Re: [U-Boot-Users] Loading from NAND using 'nboot' Periodically Fails Where 'nand read' Succeeds

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Grant, On Monday 02 June 2008, Grant Erickson wrote: Before I jump in with the BDI and start debugging, has anyone else using 'nboot' and FIT images noticed that 'nboot' periodically fails where 'nand read.i' of the SAME region of NAND succeeds? Not sure here, since I never used nboot

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-boot and ethernet on a Lubbock board

2008-06-02 Thread Victor
2008/6/2 Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I recently read the FAQ again and found about using valid MAC addresses: * Should I recompile my u-boot with the new local-admin MAC address or just I need to write the new config on the board? Neither

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions

2008-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions This patch adds more macro definitions for the UPM Machine Mode Registers They are copied from include/mpc82xx.h to simplify the merge of all 8xxx common local bus definitions into include/asm-ppc/fsl_lbc.h. They are required for my forthcoming

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot

2008-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot This patch adds macros from linux/include/asm-powerpc/io.h to clear and set bits in one shot using the in_be32, out_be32, etc. accessor functions. They are very handy to manipulate bits it I/O registers. This patch is required for my

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] MPC8360ERDK: adapt NAND interface for the re-written FSL NAND UPM driver

2008-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
MPC8360ERDK: adapt NAND interface for the re-written FSL NAND UPM driver This patch is based on the following patch sent a few minutes ago: [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback It is untested, of course. Anton, could you please give it a try. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang

[U-Boot-Users] Ethernet POST freeze on 440EPx boards (PMC440, sequoia)

2008-06-02 Thread Matthias Fuchs
Hi, I noticed some strange issues with our PMC440 (PPC440PEx based) board and also with the sequoia eval platform. In a certain configuration these boards stuck during the Ethernet POST tests. When they got stuck, it is even not possible to attach with a BDI2000. On the console you only see

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] AX88180: new gigabit network driver

2008-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 01 June 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 01 June 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Michael Hennerich [EMAIL PROTECTED] = + * $Log:$ + * 1.0.0 2006-09-06 + * New release for AX88180 US2 chip. Also, this is old stuff. Why did you

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback

2008-06-02 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:11:11PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback This is a re-write of the NAND FSL UPM driver using the more universal hwcontrol callback (instead of the cmdfunc callback). Here is a brief list of furher

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback

2008-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback This is a re-write of the NAND FSL UPM driver using the more universal hwcontrol callback (instead of the cmdfunc callback). Here is a brief list of furher modifications: - For the time being, the UPM setup writing the UPM array has been

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] MPC8360ERDK: adapt NAND interface for the re-written FSL NAND UPM driver

2008-06-02 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:14:51PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: MPC8360ERDK: adapt NAND interface for the re-written FSL NAND UPM driver This patch is based on the following patch sent a few minutes ago: [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback It is untested,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] TQM85xx: NAND support via local bus UPMB

2008-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Anton Vorontsov wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 08:00:32PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: [...] Fix that, but I can still not access the device properly. I'm a bit puzzled because it uses a different algorithm to access the device. While my and the Linux fsl_upm driver uses NAND_ALE,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git

2008-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I cannot find any of the other subjects. For example, where is any posting that contained the string fix up comment about CONFIG_BFIN_BOOT_MODE i can find them just fine with the same exact subject as well as your replies. dont know

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] MPC8360ERDK: adapt NAND interface for the re-written FSL NAND UPM driver

2008-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Anton Vorontsov wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:14:51PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: MPC8360ERDK: adapt NAND interface for the re-written FSL NAND UPM driver This patch is based on the following patch sent a few minutes ago: [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add missing define to mpc83xx.h

2008-06-02 Thread Tor Krill
Signed-off-by: Tor Krill [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/mpc83xx.h |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/mpc83xx.h b/include/mpc83xx.h index d2e1e2b..3dc926d 100644 --- a/include/mpc83xx.h +++ b/include/mpc83xx.h @@ -820,6 +820,7 @@ #define CSCONFIG_EN

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] MPC8360ERDK: adapt NAND interface for the re-written FSL NAND UPM driver

2008-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
MPC8360ERDK: adapt NAND interface for the re-written FSL NAND UPM driver This patch is based on the following patch sent a few minutes ago: [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Add support for mpc8313 based BUBBATWO

2008-06-02 Thread Tor Krill
These patches add support for the mpc8313 based BUBBATWO board. Signed-off-by: Tor Krill [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- MAINTAINERS|4 + MAKEALL|1 + Makefile |3 + include/configs/BUBBATWO.h | 516

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] Add board specific files for BUBBATWO

2008-06-02 Thread Tor Krill
Signed-off-by: Tor Krill [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- board/excito/bubbatwo/Makefile | 50 + board/excito/bubbatwo/bubba_commands.c | 93 + board/excito/bubbatwo/bubbatwo.c | 175 board/excito/bubbatwo/bubbatwo.h | 30

[U-Boot-Users] Booting hangs after tranferring control from Uboot to Linux Kernel

2008-06-02 Thread Qin, Laigui (GE EntSol, Security)
Hi all, I am new here. Currently, I am facing a problem when using bootm to boot linux from uboot: the booting hangs after tranferring control from Uboot to Linux Kernel. However, I found that the linux kernel setup works well with the Uboot 1.2.0, while fail with the latest Uboot 1.3.2/1.3.3. In

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 02 June 2008, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] All 4 patches are maintained by different people. What is the fastest way to get these patches in? Maybe Stefan could pick them up directly?

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull Request for mpc86xx repository

2008-06-02 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 11:06 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote: The following changes since commit 180a90abdae72587c0f679edf8991455e559440d: Wolfgang Denk (1): Release v1.3.3 are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-mpc86xx.git master Jon Loeliger (1):

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 8/8] New board SIMPC8313 support: nand_boot.c, sdram.c, simpc8313.c

2008-06-02 Thread Scott Wood
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: One advantage of the current nand_spl subsystem is that it uses the same NAND board/platform driver as the normal, full blown U-Boot NAND subsystem does. So there is no need to maintain multiple NAND drivers for one board/platform.

[U-Boot-Users] eth0 not geting enabled

2008-06-02 Thread Avinash Vijayvergia
Hi there I am working on at91sam9260ek. I have put kernel and rfs on dataflash. Now this board boots up but doesn't enable eth0. I searched net and found that if I do a ping it enables phy (MD9161A). But if I do that when there is no network u-boot never recovers. Can someone tell me the way

Re: [U-Boot-Users] eth0 not geting enabled

2008-06-02 Thread Ben Warren
Avinash Vijayvergia wrote: Hi there I am working on at91sam9260ek. I have put kernel and rfs on dataflash. Now this board boots up but doesn't enable eth0. I searched net and found that if I do a ping it enables phy (MD9161A). But if I do that when there is no network u-boot never

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Loading from NAND using 'nboot' Periodically Fails Where 'nand read' Succeeds

2008-06-02 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 08:22:21AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: Hi Grant, On Monday 02 June 2008, Grant Erickson wrote: Before I jump in with the BDI and start debugging, has anyone else using 'nboot' and FIT images noticed that 'nboot' periodically fails where 'nand read.i' of the SAME

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 8/8] New board SIMPC8313 support: nand_boot.c, sdram.c, simpc8313.c

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 02 June 2008, Scott Wood wrote: On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: One advantage of the current nand_spl subsystem is that it uses the same NAND board/platform driver as the normal, full blown U-Boot NAND subsystem does. So there is no need to maintain

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/8] ppc4xx: Patches for 1.3.4

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
The 8 following patches posted as followups to this mail are ppc4xx-related changes I intend to get merged in this merge period. Sorry for the late posting, but it took me much longer to get this clean and I feel its a big improvement to the current status of 4xx SDRAM/DDR/DDR2 init code and

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/8] ppc4xx: Consolidate 405 and 440 NAND booting code in start.S

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch consolidates the 405 and 440 parts of the NAND booting code selected via CONFIG_NAND_SPL. Now common code is used to initialize the SDRAM by calling initdram() and to copy/relocate to SDRAM/OCM/etc. Only *after* running from this location, nand_boot() is called. Please note that the

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/8] ppc4xx: Change Kilauea to use the common DDR2 init function

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch changes the kilauea and kilauea_nand (for NAND booting) board port to not use a board specific DDR2 init routine anymore. Now the common code from cpu/ppc4xx is used. Thanks to Grant Erickson for all his basic work on this 405EX early bootup. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/8] ppc4xx: Use new 4xx SDRAM controller enable defines in common ECC code

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- cpu/ppc4xx/ecc.c |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/ppc4xx/ecc.c b/cpu/ppc4xx/ecc.c index 3e87c84..a2eb07b 100644 --- a/cpu/ppc4xx/ecc.c +++ b/cpu/ppc4xx/ecc.c @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ #include ecc.h

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 7/8] ppc4xx: Remove superfluous dram_init() call or replace it by initdram()

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
Historically the 405 U-Boot port had a dram_init() call in early init stage. This function was still called from start.S and most of the time coded in assembler. This is not needed anymore (since a long time) and boards should implement the common initdram() function in C instead. This patch now

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 8/8] ppc4xx: Remove implementations of testdram()

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch removes the used testdram() implementations of the board that are maintained by myself. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- board/amcc/bamboo/bamboo.c | 67 -- board/amcc/canyonlands/canyonlands.c | 38 ---

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 8/8] New board SIMPC8313 support: nand_boot.c, sdram.c, simpc8313.c

2008-06-02 Thread Scott Wood
Stefan Roese wrote: On Monday 02 June 2008, Scott Wood wrote: but even then I'd rather use the space for things like SPD-based SDRAM initialization. Are you talking about a full-blown I2C SPD DIMM detection and autoconfiguration? The code I know from 4xx is much too complicated and big

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND_SPL: Remove initdram() call from nand_boot()

2008-06-02 Thread Scott Wood
Stefan Roese wrote: This patch removes the SDRAM initilization call initdram() from nand_boot(). This is done mainly because I experienced problems with some boards like Kilauea (405EX), which don't have internal SRAM (OCM) and relocation needs to be done to SDRAM before the NAND controller

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND_SPL: Remove initdram() call from nand_boot()

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch removes the SDRAM initilization call initdram() from nand_boot(). This is done mainly because I experienced problems with some boards like Kilauea (405EX), which don't have internal SRAM (OCM) and relocation needs to be done to SDRAM before the NAND controller can get accessed. When

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND_SPL: Remove initdram() call from nand_boot()

2008-06-02 Thread Scott Wood
Stefan Roese wrote: This patch removes the SDRAM initilization call initdram() from nand_boot(). This is done mainly because I experienced problems with some boards like Kilauea (405EX), which don't have internal SRAM (OCM) and relocation needs to be done to SDRAM before the NAND controller

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND_SPL: Remove initdram() call from nand_boot()

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 02 June 2008, Scott Wood wrote: Stefan Roese wrote: This patch removes the SDRAM initilization call initdram() from nand_boot(). This is done mainly because I experienced problems with some boards like Kilauea (405EX), which don't have internal SRAM (OCM) and relocation needs to

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND_SPL: Remove initdram() call from nand_boot()

2008-06-02 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 02 June 2008, Scott Wood wrote: Stefan Roese wrote: This patch removes the SDRAM initilization call initdram() from nand_boot(). This is done mainly because I experienced problems with some boards like Kilauea (405EX), which don't have internal SRAM (OCM) and relocation needs to

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback

2008-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Stefan Roese wrote: On Monday 02 June 2008, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] All 4 patches are maintained by different people. What is the fastest way to get these patches in? Maybe Stefan could pick

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]env_nand.c Added bad block management for environment variables

2008-06-02 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:05:28PM -0400, Stuart Wood wrote: Scott, I this this one is it, and thnaks for pointing out the nand_erase_opts() function. Stuart --- Modified to check for bad blocks and to skipping over them when CFG_ENV_RANGE has been defined. CFG_ENV_RANGE must be larger

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions

2008-06-02 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:09:30PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: 83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions This patch adds more macro definitions for the UPM Machine Mode Registers They are copied from include/mpc82xx.h to simplify the merge of all 8xxx common local bus

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions

2008-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Scott Wood wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:09:30PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: 83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions This patch adds more macro definitions for the UPM Machine Mode Registers They are copied from include/mpc82xx.h to simplify the merge of all 8xxx common

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]jffs2_1pass.c - Adding watchdog support

2008-06-02 Thread Stuart Wood
Adds watchdog support. signed off by Stuart Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c index a330438..9ff8e12 100644 --- a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c +++ b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ #include malloc.h #include linux/stat.h #include

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]serial_pl010.c - Add watchdog support

2008-06-02 Thread Stuart Wood
Adding watch dog support signed off by Stuart Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/drivers/serial/serial_pl010.c b/drivers/serial/serial_pl010.c index 417b6ae..134ed09 100644 --- a/drivers/serial/serial_pl010.c +++ b/drivers/serial/serial_pl010.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ /* Should be fairly simple to

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Loading from NAND using 'nboot' Periodically Fails Where 'nand read' Succeeds

2008-06-02 Thread Grant Erickson
On 6/2/08 11:21 AM, Scott Wood wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 08:22:21AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: Hi Grant, On Monday 02 June 2008, Grant Erickson wrote: Before I jump in with the BDI and start debugging, has anyone else using 'nboot' and FIT images noticed that 'nboot' periodically fails

[U-Boot-Users] Non-block-skipping NAND commands (was: Loading from NAND using 'nboot' Periodically Fails Where 'nand read' Succeeds)

2008-06-02 Thread Scott Wood
Grant Erickson wrote: Thanks for the suggestion. That solved it. As an academic exercise, is there any practical reason a system would want to use nboot, as I erroneously chose to do, without .i|.jffs2|.e? I don't think so, though I don't know the history involved. Does anyone actually use

[U-Boot-Users] u-boot-1.2.0 cross compilation fails

2008-06-02 Thread George Pitich
Hi All, I was trying to build u-boot-1.2.0 for atmel (u-boot source code delivered by the board vendor). Tried this: $ make CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux- sam9l9260_config $ make CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux- but it failed: make -C tools all make[1]: Entering directory

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-boot and ethernet on a Lubbock board

2008-06-02 Thread Ken.Fuchs
Victor (pfc) wrote: I've been working last months on a lubbock board and u-boot as a bootloader to run Linux. I always loaded my kernel via serial port, because I never got u-boot to activate my ethernet (I never got the link led on, only after booting Linux). I recently read the FAQ again

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback

2008-06-02 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:11:11PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback This is a re-write of the NAND FSL UPM driver using the more universal hwcontrol callback (instead of the cmdfunc callback). Here is a brief list of furher

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] MPC85xx: Change traps.c to not reference non-addressable memory

2008-06-02 Thread Andy Fleming
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Currently, END_OF_RAM is used by the trap code to determine if we should attempt to access the stack pointer or not. However, on systems with a lot of RAM, only a subset of the RAM is guaranteed to

[U-Boot-Users] UEC Driver - 83xx RGMII half duplex BUG FIX - RFC

2008-06-02 Thread Russell McGuire
All, I wanted to post this for comments before I submitted a patch. Anyone using the 83xx and maybe other families, may or may not have noticed that any half duplex connection will not work, except in MII or RMII modes. Although, I am guessing that many people never use this mode, real

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] Convert mpc7448hpc2 to CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT

2008-06-02 Thread Jerry Van Baren
This was configured to use the deprecated CONFIG_OF_FLAT_TREE, change to CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT. WARNING: This conversion was untested because I do not have a board to test it on. NOTE: The FDT blob (DTS) must have an /aliases/ethernet0 and (optionally) /aliases/ethernet1 property for the ethernet to

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] Change the stxxst to CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT

2008-06-02 Thread Jerry Van Baren
This was configured to use the deprecated CONFIG_OF_FLAT_TREE, change to CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT. WARNING: This conversion was untested because I do not have a board to test it on. It isn't apparent to me that a flattened device tree is used any more. Signed-off-by: Gerald Van Baren [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Non-block-skipping NAND commands (was: Loading from NAND using 'nboot' Periodically Fails Where 'nand read' Succeeds)

2008-06-02 Thread Stuart Wood
I would vote for making bad black handling the default. I've been working on fixing up a design of ours that mistakenly used non block skipping version and I've been trying to find all the places were bad block's were not being skipped and fixes them. Our system only uses NAND flash and people are

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/3] Remove the deprecated CONFIG_OF_FLAT_TREE

2008-06-02 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Jerry Van Baren wrote: The following troika of patches switch the final two boards (mpc7448hpc2 and stxxst) from using CONFIG_OF_FLAT_TREE to CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT and then remove support for CONFIG_OF_FLAT_TREE. Sorry for the noise, I didn't do a full job, working on the rest of the job. gvb

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] MPC85xx: Beatify boot output of L2 cache configuration

2008-06-02 Thread Andy Fleming
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The boot output is now aligned poperly with other boot output lines, e.g.: FLASH: 128 MB L2:512 KB enabled Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] A silly comment, but let's spell it Beautify

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions

2008-06-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 2, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Scott Wood wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:09:30PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: 83xx/85xx/86xx: add more MxMR local bus definitions This patch adds more macro definitions for the UPM Machine Mode Registers They are copied

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Add 10 base ethernet support for mcf5445x

2008-06-02 Thread Ben Warren
Ben Warren wrote: Tsi-Chung.Liew wrote: From: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/mcffec.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/mcffec.c b/drivers/net/mcffec.c index

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Add 10 base ethernet support for mcf5445x

2008-06-02 Thread Ben Warren
Tsi-Chung.Liew wrote: From: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/mcffec.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/mcffec.c b/drivers/net/mcffec.c index 5ab4726..8d4e248 100644 ---

[U-Boot-Users] Pull request: u-boot-net

2008-06-02 Thread Ben Warren
Wolfgang, Please pull from the net repo: The following changes since commit 2c8d41969b47eb0b973912830c58689b2ba0e50a: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-testing are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-net.git master