Re: [U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-31 Thread Bob McGrath
Symeon Breen symeonb at gmail.com writes: Under these circumstances, another alternative is to migrate to OpenQM, which is very mature, low cost, and very feature rich. bobm... ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org

Re: [U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-31 Thread Kevin King
I for one am absolutely blown away at the price/performance of QM. Just getting started with it here but looking forward to seeing how far I can push this. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Bob McGrath b...@rm-consulting.biz wrote: Symeon Breen symeonb at gmail.com writes: Under these

Re: [U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-29 Thread Symeon Breen
Thanks everyone, as always invaluable information. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charles Stevenson Sent: 28 May 2011 15:15 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] uv 2 ud I concur with Rich

Re: [U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-28 Thread Symeon Breen
2011 17:27 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] uv 2 ud On 27/05/11 16:53, Israel, John R. wrote: As long as the customer has no preference, and there are not a bunch of funky things that only work with UV, I would go with what you know. Completing the project SHOULD be quicker

Re: [U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-28 Thread Symeon Breen
-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] uv 2 ud +1 Convert. Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has

Re: [U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-28 Thread Richard A. Wilson
I believe it would be quicker for you to pick up UV then converting to UD The little differences will take much more time to deal with. Rich Symeon Breen wrote: Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs

Re: [U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-28 Thread Charles Stevenson
I concur with Rich completely. On 5/28/2011 4:51 AM, Richard A. Wilson wrote: I believe it would be quicker for you to pick up UV then converting to UD The little differences will take much more time to deal with. Rich ___ U2-Users mailing list

[U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-27 Thread Symeon Breen
Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has worked exclusively in ud for 10 years, so uv is rather rusty to

Re: [U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-27 Thread Israel, John R.
Users List' Subject: [U2] uv 2 ud Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has worked exclusively in ud for 10

Re: [U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-27 Thread John Thompson
To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: [U2] uv 2 ud Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has worked

Re: [U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-27 Thread Wols Lists
On 27/05/11 16:53, Israel, John R. wrote: As long as the customer has no preference, and there are not a bunch of funky things that only work with UV, I would go with what you know. Completing the project SHOULD be quicker and thus cheaper. Maintenance would also be quicker and cheaper.

Re: [U2] uv 2 ud

2011-05-27 Thread fft2001
to stick with uv. -Original Message- From: Symeon Breen syme...@gmail.com To: 'U2 Users List' u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Fri, May 27, 2011 8:47 am Subject: [U2] uv 2 ud Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked