RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Ray Wurlod
00 To: "U2 Users Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Setting up SQL step 1 > Why might I have the 9.5 docu? Because we're still running it :-( > > It's all very well, but there is some truth in the old adage "if it aint > broke, don't fix it&

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 3/18/2004 3:26:32 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Sent: 17 March 2004 19:40 > To: U2 Users Discussion List > Subject: Re: Setting up SQL step 1 > > "Good news (I think) From what I learned - the admin user is set up when you > lo

Re: [OT] RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Glenn Herbert
I do agree that IBM has made a decent effort at keeping UV viable, and that is a very nice thing indeed. Some of us put in a LOT of ourselves to get it where it was at 9.6. I believe that upgrading is a good thing too, although only if "undocumented features" are kept at a minimum. At 09:43

Re: [OT] RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Donald Kibbey
Well, that's a hearty pat on the back for all those old timers out there who worked on UniVerse during the VMark days. Still, better to upgrade (IMHO). Afterall, why not add some excitement to your life and chase some new "features" instead of the same old ones you already know how to deal wit

Re: [OT] RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Glenn Herbert
LOL... love this one. At 09:23 AM 03/18/2004, you wrote: upgrade, upgrade, upgrade. You think maybe somewhere along the path between 9.5 and 10.1 the SQL setup and operation was improved just a tad? Don Kibbey please feel free to do so. My experience with this specific issue revealed t

[OT] RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Daniel_Plocinik
upgrade, upgrade, upgrade. You think maybe somewhere along the path between 9.5 and 10.1 the SQL setup and operation was improved just a tad? Don Kibbey please feel free to do so. My experience with this specific issue revealed that it has stayed unchanged and I get the impression that it

RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Anthony Youngman
ald Kibbey Sent: 18 March 2004 12:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Setting up SQL step 1 upgrade, upgrade, upgrade. You think maybe somewhere along the path between 9.5 and 10.1 the SQL setup and operation was improved just a tad? Don Kibbey Financial Systems Manager Finnegan, Henderson, Fara

RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Donald Kibbey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 March 2004 19:40 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Setting up SQL step 1 "Good news (I think) From what I learned - the admin user is set up when you load the operating system . I was told that if I re-installed my latest upgrade tape that I could updat

RE: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-18 Thread Anthony Youngman
L PROTECTED] Sent: 17 March 2004 19:40 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Setting up SQL step 1 "Good news (I think) From what I learned - the admin user is set up when you load the operating system . I was told that if I re-installed my latest upgrade tape that I could update the user

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-17 Thread Glenn Herbert
Will, According to the manual, you'd first grant CONNECT privileges, then you can grant DBA. Not sure why it says the admin id isn't an SQL user. On NT it should default to the administrator you installed with. At 02:56 PM 03/17/2004, you wrote: Glenn, et al. I have a client who has never use

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-17 Thread Daniel_Plocinik
) [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: ver.com Subject: Re: Setting up SQL step 1

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-17 Thread FFT2001
Glenn, et al. I have a client who has never used SQL and I want to use it for something. So I tried to create a schema and it says Will.Johnson is not an SQL user. Ok so I tried to create myself as a user while logged in as administrator And it says TREGUNDO\Administrator is not an SQL user. In UV

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-17 Thread Glenn Herbert
Will, I missed what you were trying to do. Still some people here who might be able to help if we knew the question. At 02:39 PM 03/17/2004, you wrote: "Good news (I think) From what I learned - the admin user is set up when you load the operating system . I was told that if I re-installed my

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-17 Thread FFT2001
"Good news (I think) From what I learned - the admin user is set up when you load the operating system . I was told that if I re-installed my latest upgrade tape that I could update the user at that time. I never was able to find any of this documentation on this - and when I asked IBM, since I w

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-16 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 3/14/2004 6:48:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > You have to HAVE DBA privilege before you can grant DBA privilege. To grant DBA > privilege to Will.Johnson, you'll need to be logged in as OSP\Administrator (or any > equivalent > mapped in UV.LOGIN).

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-14 Thread Ray Wurlod
source Service, which runs as a system process. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:15:02 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (U2 Users Discussion List) Subject: Re: Setting up SQL step 1 > I have a client who has never used SQL on their system and I'd like

Re: Setting up SQL step 1

2004-03-12 Thread FFT2001
I have a client who has never used SQL on their system and I'd like to set it up. It is a Universe 10.0 on Windows setup. When I look at UV_Users I see two users one is NT Authority/System and the other is OSP/administrator My first question is: Is there really a windows login called System ?