Dear Rodolfo Oliveira,
In message you
wrote:
>
> I'm upgrading my hardware RAM, but I found a problem.
Why are you reposting the same question again?
Please read http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#id445111
> After replacing the RAM MT48LC32M4A2 by IS42S16800E the following message
Dear ravi@rflelect.com,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> HI All,
I would like to help you, but...
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE
> This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain confidential and/or
> legally privileged information. The Information is intended only for the
> use of the individual
Dear Velu,
In message <49c43a250907140849x2ffa6532nfba3fbe1a1667...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> My name is Velu and I am from the University of Michigan. Currently I am
> leading one of the sub-systems where we are trying to use the Toradex PXA270
> as a micro controller for a cube shaped sate
I did some looking at the source and noticed that the issue is with a
delaykey struct. I have modified the code that ignored the retry
attempt. I could not find a use for the retry portion of the struct
other than to make this not work but I didn't bother removing it since
I wasn't sure. I have rem
Dear Luke,
In message you
wrote:
> I am attempting to configure U-boot to reset in 60 seconds if no valid
> u-boot command is entered after breaking the autoboot. I have read the
> autoboot readme and from it found that I needed to define
> CONFIG_RESET_TO_RETRY as well as CONFIG_BOOT_RETRY_TIME
Dear Pierre,
> It works... but I have a very big problem : it's very very slow How can
> I decrease the time to load the kernel image?
> I try with u-boot 1.3.3, 1.3.4 and 2009.03 but the problem is always
> present...
I have tried to boot from nand with 1.3.4 and 2009.03. I can tell you tha
Andrew E. Mileski wrote:
> Norbert van Bolhuis wrote:
>> Nowadays, do many (PowerPC) embedded devices already risk omitting
>> NOR flash and use a NAND device solely for booting and storing images ?
>>
>> I'm talking about systems with 10 years life-cycle (so no
>> MP3-players nor medical systems b
Norbert van Bolhuis wrote:
> Nowadays, do many (PowerPC) embedded devices already risk omitting
> NOR flash and use a NAND device solely for booting and storing images ?
>
> I'm talking about systems with 10 years life-cycle (so no
> MP3-players nor medical systems but somewhere in between).
Add
> You missed some changes in the rebase.
>
> All CFG_ macros have been renamed to CONFIG_SYS_
This version should be betterю
From ad29d5a0c120e4eee51ecbb8a294c8492cf5fdd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:51:05 +0400
Subject: [PATCH
You missed some changes in the rebase.
All CFG_ macros have been renamed to CONFIG_SYS_
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Could you rebase it against current HEAD?
>
> Sure. Here it is.
>
> From ba2fc48842d6f866e30f52f457a4c834431e1167 Mon Sep
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe,
>
> I have a couple of unapplied patches in my list which seem to fall
> into your area of responsibility. Can you please have a look at
> these:
>
> 1 04/24 michael[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM 0/2] Ide support
>
Hi,
Please excuse me for mentioning the wrong version no ie 1.1.6.
I tried the cp.b command, but no help, the board hangs.
The kernel messges regarding the NAND flah are:
---
NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xec, C
On Aug 6, 2008, at 8:52 AM, pugazh mahalingam wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using MPC8548PC Type N card.
> where can I get the U-Boot code for this board. ?
> i cannot run the other configuration in this board.
> so can you please give the source code to MPC8548PC board.
you should talk to the vendor of th
Hi,
Wolfgang Denk skrev:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I have released U-Boot v1.3.4-rc2, and it is available both from the
> git repository and the FTP server.
>
> Please help testing.
>
> Please also check if all your patches that you want to have included
> in v1.3.4 have really been added - I d
On 18:28 Thu 31 Jul , Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> Microblaze boards are without any warnings.
Same for arm
except IXP as evertime
Best Regards,
J.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Devel
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:01:18PM +0100, Nigel Hathaway wrote:
> I have been playing around with a board from Olimex: the SAM9-L9260 (it
> has an Atmel AT91SAM9260 on it). This has a ROMboot with U-Boot in NAND
> flash. The board I am using has an interesting feature: the block which
> U-Boot is c
Dear Michal,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Microblaze boards are without any warnings.
Thanks ofr the confirmation.
> I sent some patches about Makefiles(driver folder and others) two weeks ago
> - but they need some testing.
> These patches should go to next merge window.
T
Hi Wolfgang,
Microblaze boards are without any warnings.
I sent some patches about Makefiles(driver folder and others) two weeks ago -
but they need some testing.
These patches should go to next merge window.
Regards,
Michal
> Hello everybody,
>
> I have released U-Boot v1.3.4-rc2, and it
Bernard,
> Nigel Hathaway wrote:
> > Hoping to avoid re-inventing the wheel
> >
> > It would seem that there are a number of people who are
independently
> > porting UBI to U-Boot.
>
> I expressed interest in doing so at the time but nothing happened
about
> it unfortunately. I can't speak f
Hi,
> Vincenzo Scianni a écrit :
>> Hi to everyone.
>>
>> I have a general question: my need is to use u-boot to initialize a
>> PowerPC 5123 and then to continue with a custom kernel without Linux.
>> The problem is that during initialization I must drive very early a
>> graphical controller
Vincenzo Scianni a écrit :
> Hi to everyone.
>
> I have a general question: my need is to use u-boot to initialize a
> PowerPC 5123 and then to continue with a custom kernel without Linux.
> The problem is that during initialization I must drive very early a
> graphical controller by PCI to sh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I m new to U-Boot . Plz dont neglect me may be this a sily question but I
Do not top post.
Do not full quote.
Do not hijack an unrelated subject.
Use a descriptive subject.
Do not post HTML.
In other words: make sure to read
http://catb.org/esr/
Dear All,
I m new to U-Boot . Plz dont neglect me may be this a sily question but I
want to know is U-Boot is using directly physical address or virtual address
of a processor .
plz reply this question .
On 7/26/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Send U-Boot-Users mailing lis
Hi Stuart,
IF u don't have the MMU for non-contiguous memory regions,try the below
steps.
1)First init all the memory banks in your board initilization code.
2)When u try to flash into 1st bank,what is the starting address of the
bank?If u Starting address of ur memory is 0xE010(1MB) and when
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Van Baren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 2:27 PM
> To: John Linn
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot, powerpc with device tree, initrd
problem
[snip]
>
> Yo
Please don't top post.
John Linn wrote:
> One problem fixed, I had both CONFIG_OF_FLAT_TREE and CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
> defined and that was causing the load of the device tree twice.
FWIIW, CONFIG_OF_FLAT_TREE has been removed as of this window.
> That didn't fix my initrd issue, but one less proble
dos vfat romfs
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(1,0)
Rebooting in 180 seconds..
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Van Baren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:08 PM
> To: John Linn
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourc
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:08 PM
> To: John Linn
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot, powerpc with device tree, initrd
problem
>
> John Linn wrote:
> > I realize this could be posted to the linuxppc-dev als
y Van Baren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:08 PM
> To: John Linn
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot, powerpc with device tree, initrd
problem
>
> John Linn wrote:
> > I realize this could be posted to t
John Linn wrote:
> I realize this could be posted to the linuxppc-dev also, but my kernel
> is running fine so I think it's a u-boot to kernel interface problem. I
> am able to pass a device tree to the kernel and get it to boot fine, and
> using NFS root also.
>
> I can't get it to find my initrd
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > > I ditched the entire reuse thing when I implemented nand boot for a
> > > 5121e platform. 2k was to little space to try to force in the generic
> > > files. just make a new start.S that do only the things it needs to.
...
> It is based on the nand
Hello,
Thanks a lot for patch.
With this patch we will have possibility to load file from JFFS2 into memory
and execute this which is fine.
But what is proper way for storing JFFS2 image in OneNAND? If I can create
JFFS2 partiion in u-boot, how I can store files in?
Do we need to have Linux up an
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Jerry Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Mile Davidovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
Hello
Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Mile Davidovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hello
>>> If I read code correctly u-boot have OneNAND driver. But when I check JFFS2
>>> in u-boot it seems tha
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Mile Davidovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello
>> If I read code correctly u-boot have OneNAND driver. But when I check JFFS2
>> in u-boot it seems that JFFS2 can not work on OneNA
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Mile Davidovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
> If I read code correctly u-boot have OneNAND driver. But when I check JFFS2
> in u-boot it seems that JFFS2 can not work on OneNAND.
Yes, it's not yet implemented.
>
> What is proposed way of working with One
Ashish Bijlani wrote:
> hey jerry...thanks for the replyi don't wanna replace nolo with
> u-boot...i just wanna nolo to load u-boot instead of loading the
> kernel directlythe reason is that i wanna load l4 based hypervisor
> image first and then linux on top of itcurrent loader (nolo)
2008/6/2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Victor (pfc) wrote:
>
> > I've been working last months on a lubbock board
> > and u-boot as a bootloader to run Linux. I always
> > loaded my kernel via serial port, because I never
> > got u-boot to activate my ethernet (I never got the
> > link led on, only afte
hey jerry...thanks for the replyi don't wanna replace nolo with
u-boot...i just wanna nolo to load u-boot instead of loading the
kernel directlythe reason is that i wanna load l4 based hypervisor
image first and then linux on top of itcurrent loader (nolo) is
linux specific and wouldn't
Ashish Bijlani wrote:
> Thanks for the response. Does u-boot support n810? Can I flash u-boot
> on n810? Thanks.
No, you would need to port u-boot to the hardware. The OMAP and the
necessary built in peripherals shouldn't be a major problem, but you
would have to get the rest of the hardware li
Thanks for the response. Does u-boot support n810? Can I flash u-boot
on n810? Thanks.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Menon, Nishanth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ashish,
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of Ashish Bijlani
>> Sent: W
Ashish,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Ashish Bijlani
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:01 AM
> To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot on N810
>
> - took u-boot (ELF) from TI's website for OMAP2420
>
mark roths wrote:
> Sorry if this has been covered already, the problem exists in all the u-boot
> versions I have up to 1.2.0.
1.2.0 is rather old; you should check the latest code when submitting
bug reports and patches.
> *** ../u-boot-1.1.5/drivers/nand/nand_ecc.c 2006-10-20
> 08:54:33.0
;
> break;
> + case IF_TYPE_MMC:
> + sprintf ((char *)info->name,
> "mmc%c%d\n", 'a' + dev_desc->dev, part_num);
> + br
On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 23:50 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > I ditched the entire reuse thing when I implemented nand boot for a
> > 5121e platform. 2k was to little space to try to force in the generic
> > files. just make a new start.S that do only
Dear Brian,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I tried the following versions on our old board and found that
> booting linux stops working from 1.3.2-rc1. So, some change between
> 1.3.1 and 1.3.2-rc1 is causing my problem. Can you give me any
> pointers as to where to look?
I trie
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I ditched the entire reuse thing when I implemented nand boot for a
> 5121e platform. 2k was to little space to try to force in the generic
> files. just make a new start.S that do only the things it needs to.
I seriously hope you based your code on
Brian S. Park wrote:
> Wolfgang,
> I tried the following versions on our old board and found that
> booting linux stops working from 1.3.2-rc1. So, some change between
> 1.3.1 and 1.3.2-rc1 is causing my problem. Can you give me any
> pointers as to where to look?
>
> 1.0.0: works
> 1.2.0: work
Wolfgang,
I tried the following versions on our old board and found that
booting linux stops working from 1.3.2-rc1. So, some change between
1.3.1 and 1.3.2-rc1 is causing my problem. Can you give me any
pointers as to where to look?
1.0.0: works
1.2.0: works
1.3.0: works
1.3.1: works
1.3.2-rc1
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:24 -0300, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to port U-Boot to MX31PDK board, but I getting a problem
> related to lowlevel initialization to boot from NAND flash memory.
>
> The problem is because cpu/arm1136/start.S waste so much space with
> IRQ/FIQ hand
Wolfgang,
Thank you for your response.
Boot parameter I'm using is the following.
bootargs=root=/dev/ram rw ramdisk_size=8192 console=ttyS0,115200
console=tty0
ip=192.168.1.157:192.168.1.86:192.168.1.2:255.255.255.0:DevUSB::off
It is the same bootarg that I used when using U-Boot 1.0.0. I left
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Brief: we are using U-Boot-1.1.3 on MPC866P processor along with 512 MB
> SDRAM on multiple banks.
Should be no problem if done properly.
> Problem:
> U-Boot is unable to execute the code if it is configured to banks apart
> from CS 1. Other way: U-B
Dear Brian,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get the latest U-Boot 1.3.3 and Linux (any version)
> working on our custom board based on Walnut demo board. I have used
> U-Boot 1.0.0 and Linux 2.4.20 on our other similar board and that
> worked out well. However, a lot
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
>> Wolfgang,
>>
>> The following changes since commit 8155efbd7ae9c65564ca98affe94631d612ae088:
>>Wolfgang Denk (1):
>> Merge branch 'master' of ssh://mercury/home/wd/git/u-boot/master
>>
>> are available in the git
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Wolfgang,
>
> The following changes since commit 8155efbd7ae9c65564ca98affe94631d612ae088:
>Wolfgang Denk (1):
> Merge branch 'master' of ssh://mercury/home/wd/git/u-boot/master
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>git+ssh://
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I am trying to compile uboot version 1.1.3 for ppc_870 board with the
There is no such board as "ppc_870" in the U-Boot source tree.
> make txc870_config
There is no such target as "txc870" in the U-Boot source tree.
> unrecognized option
> make:
Vijay Srivastava wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile uboot version 1.1.3 for ppc_870 board with the
> following settings
> bash$ export CROSS_COMPILE=ppc_8xx-
> bash$ export PATH=${PATH}:/opt/eldk/bin:/opt/eldk/usr/bin
>
> But I am getting following error:
>
> make txc870_config
What
Hi George,
> I was trying to build u-boot-1.2.0 for atmel (u-boot
> source code delivered by the board vendor). Tried
> this:
>
> $ make CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux- sam9l9260_config
> $ make CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-
>
> but it failed:
>
> make -C tools all
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/home/sam9l
Victor (pfc) wrote:
> I've been working last months on a lubbock board
> and u-boot as a bootloader to run Linux. I always
> loaded my kernel via serial port, because I never
> got u-boot to activate my ethernet (I never got the
> link led on, only after booting Linux).
> I recently read the FAQ
2008/6/2 Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > I recently read the FAQ again and found about using valid MAC addresses:
> >
> > * Should I recompile my u-boot with the new local-admin MAC address or just
> > I need to write the new config on the bo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I recently read the FAQ again and found about using valid MAC addresses:
>
> * Should I recompile my u-boot with the new local-admin MAC address or just
> I need to write the new config on the board?
Neither one nor the other. You just have to define
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Robert Schwebel
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 5:50 AM
> To: Kenneth Johansson
> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot v2
>
> On Wed,
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Martin Krause wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on :
> > Hi Harald, all
> >
> > do you or anyone else know, if there is a s3c6400 NAND driver
> > available somewhere for a recent U-Boot version (not OneNAND)?
> > Preferably with booting from NAND support?
>
Hi Guennadi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on :
> Hi Harald, all
>
> do you or anyone else know, if there is a s3c6400 NAND driver
> available somewhere for a recent U-Boot version (not OneNAND)?
> Preferably with booting from NAND support?
I have the U-Boot code delivered by Samsung with the SMDK6400
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 03:41:58PM +0200, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
> I'm just wondering what the status and plans are with the V2 branch.
>
> Is the plan that at some future date everyone just stops works on the
> main branch and switch over to V2 or is the features of V2 going to be
> ported ove
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I wonder if this is a common use and if it makes sense to implement
> this for mainstream u-boot, or is this very specific?
This is common use, and U-Boot already support it. See the bootcount
feature (http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootBootCountL
Hello Wolfgang,
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> For how long can I expect current u-boot (say 1.3.4) to be forward
>> compatible with newer Linux kernels?
>
> I think chances are pretty good. Please keep i
Dear Leon,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> triggered by the e-mail below (which solved my issue, thanks Kim) I
> have the following question:
>
> For how long can I expect current u-boot (say 1.3.4) to be forward
> compatible with newer Linux kernels?
I think chances are pretty go
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> U-Boot v1.3.3 has been released and is available from the git
> repository and the FTP server.
You didn't pick up this patch:
Fix 8313ERDB board configuration
from York Sun, so 1.3.3 is broken on the MPC8313ERDB.
> The Merge Window for v1.3.3 is
> You know "bootm" will do this for you?
I know, but u-boot do _NOTHING_ after power on. Any command in 'bootcmd' is
ignored.
--
Regards,
Alexei Babich, chematic engineer, OOO NPP "Rezonans", Chelyabinsk, Russia
http://www.rez.ru
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ryan Chen
-Original Message-
From: Markus Klotzbücher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 12:25 AM
To: Matthias Fuchs
Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Ryan CHEN; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
PROTECTED]; Zhang Wei
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot help request for
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> But after power on, I cannot see countdown & run bootcmd.
Probably that was not selected in the board configuration?
> If I 'run bootcmd' by hand - that works OK. But not automatically after power
> on.
> Can anybody tell me, how I can solve this ?
Alexei Babich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > bootcmd=cp.b 01e0 a100 13216e
>> What are you trying to do here?
> Simple test autostart. If I run it manually, this copy linux uImage
> from FLASH to RAM..
You know "bootm" will do this for you?
Best regards
Markus Klotzbuecher
--
DENX So
> > bootcmd=cp.b 01e0 a100 13216e
> What are you trying to do here?
Simple test autostart. If I run it manually, this copy linux uImage from FLASH
to RAM..
> It seems that support for bootdelay (CONFIG_BOOTDELAY) is not enabled in
> your vendors version of U-Boot. So to get this feature y
Alexei Babich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have PXA270 board with embedded by vendor bootleader - "U-Boot 1.3.0".
> I define that environment:
> ---
> $ printenv
> baudrate=115200
> bootdelay=3
> bootargs=video=pxafb:mode:800x480-16,active,pixclock:37000,left:100,right:1,hsynclen:10,upper:20,lo
Hi Matthias,
Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 15 May 2008 10:37:04 Markus Klotzbücher wrote:
>> > Could you suggest me how to solve the problem?
>> > Is there any specific part of USB driver that requires cache handling?
>>
>> None that I'm aware of, but I could imagine th
On Thursday 15 May 2008 10:37:04 Markus Klotzbücher wrote:
> > Could you suggest me how to solve the problem?
> > Is there any specific part of USB driver that requires cache handling?
>
> None that I'm aware of, but I could imagine that enabling caches might
> cause some kind of problems.
With U-B
Hi Ryan,
you are probably using the CONFIG_USB_OHCI_NEW option for your
PCI OHCI controller. The code in drivers/usb/usb_ohci.c is currently
not aware of caches. So we need to add some flush/invalidates at the correct
places.
I think nobody will keep you from starting to work on this :-)
Matthia
Ryan CHEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am porting U-Boot to a MIPS64 platform, that uses USB host controller NEC
> uPD720101 on PCI bus.
What CPU? What version of U-Boot are you using?
> I didn't modify anything related with USB driver, I just enabled OHCI
> in the configuration.
Please be
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Problem with ibm ppc 405 processor.
Really? Unbelievable. Working like a charm here.
> Pretty confused thing that this is hard to patch to work with ibm ppc 405!!!
You've been away for some time? It's a couple of years since IBM used
to make those ch
Problem with ibm ppc 405 processor.
Pretty confused thing that this is hard to patch to work with ibm ppc 405!!!
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:54 PM, <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Send U-Boot-Users mailing list submissions to
>u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscrib
Grant Erickson wrote:
> I am attempting to use CONFIG_FIT in u-boot-1.3.3-rc2 on the AMCC Kilauea
> board and, when used in conjunction with CONFIG_LOGBUFFER get the following
> compilation errors in common/cmd_bootm.c:
>
> cmd_bootm.c: In function 'fit_check_kernel':
> cmd_bootm.c:438: error: 'kb
Hi,
Similar problem I have also faced, We used bootelf to boot a big image
(really big around 7.5 MB ELF image).
Situation is like this, We have 32 MB of RAM in our board. And we load
this image via TFTP to lower memory , but when i do bootelf, some how
BSS section is getting overlapped with the st
On Sunday 04 May 2008, Baruch Cochavy wrote:
> Many thanks for the quick reply/comments. Please allow me to explain: I
> try to bootelf from ELF bits residing in a region of memory (address
> range) that partially overlaps the loaded code .bss (the ELFs bits just
> happen to reside in that specific
invocation option would be nice
Thanks again,
Baruch
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2008 11:16 AM
> To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Baruch Cochavy
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Use
On Sunday 04 May 2008, Baruch Cochavy wrote:
> u-boot's bootelf clears (memset to 0) sections of SHT_NOBITS type. This
> covers .bss sections - however, it might also includes other sections,
> not expected to be cleared as per some users expectations (stacks, for
> example).
most people dont decl
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Adds configurable IO Pin initialization for ADS5121 and consolidates
> existing IO pin initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martha J Marx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> board/ads5121/ads5121.c | 10 +--
> cpu/mpc512x/Makefile |2 +-
> cpu/mpc512
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Configuration changes added to support ADS5121 Rev 3 version of the board.
> This includes changes to the ref clock, memory size (from 256 to 512), the
> addition of PCI functionality and Makefile options to build either the Rev 3
> or Rev 2 U-Boot. The n
On 17:14 Sat 03 May , Martha J Marx wrote:
> Configuration changes added to support ADS5121 Rev 3 version of the board.
> This includes changes to the ref clock, memory size (from 256 to 512), the
> addition of PCI functionality and Makefile options to build either the Rev 3
> or Rev 2 U-Boot.
On 17:15 Sat 03 May , Martha J Marx wrote:
> Adds configurable IO Pin initialization for ADS5121 and consolidates
> existing IO pin initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martha J Marx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please add a correct sob
Your patch is corrupted by your e-mail client
please use git-send-e
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 07:09:44PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> This is with regards to U-Boot V2 .dox files. Are these hand coded or
> was some WYSIWYG editor generated?
>
> E.g.:
> http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot/u-boot-v2.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/developers_manual.dox;hb=HEAD
eonid
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot environment for NAND booting scheme
Hi, Wolfgang:
This brilliant idea didn't occur to me, thank you very much! It will
definitely resolve my current issue
Leonid,
> -Original Message-
> From: Leonid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 1:55 PM
> To: Menon, Nishanth; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot environment for NAND booting scheme
>
> Thank you for advice. Is
boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot environment for NAND booting scheme
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
net> you wrote:
>
> The problem is that any time u-boot image is updated, its environment
> is lost which is not convenient if the environment di
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> The problem is that any time u-boot image is updated, its environment is
> lost which is not convenient if the environment differs from default one
> significantly.
In which way is this a problem? Just run a "saveenv" each time after
you update the U-
: Thursday, May 01, 2008 11:14 AM
To: Leonid; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot environment for NAND booting scheme
Leonid,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:u-boot-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leonid
> Sent: Thur
Leonid,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:u-boot-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leonid
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 1:05 PM
> To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot environment for NAND booting scheme
> The problem is that a
Nishanth Menon said the following on 04/30/2008 09:57 PM:
> Commands:
> make sandbox_defconfig
> make V=1 C=2
>
> sparse -D__linux__ -Dlinux -D__STDC__ -Dunix -D__unix__ -Wbitwise
> -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/include
>
^^^
> -Wp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Can I use u-boot boot loader on mpc852 (powerPC)?
Yes, of course you can. MPC8xx is well supported.
> I mean is already some patch is available ? ? ?
Patch? Patch for what?
You will probably have to port U-Boot to your custome hardware,
though.
Be
On Thursday, February 07, 2008 09:59, Stefan Roese wrote:
> I'm wondering what may be needed to boot WinCE (6.0) images
> from U-Boot.
> Searching the web leads to some pages that mention booting
> WinCE is possible.
> But my understanding is that some additional patches are
> necessary and t
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
