Old history now, but as a Pr1mate (as in used, not worked for), I never
learnt (or even MET!) procs until extremely late in the day. Official
support for procs appeared with INFORMATION 8.1, released probably about
1991 just before they went bust :-(
It just WASN'T THERE on any system I ever
Think of PROC as a type of dos BAT file... Sure you could
write programs
to schedule things to happen one after the other, but it
sure is easier
to just create a BAT file, ain't it? AUTOEXEC.BAT?
Yeah, they evolved, perhaps too far, but essentially it was
a simple
procedural tool.
-Original
Can someone help?
To access our main application which is written mainly in SB+ (text
based only no GUI) we use SBClient. Since the advent of 32 Bit
Operating systems (some time ago now) we have seen an extremely disproportionate
amount of CPU resource being taken up by SBClient even
Title: RE: SBClient on Windows XP
Mike,
I think SBClient 5.2.4 is the earliest version supported for XP
We found the 4. releases to be very cpu hungry.. but from about 5.0.5 they got better.
We use 5.2.3 5.2.4 with no cpu issues.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Mike
At 12:12 AM 02/05/2004, you wrote:
[snipped]
The same applies (here) with a BASIC program that :
0011 SENTENCE = \SELECT MD WITH F! RUBBISH\
0012 EXECUTE SENTENCE CAPTURING JUNK RETURNING ERR
In this case ERR = 0 if there's no items, not 401 under vanilla (R83, AP) Pick
Unless.. Is there a
Yeah, they evolved, perhaps too far, but essentially it was
a simple
procedural tool.
Wrong way round.
Huh? I said Procs in the PQ form came before PQN's... Waz
wrong wi' dat?
The evolution was PQ to PQN ... From simple batch (step 1 to
2 to 3) we
moved to labels (step 1 to 2 to (if a = b) then
And if it was not for Glen and Steve Buck who helped push for this
inclusion, PI might never have had this as part of the core product.
It did come to be a key piece of the product when PI+, PI/Open hit the
market as we encountered a lot of old MD, PICK shops that we targeted to
convert.
Title: Message
I have
to agree here. We did the same identical conversion back several years ago
from UV 7 on SCO, to the second UV release available on NT (don't remember the
exact version number).
All we
did was TAR the SCO database, copy it through the network, and then UNTAR it on
the
Javed-
afraid CTRL T isn't doing anything for me.
Colin-
I'm not clear what exactly Dual session is about. I can click
Compile, Catalog, or Run, and they work fine. However, the whole point
of UniDebugger (from my perspective) is that it gives VB-like control
over running code. I made
Title: Message
what
about using a serial - ethernet -
wirelessbridge/// wireless
router - server
since
your only talking about a scale, speed isn't an issue, go with the cheaper
802.11b
Once
it's all hooked, you establish a link from UV - scale via a socket
connection
George
Title: Message
http://www.sena.com/products/by_name/hd_super/
Might be of some value?
george
-Original Message-From: Brutzman, Bill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004
11:38 AMTo: 'U2 Users Discussion List'Subject: Serial
Connectivity
We
are
Cyndi,
If your talking about converting Unidata (Unix) to Universe (W2k) then read on.
We converted from Unidata on an HP Unix box to W2K running UV 10. It wasn't that
difficult to do. Get a hold of IBMs Universe Technical Bulletin (Part # 74-0108)
Converting Unidata Files to Universe Files.
I tried it. It didn't seem to work but maybe I didn't do it right. I did
include the [1] in there. I'm a newbie, was I not suppose to. I'm also
running this in a UNIQUERY statement at the colon prompt. Would that have
anything to do with it not running properly. Thanks for whatever light
you can
Thanks Ray and all of those who replied to my questions. I wound up choosing
the 64bit option. For the record, I am in favor of using distributed files. I have
many situations where I use them. However, I really didn't have the time to come up
with a good algorithm to achieve even
Title: Message
If all
you need is justa count of records in a file with a particular field
containing the value "*" or "Incomplete":
COUNT file WITH field = '*' 'Incomplete'
-Original Message-From: Kevin Michaelsen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004
Title: Message
Kevin:
A problem is the use
of the double-quote more than once - this will fail. Also, in your
original below you have the following clause using LIKE:
LIKE "'...*'
which will not work in the way you
want. Because the ...* is within the single quotes,
the LIKE statement
Title: Message
I just got
a digiport server running on Universe/Linux. We have a door/people counter on it and an RF mux. We used cat5 basic wiring with rj45 to
db25 converters. Pins 2, 3, 7 (tx,
rx, sig gnd) are all that were needed.
If the digi driver installs properly and such it
Good Heavens, Mark, I think you kind of missed the tone of my post. :-) I see you sent it just before midnight, you must have been tired.
I suppose after rereading my post in the light of a new day, you will see that I understand why the code I copied from a prior post was poorly written. (Don't
Separation is pretty much unlimited under uniVerse. However from a practical
perspective, you should try to tailor your groupsize to something that
would accommodate your data. For example if your AVERAGE record size is 8k
in length, you will have records both larger than 8k and smaller than 8k.
That didn't make sense, did it. No wonder I wasn't getting any responses.
I even had my cup 'o coffee.
I'm leaving now...
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Waldie
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:55 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: UniDebugger
Is there a setting in
Title: Message
I
don't know about objections, haven't used it.
George
-Original Message-From: Brutzman, Bill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004
2:33 PMTo: 'U2 Users Discussion List'Subject: RE: Serial
Connectivity
Is a
"socket connection"
[UV10/AIX] We have a requirement to output (10MB +/- ascii) data into zipped
files, the files then being put on a web server for collection. I'm just
wondering what the best approach to this might be? How would or have other
people approached this? I'm trying to avoid writing the data until after
22 matches
Mail list logo
