Hi,
On the nosql website MultiValue is classed as Soft NoSQL because it did
not rise out of a web 2.0 need. Perhaps if people working on web 2.0
technologies had heard of U2 at the time, U2 would now already be the
primary web 2.0 backend and few of these newer databases would have
arisen.
...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Glenn Sallis
Sent: 18 December 2011 11:03
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Graph DataBase
Hi,
On the nosql website MultiValue is classed as Soft NoSQL because it did not
rise out of a web 2.0 need. Perhaps if people
Of David Jordan
Sent: 17 December 2011 05:40
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Graph DataBase
I have to pick you up on scaling. U2 scales really well there are some
staggering performance test that have been done. U2 does things
differently, but it does scale. An area that NOSQL databases
...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: 17 December 2011 05:40
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Graph DataBase
I have to pick you up on scaling. U2 scales really well there are some
staggering performance test that have been done. U2 does things
differently, but it does scale. An area
-
From: David Jordan da...@dacono.com.au
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2011 9:41 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] Graph DataBase
I have to pick you up on scaling. U2 scales really well there are some
staggering performance test that have been done. U2 does things
Regarding scaling, the MV DBMS I use advertises as highly scalable. Even if
typical partitioning is not by sharding there are many ways in which databases
can scale. People looking for non-SQL-only DBMS tools will have many and varied
requirements --dawn
Typed on a mobile keyboard
On Dec 16,
Comments below...
-Original Message-
From: DavidJMurray (mvdbs.com) [nab...@mvdbs.com]
Date: 12/16/2011 09:37 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Graph DataBase
I also, to some extent, agree with Dawn.
The mv, NF**2, post relational, PICK, or whatever the correct
In your quote from Dr Goodman, for what exact source are you quoting.
I would like to include that quote with a link in one on articles.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
.
On 12-17-2011 12:09 PM, Laura Hirsh wrote:
Comments below...
-Original Message-
From: DavidJMurray (mvdbs.com) [nab...@mvdbs.com]
Date: 12/16/2011 09:37 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Graph DataBase
I also, to some extent, agree with Dawn.
The mv, NF**2, post
From: Laura Hirsh
... Most importantly, does i model allow a
company to focus on, and increase the bottom line of
their business.
It really shouldn't be about one technology vs another.
Laura hit it on the head. There's all of this rhetoric about
where MV is best positioned. But
Hi
One MV vendor suggested that we collectively try to occupy NoSQL and see
if we can make a place for MV within the greater NoSQL (Not Only SQL)
community. Most of the MV DBMS vendors are on the list at nosql-database.org.
Whilst there would appear to be some similarities with NoSQL
I do disagree with this. If neo4j meets the not-determined criteria (except by
marketing departments) then MV products do too. MV vendors might have
suggested they are relational at varying points in their history (again
marketing depts) but they do not meet Relational or at least SQL-only
I also, to some extent, agree with Dawn.
The mv, NF**2, post relational, PICK, or whatever the correct model name is,
it is not a relational database. There are very strict definitions to a
relational database, namely, but not complete, normalisation, SQL, joins
etc.
Yes, the mv model can
I also, to some extent, agree with Dawn.
The mv, NF**2, post relational, PICK, or whatever the correct model name is,
it is not a relational database. There are very strict definitions to a
relational database, namely, but not complete, normalisation, SQL, joins
etc.
Yes, the mv model can
Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of DavidJMurray
(mvdbs.com)
Sent: Saturday, 17 December 2011 1:38 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Graph DataBase
I also, to some extent, agree with Dawn.
The mv, NF
I expect that the topic is of interest to U2 programmers. I plan to attend.
NYJavaSIG,
What: Neo4J - High Performance NoSQL Graph Database
Who: Peter Bell - CTO - Skinnio
When: WEDNESDAY, Dec 21, 2011 - 6:30pm-8:00pm (refreshments 6:00-6:30pm)
Where: Credit Suisse
1
Good idea to attend.
Although I have some probably-not-great reasons (so I'll keep them to
myself) for not having a lot of respect for Neo4J even without touching it,
I think it is a really good idea to visit some of the many various NoSQL
events when they are in your neck of the woods (they are
17 matches
Mail list logo
