Re: [U2] [UV] Is anyone up on UV 11.2 ?

[Mike Pflugfelder]

We just discovered that connecting to secure web services (https://) that are 
using SSL certificates with the SHA-2 hash algorithms will require the new 
crypto libraries that are provided with UniVerse 11.2.

There are also new licensing options in 11.2 that will help us in certain 
situations.

Because of this, we are working out our upgrade path to 11.2 for development 
and testing, then finally releasing it to customers.

-Mike Pflugfelder 

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:57 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Is anyone up on UV 11.2 ?


Baker you didn't mention what I was thinking.
What does 11.2 give me, that I need, and would be worth the upgrade pain?



-Original Message-
From: Baker_Hughes 
To: U2 Users List 
Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 8:29 am
Subject: [U2] [UV] Is anyone up on UV 11.2 ?


Hi friends,

Its time to rev a few UV instances here and I wanted to ask if anyone is 
running on UniVerse 11.2.x  ??

If so, what can you share?

If you considered it but decided to stay with 11.1.14 or something around 
there, why?  Any issues that are yet to get worked out?

What ARE you waiting for -- is there some enhancement that you've heard is 
about to be released, or something patched that you feel is essential?

Thanks, from [unusually] cold Texas (yet not as cold as Chicago).

-Baker

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

 
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

[U2] UniVerse Training

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Does anyone know if the UniVerse internals class is being offered anymore?  It 
something that I've always wanted to attend, but I was never able to get 
approved.  I think I can get it approved now, but it seems like the course 
isn't being taught anymore.  If it's not available, is there any option to get 
the course materials?  I've tried reaching out to 
u2train...@rocketsoftware.com and haven't 
gotten any response.

On a somewhat similar topic, does anyone know anything about U2 UniVersity?  
The information on their web page (http://www.rocketsoftware.com/u2-university) 
is a little out of date, mentioning University 2012.  Nothing about 2013 or 
2014.

Thanks!
-Mike


___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: [U2] [uv] Secure Sockets / SSL

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Well, I'd like this to run from a Universe server, running on either
Windows or Unix, not the client side.  From what I understand, current
releases of Universe include secure sockets and therefore can make the
call directly.


-Original Message-
From: Hona, David S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:50 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [uv] Secure Sockets / SSL

Why re-invent the wheel when there are plenty of commerical SSL/TLS
packages out there already?
Such as SecureBlackBox suite (there are plenty more out there)...they
have downloadable trialware & code examples, etc.
http://www.eldos.com/sbb/net-ssl.php

Regards
David

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Pflugfelder
Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2008 12:53 PM
To: u2-users
Subject: [U2] [uv] Secure Sockets / SSL

I'm trying to write some software to send e-mail to a mail server.  I
would like to encrypt the connection using SSL or TLS.



Could someone point me in the direction of documentation or example code
that I could look at to get started with this.  It's all very new to me,
and I'm not getting anywhere with the Universe documentation.



For example, where do I start?  I know that my Exchange server supports
TLS encryption, and that when I connect, the traffic is unencrypted
until I issue the STARTTLS command.  Can I switch from an unencrypted
connection to an encrypted connection on the fly?



TIA



C. Michael Pflugfelder | Systems Manager | Keystone Information Systems,
Inc. | 856-722-0700 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] [uv] Secure Sockets / SSL

[Mike Pflugfelder]

I'm trying to write some software to send e-mail to a mail server.  I
would like to encrypt the connection using SSL or TLS.



Could someone point me in the direction of documentation or example code
that I could look at to get started with this.  It's all very new to me,
and I'm not getting anywhere with the Universe documentation.



For example, where do I start?  I know that my Exchange server supports
TLS encryption, and that when I connect, the traffic is unencrypted
until I issue the STARTTLS command.  Can I switch from an unencrypted
connection to an encrypted connection on the fly?



TIA



C. Michael Pflugfelder | Systems Manager | Keystone Information Systems,
Inc. | 856-722-0700 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Wintegrate and MS Excel Automation

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Does anyone have some existing code, or sample code, to use any version
of Wintegrate to manipulate Microsoft Excel?  We're trying to use
Wintegrate to open an existing Excel document, make some changes, save
the document then close it.  I know that Wintegrate has DDE, but we'd
like to steer away from that as DDE is due to disappear sometime in the
future.  In addition, I know about the Wintegrate documentation for the
WIN.OB... calls and the WIN.OBDEMO program, but I'm still confused as to
what calls to use and when.

Thanks,
-Mike

C. Michael Pflugfelder | Systems Manager | Keystone Information Systems,
Inc. | 856-722-0700 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Have you tried looking at the way your username is stored in windows.
The easiest way I know to do this is run the "net user" command from
windows, or "net user /domain" if it's a domain login.  All of our
network logins are in lower case, as is the same for most of our
customers.  We did have one customer that entered their logins in mixed
case.  Apparently, windows is case-insensitive when checking to see if
the login is valid, but when it returns the login to Universe, it
returns it in the original case that was entered, which for that
customer was mixed.  UV.LOGINS would not work as we had expected.
Ultimately, checking "net user" showed that they were in mixed case.
The way that I knew of to clean this up was to delete and recreate the
login in windows, or possibly rename the user.  Once the user is fixed
in windows, give Universe a reboot to clear it's user cache and it
should be fixed.

Good luck.
-Mike

-Original Message-
From: ATLAS SA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:59 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2][UV] Up casing Login IDs {unclassified}

Thanks Dave,

I tried it out but, unfortunately, the problem is occurring before the
UV LOGIN voc is invoked. And, to add insult to injury, it is only
happening to my login ID, not to the login ID of anyone else who has
access to the server.

If their UV.LOGINS record is AUSER10, they can enter any case
combination they like (AuSEr10) and UV passes AUSER10 to the UV.LOGINS
file. I use any case combination of my user ID and UV passes asuer14 to
the UV.LOGINS file. Somehow UV knows to upcase all telnet login IDs
except mine.

I suspect it may be because I installed something whilst logged onto the
server as myself, rather than as administrator. However, I did install
UV itself as administrator so it's not that. Possibly UVDK? However, I
have installed UV & UVDK on dozens of servers (Unix and Windows) and
have never had this occur before.

Also, I would rather not maintain separately formatted records for
myself throughout the DB. It would have further consequences in the
management of my records on what is the main payroll database.

Has anyone else encountered this problem before?

Cheers,

Andy
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UV install - internal vs. external

[Mike Pflugfelder]

There are files at the root filesystem: /.uvhome /.unishared /.uvdlls
The spooler typically installs into: /usr/spool/uv
The spooler area could be moved elsewhere if you modify
/uvconfig

I think that might be it, including the files that start UV
(/etc/inittab) or /etc/init.d depending on your release.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 10:32 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV install - internal vs. external

As part of our DR configuration, our database is loaded on an external
RAID
array.  We have the ability, should one server crash, to present the
disks to
other servers and be back up and running.
 
The question has arisen as to
whether we should do the same with UV itself.
Currently, it is loaded on an
internal drive, and therefore has to be loaded
on any failover machine.  If
we load it on an external drive, we would be
able to present that disk to a
failover machine along with the database.
This would also allow us to only
have to do UV maintenance updates, mods,
etc.) in one place and not have to
worry about keeping multiple servers in
synch.
 
The down side is that it
appears that when UV installs, it doesn't put
EVERYTHING into /usr/ibm/uv (or
whatever directory you choose for the
install).  For example, the uv.rc
script gets installed into /etc, and the
/etc/inittab file is modified to
call it.  Our concern is that there are
other pieces strewn throughout unix
that would be missing if we didn't
actually do the install on every server.
Does anyone know if there are other pieces of UV that don't go into the
install directory - or if this is the only one?
 
Thanks!
Brian

 
Brian
F. Paige
Serta International
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Direct line:  847-747-0451
Internal extension:  2051
Fax:  847-747-0551
 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material
not
intended for Public use.  
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by
persons
or entities other than the intended recipient is 
strictly prohibited. If you
received this communication in error, please notify the sender and
delete the
material from any and all computers or devices.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Example of connecting ASP.net to U2WDE (Redback)

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Visual Web Developer 2005 Express Edition

U2 Web DE 4.3.0

Universe 10



Does anyone have or know of an example of getting ASP.net setup to talk
to Redback.  I've already seen the IBM developerWorks article by Ray
Else at this url
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0506els
e/.  The problem I seem to be having is that the article talks about
using Visual Studio and it seems like he was using .net framework 1.1.
When I try the examples there, it doesn't work the same under WebDev
Express.



Thanks,

-Mike Pflugfelder
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] RE: [uv] 10.2

[Mike Pflugfelder]

We've had problems with 10.2 on Windows 2000.  We installed it right
around the time it was released.

Our problems seem to be:

Frequent persistent group locks on the voc file to group 0.
Multiple users show up in LISTU with the exact same PID.
Inconsistencies between LISTU and uvlictool user counts.

I'm close to rolling back to an earlier release of UV, probably 10.1.23
for this server.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Eastwood
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 11:23 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] RE: [uv] 10.2

Speaking of UV 10.2 - anyone running it care to share their experience. 
I've heard rumors of a "locking" issue, but don't know the details.

Mark
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Universe/UniObjects and Visual Studio

[Mike Pflugfelder]

I downloaded the tutorial and I like it so far but it seems to refer to the 
"Wychwood Audio Books" demonstration database.  Where could I find this 
database?  I can't seem to find it on www.mvopen.org/cms.

Thanks,
-Mike

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 4:42 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/UniObjects and Visual Studio

Anthony

there is a tutorial on using UniObjects with VB Express on the U2UG Knowledge 
Base.

Check out : www.mvopen.org/cms and click the Knowledge Base link.

Regards,

Brian

Hi guys,

I am messing with Visual Basic Express edition.  I was hoping to use
UniObjects against my Universe Database.  The examples in the UniObjects
Developers Guide are a little outdated.  How do I get the UniObjects to
appear in the toolbar (if you can do this) ? They refer to Sub
Form_Load, which I have seen in older versions of VB, but not VB 2005.
Basically what I am looking for is a 'quick fix' for the 5 minute
program example in the Developers Guide that has already taken me beyond
that time frame.

Thanks
Anthony

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/716 - Release Date: 3/9/2007
6:53 PM
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] [UV] LIST.READU program

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Does anyone have a program written that would give us better output for
LIST.READU that they wouldn't mind sharing?  We're having some problems
with record locks on one of our systems and it would help a whole lot if
I could do a LIST.READU (or similar) and see the username and filename
of the record that is locked all on one line.  We have an up-to-date
UNIVERSE.STAT.FILE and I was about to write my own replacement for
LIST.READU but I figured I would ask first so as to not reinvent the
wheel.

We're currently running Universe 10.2.0 on Windows 2000.

Thanks,
-Mike Pflugfelder
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Universe & Secure Telnet

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Karl,
Are you connecting to a Windows application server or a
Linux/Unix application server?

Thanks,
-Mike 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 1:37 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe & Secure Telnet

http://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/latest/x86/putty.exe

This is the method we use for SSH on PCs. Of course, our Linux
workstations come with it built in.

Karl


> Universe 10.1.0, Windows 2000 Server
>
> Does anyone have experience with making a secure telnet connection to
a
> Universe server running on Windows?  What terminal emulators have you
> used?  Is there any documentation on writing a wrapper or adding code
to
> an existing terminal emulator to make the SSL connection?
>
> Our goal is to secure the telnet connections that we are using until
all
> users transition to the secure web site.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Mike Pflugfelder
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>


-- 
karl

 _/  _/  _/  _/_/_/      __o
_/ _/   _/  _/_/   _-\<._
   _/_/_/  _/_/_/ (_)/ (_)
  _/ _/   _/  _/   ..
 _/   _/ arl _/_/_/  _/ earson[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
IT Director, ATS Industrial Supply, Inc.
http://www.atsindustrial.com
Toll-free: 800-789-9300 x29
Direct2Desk: 801-978-4429
Facsimile: 801-972-3888
--
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Universe & Secure Telnet

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Universe 10.1.0, Windows 2000 Server

Does anyone have experience with making a secure telnet connection to a
Universe server running on Windows?  What terminal emulators have you
used?  Is there any documentation on writing a wrapper or adding code to
an existing terminal emulator to make the SSL connection?

Our goal is to secure the telnet connections that we are using until all
users transition to the secure web site.

Thanks

-Mike Pflugfelder
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Closing Dynamic Connect

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Windows 2000 SP4
Universe 10.0.21
Dynamic Connect

I have a customer that uses Dynamic Connect for most of their users.
They asked me recently if there is a way to catch a user when they click
on the X to close Dynamic Connect so that they can properly log the user
off of the system.  Does anyone know of a way to handle this?  Some
changes that could be made to their application or to Dynamic Connect?

Thanks,
-Mike Pflugfelder
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] How to connect file remotely

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Bill,
In Universe, you can put a UNC pathname directly into a VOC
pointer for either the data portion, dictionary portion, or both.  The
key is to have ALLOWNFS in the uvconfig file set to 1.  It will use each
user's credentials to access the share, so if the user does not have
permissions to that share / folder in Windows, then they will not have
access from Universe.

001: F
002: \\server\share\dir\file
003: D_VOC

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 2:51 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] How to connect file remotely

Kevin:

I'm not sure this is even true.  For instance, I have UV on my notebook
computer.  I have access to a "shared" Windows folder on another server.
I've "mapped" this shared folder to my local UV notebook computer using
the
"Z:" drive letter.

I now have access to this "shared" directory through Windows but __NOT__
via
UniVerse.  There are several steps I need to take to gain access (note:
this
is not UV/NET access which is another story).  These steps, in UniVerse,
are:

1)  In UniAdmin select "Configuration Editor" and change the "ALLOWNFS"
parameter to "1".  This is the "critical" piece and escaped me for days
until someone suggested it.  :-)

2)  Get to TCL in UV and execute the following:

   DOS /C"net use Z: \\Server\Share Passwd /user:Server\U2Admin"

"Server" is the name of the remote Windows server.
"U2Admin" is the Windows user who's logged in.
"Passwd" is the Windows password for the "U2Admin" Windows user.

3)  Create an "F" item in the VOC that looks like:

U2TEMP
   0001 F
   0002 Z:\Temp
   0003 D_VOC

This will allow UV to access shared network resources without UV/NET.
In
UniData, as I understand it, one only has to create (VOC) pointers such
as:

U2TEMP
001 DIR
002 \\Server\Share\Temp
003 D_VOC

If this is not accurate (or the least number of steps to achieve this)
I'd
sure like to know.

Bill


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 8:35 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] How to connect file remotely

Actually, I don't believe that's true.  That will give you access, but
not lock support. 


-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Angelo
Collazo
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 7:35 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] How to connect file remotely

Eugene,

All you simply need to do is share your laptop drive and map it on the
network with the path info. Hope this helps.

Cheers,

Angelo Collazo
System Administrator
Silver Line Building Products Corporation One Silver Line Drive North
Brunswick NJ, 08902 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: 732.435.1000 X4495

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eugene Perry
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 6:42 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] How to connect file remotely

Hello,

I am using a copy of Universe PE on my laptop and I am interested in
accessing a file over the network.  Is there anyway to do that and
how?

Thanks

Eugene
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Filepeek usage to find internal file version

[Mike Pflugfelder]

I would like to find the internal version of a Universe Dynamic file.
Can someone give me the correct syntax of the filepeek command (or any
other command that would work) to find this information.  Is there also
a table of the different versions and any changes made to the file
version?

Where I'm going with this is that I have a customer that is experiencing
frequent broken files.  Most of their files are Dynamic.  They're
running AIX 4.3.3, Universe 10.1.12.  I'm fairly sure that they've been
upgraded over the years, but the files have not been resized or rebuild
since any upgrade, so I suspect that the files are an older vintage.
I'm hoping that this is contributing to their file corruption, but I'd
like to build a script to find the version of all of the files on their
system and report on it.

Thanks in advance...

C. Michael Pflugfelder | Systems Integrator | Keystone Information
Systems | 856-722-0700 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Universe file problems

[Mike Pflugfelder]

I have 2 customers, both running Universe 10.1.12 on AIX 4.3.3.

One seems to be getting frequent, corrupt files.
The other seems to call regularly saying that they have missing records
in different files.

Most of our files are dynamic files.

Can someone point me in the right direction as to where to go with each
of these.
Is there any type of logging that I can do that might tell me if a user
or a process is deleting records, maybe outside of the application?
Is there anything that I could be looking for as far as corrupt files
go?

Thanks,
-Mike
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Citrix with Universe

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Does anyone out here have experience with Citrix as it pertains to
Universe?

We have some customers / prospects that use Macs as their desktop
computer and would like to connect to our app.  Our front-end is written
in Visual Basic and doesn't run on the Mac.  Someone from sales just
mentioned that we might be able to use Citrix to get the app to a Mac.
So, does Citrix have a Mac client?  Does anyone have any war stories
from an implementation or anything like that?

Thanks,
-Mike Pflugfelder
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Windows UV & host based printers

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Windows Server 2003
Universe 10.1.11
Printer: HP Color LaserJet 2600n

>From what I've found on HP's website and some other research on the net,
it appears that this printer uses a 'host-based printer driver' or
'host-based printing'.  Does anyone have any experience with this
specific printer, or more information about host-based printers in
general?

The problem that we're having right now is that we can print a test page
from Windows and it prints fine.  When we try to print from Universe,
nothing comes out on the printer.  We've paused the printer and printed
from Universe and I can see the job hang in the queue waiting to print.
We then unpause the printer and still, nothing prints.

It appears from the documentation that printers are being made with less
intelligence now.  They're taking the hardware out of the printer that
does the formatting (converting from text to raster) and they're now
building it in to the driver in windows.  I haven't tested it yet, but I
know that there is the GDI option to the SETPTR command that might work
for us.  Does anyone know if I will still be able to pass PCL codes
through with this mode of printing?

Thanks for any help you can provide.


Michael Pflugfelder | Systems Integrator | Keystone Information Systems
| 856-722-0700 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] [UV] Gigabit NIC

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Hi all,
I remember seeing something in the list a while back about Gigabit
NIC cards and Universe but I can't seem to find a reference to it and
the search still seems to be down.  Does anyone know exactly what the
problem is between Universe on Windows and Gigabit NIC cards?  I believe
that it had to do with the driver for the NIC card and I know that
replacing the card with a 10/100 MB card was one solution, but that
doesn't sit well with me or my customers.  It's getting hard to tell a
customer that their new fancy server with it's blazing Gig NIC needs to
have it's network card "downgraded" in order to not have problems with
our application.  Can I simply change drivers?  Do I need to upgrade or
downgrade the driver?

Thanks in advance...


Michael Pflugfelder | Systems Integrator | Keystone Information Systems
| 856-722-0700 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [uv] Windows printer setup

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Dianne,
In your SETPTR statement, if you specify the printer name as a
UNC printer (\\server\printer) then yes, you can print to a remote
printer on a separate server or workstation.  The user that is sending
the print job needs to have permissions to print to the printer, but
that's normally the case.

-Mike 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dianne Ackerman
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 11:55 AM
To: U2 List Server
Subject: [U2] [uv] Windows printer setup

Hello wise ones!  It has always been my assumption that Universe on 
Windows can only deal with printers which are mounted locally.  Is there

a way to spool to printers on a separate printer server, other than 
mounting each one locally on the uv server?
Thanks in advance for your help!
-Dianne
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Hypothetical question about switching server frontends to SAN w/o reinstalling Universe

[Mike Pflugfelder]

So the OS between the two servers is still RedHat, just the difference
between 32 bit and 64 bit, correct?  Are they the same release, same
glibc, same kernel?

It doesn't surprise me that it would work as Universe on RedHat is 32
bit, not 64, but I wanted to get more details if possible.

Thanks! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 1:14 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Hypothetical question about switching server frontends
to SAN w/o reinstalling Universe

*Extremely* preliminary testing indicates no problems moving from a 
X86_64 based SunV20z to an x86 based IBM x345, and from the RH 64 bit OS

to the 32 bit OS, works fine. I'm not going to be able to do any testing

further in depth because we need to reallocate the qlogic cards, 
unfortunately, but at least in a trivial way it worked absolutely fine. 
System came up and all the custom software I tested worked exactly as 
expected.

Many thanks, Mike & all, this is heartening.

Mike Pflugfelder wrote:
> If you do, I'd love to hear how it works out for you, either on list
or
> off.
> 
> -Mike 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 8:36 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] Hypothetical question about switching server
frontends
> to SAN w/o reinstalling Universe
> 
> Thanks very much, Mike, I'll probably give that a shot myself just to 
> see what happens.
> 
> Mike Pflugfelder wrote:
>> The licensing and the files / pointers that you mentioned earlier
were
>> the only issues that we encountered.  Once all of that was taken care
>> of, it's very simple to just move the 'application' from one server
to
>> another.  If I ever do get a chance to try it on dis-similar
hardware,
>> I'll post a note.
>>
>> -Mike 
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
Ivanick
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:24 AM
>> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> Subject: Re: [U2] Hypothetical question about switching server
> frontends
>> to SAN w/o reinstalling Universe
>>
>> Many thanks, Mike, good to know it's in use elsewhere.  Anything I'm 
>> missing in terms of the switching out frontends/enabling a new
system,
> 
>> or any gotchas I need to worry about apart from the licensing issues
> you
>> bring up?
>>
>> Mike Pflugfelder wrote:
>>> Peter,
>>> I've had experience with the same setup.  We have used SANs for
>>> High Availability environments as well as Disaster Recovery as well.
>> We
>>> have used this in quite a few environments that want to be up all of
>> the
>>> time.  We haven't ever tried to use different OS releases as the
>> purpose
>>> was to keep the system highly available or be back online as quickly
>> as
>>> possible.  One of the advantages of a scenario like this is that you
>>> don't need to purchase additional licenses for other servers.  If
> your
>>> application goes down for any reason, you fail the disks over to
>> another
>>> server and bring up the application from there.  In other scenarios,
>> you
>>> either purchase hot-standby licenses at a percentage of the full
>> price,
>>> or purchase a small user license, then replace it with the full
>> license
>>> if you have a disaster situation.
>>>
>>> Just my $0.02
>>>
>>> Michael Pflugfelder | Systems Integrator | Keystone Information
>> Systems
>>> | 856-722-0700 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
Peter Ivanick
Web Services and Instructional Technologies
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777
http://www.vet.upenn.edu/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Hypothetical question about switching server frontends to SAN w/o reinstalling Universe

[Mike Pflugfelder]

If you do, I'd love to hear how it works out for you, either on list or
off.

-Mike 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 8:36 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Hypothetical question about switching server frontends
to SAN w/o reinstalling Universe

Thanks very much, Mike, I'll probably give that a shot myself just to 
see what happens.

Mike Pflugfelder wrote:
> The licensing and the files / pointers that you mentioned earlier were
> the only issues that we encountered.  Once all of that was taken care
> of, it's very simple to just move the 'application' from one server to
> another.  If I ever do get a chance to try it on dis-similar hardware,
> I'll post a note.
> 
> -Mike 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:24 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] Hypothetical question about switching server
frontends
> to SAN w/o reinstalling Universe
> 
> Many thanks, Mike, good to know it's in use elsewhere.  Anything I'm 
> missing in terms of the switching out frontends/enabling a new system,

> or any gotchas I need to worry about apart from the licensing issues
you
> 
> bring up?
> 
> Mike Pflugfelder wrote:
>> Peter,
>>  I've had experience with the same setup.  We have used SANs for
>> High Availability environments as well as Disaster Recovery as well.
> We
>> have used this in quite a few environments that want to be up all of
> the
>> time.  We haven't ever tried to use different OS releases as the
> purpose
>> was to keep the system highly available or be back online as quickly
> as
>> possible.  One of the advantages of a scenario like this is that you
>> don't need to purchase additional licenses for other servers.  If
your
>> application goes down for any reason, you fail the disks over to
> another
>> server and bring up the application from there.  In other scenarios,
> you
>> either purchase hot-standby licenses at a percentage of the full
> price,
>> or purchase a small user license, then replace it with the full
> license
>> if you have a disaster situation.
>>
>> Just my $0.02
>>
>> Michael Pflugfelder | Systems Integrator | Keystone Information
> Systems
>> | 856-722-0700 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
Peter Ivanick
Web Services and Instructional Technologies
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777
http://www.vet.upenn.edu/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Hypothetical question about switching server frontends to SAN w/o reinstalling Universe

[Mike Pflugfelder]

The licensing and the files / pointers that you mentioned earlier were
the only issues that we encountered.  Once all of that was taken care
of, it's very simple to just move the 'application' from one server to
another.  If I ever do get a chance to try it on dis-similar hardware,
I'll post a note.

-Mike 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:24 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Hypothetical question about switching server frontends
to SAN w/o reinstalling Universe

Many thanks, Mike, good to know it's in use elsewhere.  Anything I'm 
missing in terms of the switching out frontends/enabling a new system, 
or any gotchas I need to worry about apart from the licensing issues you

bring up?

Mike Pflugfelder wrote:
> Peter,
>   I've had experience with the same setup.  We have used SANs for
> High Availability environments as well as Disaster Recovery as well.
We
> have used this in quite a few environments that want to be up all of
the
> time.  We haven't ever tried to use different OS releases as the
purpose
> was to keep the system highly available or be back online as quickly
as
> possible.  One of the advantages of a scenario like this is that you
> don't need to purchase additional licenses for other servers.  If your
> application goes down for any reason, you fail the disks over to
another
> server and bring up the application from there.  In other scenarios,
you
> either purchase hot-standby licenses at a percentage of the full
price,
> or purchase a small user license, then replace it with the full
license
> if you have a disaster situation.
> 
> Just my $0.02
> 
> Michael Pflugfelder | Systems Integrator | Keystone Information
Systems
> | 856-722-0700 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Peter Ivanick
Web Services and Instructional Technologies
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777
http://www.vet.upenn.edu/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Hypothetical question about switching server frontends to SAN w/o reinstalling Universe

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Peter,
I've had experience with the same setup.  We have used SANs for
High Availability environments as well as Disaster Recovery as well.  We
have used this in quite a few environments that want to be up all of the
time.  We haven't ever tried to use different OS releases as the purpose
was to keep the system highly available or be back online as quickly as
possible.  One of the advantages of a scenario like this is that you
don't need to purchase additional licenses for other servers.  If your
application goes down for any reason, you fail the disks over to another
server and bring up the application from there.  In other scenarios, you
either purchase hot-standby licenses at a percentage of the full price,
or purchase a small user license, then replace it with the full license
if you have a disaster situation.

Just my $0.02

Michael Pflugfelder | Systems Integrator | Keystone Information Systems
| 856-722-0700 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 10:40 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Hypothetical question about switching server frontends to
SAN w/o reinstalling Universe

Hola all -

We've got our UniVerse installation (RH AS 3.5, U2 10.1.4) on a SAN 
partition, /usr/ibm is mounted entirely from there and that's where 
everything was installed to. On a hardware testing server, I had the 
opportunity to test out pointing an entirely different front-end system 
to that partition (well, a copy of it for testing) to see if U2 would 
come up, and it did indeed after I:

1) copied uv.rc, S999uv.rc, .uvhome & .unishared over to the new system
2) linked .uvlibs appropriately
3) restore spconfig & the whole spool directory from a backup
4) added the RPC port into /etc/services

Is there anything I missed here that would be helpful and/or necessary 
to proper functioning? I'm looking at this as an extreme disaster 
recovery scenario possibility, but theoretically it could substantially 
ease upgrading the system as well (although ours is pretty recent so 
this likely wouldn't come up for some time) with minimal downtime.

Thoughts/comments? Would OS differences matter at all here, i.e. if one 
was RH 3.5 64 bit and the next system coming up was 32 bit, or a jump 
from the 2.4 kernel to the 2.6 kernel (presuming the release of U2 
supported the 2.6 kernel)?

Thanks very much for any input.

-- 
Peter Ivanick
Web Services and Instructional Technologies
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777
http://www.vet.upenn.edu/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Free Editor

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Is there any documentation for this?  Like others, I've been able to
download Eclipse, install it and the U2Editor, but I'm unable to connect
to any of my servers as of yet.  So far, I've tried a Windows and a
Linux server, each running current versions of Universe, but I have yet
to see any of my files.

Thanks,
-Mike Pflugfelder 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D Averch
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:47 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Free Editor

For too many years in the U2 Community, we have been laboring with a
single
line editor.  Whether it was ED or the improved AE we have been pretty
much
stuck in the 70's and 80's.  Others have produced a lot of full-screen
editors, but they take a telnet license for every session.  We have a
solution for those who need to edit from multiple accounts, machines and
databases simultaneously in one editor environment.

U2Editor works on workstations such as Windows, Linux, Hp-UX, AIX,
Solaris,
and Mac OS X. U2Editor is built on open source development tool called
Eclipse as a plug-in.  By using the Eclipse platform for the open source
community, U2Editor can be updated automatically or manually via the web
using Eclipse Update.  Those using U2Editor will always have the most
up-to-date copy of the software. 

U2Editor is available today for downloading at www.u2logic.com.  Or send
us
an email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] vmuvadm.exe

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Where exactly is the vmuvadm.exe executable?  What version of UV for
Windows do you see this on?  I'm currently looking at UV 10.1.10 on
Windows and I don't see a vmuvadm.exe

Thanks! 

-Original Message-
From: Key Ally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 9:03 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] vmuvadm.exe

All,
 UniVerse on Windows ships with vmuvadm.exe, a utility for launching

a number of UniVerse configuration tools. I think the Unix/Linux 
versions of UniVerse have the same tool, but I don't recall it's name.

- Chuck "Same Name on Linux, Unix, and Windows" Barouch
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Universe GCI on Linux

[Mike Pflugfelder]

OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 4)
Kernel: 2.4.21-15.EL #1 SMP
Hardware: Dell PowerEdge SC 1425
Universe: 10.1.4

I've finally gotten UV 10.1.4 to install on this server by installing
the 32 bit version of libstdc++ and libstdc++-devel.  Now, I want to
compile in a GCI routine (Blacksmith) and I'm getting error messages.
I'm not a C programmer, so I'm having some trouble with this.  Is anyone
else in this situation?  I've tried rebuilding UV with no external C
routines and I get the same error messages.  Any ideas?  I've opened a
case with IBM support, but so far, they haven't gotten very far.  I
suspect that it's related to the OS being 64 bit and Universe being
compiled under a 32 bit OS.  I've also removed and reinstalled UV a few
times to make sure that I haven't added anything strange.

Here are the error messages that I'm getting:


cp ../pkgobjects /tmp/pkgobjects
sed -e "/GCI/d" /tmp/pkgobjects > ../pkgobjects
rm -f /tmp/pkgobjects
echo "GCI^gcc^gci.o datedata.o gcilib.a^-lm -lcrypt -ldl -lstdc++  -lc
/.uvlibs/libodbc.so^-lm -lcrypt " >> ../pkgobjects
cd ..; bin/lduv GCI
obj/uvsh.o(.text+0x225dc): In function `matherr':
: multiple definition of `matherr'
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `matherr' changed from 3 in
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/../../../../lib64/libm.so to
677 in obj/uvsh.o
obj/libuv3.a(do_mkdb.o)(.text+0x149b): In function `do_mkdb':
: `sys_errlist' is deprecated; use `strerror' or `strerror_r' instead
obj/libuv3.a(do_mkdb.o)(.text+0x148f): In function `do_mkdb':
: `sys_nerr' is deprecated; use `strerror' or `strerror_r' instead
obj/libuv2.a(pcdriver.o)(.text+0x4db): In function `pcdriver':
: the `gets' function is dangerous and should not be used.
obj/libuv3.a(DOMutil.o)(.text+0x462): In function `U_xdomValidate':
: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
/.uvlibs/libodbc.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
obj/uvsh.o(.text+0x225dc): In function `matherr':
: multiple definition of `matherr'
/usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `matherr' changed from 3 in
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/../../../../lib64/libm.so to
677 in obj/uvsh.o
obj/libuv3.a(do_mkdb.o)(.text+0x149b): In function `do_mkdb':
: `sys_errlist' is deprecated; use `strerror' or `strerror_r' instead
obj/libuv3.a(do_mkdb.o)(.text+0x148f): In function `do_mkdb':
: `sys_nerr' is deprecated; use `strerror' or `strerror_r' instead
obj/libuv2.a(pcdriver.o)(.text+0x4db): In function `pcdriver':
: the `gets' function is dangerous and should not be used.
obj/libuv3.a(DOMutil.o)(.text+0x462): In function `U_xdomValidate':
: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
/.uvlibs/libodbc.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation


Thanks in advance for any help
Mike Pflugfelder
Keystone Information Systems
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Multiprocessor IBM server

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Universe 9.6.2.5
IBM H50 server with 4 CPU's
AIX 4.3.3

Does anyone know how I can tell that this server is running multiple
CPU's?  In addition, how does Universe handle multiple CPU's?  I know
that there's been discussion about multi-threading in universe, but at a
more basic level, shouldn't universe or AIX distribute processes among
the available processors?  How do I know that this is happening?

Thanks,

Michael Pflugfelder
Systems Integrator
Keystone Information Systems
1000 Lenola Rd, Maple Shade NJ 08052
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: 856.722.0700 ext 238
fax: 856.234.5871
web: www.keyinfosys.com 
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Monitoring file changes

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Universe 9.6.2.1
Dec OSF1 V4.0F

In our payroll application, we've got a file, EMPMAST which is indexed
(Blacksmith Index for those that are curious).  Occasionally, records
are disappearing from the file, but not from the index.  The only way
that this should happen is from TCL.  I've checked the file for
corruption and it doesn't seem to be corrupt.  It's a dynamic file, but
so are most of our other files and we don't have any problems with
those.

Is there some way that I could monitor the file to see who deletes or
changes records?  Is there something else that I should be concerned
about?

I'm not sure if it will help, but I'm including an ANALYZE.FILE EMPMAST
STATS:

File name ..   EMPMAST
Pathname ...   EMPMAST
File type ..   DYNAMIC
Hashing Algorithm ..   GENERAL
No. of groups (modulus)    4501 current ( minimum 1, 93 empty,
1441 overflowed, 46 badly )
Number of records ..   18625
Large record size ..   1628 bytes
Number of large records    0
Group size .   2048 bytes
Load factors ...   80% (split), 50% (merge) and 80% (actual)
Total size .   12236800 bytes
Total size of record data ..   7385520 bytes
Total size of record IDs ...   82020 bytes
Unused space ...   4765164 bytes
Total space for records    12232704 bytes

-Mike Pflugfelder
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] u2bc - lack of software delivery.

[Mike Pflugfelder]

We've been pretty successful here at Keystone.  We order a Gold Master
and we usually get an e-mail within 1 week with the instructions on
where to download the software from...  Are you requesting CD media, or
online delivery? 

-Original Message-
From: Dianne Ackerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] u2bc - lack of software delivery.

Don't get me started  The last time I ordered a gold master, it took

7 weeks and constant emails/phone calls.
-Dianne

uniVerse mailing list wrote:

>Does anyone else get a headache everytime they try and order gold
>masters from u2bc? We've been waiting over a month for version 5.3.4 of
>SB+ that supposedly fixes problems we have but we can't get hold of it!
>
>Andy
>---
>u2-users mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] RE: non-admin groups access to universe nt

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Kevin,
When you changed to 'any directory' or 'any account', what
happens after you enter the password?

You should see something like this:

[Connection opened] 
Welcome to the IBM UniVerse Telnet Server. 
Enter user name: mikep 
Enter password: 
Account name or path(uv): 

Once that comes up, try attaching to the UV account.  Do you get any
error messages?  Can you get to TCL?

-Mike 

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Vezertzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] RE: non-admin groups access to universe nt

Thanks for the input Amy...actually, I have already changed the
networking option to 'any directory' and/or 'any account'...it didn't
seem to help.  Any other suggestions would be great.

Thanks,
Kevin
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UV on Red Hat Linux

[Mike Pflugfelder]

Sara,
You should look at the /etc/xinetd.d/telnet file.  Make sure
that disabled is set to no (or commented out).  You want to also look
for a line that says only_from and comment that out.  Run
/etc/init.d/xinetd restart and you should be good.

-Mike

-Original Message-
From: Sara Burns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [U2] UV on Red Hat Linux

We are missing something obvious here - can anyone assist by pointing me
in
the right direction (we have even read the manuals - but haven't found
the
vital key)
 
We obtained a copy of Red Hat RHEL 3  from IBM to test moving to this
platform.  It is installed on a test PC and forms part of an isolated
network with a W2003 PDC and an NT4 workstation.  UV 10.1 is installed
and
running.
 
Problem:  We cannot telnet to this box from our NT4 workstation.  We can
ping the box but a plain windows NT4 telnet session gives a Connect
Failed
message.
We can telnet into UV from the Linux server (to itself) and we can
telnet
out from the Linux server to the NT4 workstation (where we also have a
version of UV running from a previous test), but not from NT4 into the
Linux
box.
 
Any suggestions would be very welcome - on or off line.
 
Sara Burns
 
Sara Burns (SEB) 
Development Team Leader

Public Trust 
Phone: +64 (04) 474-3841 (DDI) 

Mobile: 027 457 5974
< 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Information contained in this communication is confidential. If you are
not
the intended recipient the information should not be used, disclosed,
copied
or commercialised. The information is not necessarily the views nor the
official communication of Public Trust. No guarantee or representation
is
made that the communication is free of errors, virus or interference.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Crystal Reports / ODBC

[Mike Pflugfelder]

I've heard rumors that newer releases of Crystal Reports do not play
happily with Universe ODBC.  Does anyone know why that is, and what
version(s) of Crystal do not work?

Thanks,
-Mike Pflugfelder
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV/Windows] Authentication / encryption issues

[Mike Pflugfelder]

LeRoy / Bill,
We are interested in the same thing, as are other people, I'm
sure.  If instructions do appear, would you be so kind as to post them
to the list.

Thanks,
Mike Pflugfelder
Keystone Information Systems


-Original Message-
From: Bill H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV/Windows] Authentication / encryption issues

LeRoy:

Could you please tell me the procedure to get wIntegrate to access
uniVerse
(or anything for that matter) using SSL (or where to find it)?  Am I
required to request, pay for, and install an SSL certificate on my dbms
server?

One reason I like AccuTerm is they use SSH, which is normally installed
with
Linux.  So, it's just: check the SSH box (instead of telnet) and proceed
as
I normally would.

Bill

P.S. I read a major league "futzing-around" procedure to connect to UV
using
wIntegrate via SSH.  Not exactly point'n click.  :-)
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Debugging code with #INCLUDES

[Mike Pflugfelder]

I've got a customer that is having some problems debugging his Basic
code.  He started using the #INCLUDE statement to include code from
other files.  He's running the code with the TRAP option so that he gets
dropped to the debugger on non-fatal errors.  When the program
encounters an error that comes from the #INCLUDEd file, he's left in the
debugger, on the line where #INCLUDE is.  When he tries to step to the
next line, it seems to run the rest of the code in the #INCLUDE, then
puts him at the next line in the main program.

Does anyone know how to tell exactly what line in the #INCLUDE is
causing the problem?  Are there any $OPTIONS that could be set to change
this behavior?

Thanks!

Mike Pflugfelder
Keystone Information Systems
856.722.0700 x238
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/