Thanks Mark!
Bjorn managed to find his reply (in an Advanced Pick manual)
just after
I'd sent the request, which kinda worked, but not exactly,
but your
length of inputbuffer works a charm.
Speaking of these SYSTEM thangs - is there anywhere I can
get a list of
all the settings / variables
In reply to what Steve wrote re: app level problems with
scability:
In a way you're right, in that an app written for small
scale systems
cannot easily be scaled upward to infinity without having
serious
bottleneck issues. No matter what tool (read
language/RAD/whatever) is
used, if the design
We have a program looping through all data files searching
for something
- sometimes it gets to a file containing several million
records and
we'd like to be able to tell it to skip that file and
continue with the
next file. We've tried the following approaches with said
results:
(1) OPT.OUT =
I think I have found the holy grail!
Mr Hogan, Sir
I do believe you have it...
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
, and churn out lotsa useful
utilities,
plus any amount of real work...
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 April 2004 12:01
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: OT: veryy OT: RE: We need a web based Forum!
Schalk
--
u2-users mailing list
Definitely an honourable reply.
The thing is tho', that if they don't do it in the most
accepted/requested way, they'll have more hassle in the long run,
forever being bombarded with petty whinging.
Seems to me a system where
* email (the list) carries on as usual
* All emailed
Schalk, you don't have to send the screen layout up and down
the lines -
have locally installed GUI apps, pointing to remote site
data. When the
program loads up, it gets all it's programming power from
the local
workstation, and data transfer is at a minimum.
I know this is a nirvana, and a real
Dawn
Why dispense with the work already done in Data/Basic - I
know I plug
the language, and y'all ignore me, but OpenInsight (the GUI
version of
Advanced Revelation) looks and feels just like the Gates
product, _and_
has the wonderful facility to use your already existing
DataBasic code.
The
but remembered not to include the entire original
post in my response this time -- sorry I forget that on
Oops! Me too - sorry folks!
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
The main argument against the forum is that some of you
out their can
not access the web. How can anyone in a development
role do their
job properly nowadays
without being able to access the web. I am sure that if
all we had
was a forum on the web, admin departments would be told
that X needs
For what it's worth the Revelation / Arev / OpenInsight
crowd have a
thing called Bonding where in you can create a bond with
another
database structure, and natively list/sort/query that
database. Bundled
with Arev comes Dbase / Ascii bonds. I don't know what comes
with OI,
but I believe you get
U2 TO DB2 --- Best thing to Happen.
Hopefully IBM will start integrating all IBM DB's into
Flagship RDBMS
UDB.
Joe Eugene
BOY! OH! BOY!This lad sure is a flamethrower. Wotsa
matta boy, you
have a bad childhood? Someone drown yer puppy? Wet the bed
last night?
You really got it bad. Why
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Clif Oliver
Sent: 15 April 2004 03:10
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: The future of U2
*** END OF THREAD ***
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD ANY FURTHER
(That means *anyone* not just the poster of
Hi Clif
A bit late in the day, but it would be better if you put END
OF THREAD
in the subject line as those of us who selectively read
posts often miss
these posts. On any thread that wanders about one starts to
get
interesting snippets that are tempting to reply to... Thus
inadvertently
breaking
In fact, knowing who wrote the message would help greatly
too (as I
always make a point of reading the posts from the
greats...Glenn
Herbert, Ray Wurlod, Leroy Dreyfuss...etc, and avoid those
written by
contentious souls, eg Joe...)
Knowing a post comes from [EMAIL PROTECTED] really does nothing
Surely
OneYear = 101
Current = 0203
*
NextYr = ( Current + OneYear ) R(0)#4
would be simpler???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of djordan
Sent: 31 March 2004 12:36
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Data
Wendy,
All that subscribing to a forum will do for you is that
you'll get an
email telling you that someone has replied to something on
the forum.
The email will NOT contain the posting, nor any reference
short of the
subject line to the previous post.
In short, all communication from the U2UG
Listen, Will the blind, deaf and possibly dumb Johnson
Are you hearing nothing? There are those of us who don't
live in the
land of the mighty dollar. We have to pay for our traffic,
we have
employment contracts that forbid us from internet access
during the day,
yet we still need access to U2
Ha! Will pernickty Johnson is at it again.
Integrate as a verb I think applies to mathematics.
But if I say My software integrates well I think most
people would
think
A) you have math software ?
or
B) Your English is bad?
Damn! Sir, can't you also get a life?
Ain't this a technical
Dennis Bartlett agrees that:
Dennis Bartlett wrote:
All that subscribing to a forum
And that
Dennis Bartlett was obviously smoking out of some BEEG pot
resulting in the fact that
Dennis Bartlett
is truly soree
errr..
oops
--
u2-users
Clif,
Like others I've selfishly used your lists for my gain,
without thinking of the work involved.
Like others,I've learnt so much,
and probably given so little.
Like others, I've flamed, been flamed,
and duly reprimanded in such a loving way :)
Like others, I've been
The number of after-the fact non-volunteers pointing out
what we
*should* have done is always staggering...
I think what you've done is excellent.
I think that the who comparison thang came about as a result
of the
imminent demise of the oliver thing...
Volunteer?
No problem, only I wonder
So there Will Johnson
Ha Will! So nice to see you're wearing a new style...
Must say it really suits you...
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Somebody the other day said that if we all asked IBM
(nicely) we might
be able to get UniData-type profiling available on
UniVerse...
I sent a message to U2AskUs and got back a snotty (sorry
Jackie!) reply
The appropriate way to request an enhancement is to raise
it with
your support
Hey, Wol, wot's cdp?
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
For what it's worth I'm writing a trigger-based solution
in-house.
Progress has stalled for the mo' for a lack of time, but
basically it's
as follows:
The RC means Revision Control
Two files:
RC.PROJECTS -stores a description,
creation author, date, time
Just a reminder that to ask IBM for something, simply send
a post to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please ask..!!!
-Original Message-
Pity that's a UniData-only feature.
[snip]
Maybe if enough UniVerse users request it, it will be
added.
[snip]
Tim Snyder
IBM Data Management Solutions
Everything seems to revolve around block size. I know we've
been over
this a thousand times, but I'm trying to make sure (coz I'm
being
hounded to prove my theories)
I've been using 2k as a general rule-of-thumb (on W2k NT),
but have
now been informed (albeit wrongly perhaps) that Pick is 2k,
the trigger. BUT - I haven't tried it. Not
sure I would
try it.
Good luck!
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 9:20 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: How to Add Triggers on Dicts
The trigger is currently working
for adding triggers to data files.
CREATE TRIGGER AUDIT_XXX AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE ON
XXX FOR
EACH ROW CALLING 'DATA.TRIGGER' ;
I've tried various ways of modding this statement to add the
trigger to
a dict, but alas no success.
Any ideas?
dennis bartlett
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL
Hi Vincent,
Is your subroutine GLOBAL cataloged ?
Thanks for the prompt reply! Yes, it is cataloged using the
INFORMATION
FLAVOR catalog command. (our system runs on a PICK flavor
account)
The trigger is currently working fine on DATA files. It's
just the
adding of it to DICT files that's
Whoa! Hold on...
The original poster of this thread never questioned the need
for support
- he just questioned the need for east coast support...
All he was asking is is there a way to directly approach
IBM for
support, and if not, who can he go to as a VAR on the west
coast... Not
so difficult,
Hi Gwen
We're running UniVerse 10.0.4 (a known baddie as it is) and
Backup Exec,
tho' which I don't know off hand. We also get plenty app
errors
We've had 47 system crashes sinces Aug '03, which IBM have
first blamed
on Backup Exec, then told us that 10.1 would fix it
thereby admitting
the
Sometimes (out here in Africa) we cannot get access to the
internet -
whilst I realise it would just be a snapshot without
updating, would it
be possible to use something like webstripper and copy the
entire site
to my HDD?
dennis
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Think of PROC as a type of dos BAT file... Sure you could
write programs
to schedule things to happen one after the other, but it
sure is easier
to just create a BAT file, ain't it? AUTOEXEC.BAT?
Yeah, they evolved, perhaps too far, but essentially it was
a simple
procedural tool.
-Original
Yeah, they evolved, perhaps too far, but essentially it was
a simple
procedural tool.
Wrong way round.
Huh? I said Procs in the PQ form came before PQN's... Waz
wrong wi' dat?
The evolution was PQ to PQN ... From simple batch (step 1 to
2 to 3) we
moved to labels (step 1 to 2 to (if a = b) then
For what it's worth, the Arev knowledgebase has a great
article on
optimising BASIC code (for speed!), which mentions that the
-1 concept
is the slowest structure. Admittedly we have processors that
thrash
these things out in milliseconds today, but for the
purist... The A = A
: newvalue : @fm
37 matches
Mail list logo
