Re: [U2] [U2[UV] @TIME and TIME() not reliable

2012-09-11 Thread Gregor Scott
...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jacques G. Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2012 2:50 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] [U2[UV] @TIME and TIME() not reliable Hello, Has anyone else here observed this behavior for Universe 11.1.3 on a OS other than HP-UX ? Sometimes, @TIME will report an incorrect

Re: [U2] [U2[UV] @TIME and TIME() not reliable

2012-09-10 Thread Jeff Schasny
if I recall correctly @TIME returns the time that the program began running, TIME() returns the current time. Jacques G. wrote: Hello, Has anyone else here observed this behavior for Universe 11.1.3 on a OS other than HP-UX ? Sometimes, @TIME will report an incorrect internal time. When I

Re: [U2] [U2[UV] @TIME and TIME() not reliable

2012-09-10 Thread Brian Leach
hat user, does it show the right time? Brian -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jacques G. Sent: 10 September 2012 17:50 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] [U2[UV] @TIME and TIME() not reliable Hell

Re: [U2] [U2[UV] @TIME and TIME() not reliable

2012-09-10 Thread Jacques G.
Hello, Has anyone else here observed this behavior for Universe 11.1.3 on a OS other than HP-UX ? Sometimes, @TIME will report an incorrect internal time.  When I first observed this behavior, I changed my use of @TIME for a call to TIME().  It fixed the problem on one HP-UX server I was work

Re: [U2] UV time milliseconds option

2010-02-15 Thread John Rodgers
dgers MasterPack Project Team Masonite International Tel: (813) 2612396 ext 3036 -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Rex Gozar Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:24 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] UV t

Re: [U2] UV time milliseconds option

2010-02-15 Thread andy baum
odgers To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Fri, 12 February, 2010 15:58:34 Subject: [U2] UV time milliseconds option We run UniVerse 9.6 on HP-UX We run PICK flavor accounts to accommodate our SB+ applications I am having trouble pinning down the cause of a performance issue so I want to

Re: [U2] UV time milliseconds option

2010-02-15 Thread George Gallen
o:u2-users- > boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Rex Gozar > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:24 AM > To: U2 Users List > Subject: Re: [U2] UV time milliseconds option > > When I run this on UV 10.1.18 (windows): > > $OPTIONS TIME.MILLISECOND > STIME = SYSTEM(1

Re: [U2] UV time milliseconds option

2010-02-15 Thread Rex Gozar
When I run this on UV 10.1.18 (windows): $OPTIONS TIME.MILLISECOND STIME = SYSTEM(12) NAP 500 ETIME = SYSTEM(12) DISPLAY STIME DISPLAY ETIME DISPLAY (ETIME-STIME) END I get the output: 40473687 40474187 500 Are you saying you get "1000" when you the same code? rex John Rodgers wrote: We run

Re: [U2] UV time milliseconds option

2010-02-12 Thread John Rodgers
: Re: [U2] UV time milliseconds option You should check for the existence of the following setting in the uvconfig file: # TIMEACCURACY - This may be 0 or 1. This parameter affects the # output of the TIME() function. If set to value of 1 (default), # the TIME() function will try to report the

Re: [U2] UV time milliseconds option

2010-02-12 Thread John Hester
Behalf Of John Rodgers Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 7:59 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UV time milliseconds option We run UniVerse 9.6 on HP-UX We run PICK flavor accounts to accommodate our SB+ applications I am having trouble pinning down the cause of a performance issue so

[U2] UV time milliseconds option

2010-02-12 Thread John Rodgers
We run UniVerse 9.6 on HP-UX We run PICK flavor accounts to accommodate our SB+ applications I am having trouble pinning down the cause of a performance issue so I want to record the progress of program. I need timestamps in milliseconds. I tried the $OPTIONS TIME.MILLISECOND So SYSTEM(1

RE: [U2] [UV] time()

2006-07-25 Thread Bob Witney
its "NAP " IN uv -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Symeon Breen Sent: 25 July 2006 10:16 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] time() Barry - on Unidata there is SYSTEM(9) which gives the CPU millisecond co

Re: [U2] [UV] time()

2006-07-25 Thread Symeon Breen
Barry - on Unidata there is SYSTEM(9) which gives the CPU millisecond count within the current program. - not sure what the uv equiv is Rgds Sym. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Re: [U2] [UV] time()

2006-07-24 Thread will
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of will Sent: 22 July 2006 20:35 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] time() John, I have an interest, completely outside of U2, in what you did with NMI and would like to ask some questions off-list if you would care to resp

RE: [U2] [UV] time()

2006-07-24 Thread John Jenkins
20:35 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] time() John, I have an interest, completely outside of U2, in what you did with NMI and would like to ask some questions off-list if you would care to respond. Kind regards, Patrick "Will" Williams 91

RE: [U2] [UV] time() {Unclassified}

2006-07-23 Thread HENDERSON MIKE, MR
results were very, very similar on UV10.0.15, but I have not tried it on other Windows platforms Hope this helps Mike > -----Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Brevik > Sent: Saturday, 22 July 2006 10:41 > To: U2-users (E-mail) > Subject: [U2] [UV] time

Re: [U2] [UV] time()

2006-07-22 Thread will
Regards JayJay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Brevik Sent: 21 July 2006 23:41 To: U2-users (E-mail) Subject: [U2] [UV] time() The TIME() function is supposed to return the number of seconds since midnight, in whole seconds on unix, but

RE: [U2] [UV] time()

2006-07-22 Thread John Jenkins
lled event. Regards JayJay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Brevik Sent: 21 July 2006 23:41 To: U2-users (E-mail) Subject: [U2] [UV] time() The TIME() function is supposed to return the number of seconds since midnight, in whole sec

[U2] [UV] time()

2006-07-21 Thread Barry Brevik
The TIME() function is supposed to return the number of seconds since midnight, in whole seconds on unix, but on Windows machines it returns a real number implying it is accurate to the nearest .001 second. Of course, it doesn't, but I noticed on my server that it rather reliably returns a numb

RE: [U2] [UV] Time Output Conversion

2005-01-21 Thread Kevin King
Following this discussion about a special time conversion code, I've been wondering... Are many people writing custom conversion subroutines? You know what I mean, the Uname subroutines? It seems to me that with this we have access to create any conversion we can dream up - no matter how wacky -

Re: [U2] [UV] Time Output Conversion

2005-01-21 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 1/21/2005 2:31:23 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Nick Cipollina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20.01.2005, 19:00:47: > >Is there an output conversion for time that will include the > >milliseconds? If I have a time that is 10:35:14 am and there are 35 > >m

Re: [U2] [UV] Time Output Conversion

2005-01-21 Thread brian
Nick, Not exactly - most time values captured and stored tend to be whole seconds. However take a look at SYSTEM(12) and the $OPTIONS TIME.MILLISECONDS BASIC option - that may give you what you want. Also later releases of UniVerse contain an option in the uvconfig file that determines whether th

[U2] [UV] Time Output Conversion

2005-01-20 Thread Nick Cipollina
Is there an output conversion for time that will include the milliseconds? If I have a time that is 10:35:14 am and there are 35 milliseconds, how can I convert this to include them? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Su

re: [U2] [UV] TIME() truncation

2004-05-27 Thread Norman, David (SAAS)
Karl, As far as I know there isn't an OS solution - the easiest way I found was to add a $OPTIONS TIME.MILLISECOND to each program and re-compile. Another option is to use INT(TIME()) in each statement. David Norman Senior Systems Engineer SA Ambulance Service Box 3, GPO A

Re: [U2] [UV] TIME() truncation

2004-05-27 Thread Karl L Pearson
Thanks for the responses. I tested and will use $options TIME.MILLISECONDS because of it's compile-time rather than run-time impact. But, I was interested to find that TIME() on my Linux PE 10.0.2 box returns no decimal. On my AIX 4.3.3 and UV 10.0.14 it did and using $options TIME.MILLISECONDS

Re: [U2] [UV] TIME() truncation

2004-05-27 Thread Stu Glancy
gt; To: "u2-users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 2:02 PM Subject: [U2] [UV] TIME() truncation > I remember seeing this but searching archives isn't working at > oliver.com. My main problem with searching is that I can't remember the > correc

Re: [U2] [UV] TIME() truncation

2004-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karl, I don't believe that you can turn off the decimal portion. I'd suggest writing a subroutine with the one line "field(TIME(),'.',1) " and build a program to find "TIME() and replace it with the subroutine call. If you go this route, I strongly suggest that you run the replacer program

RE: [U2] [UV] TIME() truncation

2004-05-27 Thread Stevenson, Charles
m/ but I couldn't find what I wanted the other day, either. cds > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl > L Pearson > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:03 AM > To: u2-users > Subject: [U2] [UV] TIME() truncation

[U2] [UV] TIME() truncation

2004-05-27 Thread Karl L Pearson
I remember seeing this but searching archives isn't working at oliver.com. My main problem with searching is that I can't remember the correct text to search for. I have a client that uses TIME() in filenames, etc. when creating items, and even for creating some files. They just upgraded from UV9.

Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] TIME() precision on UV 10.1

2004-05-14 Thread Stu Glancy
TIMEACCURACY didn't work for me either. I've reported it to IBM. - Original Message - From: "HENDERSON MICHAEL MR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 8:43 PM Subject: Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] TIME() precision on UV 10

Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] TIME() precision on UV 10.1

2004-05-11 Thread John Hester
Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Hester Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 12:02 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: [U2] [UV] TIME() precision on UV 10.1 I'm working on an upgrade from UV 9.6 to 10.1 and need TIME() to behave as it used to f

Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] TIME() precision on UV 10.1

2004-05-11 Thread HENDERSON MICHAEL MR
COND" into every program unit whose behaviour you want to change (and re-compile of course). HTH Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Hester Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 12:02 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: [U2] [UV] TIME()

[U2] [UV] TIME() precision on UV 10.1

2004-05-11 Thread John Hester
I'm working on an upgrade from UV 9.6 to 10.1 and need TIME() to behave as it used to for backward compatibility. UV 10.1 is running on RedHat EL 3.0. I changed TIMEACCURACY to 0 in uvconfig and executed uvregen, but TIME() is still showing milliseconds instead of whole seconds. What am I mi