Careful Tony, the AD police will be after you :-)
Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage Better by Design!
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony G
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 7:22 AM
To:
Why not just resize UFD to a type 19?
Norman, David (Health) wrote:
UV 10.2.16 HP-UX 11i
UFD is a type 1 file by default. I have some files in UFD with long
filenames that go down 1 level. I have created an I-type to extract delimited fields within the
@ID which either spans the 2 levels, or
Create a type 19 file and redirect the logs to the new file. UFD is a bad
place to store these types of files anyway because it is the account
directory. When yo go to clean up the file you may accidently remove part of
your account.
Jerry Banker
-Original Message-
From:
Can some one help me with a problem we have.
The STATUS() is returning a 4 digit uid of the person who has a record
locked.
I need this to reflect the actual 5 digit uid number. It is causing a
problem by informed a user that a record is locked by user 1234 but it
is actually locked by user 51234.
What OS? I _think_ we had that issue with aix 5.3, and it was resolved
with one of the July patch releases.
Buffington, Wyatt wrote:
Can some one help me with a problem we have.
The STATUS() is returning a 4 digit uid of the person who has a record
locked.
I need this to reflect the actual 5
Sorry, I should know better.
We are running Unidata 7.2 on a HP Unix 11.23.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Steve Romanow
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:23 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2]
Hi Folks,
Here's a scenario for you:
Let's say there is an XML file containing album track data that we'd
like to import into 2 different Universe files. A sample layout might be
something like:
albums
album
album_ID/
album_title/
album_total_runtime/
Why two files? That would be the approach with a SQL type database, but in
Universe, you can make the track data multi-valued related fields in the
albums file.
Larry Hiscock
Western Computer Services
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
The scenario and sample I posted is theoretical. The actual data
structure is much larger and has way too many nested levels.
Unfortunately splitting data is a must.
The two files piece is working fine it's just the multiple records in
the second file that's an issue.
- Josh
-Original
All -
We are attempting to enact IBM's double mirrored striped set backup
alternative.
This is where your server has a RAID array of 0+1 and then a second Raid 1
that is mirrored to the first mirror.
The process as IBM describes it is:
1. Quiesce the database (pause all writes,
Kevin Gusler wrote:
All -
We are attempting to enact IBM's double mirrored striped set backup
alternative.
This is where your server has a RAID array of 0+1 and then a second Raid 1
that is mirrored to the first mirror.
The process as IBM describes it is:
1. Quiesce the
The suggestion about including the OCONV in the i-descriptor should do it for
you. It has to do with how the system looks at the data in input or output
format. The D2 conversion is not part of the ouput but moving the OCONV up
should change the data to match the with clause.
From:
How many disks are in your array and are they all raid 0?
What kind of controller (if hardware) are you using that is doing a Raid
0+1+1??
Kevin Gusler
Applications Developer
Mortgage Builder Software, Inc.
Main: 800.850.8060 ext. 106
Fax: 248.304.0601
www.mortgagebuilder.com
Kevin Gusler wrote:
How many disks are in your array and are they all raid 0?
What kind of controller (if hardware) are you using that is doing a Raid
0+1+1??
Kevin Gusler
Applications Developer
Mortgage Builder Software, Inc.
Main:800.850.8060 ext. 106
Fax: 248.304.0601
Steve -
Why do you think this?
The failure I see of this system is that even though the db is paused, it
is not in a safe state for backup.
Once you broke the mirror would it not be safe to backup that array??
Kevin Gusler
Applications Developer
Mortgage Builder Software, Inc.
Main:
Kevin Gusler wrote:
Steve -
Why do you think this?
The failure I see of this system is that even though the db is paused, it
is not in a safe state for backup.
Once you broke the mirror would it not be safe to backup that array??
Kevin Gusler
Applications Developer
Mortgage Builder
Are you using the Quiesce database command? (pause all writes, data can
still be read, no loss of data)?
Kevin Gusler
Applications Developer
Mortgage Builder Software, Inc.
Main: 800.850.8060 ext. 106
Fax: 248.304.0601
www.mortgagebuilder.com
-Original Message-
From:
Kevin Gusler wrote:
Are you using the Quiesce database command? (pause all writes, data can
still be read, no loss of data)?
we use dbpause in unidata.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
Why do you think this?
The failure I see of this system is that even though the db is
paused, it
is not in a safe state for backup.
Once you broke the mirror would it not be safe to backup that array??
The db is basically in mid sentence. The commits are not atomic.
If you restore to
Charles -
When you did this: so we used the same double mirror/pause/split/tape
backup as described by others
How many disks were in your array and were they all raid 0?
What kind of controller were you using that was doing a Raid 0+1+1??
Sounds like you were on Universe, was it windows as
Charles Stevenson wrote:
with one variation: We left the mirror split and stale for most of
the day. That way if problems arose (e.g., broken file, file cleared
inappropriately, etc.) I had fast access to the previous day's data.
I occasionally took advantage of that feature. We never
UV on HPUX.
Disks were part of a huge SAN (vendor slips my mind at the moment) where
our ap was just a small part of a mix of unix, windows, linux. I don't
recall raid level. The SAN was administered by someone else. Tape
backup was Legato.
I really liked the idea of keeping the backups
We've got a UV client/server application with a thick VB client. The
vintage is around 1997, and the architecture has a debug mode that I leave
on all the time that logs the calls back to the server and the arguments
passed back and forth. The server side stuff is all phantomed off, so the
Dave,
From (IIRC) 10.0 onwards, there's the SYSTEM(9001) pseudo-variable
which contains the UV CALL Stack.
It's formatted a bit funny, but there may be a routine on the Pickwiki
to make it a sensible format.
HTH
Regards
Mike
-Original Message-
From:
Depending on the version of UV you are on you should be able to access
SYSTEM(9001) from memory. This is an array which contains the call
stack.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of David A Barrett
David,
In the second LIST you're looking for 29.5.09 yet the I-desc is
returning 29.05.09. Try LIST UFD WITH DATE2 = 29.05.09. Just a
thought.
Norman, David (Health) wrote:
UV 10.2.16 HP-UX 11i
UFD is a type 1 file by default. I have some files in UFD with long
filenames that go down 1
Here's a lead, not an answer.
When we upgraded from 11.11 on HP Risc to 11.23 on HP Itanium, some of
the permissions on files in /etc changed from rw-r--r-- to rw---.
Owner remained root.
That made a couple UV (not UD) utilities that relied on that unix info
to yield up user counts stop
Thanks to those who responded - changing the I-Type didn't work, but Jerry
offered sound advice to not use UFD anyway. What were temporary debugging
files are now in use everyday, so a specific type 19 file is appropriate. I've
now moved all these entries from UFD to their own file and all's
28 matches
Mail list logo
