1SAM9G41) || \
defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9M10) || \
defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9M11) || \
defined(CONFIG_AT91CAP9) || \
defined(CONFIG_AT572D940)
This statement will have to be updated every time a new MCU is released.
Having the statment
#if defined(CONFIG_AT91)
should definitely reduce the main
/Linux4SAM/U-Boot
You will need:
ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/u-boot/u-boot-1.1.5.tar.bz2and
applyftp://www.linux4sam.org/pub/uboot/u-boot-1.1.5_atmel_1.6/u-boot-1.1.5_atmel_1.6.diff
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Atmel Nordic AB
Mai
have any AT91 boards?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Atmel Nordic AB
Mail: Box 2033, 174 02 Sundbyberg, Sweden
Visit: Kavallerivägen 24, 174 58 Sundbyberg, Sweden
Phone +46 (8) 441 54 22 Fax +46 (8) 441 54 29
G
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:19:47 +0200
> "Ulf Samuelsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
>>> It's a bit hard to see what your proposal is all about when you
>>> create a new file instead of m
w SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
> ___
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://
g OE-QuoteFix.
> <http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/>
My main problem is how to get my 500-1000 email sorting rules
over to a new client, so QuoteFix is probably the best choice.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
ards,
Antonio
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/serv
r card found
> No MMC card found
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Best Regards,
>
> Pierre
>
>
I do not think that Antonio has any AT91SAM9260 boards.
Pls check what is happening with a JTAG emulator and propose a patch.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
---
uld work?
>
>> flash_LED.bin" system also hangs...
>
> Probably because you are overwriting the exception vectors?
>
>> I must say that with my dev. board comes an "hello world" example which is
>> an
>> empty function :-( -- but even I don
gt;env_valid. Or, put the other way round, we always set
> GD_FLG_RELOC long before gd->env_valid get's set.
>
> Thus your change above is just redundant.
>
>
> Now, if your board does not perform proper relocation
st about
anything than a parallel flash, maybe it is better to have a
CONFIG_COPY_TO_SDRAM than its negative form.
Whats the big benefit of beeing able to select where U-boot runs?
I could understand if there was a need for a compile time parameter.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
--
utility
generating the binary during the build
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still
f should maybe be common with avr32.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use pri
o DBGU.
Aborted by pressing a combination of keys (Ctrl-C three times?).
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don
e list, too.
>
Fine,
Once someone replaces the flash driver for the DK with CFI driver, and test
it...
I can use this as the base for an AT91RM9200EK patch.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Atmel Nordic AB
Mail: Box 2033, 174 02 Sundbyberg, Sweden
Visit: Kavalleriväg
mel specific version for which there exist no good method
for non-Atmel people to submit patches.
I think the most practical approach to allow getting rid of the Atmel specific
version is to include the legacy stuff (AT91RM9200 related) first.
Then move the shared stuff to an board/atmel/common directory
to
ch uses it.
I plan to submit these patches later, but they depend on having other things
included.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year&#x
>
> Le lundi 14 avril 2008 à 08:00 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit :
>> > Le samedi 12 avril 2008 à 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit :
>> >> Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
>> >
>> > Is there any added value on using the atmel flash d
> Le samedi 12 avril 2008 à 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit :
>> Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
>
> Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the
> standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9
> board
>
> Le samedi 12 avril 2008 à 22:06 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit :
>> Add support for the AT91RM9200EK Board.
>
> Hi Ulf,
>
> I do have a few issues with your patch. As you have seen, I started
> adapting the Atmel changes for the AT91SAM boards, and in doing so I
Add support for the AT91RM9200EK Board.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -urN u-boot.cmp/board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/at91rm9200ek.c u-boot/board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/at91rm9200ek.c
--- u-boot.cmp/board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/at91rm9200ek.c 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
Add environment for the date when U-Boot is built
Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -urN u-boot.cmp/Makefile u-boot/Makefile
--- u-boot.cmp/Makefile 2008-04-12 20:56:58.0 +0200
+++ u-boot/Makefile 2008-04-12 21:06:23.0 +0200
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -urN u-boot.cmp/include/flash.h u-boot/include/flash.h
--- u-boot.cmp/include/flash.h 2008-04-12 07:05:17.0 +0200
+++ u-boot/include/flash.h 2008-04-12 20:57:51.0 +0200
@@
Rearrange ARM boards in Makefile so that ARM926EJ-S boards
are no longer under ARM92xT header.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
diff -urN u-boot.cmp/Makefile u-boot/Makefile
--- u-boot.cmp/Makefile 2008-04-12 07:05:14.0 +0200
+++
ctor/page boundaries.
The CONFIG_NEW_DF_PARTITION was used to create named partitions
This is now the default operation, and the CONFIG variable is removed.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -urN u-boot-0rg/board/atmel/at91cap9adk/Makefile u-boot/board/atmel/at91cap9adk/Mak
are developer when the
>> flash memory space is a critical resource.
>
> Frankly, if you are so short with flash you have a h/w design problem.
>
Lots of applications are cost sensitive, and shaving 50 cents he
> On Thursday 20 March 2008, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Ulf Samuelsson atmel.com> writes:
>> > > Too bad. I think it would be a good idea, if "they" would try to work
>> > > with the "official" U-Boot community again. Now with the custod
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> >> Would it not be better if the Atmel ARM was handled by the Atmel AT91
>> >> Product line
>> >
>> > Could be, I really don't know. I don't remember seeing Atmel ARM patches
>>
> On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> > Here a short announcement about a change in the U-Boot ARM custodianship:
>> >
>> > Since the ARM platform is so broad and has multiple vendor
>> > specific "sub-architectures" it seemed necess
lp is really appreciated.
>
Would it not be better if the Atmel ARM was handled by the Atmel AT91 Product
line
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R
> Is anyone doing any work on this for u-boot?
>
> Thanks,
>
I think that the Atmel U-Boot at www.linux4sam.org has USB host support
allowing access to a USB memory.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
This SF.
SRAM. Only big difference is that the SAM9XE has
2 x TWI instead of one, and only 6 serial ports instead of 7.
I think it would be much easier to get U-boot running on the SAM9XE.
It also has an Ethernet controller so you can do fast downloads.
Also, it runs at 200 MHz instead of the ~50 MHz of the
?
Then the code is simply wrong.
If you run from a serial flash, then the code is already relocated
and is executing from SDRAM at this point, so the code will crash.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
This SF.net email is s
ult settings.
>> >
I see this as essential and have implemented this in my own u-boot.
I call it "defenv".
It is a little different though, It will reinitialize the predefined environment
variables to default settings but will not touch the other.
If "env default" is imp
e is no reason to force someone to use
architecture specific tuning, but that U-boot should allow
for people to apply this.
> (excluding build systems which treat all warnings as errors)?
>
> If so, please supply details.
>
> Regards
>
> Peter
>
Best Regards
Ulf Samuel
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:33:47 +0100
> "Ulf Samuelsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> In this case, reality and the map differs.
>> NWFPE toolchains built by cross-tool, buildroot, and www.gnuarm.com
>> not sure abnout the last) all bombs when they
easy to replace all fixed parameters with symbolic Makefile variable
which can be modified by your make command
$ make "MYPARS=-msoft-float" uboot
With sensible defaults which can be overriddern, this would solve the problem,
without having to locally *patch* the source.
When you are buil
.
>> I would also accept
>> (reluctantly, although it saves lots of space I could waste
>> as empty lines ;-) )
>>
>> "
>> For simplicity, the main (arm) tree processor options use the
>> lowest common architecture option (armv4), whatever the
&
llenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
> ___
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
---
91SAM9260-EK and
> AT91SAM9261-EK can't support an EBI NOR flash due to intentional design
> limitations.
They can, by adding a PCB to the EBI connector.
There has been some progress here on the S/W side,
but I am still waiting for the release.
>
B (in the AT91SAM9260) and that limits the
functionality.
U-Boot does not fit, so you have AT91bootstrap.
AT91bootstrap needs to run BEFORE U-Boot is started.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
This SF.net email is spo
s this a common "user error" problem with ckermit? I've double
> checked my config option with uboot docs.
>
I have used "minicom" a lot when downloading to the AT91RM9200,
but I use the special downloading program
define IMG_SIZE 0x2E400
for 185 kB.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120
ed, so that is not an option.
Do you use a dataflashcard?
It is easy to mix the chip selects.
Recompile the original source and see if you can run that.
Otherwise play with LEDs.
You can also try the SAM9263EK U-Boot-1.2.0 built by buildroot at
"buildroot.uclibc.org".
Best Regards
e 5 Mbps
means you load it in about 6 seconds.
In this user case, the SPI is probably already initialized by the AT91 bootstrap
which loads U-Boot to SDRAM from the dataflash, so any initialization should
maybe be optional.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
---
;board/at91" and "board/avr32" directories for non-atmel boards.
> Stelian.
> --
> Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
80 +++
> board/at91cap9adk/nand.c| 71 ++
> board/at91cap9adk/u-boot.lds| 57
I think it would be better if these files were located in the
"board/atmel/at91cap9adk", instead of "board/at91cap9adk"
Maybe Peter can fix that, it sh
m926ejs/start.S |3 +
How much is different from the Atmel AT91SAM926x U-Boot patches on
www.linux4sam.org?
The CAP9 is very similar to the AT91SAM9263.
Should those chips share drivers?
Then it would be better to store the files in "cpu/arm926e
fic driver to do a block transfer.
Having a generic driver do the small details of access
will remove all possibilities for an efficient driver.
There can of course be a driver which sends bytes one by one,
as a fallback , but I think this should be an option that can be overridden
by a driver f
will allow people in this situation to use the
U-Boot on the board without recompilation.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio
please quote properly in your replies
==> Mailers can't quote properly when mails are sent as a text attachement.
Also quoting does not work when people are sending non-compliant mails
allowing long lines.
On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> &
not nessarely store u-boot in it? (you can have 2 falsh)
OK, let me rephrase the statement:
It is stupid to allow the user to *accidently* erase the environment sector and
the U-boot area
The proposed user interface will do this, if you do not give any address
parameters
to the erase comma
e, and that (as is) will never become a part of it.
>
No, I am referring to code which does exist in the U-Boot tree.
- Look how proper quoting can be when the sender of the original mail follows
mail standards ...
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
---
On Monday 28 January 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> Unfortunately, this code seems useless, at least for the combination AT91 +
> SPI flash. Some issues:
>
> I believe that the AT45 is not using the same command set as other
> SPI flash memories. I think the commands need to b
something which can be directly used by U-Boot without any further
modification.
It may make sense to split up the file as well, as Haavard proposes,
but preferably, the split should be done at the source.
I will forward this request to the AT9
resources,
and you cannot compare two memory areas if the memory area is larger than
half the SDRAM size.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
> /*
> * SPI flash driver user interface
> *
> * Copyright (c) 2005-2008 Analog Devices Inc.
> *
> * Licensed under the GPL-2 or later.
&g
==
> +PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS +=$(call cc-option,-mcpu=arm926ej-s,-march=armv4)
> PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS +=$(call cc-option,-mapcs-32,-mabi=apcs-gnu)
> PLATFORM_RELFLAGS +=$(call cc-option,-mshort-load-bytes,$(
57 matches
Mail list logo
