Re: [U2] U2 on Windows 2012 Server

We added W2012 to the Windows certification platform list for UniData 7.3.3. This is currently targeted for the end of January. As we have not yet reached code freeze for this patch, we have not started the QA process - so don't know how well this will go (the W2012 testing). I don't know of an

[U2] U2 on Windows 2012 Server

Does the U2 product(s) run on Windows 2012 Server? Microsoft has pulled 2008 R2 from my MSDN download site and gives me 2012 instead. Thanks, Bill ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-u

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

Why do you call it "ring" jump in particular? What's the "ring" ? -Original Message- From: Wols Lists To: u2-users Sent: Tue, Dec 4, 2012 4:07 pm Subject: Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC On 04/12/12 17:03, Wjhonson wrote: > Ring-jump ? > Vas is das > It's when th

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

On 04/12/12 17:03, Wjhonson wrote: > Ring-jump ? > Vas is das > It's when the processor jumps between restricted user mode, and kernel can do anything mode. Cheers, Wol ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/ma

Re: [U2] U2 Toolkit for .NET and Windows PowerShell - how?

Please visit the above link (stackoverflow). There is an answer (*ADO.NET *way and *UO.NET *way). See screen shot and PowerShell script. If you have more question, you can ask U2 Support Team. -- View this message in context: http://u2-universe-unidata.1073795.n5.nabble.com/U2-Toolkit-for-NET-a

Re: [U2] U2 Toolkit for .NET and Windows PowerShell - how?

Maybe you should let us all know when you have found the answers. On 5 December 2012 07:03, rajank wrote: > Please read : > > * > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13347631/using-the-u2-toolkit-for-net-uniobjects-in-windows-powershell* > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13347631/using-the

[U2] U2 Toolkit for .NET and Windows PowerShell - how?

Please read : *http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13347631/using-the-u2-toolkit-for-net-uniobjects-in-windows-powershell* http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13347631/using-the-u2-toolkit-for-net-uniobjects-in-windows-powershell

Re: [U2] How can I create DataSet using U2 Toolkit for .NET's Add-ins and Visual Studio 2010 DataSet Designer?

Hi Rajan Good job! Brian -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of rajank Sent: 04 December 2012 17:17 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] How can I create DataSet using U2 Toolkit for .NET's Add-i

[U2] How can I create Entity Data Model using U2 Toolkit for .NET’s Add-ins and Visual Studio 2010 Entity Data Model Designer?

Please read : *http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13677440/u2-database-add-ins-for-visual-studio-and-entity-data-model* http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13677440/u2-database-add-ins-for-visual-studio-and-entity-data-model

[U2] How can I create DataSet using U2 Toolkit for .NET’s Add-ins and Visual Studio 2010 DataSet Designer?

Please read : *http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13666214/how-can-i-create-dataset-using-u2-toolkit-for-nets-add-ins-and-visual-studio-2* http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13666214/how-can-i-create-dataset-using-u2-toolkit-for-nets-add-ins-and-visual-studio-2

[U2] Product Release : U2 Database Add-ins for Visual Studio (beta)

We are running beta for U2NETDK's new features called "U2 Database Add-ins for Visual Studio". If you want to join beta, please contact U2 Support. -- View this message in context: http://u2-universe-unidata.1073795.n5.nabble.com/Product-Release-U2-Database-Add-ins-for-Visual-Studio-beta-tp3937

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

Ring-jump ? Vas is das -Original Message- From: Wols Lists To: u2-users Sent: Tue, Dec 4, 2012 8:37 am Subject: Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC On 04/12/12 16:06, Jeff Schasny wrote: > I'll second Allen Egerton's "left over from Prime Information" theory. I > dist

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

Of course "blindingly fast" on a 4 MIPS 9955 is what we might now call "quaintly tortoise like" and that's why we still find things like the all indirect subroutine calls in an attempt to squeeze any available drop of performance out of applications. Wols Lists wrote: >From my knowledge of Pr

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

On 04/12/12 16:06, Jeff Schasny wrote: > I'll second Allen Egerton's "left over from Prime Information" theory. I > distinctly remember being told that indirect subroutine calls were > measurably faster way back in my days at Prime. > >From my knowledge of Pr1me architecture (which isn't great) th

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

I'll second Allen Egerton's "left over from Prime Information" theory. I distinctly remember being told that indirect subroutine calls were measurably faster way back in my days at Prime. Wjhonson wrote: I've not encountered this is my career previously, but now I'm seeing a system written al

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

We use the indirect call method to allow a user to create, for instance, an ITEMPROC subroutine. The subroutine implements a defined interface and the name is provided in the command syntax, so we parse out the subroutine name and call it at run-time. There's no way at compile time that we can

Re: [U2] uniobjects.net

Similarly, you can do a SELECT SAVING Then read that select list either by subroutine or directly. The only catch is you need to make sure there is an 'A' in attribute 4 of the select verb. "Kate Stanton" wrote in message news:... > Why not call a subroutine to do REFORMAT to a file,

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

Hi, A direct call has to be looked up once in the catalogue system when it is first used. Subsequent calls will be fast because the link has been created. However, if the call is itself in a subroutine and that subroutine exits, it starts clean again on next call and hence may need to rebuild th

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

Does anyone have any current benchmarks on this type of call? Several years ago when I tested it in UniData it was very slow call compared to using the name. David A. Green (480) 813-1725 DAG Consulting -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun..

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

On 12/03/2012 10:11 PM, Ed Clark wrote: I could see a 4gl writing out this kind of code, or a menu system. When you use indirect calling, the name of the subroutine can contain odd characters that wouldn't normally be allowed--though on some platforms you can also quote the call, e.g.: CALL

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

hi, These method is very usefull when you build software like a "lego", some pieces are polymorphic, the assignment of "source" depens of environment, params at runtime not only at compile time... the value of "soure" can be assigned from litteral, but also read from file or be the result of a

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

On 04/12/12 00:38, Wjhonson wrote: > I've not encountered this is my career previously, but now I'm seeing a > system written almost entirely with the use of indirect calls in Universe > BASIC. > > That is > SOURCE = "*SOME.PROGRAM" > ... > CALL @SOURCE(INPUTS) > > Is there some advantage to th

Re: [U2] Advantage of indirect call in BASIC

On 04/12/12 04:57, Israel, John R. wrote: > As far as the number of arguments changing, I will often write a subroutine > with a few extra variables (FUTURE1, FUTURE2, FUTURE3) so that I do not need > to find all the existing programs that call it and recompile them. It makes > this sort of thi