Hi.
We had same issues on HP-UX.
Be sure to have at least 900 MFILES.
Consider increasing RAM (to disk cache)
Use UVTEMP on a different disk controller than DB. (even better use ramdisk)
And the most important: the right size of big files. Try different
separation. I got best results with separatio
Well. I'm not a copyright lawyer, and I'm not pretending to be.
If you do as you suggest and send it back to the author for suggested
improvements, I'm sure you're right - there is no violation, and you are
effectively seeking documentation enhancement or correction.
If you do as you suggest, do no
No you're not paying attention.
Below I have copied your entire message, and now I'm criticizing it.
I'm not claiming your message is MY message, that's the point of the criticism.
I'm saying here is what he says, and here is what's right ;)
So you are mistaken in the believe that a person sellin
I ve had an idea
Publish the whole of harry potter in a book called "the critique of harry
potter", stick a few paragraphs at the end saying it's a childrens book ,
why do so many adults read it etc, then sell it for 1.99.
Or have I missed your point ;)
-Original Message-
From: u2-user
Yes you've quite missed it.
The core value of your work has to BE the criticism.
If the point of your work is merely to repeat not criticize, then you don't
enjoy exemption.
-Original Message-
From: Symeon Breen
To: 'U2 Users List'
Sent: Sun, Dec 4, 2011 11:33 am
Subject: Re: [U
Gee, I had no idea what-so-ever that we were talking about E-mail...
I have said, from the beginning, that I am speaking of copyrighted material,
or material authored by someone else and not released in an open forum in
which anyone is free to use the information in whatever manner they choose.
Ro
Criticism does not extend to rewriting or enhancing, in whole or in part,
the author's original work.
You are free to quote from the original work, citing the source of that
original work.
I can't remember the last book, movie, or other critique stating in any way,
shape, or form "... this is how
It was an example "literal Bob", in order to address the issue of credit, and
extent.
It was not intended to be all encompassing.
The exact same thing I did there, can be done with any work whatsoever, without
limit, without permission :)
-Original Message-
From: Bob Wyatt
To:
I think it's time to stop arguing with someone who doesn't
understand or agree with generally accepted concepts like
intellectual property, infringement of copyright, plagiarism,
etc. This has been a recurring theme of his for years. Add to
this that he intentionally publishes incomplete and misl
"The only winning move is. Not to play!"
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 5:57 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 7.1
Tony the legal points are all layed out in a blog from Stanford University.
This isn't something I'm making up.
Don't try to troll the list by making an extreme statement that I never made.
We're only discussing copyright and criticism, period. We're not discussing
all things.
-Origina
Sir:
Just because you use the words "Stanford University" doesn't impress
most of us. Nor does it improve your arguments. I suspect this is one
of those instances where we should just let things go and we can all
move on. :-)
Bill
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
