57 >> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: ide arm support >> >> Michael >> >> I have little IDE knowledge - I'm hoping some one who >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] fdt: Fixup compile error and add a new OF manipulation option

Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:27:14 -0500 > Jerry Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > >> Hi Bryan, >> >> I don't think CONFIG_OF_CHOSEN_UPDATE is needed. If it *is* needed, I >> don't think it *should be* needed and we need to discuss scenarios

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Delete all env vars except read onlys

Hi Matthias, On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > I am wondering if there is a way to delete all environment variables > but not the readonly ones. The common way to delete all variables > is to make the environment CRC invalid an do a reset. After reset > a saveenv saves a default

[U-Boot-Users] FW: Re: ide arm support

> -Original Message- > From: Peter Pearse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 February 2008 09:57 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: ide arm support > > Michael > > I have little IDE knowledge - I'm hoping some one who > doe

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] fdt: Fixup compile error and add a new OF manipulation option

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:27:14 -0500 Jerry Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > Hi Bryan, > > I don't think CONFIG_OF_CHOSEN_UPDATE is needed. If it *is* needed, I > don't think it *should be* needed and we need to discuss scenarios. Hey Jerry. I'd have to say I fun

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] fdt: Fixup compile error and add a new OF manipulation option

Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > Greetings. > > This patch fixes up a compile error that crept with with debug switched on. > Introduces CONFIG_OF_CHOSEN_UPDATE - which is useful if you have a /chosen > entry in the dts - which doesn't contain a bootargs entry - in which case > you'd > want u-boot's ver

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] 8xx: Add OF support to adder87x board

Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > Fits in with recent work done in Linux. > > Adds u-boot support in conjunction with two previous patches to boot a Linux > uImage in conjunction with a .dtb generated from the in-tree > adder875-uboot.dts > in recent PowerPC Linux kernel patches. > > Works too ! > > Si

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM AT91 Ethernet address register

> -Original Message- > From: Rafal Jaworowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 February 2008 11:52 > To: Peter Pearse > Cc: u-boot-users > Subject: ARM AT91 Ethernet address register > > Hi Peter, > > What is the reason the MAC address on the AT91 is written in > the 2nd address

[U-Boot-Users] ARM AT91 Ethernet address register

Hi Peter, What is the reason the MAC address on the AT91 is written in the 2nd address register, leaving the first one out? Is there something particular about this? See cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c, eth_init() ... p_mac->EMAC_SA2L = ... ... The reason I ask is this may confuse OS driver if no

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Patch for ARM optimized memcpy/memmove routines

> -Original Message- > From: David Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 February 2008 19:49 > To: Peter Pearse > Subject: Patch for ARM optimized memcpy/memmove routines > > > > This page refers to the 071107_mem which I am unable to get > with git, it seems to time out: >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM: Move duplicated exception handling code into lib_arm

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Andreas Engel > Sent: 08 February 2008 12:15 > To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [resent #3] ARM: Move > duplicated exception handling code into lib_arm >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot patch submission process

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:25:26 +0100 Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Haavard, > > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > But if Wolfgang doesn't wake up and apply a fix pretty soon, I guess > > that might be exactly what's going to happen. > > Please believe me, I'm not

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [ARM] how to Relocate arm startup code

Hebbar The U-Boot code for all ARM supplied development boards ASSUMES that the ARM Boot Monitor has run to remap flash to SDRAM. The Versatile User Guide contains details of how the Versatile acts at power up and soft or hard reset, according to what switch settings are set. The

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ide arm support

Michael I have little IDE knowledge - I'm hoping some one who does will pick up this patch. Regards Peter - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] MPC85xx, MPC83xx: Add/Fix UPM configuration support

> > Definitely true, but that's a delicate change. For instance, this UPM > > patch has the same logics for the 83xx & 85xx platforms, but the > > registers are different. Unifying this code should result in lots of > > ugly ifdefs. > > which registers are different? Well, not quite the register

Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot patch submission process

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 February 2008 23:25 > To: Haavard Skinnemoen > Cc: Dirk Behme; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; u-boot-users; Peter Pearse > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot patch submission process > --- snip --- > So > please

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Patch for ARM optimized memcpy/memmove routines

> -Original Message- > From: David Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 February 2008 19:49 > To: Peter Pearse > Subject: Patch for ARM optimized memcpy/memmove routines > > > Hi Peter, > > I have been trying shorten our boot-time (Linux on a pxa27x), > and am using a short as

[U-Boot-Users] Delete all env vars except read onlys

Hi, I am wondering if there is a way to delete all environment variables but not the readonly ones. The common way to delete all variables is to make the environment CRC invalid an do a reset. After reset a saveenv saves a default environment. What I want to do is to delete all variables (prefer

[U-Boot-Users] ramdisk problem (once again?)

Hi I am experiencing problems using a ramdisk with Das u-boot, and although I have been reading the previous questions and answers in the mailing list I cannot solve the question. The problem: I can start a Linux kernel and its filesystem from flash (linux image made using mkimage, and filesystem

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Extend ATI Radeon driver to support more video modes

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 08:42:08PM +0100, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > Adds ATI Radeon 9200 support for 1280x1024, 1024x768, > 800x600, 640x480 at 24, 16 and 8 bpp. Hope this patch > won't screw up X300 and X700 support. Can someone test/check this issue? :) > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <[E