[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/1] Moved initialization of AVR32 Ethernet controllers to board_eth_init()

Hello, More cleanup of net/eth.c, this time taking care of AVR32 boards. I got rid of the board/eth.c files because board_eth_init() needs to be in a file where there are other strong symbols in order to override the weak board_eth_init() in net/eth.c. I've compiled this code and verified that

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] Moved initialization of AVR32 Ethernet controllers to board_eth_init()

Renamed initialization functions for atngw100 and atstk1000. Removed initializations for these boards from net/eth.c Signed-off-by: Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/atmel/atngw100/Makefile |2 +- board/atmel/atngw100/atngw100.c | 11 ++ board/atmel/atngw100/eth.c

Re: [U-Boot-Users] DTC and Binary Includes

Hi Jon and Detlev, I sent the similar patch to Jon yesterday. I can confirm that I can compile DTC with small change in convert-dtsv0-lexer.l (add missing library). I tested it with Microblaze linux and seems that work well. I will test it binary include as well and I'll send you if is work or no

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] sh: ms7750se: Fix "make O=" builds

When compiling ms7750se board with "make O=", I got some errors. I tuned some makefiles. --- Makefile|1 + board/ms7750se/Makefile | 13 - cpu/sh4/Makefile| 16 ++-- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/

[U-Boot-Users] How to + USB-Uboot

Hi All, I want to develop USB-Uboot in Linux for an OTG Controller. But I am not sure from where to start.. Please, help for getting started.. how to test any existing platform with USB-Uboot, please suggest platform and any link to test? Please, point to any good document which explains basic co

[U-Boot-Users] Inflation and price concerns

Give her unlimited climaxes every night http://www.inchsell.com/ -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown t

[U-Boot-Users] AT91 Pull request

Please pull The following changes since commit a524e112b424c6843800ea2f19d3a8cf01d0aa94: Detlev Zundel (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-at91.git master Patrice Vilchez (1): [AT91S

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 01/10] [ARM] MXC: insert bus busy check in i2c_probe

On 16:50 Fri 04 Jul , Jens Gehrlein wrote: > On fast CPUs the time between two chip queries can become too short > to issue clear start and stop conditions. The bus seems to be blocked. > This cannot be compensated by just waiting for completed byte transfer. > The patch introduces polling of t

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 10/10] [ARM] TQMA31: new kernel param. to pass the eth MAC addr to the Linux eth chip driver

On 16:50 Fri 04 Jul , Jens Gehrlein wrote: > Some Linux drivers like the smc911x driver, as used on TQMA31, rely on the > MAC address > in the appropriate register, but U-Boot resets the controller after every > transfer. > A patch for the Linux driver is necessary to extract the MAC address

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB

On 00:02 Tue 17 Jun , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:13:32 -0500 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > However, I was mistaken about my code being committed into the > > official u-boot tree. Please see my response above. > > Ok, I figured it must be something like that. >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (SDHC support part 1)

On 08:38 Fri 13 Jun , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > If you want to see changes right now, > > then just replace the existing file with the Diopsis file and do a diff. > > No, this is not the way we work. We submit patches that can be > reviewed, not

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/3] Move atmel_mci driver into drivers/mmc

On 19:27 Thu 12 Jun , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > > So how about we start by introducing a new drivers/mmc directory and > > move the existing AVR32 driver there? > > In fact, this is so incredibly easy to do with git that I decided to > just do it. The three patches posted as a follow-up to t

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (include files part 2)

On 16:14 Thu 12 Jun , Antonio R. Costa wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-at572d940hf/at572d940hf.h > b/include/asm-arm/arch-at572d940hf/at572d940hf.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000..53f049b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/inc

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] at91: move arch-at91sam9 to arch-at91

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 8bfc891..d3bb951 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -2344,13 +2344,13 @@ at91rm9200dk_config : unconfig @$(MKCONFIG) $(@:_config=) arm arm920t at91rm9200dk atmel at91rm

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 08/17] marabun_pcmcia: Move compile condition to the Makefile

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/pcmcia/Makefile |2 +- > drivers/pcmcia/marubun_pcmcia.c |7 +++ > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 10/17] pcmcia/ti_pci1410a: Move compile condition to the Makefile

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/pcmcia/Makefile |2 +- > drivers/pcmcia/ti_pci1410a.c |4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Applied, thanke. Best regards, Wolfgang

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 09/17] pxa_pcmcia: Move compile condition to the Makefile

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/pcmcia/Makefile |2 +- > drivers/pcmcia/pxa_pcmcia.c |4 > 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang De

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH RESEND] Conditionally add -fno-stack-protector to CFLAGS

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > When compile-testing on powerpc, I get errors like this: > > /home/hskinnemoen/work/git/u-boot/net/nfs.c:422: undefined reference to > `__stack_chk_fail_local' > > This seems to be because -fstack-prote

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]:arm926ejs: Regression to remove inappropriate LED control code from arch init start.S

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > cpu/arm926ejs/start.S: > > Removed code to LED init since it is not specific to the ARM CPU, but > rather should go in the board/platform specific files. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Allred gmail...> Please provide a non-garbled, working mail address in

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [AT91] Re: [PATCH] DataFlash AT45DB021 support

Dear Sergei, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > Wolfgang, are these simple patches of any interest to the general > > community, when they're so trivial to add? > > > Wolfgang, could you please answer this? Sorry, I really don't know. Please see my previous message - this should be

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [AT91] Re: [PATCH] DataFlash AT45DB021 support

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > I added code to handle the 011 chip, but I really didn't think anyone > would be interested in it. I think all such changes should get added to the public repository. > If someone wants it, I can post it. Please do. > Wolfgang, are these simple patche

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v3 2/4] Add lmb_free

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > lmb_free allows us to unreserve some memory so we can use lmb_alloc_base or > lmb_reserve to temporarily reserve some memory. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Rebased off the top of tree to ease application. > > lib_generic/l

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v3 3/4] Fix an underflow bug in __lmb_alloc_base

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > __lmb_alloc_base can underflow if it fails to find free space. This was fixed > in linux with commit d9024df02ffe74d723d97d552f86de3b34beb8cc. This patch > merely updates __lmb_alloc_base to resemble the current version in Linux. > > Signed-off-by: And

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v3 4/4] Resize device tree to allow space for board changes and the chosen node

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Current code requires that a compiled device tree have space added to the end > to > leave room for extra nodes added by board code (and the chosen node). This > requires that device tree creators anticipate how much space U-Boot will add > to > the tr

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v3 1/4] Add ALIGN() macro

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > ALIGN() returns the smallest aligned value greater than the passed > in address or size. Taken from Linux. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Rebased off the top of tree to ease application. > > include/common.h |3 +++ >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from MAINTAINERS

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Your message > > > > To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > Skinnemoen, Haavard > > Subject: [PATCH] MMC: Consolidate MMC/SD command definitions > > Sent:Wed, 21

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Use the better ethernet timing at apollon

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Use the better ethernet timing at apollon > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > diff --git a/board/apollon/mem.h b/board/apollon/mem.h > index 5bc96fa..d4636f4 100644 Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Softwa

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] MMC: Consolidate MMC/SD command definitions

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This moves the MMC and SD Card command definitions from > include/asm/arch/mmc.h into include/mmc.h. These definitions are given > by the MMC and SD Card standards, not by any particular architecture. > > There's a lot more room for consolidation in the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ARM: Add support for Lyrtech SFF-SDR board (ARM926EJS)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > ARM: This patch adds support for the Lyrtech SFF-SDR > board, based on the TI DaVinci architecture (ARM926EJS). > > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Philip Balister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > MAKEALL

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Fix endianess conversion in usb_ohci.c

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > I think this must be swapped (result may be equal). > --- > drivers/usb/usb_ohci.c |6 +++--- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Markus, can you please comment on this patch? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DEN

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] fsl_elbc_nand: workaround for hangs during nand write

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Using current driver elbc sometimes hangs during nand write. Reading back > last byte helps though (thanks to Scott Wood for the idea). > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] MAKEALL: add at91 list

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > diff --git a/MAKEALL b/MAKEALL > index 7360fa9..c8ee201 100755 > --- a/MAKEALL > +++ b/MAKEALL > @@ -522,6 +522,24 @@ LIST_ARM11=" \ > " > > #

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: extended cpu identification

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The current cpu identification code is used just to return the name > of the processor at boot. There are some other locations that the name > is useful (device tree setup). > > Also, we add a feature field to convey useful attributes of the processor.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Latest U-Boot MD5 compile error??

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Possible fix, since I am a newbie at messing with somebody elses code can > the owner of the MD5 code verify this problem / fix?? As I wrote before, I tried building on FC5 and on other systems (including FC4, FC6, F7, F8 and F9) without seing the pro

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add sata sil3114 support (V2)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > >Add support for Silicon Images sil3114 sata chip using libata ... > I have received no comments on the last version of this patch. Any > posibility on getting it added? Sure - done. Sorry it took so long. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Softw

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Cleanup: replace hard-wired $(AR) 'crv' settings by $(ARFLAGS)

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/MigoR/Makefile |2 +- board/freescale/m5275evb/Makefile |2 +- board/linkstation/Makefile|2 +- board/lpc2292sodimm/Makefile |2 +- board/m501sk/Makefile |2 +- board/mpr2/Makefile

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] lmb: fix "implicit declaration of function 'lmb_free'" warning

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/lmb.h |1 + lib_ppc/bootm.c |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/lmb.h b/include/lmb.h index 03d7667..0283075 100644 --- a/include/lmb.h +++ b/include/lmb.h @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ extern phys

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Cleanup: fix out-of-tree building for some boards

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/MigoR/Makefile | 12 board/freescale/m5275evb/Makefile | 12 board/mpr2/Makefile | 12 board/ms7720se/Makefile | 12 board/ms7722se/Makefile

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Cleanup: remove redundant deleting on *~ files

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/amcc/acadia/Makefile|2 +- board/amcc/katmai/Makefile|2 +- board/amcc/kilauea/Makefile |2 +- board/amcc/makalu/Makefile|2 +- board/amcc/ocotea/Makefile|2 +- board/amcc/yucca/Mak

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Cleanup: fix "expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'phys_size_t'" errors

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/amirix/ap1000/serial.c |2 +- board/exbitgen/exbitgen.c|2 +- board/exbitgen/flash.c |2 +- board/ml2/serial.c |2 +- board/sacsng/sacsng.c|2 +- board/xilinx/ml300/serial.c |2 +- 6 fil

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] sacsng board: fix warnings "suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else'"

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/configs/sacsng.h | 12 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/sacsng.h b/include/configs/sacsng.h index 4974fb4..2a398e8 100644 --- a/include/configs/sacsng.h +++ b/include/configs/s

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] CCM board: fix build errors.

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/siemens/CCM/Makefile | 11 +-- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/siemens/CCM/Makefile b/board/siemens/CCM/Makefile index e053c7d..fd3edb4 100644 --- a/board/siemens/CCM/Makefile +++ b/board/siem

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] IAD210 board: fix ``"ALIGN" redefined'' warning.

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/siemens/IAD210/atm.c |5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/siemens/IAD210/atm.c b/board/siemens/IAD210/atm.c index c77e359..1b27f33 100644 --- a/board/siemens/IAD210/atm.c +++ b/board/siemens/IA

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] SCM board: fix build errors.

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/siemens/SCM/Makefile | 13 ++--- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/siemens/SCM/Makefile b/board/siemens/SCM/Makefile index edc1820..ed67a09 100644 --- a/board/siemens/SCM/Makefile +++ b/board/s

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] CCM/SCM boards: fix out of tree building

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/siemens/CCM/Makefile |2 +- board/siemens/SCM/Makefile |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/siemens/CCM/Makefile b/board/siemens/CCM/Makefile index fd3edb4..c5695f9 100644 --- a/board/siemens/

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Update CHANGELOG

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- CHANGELOG | 264 + 1 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/CHANGELOG b/CHANGELOG index 02b05a6..4e16b82 100644 --- a/CHANGELOG +++ b/CHANGELOG @@ -1,3 +1,267 @

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][FSL DDR 0/8] Freescale DDR rewrite

Dear Kumar, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This is a series of patches that are a work-in-progress towards a new > DDR initialization for the Freescale 8{3,5,6}xxx devices that have a > common DDR controller. Just to avoid misunderstandings: I understand these patches as RFC only (as

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fdt: Fix typo in variable name.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Detlev Zundel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > common/fdt_support.c |4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Det

[U-Boot-Users] variable type issues in LMB code

Hello Andy & Becky & Kumar, there is a general problem of variable types with the LMB code; at the moment, it uses some "u64" (and in lib_ppc/bootm.c actually a mix of "u64" and "uint64_t") declarations where I think we should use phys_addr_t resp. phys_size_t types instead. At the mome

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH RESEND #2] Conditionally add -fno-stack-protector to CFLAGS

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > When compile-testing on powerpc, I get errors like this: ... > This patch was previously posted > * Dec 11 2007 > * May 19 2008 > > Doesn't anyone care about this build breakage? This was applied in the meantime. Note that it might be helpful if

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Remove duplicate code introduced by commit 597f6c26a18b389903a64692bacbf9a1ca69355b

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Remove duplicate code introduced by commit > 597f6c26a18b389903a64692bacbf9a1ca69355b > > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > common/main.c |6 -- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] configure dsp POST and add watchdog reset to the diag cmd.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > post/post.c |1 + > post/tests.c |2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk --

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [MIPS] Convert CPU type name into CONFIG_CPU_*

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > Well, yes - if it's for compiler/assembler options only, then the > > board config file is not the correct place for this. > > I don't think so because 1) CPU type is not board-dependent, and 2) the > board config file is not board-specific file, but

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/3] Move atmel_mci driver into drivers/mmc

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > So how about we start by introducing a new drivers/mmc directory and > > move the existing AVR32 driver there? > > In fact, this is so incredibly easy to do with git that I decided to > just do it. The three patches posted as a follow-up to this e-mail

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]jffs2_1pass.c - Adding watchdog support

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Adds watchdog support. > > signed off by Stuart Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > diff --git a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c Applied, after fixing white space mangling (long lines wrapped around) and Signed-off-by: format errors. Pl

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Patch to clean up syntax highlighting

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > My text-editor (vim) has a bit of trouble syntax-highlighting the cmd_nvedit.c > file, because it apparently does not parse C ifdef/else/endif. The following > patch does not change the behavior of the code at all, but does allow the > editor to prope

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Patch to setenv() to return status

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Currently, the setenv function does not return an error code. I'd like to > propose the following patch, because I want to be able to test for errors in > a new BSP I'm writing. > > Comments invited. > > Signed-off-by: Steve Falco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ata: fix the bug of signature updated

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The driver need wait for the device updating signature > to host. if we don't wait for it, the driver can not detect > the device(disk) when the system power up. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/block/fsl_sata.c |8 +++

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mips: Bring over optimized memset() routine from Linux.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This commit pulls over the memset() MIPS routine from Linux 2.6.26, > which provides a 10x to 20x speedup over the generic byte-at-a-time > routine. This is especially useful on platforms with manual ECC > scrubbing, that require all of memory to be writt

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add a logo for RRvision.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I wasn't sure how big this and the other logo would be, so I split > up the commits. > > Signed-off-by: Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > tools/logos/linux_logo_ttcontrol.bmp | Bin 0 -> 11830 bytes > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+),

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][RFC] pci: Remove CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE and Add check PCI class of host bridge

Hi Stefan, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > > 2008/5/13 Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >> > >> I made the patch that applied your comment. > >> This patch skips PCI bridge ( Class code : 0x06XX). > >> > >> Could you chec

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add another logo for RRvision.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I wasn't sure how big this and the other logo would be, so I split > up the commits. > > Signed-off-by: Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > tools/logos/linux_logo_ttcontrol_palfin.bmp | Bin 0 -> 20534 bytes > 1 files changed, 0 inserti

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Remove the obsolete cfg definition

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The rtl8139 driver doesn't need KSEG again, remove > it. the _IO_BASE has default value as 0, so also > remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > include/configs/HIDDEN_DRAGON.h |3 ---

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add sata sil3114 support (V2)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > --===025132== > > Add support for Silicon Images sil3114 sata chip using libata > > Changes since last version > * use debug() print instead of local version > * Coding standard and whitespace fixes > > Signed-off-by: Tor Krill <[EMAIL

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Squash warnings from pointer aliasing in dlmalloc

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > When we building with gcc-4.3.x on a ppc host we get the following warnings: > > dlmalloc.c: In function 'malloc_extend_top': > dlmalloc.c:1971: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break > strict-aliasing rules > dlmalloc.c:1999: warning: de

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [FIT] Delay FIT format check on sector based devices

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Global FIT image operations like format check cannot be performed on > a first sector data, defer them to the point when whole FIT image was > uploaded to a system RAM. > > Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > Grant, > > Pleas

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot booting from NAND

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > I ditched the entire reuse thing when I implemented nand boot for a > > > 5121e platform. 2k was to little space to try to force in the generic > > > files. just make a new start.S that do only the things it needs to. ... > It is based on the nand

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH V4] Add mechanisms for CPU and board-specific Ethernet initialization

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This patch is the first step in cleaning up net/eth.c, by moving Ethernet > initialization to CPU or board-specific code. Initial implementation is > only on the Freescale TSEC controller, but others will be added soon. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Warren <[E

[U-Boot-Users] Release status - things to be done

Hi everybody, here is a summary of the current state of my processing of patches that have been submitted for the upcoming 1.3.4 release. As you might have noticed, I've been on vacation for the last two weeks, and I spent this time (intentionally) completely offline. So please apologize if parts

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]serial_pl010.c - Add watchdog support

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Adding watch dog support > > signed off by Stuart Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > diff --git a/drivers/serial/serial_pl010.c b/drivers/serial/serial_pl010.c > index 417b6ae..134ed09 100644 Applied, after fixing Signed-off-by: format error. Best regards,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] MPC8641HPCN: Report board id, board version and fpga version.

Dear Jon, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > board/freescale/mpc8641hpcn/mpc8641hpcn.c |6 -- > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > Applied to -mpc86xx repo. I guess I'll see

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mpc8260: add fdt_fixup_ethernet support

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Add support for updating mac-address and local-mac-address in fdt for > all MPC8260 targets. > > Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > cpu/mpc8260/cpu.c |5 + > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Applied, afte

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v3] ppc: Added fls, fls64, __ilog2_u64, and ffs64 to bitops

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > fls64, __ilog2_u64, ffs64 are variants that work on an u64 and fls > is used to implement them. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > Added comment about __ilog2(0) not being generally safe from Haavard > Skinnemoen > > - k > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]: Fix for bug: U-boot environment corrupt by reading uninitialized flash memory instead of RAM.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > So what *is* the state of this? > > > > If nobody responds soon, I will indeed re-apply that patch, andthen I > > will not revert this commit again. So if you think this bytes you, > > please speak up *now*. > > > > Jock, would you please send me a

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] add SHA256 support

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Francesco Albanese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > include/sha256.h | 16 +++ > lib_generic/Makefile |1 + > lib_generic/sha256.c | 262 > +++

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] Move conditional compilation of MPC8XXX SPI driver to Makefile

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > board/freescale/mpc8349emds/mpc8349emds.c |2 +- > drivers/spi/Makefile |2 +- > drivers/spi/mpc8xxx_spi.c |2 -- > include/configs/MPC8349EMDS.h

Re: [U-Boot-Users] i.MX31: Cleanup comments in lowlevel_init.S.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Lilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > board/imx31_litekit/lowlevel_init.S |4 ++-- > board/imx31_phycore/lowlevel_init.S |4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgan

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v4] fdt: add crypto node handling for MPC8{3, 5}xxE processors

Dear Kim, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Delete the crypto node if not on an E-processor. If on 8360 or 834x family, > check rev and up-rev crypto node (to SEC rev. 2.4 property values) > if on an 'EA' processor, e.g. MPC8349EA. > > Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Allow per file CFLAGS and AFLAGS

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Mimic the linux kernel build system's ability to have per source file > CFLAGS or AFLAGS. In the makefile you can now do: > > CFLAGS_.o += MY_FLAGS_OPTIONS > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'm not sure why this would be needed. I ten

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Some copy-n-paste fixes in printf usage

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >From 9bdd14533d7c6f0af336b59a2a026093be84eff9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Matvejchikov Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED](none)> > Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:01:42 +0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Some copy-n-paste fixes in printf usage > > > Signed-off-by: Matvejchik

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] FDT memory and pci node fixes for MPC8260ADS

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >From 3c7a1b900ab7b473fed62398fc76a16fa9c5940a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Matvejchikov Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED](none)> > Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 16:57:14 +0400 > Subject: [PATCH] FDT memory and pci fixes for MPC8260ADS > > > Signed-off-by: Matvejchik

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] i.MX31: fixed CTRL-C detection

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The Register URXD contains status information in bits [15..8]. > With status bit 15 set, CTRL-C was reported as 0x8003 instead > of 0x03. Therefore CTRL-C was not detected. > To solve this, bits [15..8] were masked out now. > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Kil

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] net: Conditional COBJS inclusion of network drivers

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Replace COBJS-y with appropriate driver config names. > > Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > Changes v2: > > * Kill more CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_NET_MULTI defines from >- fsl_mcdmafec.c >- mcffec.c >- netarm_

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [MIPS] Convert CPU type name into CONFIG_CPU_*

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >>> Well, yes - if it's for compiler/assembler options only, then the >>> board config file is not the correct place for this. >> I don't think so because 1) CPU type is not board-dependent, and 2) the >> board config file is not boar

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] net: Conditional COBJS inclusion of network drivers

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hm... Are you absolutely sure your changes, especially the > CONFIG_CMD_NET and even more the CONFIG_NET_MULTI related ones, do not > cause any trouble on any systems? [...] > It seems not obvious to me that your change is really harmless, or > tested. > > Could you ple

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mips: When booting Linux images, add 'ethaddr' and 'eth1addr' to the environment

Jason McMullan wrote: > Add 'ethaddr' and 'eth1addr' to the Linux kernel environment if > they are set in the U-Boot environment. I missed this mail, sorry for my late reply. Patch itself looks correct, but let me confirm. Looking closely into linux/arch/*, I found that mips is the only architec

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - things to be done

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > * U-Boot mailing list traffic: > 2858 05/27 wangjiankun820624 [U-Boot-Users] MIPS: about the function of > the octeon_twsi_set_addr8 > -> for MIPS custodian I'm happy to know there is Octeon port, but I guess that's a local version provided from Cavium Networks to