...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jacques G.
Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2012 2:50 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [U2[UV] @TIME and TIME() not reliable
Hello,
Has anyone else here observed this behavior for Universe 11.1.3 on a OS other
than HP-UX ?
Sometimes, @TIME will report an incorrect
if I recall correctly @TIME returns the time that the program began
running, TIME() returns the current time.
Jacques G. wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone else here observed this behavior for Universe 11.1.3 on a OS other
than HP-UX ?
Sometimes, @TIME will report an incorrect internal time. When I
hat user, does it
show the right time?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jacques G.
Sent: 10 September 2012 17:50
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [U2[UV] @TIME and TIME() not reliable
Hell
Hello,
Has anyone else here observed this behavior for Universe 11.1.3 on a OS other
than HP-UX ?
Sometimes, @TIME will report an incorrect internal time. When I first observed
this behavior, I changed my use of @TIME for a call to TIME(). It fixed the
problem on one HP-UX server I was work
dgers
MasterPack Project Team
Masonite International
Tel: (813) 2612396 ext 3036
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Rex Gozar
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:24 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] UV t
odgers
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Fri, 12 February, 2010 15:58:34
Subject: [U2] UV time milliseconds option
We run UniVerse 9.6 on HP-UX
We run PICK flavor accounts to accommodate our SB+ applications
I am having trouble pinning down the cause of a performance issue so I
want to
o:u2-users-
> boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Rex Gozar
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:24 AM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] UV time milliseconds option
>
> When I run this on UV 10.1.18 (windows):
>
> $OPTIONS TIME.MILLISECOND
> STIME = SYSTEM(1
When I run this on UV 10.1.18 (windows):
$OPTIONS TIME.MILLISECOND
STIME = SYSTEM(12)
NAP 500
ETIME = SYSTEM(12)
DISPLAY STIME
DISPLAY ETIME
DISPLAY (ETIME-STIME)
END
I get the output:
40473687
40474187
500
Are you saying you get "1000" when you the same code?
rex
John Rodgers wrote:
We run
: Re: [U2] UV time milliseconds option
You should check for the existence of the following setting in the
uvconfig file:
# TIMEACCURACY - This may be 0 or 1. This parameter affects the
# output of the TIME() function. If set to value of 1 (default),
# the TIME() function will try to report the
Behalf Of John Rodgers
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 7:59 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV time milliseconds option
We run UniVerse 9.6 on HP-UX
We run PICK flavor accounts to accommodate our SB+ applications
I am having trouble pinning down the cause of a performance issue so
We run UniVerse 9.6 on HP-UX
We run PICK flavor accounts to accommodate our SB+ applications
I am having trouble pinning down the cause of a performance issue so I
want to record the progress of program.
I need timestamps in milliseconds.
I tried the $OPTIONS TIME.MILLISECOND
So SYSTEM(1
its "NAP " IN uv
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: 25 July 2006 10:16
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] time()
Barry - on Unidata there is SYSTEM(9) which gives the CPU millisecond co
Barry - on Unidata there is SYSTEM(9) which gives the CPU millisecond count
within the current program. - not sure what the uv equiv is
Rgds
Sym.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of will
Sent: 22 July 2006 20:35
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] time()
John,
I have an interest, completely outside of U2, in what you did with NMI
and would like to ask some questions off-list if you would care to
resp
20:35
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] time()
John,
I have an interest, completely outside of U2, in what you did with NMI
and would like to ask some questions off-list if you would care to
respond.
Kind regards,
Patrick "Will" Williams
91
results were very, very similar on UV10.0.15, but I have not tried
it on other Windows platforms
Hope this helps
Mike
> -----Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Brevik
> Sent: Saturday, 22 July 2006 10:41
> To: U2-users (E-mail)
> Subject: [U2] [UV] time
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Brevik
Sent: 21 July 2006 23:41
To: U2-users (E-mail)
Subject: [U2] [UV] time()
The TIME() function is supposed to return the number of seconds since
midnight, in whole seconds on unix, but
lled event.
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Brevik
Sent: 21 July 2006 23:41
To: U2-users (E-mail)
Subject: [U2] [UV] time()
The TIME() function is supposed to return the number of seconds since
midnight, in whole sec
The TIME() function is supposed to return the number of seconds since midnight,
in whole seconds on unix, but on Windows machines it returns a real number
implying it is accurate to the nearest .001 second.
Of course, it doesn't, but I noticed on my server that it rather reliably
returns a numb
Following this discussion about a special time conversion code, I've
been wondering... Are many people writing custom conversion
subroutines? You know what I mean, the Uname subroutines? It seems
to me that with this we have access to create any conversion we can
dream up - no matter how wacky -
In a message dated 1/21/2005 2:31:23 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Nick Cipollina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20.01.2005, 19:00:47:
> >Is there an output conversion for time that will include the
> >milliseconds? If I have a time that is 10:35:14 am and there are 35
> >m
Nick,
Not exactly - most time values captured and stored tend to be whole
seconds. However take a look at SYSTEM(12) and the $OPTIONS
TIME.MILLISECONDS BASIC option - that may give you what you want.
Also later releases of UniVerse contain an option in the uvconfig file
that determines whether th
Is there an output conversion for time that will include the
milliseconds? If I have a time that is 10:35:14 am and there are 35
milliseconds, how can I convert this to include them? Thanks.
Nick Cipollina
Pick Programmer
ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc.
2810 North Parham Road, Su
Karl,
As far as I know there isn't an OS solution - the easiest way I found was to
add a $OPTIONS TIME.MILLISECOND to each program and re-compile. Another
option is to use INT(TIME()) in each statement.
David Norman
Senior Systems Engineer
SA Ambulance Service
Box 3, GPO
A
Thanks for the responses. I tested and will use
$options TIME.MILLISECONDS
because of it's compile-time rather than run-time impact. But, I was
interested to find that TIME() on my Linux PE 10.0.2 box returns no
decimal. On my AIX 4.3.3 and UV 10.0.14 it did and using $options
TIME.MILLISECONDS
gt;
To: "u2-users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 2:02 PM
Subject: [U2] [UV] TIME() truncation
> I remember seeing this but searching archives isn't working at
> oliver.com. My main problem with searching is that I can't remember the
> correc
Karl,
I don't believe that you can turn off the decimal portion. I'd suggest writing a
subroutine with the one line "field(TIME(),'.',1) " and build a program to find
"TIME() and replace it with the subroutine call.
If you go this route, I strongly suggest that you run the replacer program
m/ but I couldn't find what I
wanted the other day, either.
cds
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl
> L Pearson
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:03 AM
> To: u2-users
> Subject: [U2] [UV] TIME() truncation
I remember seeing this but searching archives isn't working at
oliver.com. My main problem with searching is that I can't remember the
correct text to search for.
I have a client that uses TIME() in filenames, etc. when creating items,
and even for creating some files. They just upgraded from UV9.
TIMEACCURACY didn't work for me either. I've reported it to IBM.
- Original Message -
From: "HENDERSON MICHAEL MR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 8:43 PM
Subject: Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] TIME() precision on UV 10
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 12:02
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: [U2] [UV] TIME() precision on UV 10.1
I'm working on an upgrade from UV 9.6 to 10.1 and need TIME() to behave as
it used to f
COND" into every
program unit whose behaviour you want to change (and re-compile of course).
HTH
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 12:02
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: [U2] [UV] TIME()
I'm working on an upgrade from UV 9.6 to 10.1 and need TIME() to behave
as it used to for backward compatibility. UV 10.1 is running on RedHat
EL 3.0. I changed TIMEACCURACY to 0 in uvconfig and executed uvregen,
but TIME() is still showing milliseconds instead of whole seconds. What
am I mi
33 matches
Mail list logo