Andrew E. Mileski wrote:
Norbert van Bolhuis wrote:
Nowadays, do many (PowerPC) embedded devices already risk omitting
NOR flash and use a NAND device solely for booting and storing images ?
I'm talking about systems with 10 years life-cycle (so no
MP3-players nor medical systems but
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kyungmin Park,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Since page size field is changed from oobblock to writesize. But OneNAND is
not updated.
- fix bufferram management at erase operation
This patch includes the NAND/OneNAND state filed too.
generated against
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 09:11:02AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
Since page size field is changed from oobblock to writesize. But OneNAND is
not updated.
- fix bufferram management at erase operation
This patch includes the NAND/OneNAND state filed too.
Applied to nand-flash, with some
The following changes since commit 81c4dc39797e88ebbde14bb4b711f9588f197680:
Stefan Roese (1):
Merge branch 'master' of /home/stefan/git/u-boot/u-boot
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-nand-flash.git master
Steve Sakoman (1):
OneNAND: Remove
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:06:20AM +0200, Fathi BOUDRA wrote:
-void onenand_print_device_info(int device, int verbose)
+char * onenand_print_device_info(int device)
No space after unary '*' (here and elsewhere).
{
int vcc, demuxed, ddp, density;
-
- if (!verbose)
-
Fathi BOUDRA wrote:
Why not just declare a static array?
I tried with a static array but it doesn't give the expected result (a quick
test with onenand info command returns an empty mtd name), so I used a
pointer.
Odd... Maybe a relocation issue?
It'd be better to use snprintf, even if
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:47:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Well, the version 2 prefix is kind of already taken by Sascha Hauers
alternative implementation.
Should we go for 2.x.x anyway?
May I suggest CC.YY.MM?
VERSION = Century number
PATCHLEVEL =
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 04:42:51PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Oops? This is expected and normal behaviour. Did anybody complain
about this?
It's hit me before when I foolishly try to load something at address
zero -- why do we put u-boot at the
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 09:42:07PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
block = offs / CFG_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE;
+ blocks = (uboot_size + offs - ((block - 1) * CFG_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE) - 1) /
+ CFG_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE;
blockcopy_count = 0;
- while (blockcopy_count
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 03:08:04PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
It's a large-page device. And, as far as I understand the datasheet, to
read data at arbitrary offset in a page, you first have to issue a READ
PAGE (READ0) for _the_ _whole_ page, then you can use RANDOM DATA READ to
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Version 5: This time based on nand-flash/testing head. Therefore it
couldn't be runtime-tested: largepage support in nand_spl is broken there
ATM.
Hmm, so it is. I don't have hardware that uses the cmd_ctrl interface to
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 03:36:43PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
/*
- * offs has to be aligned to a block address!
+ * offs has to be aligned to a page address!
*/
block = offs / CFG_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE;
+ /* Recalculate offs as an offset inside a block */
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Scott Wood wrote:
Are you saying that your NAND chip can't read the OOB by issuing READ0
with the appropriate column address? Which chip is this, and where can I
find a manual?
At least, this is how I understood it, I might be wrong though
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:06:28AM +0200, Fathi BOUDRA wrote:
-void onenand_print_device_info(int device, int verbose)
+char * onenand_print_device_info(int device)
{
int vcc, demuxed, ddp, density;
-
- if (!verbose)
- return;
+ char *dev_info;
vcc =
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:16:13PM -0500, Jatin Sharma wrote:
I have to increase u-boot's partition size on my board to make room
for an application to be compiled as part of u-boot binary. I am
currently running u-boot version 1.3.1-rc1 and my current NOR
partition is as follows:
Partition
Jatin Sharma wrote:
After I posted this message, I learned the reset vector for the PPC
architecture lies at 0xFFF00100.
Well, it depends on what kind of PPC chip...
Does it mean the u-boot has to start
at the address 0xFFF0?
Yes (or possibly zero, if the RCW is set appropriately).
If
Jatin Sharma wrote:
I have Freescale MPC8347. Can you confirm that I have to have U-Boot
start at 0xFFF0?
Your choices are 0xfff0 and zero, based on the BMS (Boot Memory
Space) bit of the low reset control word.
-Scott
Scott Wood wrote:
Jatin Sharma wrote:
I have Freescale MPC8347. Can you confirm that I have to have U-Boot
start at 0xFFF0?
Your choices are 0xfff0 and zero, based on the BMS (Boot Memory
Space) bit of the low reset control word.
Grr, that should say high reset control word
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
So just run the needed commands before you run bootm as part of your
boot command sequence.
This doesnt work. Lets say I want to remove a node or property that
ft_board_setup() adds. If I do what you are suggesting the
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:42:43PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 33 +
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
Why not? Wouldn't it be just another environment variable, like the
load address for the kernel?
Right now the fdt is placed at the first 4k page after the kernel is
decompressed. I don't now where that address is.
Do we
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 02:45:33PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
I _think_ this should work with all NAND chips. Otherwise we might have to
introduce a configuration variable.
Which small-page NAND chips can't handle READOOB? On large page devices,
nand_command changes it to READ0.
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 02:46:15PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_NAND_SPL
+static u_char nand_read_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd)
+{
+ struct nand_chip *this = mtd-priv;
+ return readb(this-IO_ADDR_R);
+}
+
+static void nand_write_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash/testing.
include/configs/MPC8313ERDB.h |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/MPC8313ERDB.h b/include/configs/MPC8313ERDB.h
index d547681..3a644d3 100644
--- a/include
current
revisions have). If you have such a board, please let me know if it
works after a warm reset.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash/testing.
Makefile| 10 ++-
board/freescale/mpc8313erdb/config.mk
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:20:39AM +0200, Fathi BOUDRA wrote:
TODO: Use NAND command interface (e.g.: part_validate_*nand()).
Do you mean merging the NAND and OneNAND versions of the jffs2 code,
through the (mostly already existing) function pointer interface?
I'd really like to see that done
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:01:18PM +0100, Nigel Hathaway wrote:
I have been playing around with a board from Olimex: the SAM9-L9260 (it
has an Atmel AT91SAM9260 on it). This has a ROMboot with U-Boot in NAND
flash. The board I am using has an interesting feature: the block which
U-Boot is
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 04:30:06PM +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
Fixes an issue with chip-state not always being set causing troubles.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:31:07PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
/* 2 Gigabit */
- {NAND 256MiB 1,8V 8-bit, 0xAA, 0, 256, 0,
NAND_SAMSUNG_LP_OPTIONS | NAND_NO_AUTOINCR},
- {NAND 256MiB 3,3V 8-bit, 0xDA, 0, 256, 0,
NAND_SAMSUNG_LP_OPTIONS | NAND_NO_AUTOINCR},
-
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:22:24AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 04:23:34PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
Use the common declaration in NAND/OneNAND state
As previously requested, please base
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:37:35PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This board seems to be using the legacy NAND interface, but doesn't
define CFG_NAND_LEGACY. It also doesn't define CONFIG_CMD_NAND; if one
does so, then it gets build errors (with or
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:52:12AM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote:
I didn't want to use u-boot's slient boot options, since they're
hard-coded at compile time. The only place I could think to this was to
modify the atmel_usart.c file as above.
It's not hard-coded at compile-time -- set
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:48:51PM +0800, Ryan CHEN wrote:
Description:
The patch updates /fs/ext2/ext2fs.c file. There are two aims:
1. Make U-Boot could support the EXT2 dynamic version that ext2_inode_size
beyond 128bytes.
One new feature be involved: CFG_EXT2_SUPPORT_DYNAMIC_REV
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Aligning with TABs (or at all, in initializer lists) is not a good thing,
It is mandatory per Coding Style requirements.
Where? I don't see any mention of alignment, and while there's no
explicit definition of indentation, the
Ben Warren wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One topic that come up during OLS in discussions and u-boot BOF was
the idea of driving u-boot configuration from a device tree instead of
from config.h. I was wondering if anyone has actually looked at
Ben Warren wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find a device tree much easier to figure out than a tangled mess of header
files, #defines, and #ifdefs...
In many ways, yes. But are you an average Joe or a Linux kernel
propellerhead?
Is u-boot
Ben Warren wrote:
Uh, yeah. I like the idea of a central repo for hardware info, and
the device tree concept is good. My point is that the syntax, while
concise and exact, can be intimidating. Just look at the amount of
traffic on the mailing lists of people that don't understand what all
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 28, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
In principle I like the idea of having configuration retrieved from
the device tree blob, but the idea of reflashing the blob in the
context of u-boot scares me. In particular, if u-boot depends too
much on the presence of
Can someone with the appropriate access run git-update-server-info on
u-boot-nand-flash.git? Currently, it is impossible to clone this
repository via HTTP.
Ideally, this should run via a post-receive hook...
-Scott
-
This
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:03:43PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
+
+static const struct sdram_config sdram_config = {
+.data_bits= SDRAM_DATA_16BIT,
+.row_bits= 13,
+.col_bits= 9,
+.bank_bits= 2,
+.cas= 3,
+.twr
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 04:23:34PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
Use the common declaration in NAND/OneNAND state
As previously requested, please base this patch against the testing
branch of the u-boot-nand-flash repository.
-Scott
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:10:02AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h b/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h
index 4b0c2df..903c3af 100644
--- a/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h
+++ b/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
/* Note: The header order is
This fixes building out-of-tree.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash.
nand_spl/board/amcc/kilauea/Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nand_spl/board/amcc/kilauea/Makefile
b/nand_spl/board/amcc/kilauea
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:18:31PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
- at91rm9200dk:
In file included from /home/wd/git/u-boot/work/include/nand.h:32,
from board.c:48:
/home/wd/git/u-boot/work/include/linux/mtd/nand.h:82:1: warning:
NAND_CTL_SETCLE redefined
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:11:12PM +0530, Vijay Nikam wrote:
Hello All,
I have mpc8313erdb evaluation board ... now I am trying to boot it
from NAND Flash (32MB Flash) ... I am able to get u-boot prompt ...
but the linux kernel is not booting and so filesystem is not mounting
...
It says
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:11:29PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
+#if defined(CFG_ENV_OFFSET_OOB)
Can you push this conditional into the Makefile?
+int do_dynenv(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_info[0];
+ int ret, size = 8;
+
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:22:56AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
+static int part_validate_onenand(struct mtdids *id, struct part_info *part)
+{
+#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_ONENAND)
+ /* info for OneNAND chips */
+ struct mtd_info *mtd;
+
+ mtd = onenand_mtd;
+
+ if ((unsigned
Some macros such as NAND_CTL_SETALE conflict between current and legacy
NAND, being defined by the subsystem in the former case and the board
config file in the latter.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash.
include/nand.h |5 -
1 files changed, 4
warning due to missing env_ptr casts to u_char * in env_nand.c.
Scott Wood (2):
NAND: Rename DEBUG to MTDDEBUG to avoid namespace pollution.
NAND: ifdef-protect most of nand.h when using legacy NAND.
common/env_nand.c |8 ++--
cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/nand.c
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
From: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using current driver elbc sometimes hangs during nand write. Reading back
last byte helps though (thanks to Scott Wood for the idea).
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:37:13AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
4026 06/18 Jason McMullan [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mtd: SPI Flash:
Winbond W25X16/WX2532/WX2564 support 4027 06/19 Jason McMullan
[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mtd: SPI Flash: Support the ST Microelectronics
M25P80 and
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 04:04:20PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
[PATCH] add new NAND_DONT_CRATE_BBT flag
This patch makes creation of the BBT optional.
It adds a new platform-independent NAND-wide flag NAND_DONT_CREATE_BBT
The testing branch of u-boot-nand-flash already has
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 04:04:56PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
- do_nand: ask for confirmation for nand erase
This will break any usage in scripts. At least, have an explicit command
such as nand erase all that doesn't ask.
- do_nand: add command nand createbbt to erase NAND and create a new
Jens Gehrlein wrote:
Today, I updated my local git tree to the current U-Boot. Running my
board I saw the message RAM Configuration:, which didn't appear before.
I think the reason is the following:
nand.h includes linux/mtd/mtd.h, which defines a macro
#define DEBUG(n, args...) do { }
Jason McMullan wrote:
Currently, nand dump.oob is a no-op.
This commit makes it functional.
nand dump.oob is implemented in the testing branch of u-boot-nand-flash,
which I hope to merge next window.
-Scott
-
Sponsored
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:31:18AM +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote:
It seems odd that backwards compatibility requires turning *off* an
option with compatible in the name... I'd invert the sense of the
ifdef, and have it be something like CFG_BROKEN_ECC_COMPATIBILITY.
The concern with
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:02:47PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
This patch is the first step to consolidate the UIC related defines in the
4xx headers. Move header from asm-ppc/ppc4xx-intvec.h to
asm-ppc/ppc4xx-uic.h as it will hold all UIC related defines in the next
steps.
Signed-off-by:
Ilya Yanok wrote:
diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
index 37eb41b..6f5d13d 100644
--- a/common/cmd_nand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
@@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
char *argv[])
}
nand = nand_info[nand_curr_device];
+
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:04:55AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
rohit h wrote:
Hello everyone.
I have got a modified u-boot source which boots vanilla 2.6.22 kernel,
but is unable to boot vanilla 2.6.25.
1.1.4 is too old to boot such a modern kernel.
No, it's not -- it should be quite
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 01:20:28PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:04:55AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
rohit h wrote:
Hello everyone.
I have got a modified u-boot source which boots vanilla 2.6.22 kernel,
but is unable to boot vanilla 2.6.25.
1.1.4 is too old
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:03:47PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1)Is NAND BOOT possible on MPC8323?
No, 8323 does not support NAND booting. You need a chip with an enhanced
local bus controller (831x, 837x).
Please don't post the same question multiple times, and please fix the date
on your
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 04:30:06PM +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
Fixes an issue with chip-state not always being set causing troubles.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
This is particularly problematic now that non-NAND-specific code is
including nand.h, and thus all debugging code is being compiled
regardless of whether it was requested, as reported by Scott McNutt
[EMAIL PROTECTED].
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/nand.c
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:42:29AM -0400, Scott McNutt wrote:
lib_arm/board.c now includes nand.h
which in turn includes linux/mtd/mtd.h
which defines DEBUG
So all of the #ifdef DEBUG code is getting built, which I'm sure
isn't intentional.
I'm not sure if this was already fixed
mark roths wrote:
Sorry if this has been covered already, the problem exists in all the u-boot
versions I have up to 1.2.0.
1.2.0 is rather old; you should check the latest code when submitting
bug reports and patches.
*** ../u-boot-1.1.5/drivers/nand/nand_ecc.c 2006-10-20
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:58:07AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
While compiling Hugo's Lyrtech SFFSDR board patch on a very recent git,
I ran into this problem. (Warning, this patch comes from Thunderbird,
I'm on vacation :)
diff --git a/common/env_nand.c b/common/env_nand.c
index
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 02:01:29PM +0200, Morten Ebbell Hestens wrote:
patch for branch mtd-2.6.22.1 on git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nand-flash.git
nand read(.jffs2|.e|.i) skips bad blocks during read.
write(.jffs2|.e|.i) skips bad blocks during write
nand read will read 0xff for bad block.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 02:35:36PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
I have to admit that I don't remember all the details anymore. And I don't
have the time to fully review those changes again right now. So if you
really need my Signed-off-by for me handling/merging those patches from
William, here
--
common/cmd_scsi.c | 15 ---
common/cmd_usb.c | 15 ---
6 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
NAND and DOC bits Acked-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Scott
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 12:29:26PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
diff --git a/common/cmd_fdt.c b/common/cmd_fdt.c
index ede65ae..8592128 100644
--- a/common/cmd_fdt.c
+++ b/common/cmd_fdt.c
@@ -403,7 +403,8 @@ int do_fdt (cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char
*argv[])
}
There are several patches from William Juul in the mtd-2.6.22.1 branch of
u-boot-nand-flash that are missing Signed-off-by lines. William or
Stefan, can you provide sign-offs for these?
-Scott
-
Check out the new
The following changes since commit 8155efbd7ae9c65564ca98affe94631d612ae088:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of ssh://mercury/home/wd/git/u-boot/master
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-nand-flash.git master
Stuart Wood (1):
erase percentage output
Scott Wood (3):
NAND: Provide a sane default for NAND_MAX_CHIPS.
Make onenand_uboot.h self-sufficient.
Remove prototypes of nand_init() in favor of including nand.h.
Stuart Wood (1):
env_nand.c: Added bad block management for environment variables
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
One advantage of the current nand_spl subsystem is that it uses the same NAND
board/platform driver as the normal, full blown U-Boot NAND subsystem does.
So there is no need to maintain multiple NAND drivers for one board/platform.
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 08:22:21AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Monday 02 June 2008, Grant Erickson wrote:
Before I jump in with the BDI and start debugging, has anyone else using
'nboot' and FIT images noticed that 'nboot' periodically fails where 'nand
read.i' of the SAME
Stefan Roese wrote:
On Monday 02 June 2008, Scott Wood wrote:
but even then I'd
rather use the space for things like SPD-based SDRAM initialization.
Are you talking about a full-blown I2C SPD DIMM detection and
autoconfiguration? The code I know from 4xx is much too complicated and big
Stefan Roese wrote:
This patch removes the SDRAM initilization call initdram() from
nand_boot(). This is done mainly because I experienced problems with
some boards like Kilauea (405EX), which don't have internal SRAM (OCM)
and relocation needs to be done to SDRAM before the NAND controller
can get accessed. When initdram() is called later on in nand_boot(),
this can lead to problems with variables in the bss sections like
nand_ecc_pos[].
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please send via the 4xx tree in order for the initdram
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:05:28PM -0400, Stuart Wood wrote:
Scott, I this this one is it, and thnaks for pointing out the
nand_erase_opts() function.
Stuart
---
Modified to check for bad blocks and to skipping over them when
CFG_ENV_RANGE has been defined.
CFG_ENV_RANGE must be larger
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:09:30PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions
This patch adds more macro definitions for the UPM Machine Mode Registers
They are copied from include/mpc82xx.h to simplify the merge of all 8xxx
common local bus
Grant Erickson wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion. That solved it. As an academic exercise, is there
any practical reason a system would want to use nboot, as I erroneously
chose to do, without .i|.jffs2|.e?
I don't think so, though I don't know the history involved. Does anyone
actually use
*/
- if (fun-width != 1)
+ if (fun-width != 8 fun-width != 16 fun-width != 32)
The above comment looks like it should be removed.
Otherwise, Acked-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feel free to send via a powerpc tree due to the dependencies.
-Scott
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:15:16AM -0700, Ron Madrid wrote:
New board SIMPC8313 support: nand_spl
Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
---
nand_spl/board/sheldon/simpc8313/Makefile | 91
+++
nand_spl/board/sheldon/simpc8313/config.mk | 50
+++
Ron Madrid wrote:
New board SIMPC8313 support: nand support
I realize that perhaps these files should be in the
drivers/mtd/nand folder, but I have been informed by
Scott Wood that he will be soon working on nand
support for the MPC83XX(?) family of chips. So these
will be considered
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 02:01:09PM -0700, Ron Madrid wrote:
So does this mean that I need to now base all of my patches off of the
mtd-2.6.22.1 branch on the
u-boot-nand-flash tree? How do the two (u-boot and u-boot-nand-flash)
coincide, or don't they?
It looks like in the Makefile of the
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:02:54PM -0700, Ron Madrid wrote:
So am I just stuck until then, since we clearly shouldn't put old drivers
into the code, but the
mtd branch is not rebased yet?
Yes, unless you want to target the current mtd-2.6.22.1 branch (I don't
know how much has changed that
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 06:47:21AM +0800, Liu Dave wrote:
---
cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 310
---
1 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
index 309eb30..39bcaa8 100644
---
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:31:28AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
#define bin_at(i) ((mbinptr)((char*)(av_[2*(i) + 2]) - 2*SIZE_SZ))
#define next_bin(b)((mbinptr)((char*)(b) + 2 * sizeof(mbinptr)))
#define prev_bin(b)((mbinptr)((char*)(b) - 2 * sizeof(mbinptr)))
..
#define top
Scott Wood wrote:
+size_t end;
+int ret_val = 0;
+end = offset + CFG_ENV_SIZE;
+
+for (; offset end; offset += nand_info[0].erasesize) {
+if (nand_block_isbad(nand_info[0],offset))
+ret_val = 1;
+}
+
+return ret_val;
size_t end
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:31:09AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
On Wednesday 28 May 2008, Sergei Poselenov wrote:
What is the reason for doing this? Compiler issues? I see the direct
pointer addressing is used all over the 85xx code.
Either the compiler or the hardware could reorder direct
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
This patch moves Freescale Localbus defines out of mpc83xx.h, so we could
use it on MPC85xx and MPC86xx processors.
Can we similarly merge lbus83xx_t with ccsr_lbc?
-Scott
-
This SF.net email is
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:01:14AM -0400, Stuart Wood wrote:
Hi All, This is my first attempt at submitting a change so please be
patient and kind. This change allows for the environment variables to be
stored in a rand of nand flash. If the first block is bad then the
environment is stored in
erase percentage output
Scott Wood (3):
NAND: Provide a sane default for NAND_MAX_CHIPS.
Make onenand_uboot.h self-sufficient.
Remove prototypes of nand_init() in favor of including nand.h.
Stelian Pop (1):
Cleanup nand_info[] declaration.
common/cmd_nand.c
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 08:12:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
This patch adds support for NAND FLASH on the TQM8548. It is disabled by
default and can be enabled for the TQM8548 modules. Note that the R/B pin
is not supported by that module requiring to use the specified maximum
delay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
The warnings are harmless but annoying. Let's fix them.
If the warnings are harmless, why are you fixing them?
Warnings are never completely harmless -- they make it harder to notice
other warnings that point out real problems.
The
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 05:31:24PM +0200, Stelian Pop wrote:
The nand_info array is declared as extern in several .c files.
Those days, nand.h contains a reference to the array, so there is
no need to declare it elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Stelian Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
common/cmd_nand.c
Likewise with onenand_init().
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
lib_arm/board.c | 10 ++
lib_ppc/board.c |4 +---
lib_sh/board.c |2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib_arm/board.c b/lib_arm/board.c
index 67506b3..5e04553 100644
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:52:26PM +0200, Stelian Pop wrote:
This patch modifies the nand_init() routine and makes it return the
total detected NAND size, since this information can be useful to the
caller.
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash.
-Scott
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 10:50 Thu 22 May , Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:52:26PM +0200, Stelian Pop wrote:
This patch modifies the nand_init() routine and makes it return the
total detected NAND size, since this information can be useful to the
caller
From: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using current driver elbc sometimes hangs during nand write. Reading back
last byte helps though (thanks to Scott Wood for the idea).
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/mtd/nand
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
