On 13/12/11 06:23, Ross Ferris wrote:
You are going to end up with key in field 1 with your code
Your assumptions in PRINT statements had also better let people know that
column # corresponds to field number (with caveat from above)
Would also suggest that
CONVERT TAB.KEY to @FM IN T.ROW,
We should come up with some standards and collaboration guidelines. But
until then here is a suggestion.
Make it a subroutine and separate the logic from the interface.
This way it can be used by everyone, the Desktop world, TCL world, or
whatever interface. Here is a good generic method that
Is anyone using U2 Web DE with Universe? Please share your experience.
Baruch
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
And FWIW my new dev environment, on general release early next year, uses a
client side language modelled on UniVerse Basic but with component and event
oriented features...
Hideously contrived example follows -
* get the author id from a selection dialog
Author = This.AUTHOR.Text
If Author =
In what language is the interpreter / compiler for your new dev environment
written ?
-Original Message-
From: Brian Leach br...@brianleach.co.uk
To: 'U2 Users List' u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Tue, Dec 13, 2011 7:35 am
Subject: Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?
And FWIW my
Will
The interpreter is in C#.
The compiler is in UniVerse - I know that seems mad but there are good
architectural reasons.
That's all I'm going to say for now - there are a couple of sites using it
but everyone else will have to wait until the new year.
Brian
-Original Message-
Envision if you will, a compiler written in Pick BASIC, which can compile an
object-oriented syntax.
Two passes, first turning the syntax into ordinary Pick BASIC code, and then
compiling that.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Leach br...@brianleach.co.uk
To: 'U2 Users List'
So I'm going through this wonderful project of moving from AIX 5.3 to RHEL
6.x for Universe (note the holiday sarcasm)
I was curious if Universe was certified on all versions of RHEL 6, since
Red Hat seems to be releasing the minor versions at a fast pace.
Here is the response my var got from
Wouldn't you want to phrase a question like How many outstanding bugs are
there on 6.1 ?
Or is that a constantly moving target?
Something like there were 50 reported bugs, we fixed 32 of them in 6.2 and
another 12 in 6.3, but of course in 6.2 there were 20 more new bugs reported,
and in 6.3
Ha Ha.
This was specifically related to Universe 11.1.4 being supported on RHEL
6.0, 6.1, or 6.2
https://u2tc.rocketsoftware.com/matrix.asp
Since Red Hat makes all of their releases binary compatible, Rocket does
not publish minor version numbers with Red Hat.
They do however, for OS's like
That would have been me.
However our hosting partner is not geared up to redhat 6 yet so we have gone
with redhat 5.7
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Thompson
Sent: 13 December 2011 18:37
To:
Ah ok. Well, look on the bright side. At least the hosting partner is
taking care of all of the OS guru stuff for you.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Symeon Breen syme...@gmail.com wrote:
That would have been me.
However our hosting partner is not geared up to redhat 6 yet so we have
Hi Dan,
Thanks for this information.
Can you tell us if Rocket has any plans to further develop / support the
original COM/OLE version of UniObjects? And in particular, are there any
plans to release a 64 bit version?
Thank you,
Jim Stoner
SUNY Empire State College
From: Daniel McGrath
Hi,
If Rocket is not going to be updating / supporting the original
UniObjects, we're looking at either creating a wrapper for UO.net, or
using UOJ. UOJ is the obvious choice for us, since we're currently
Domino-based, and Domino supports Java agents. However, I have the
impression UO.net
SB+ is not object-oriented. It is actually highly-functional in nature - the
underlining PROCESS call structure is:
@RTN.FLAG = PROCESS(@PARMS, @VALUE)
Where @RTN.FLAG is an output, @PARMS is an input and @VALUE is normally the
output, but can be used as an input also. This is common to all
Why would I want to?
To Keep Pick BASIC alive and kicking more.
-Original Message-
From: DavidJMurray (mvdbs.com) nab...@mvdbs.com
To: u2-users u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Tue, Dec 13, 2011 1:42 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?
SB+ is not object-oriented. It is
From: John Thompson
I'm not going to revert to RHEL 5.7 because I'm
afraid, and then in two years have to convert to RHEL
6.x because Red Hat stopped supporting it, and have to
go through all of this nonsense again.
Few people will admit that a decade ago they dumped a commercial
OS like
Please ignore
Stew
Effective October 2011 Symbion Pharmacy Services has changed it's name to
Symbion. My email address has changed from @symbionpharmacy.com to
@symbion.com.au. The company's ABN (25 000 875 034) remains the same.
0044: SUFFIXES = ,JR,SR,MD,III,
0045: S.NAME = DCOUNT(UM.NAME,' ')
0046: LAST.WORD.IN.NAME = FIELD(UM.NAME,' ',S.NAME)
0047: IF INDEX(SUFFIXES,,:LAST.WORD.IN.NAME:,,1) THEN
0048: LAST.NAME = FIELD(UM.NAME,' ',S.NAME-1)
0049: END ELSE
0050:
From: Wjhonson
Envision if you will, a compiler written in Pick
BASIC, which can compile an object-oriented syntax.
Two passes, first turning the syntax into ordinary
Pick BASIC code, and then compiling that.
That's not a concept that needs to be envisioned as though it's
new and has
I only have experience with UOJ, so I can't offer any comparison, but
I'd suggest the extensiveness of the feature set of each API may be a
moot point depending on how you use them. For example, I've never
attempted to use UOJ to do anything that can be done locally by a
UniBASIC subroutine. The
Great start, but here is a longer list, although still nowhere near
complete:
Prefixes
Code Description
1st Lt First Lieutenant
Adm Admiral
Atty Attorney
Brother Brother (religious)
Capt Captain
ChiefChief
Cmdr Commander
Col Colonel
Dean University Dean
+1 for what David said.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Yes but there is linux and there is linux - redhat is a commercial operating
system with a full support model - you can always go the fedora route if you
want to browse the bazaar. Actually many people only take the first year
support from redhat - after that there is plenty of bazaar activity for
Same here with uo.net - call a sub, let it pass back a dynamic array, or a
json string or an xml string, close the connection, do the rest in .net.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent:
This reminds me that around 1990 I wrote functions like this in F
correlatives that wrapped around the screen several times, one
dict item for each name part. Oh joy.
From: Charlie Noah
Great start, but here is a longer list, although still nowhere
near
complete:
[snip]
Wjhonson wrote:
Hi All,
I am in the process of moving some accounts form SB+ 5.0.4 TO SB+ 6.1.1 and on
logon the system no longer displays the contents of SB.WELCOME record.
I only get the standard SB+ login screen. An interesting twist, is that if I
escape all the way out of SB+ it then displays the login
27 matches
Mail list logo
