from my experience.
I want to thank everyone who offered help and took the time to make
suggestions.
Vance Dailey
-Original Message-
From: Vance Dailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:23 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: UV command failing mystery
>From: Vance Dailey
>It was suggested that I try to run dg_strace. I ran it on one
>of the failing
>uv processes. It generated a 1mb file. I can see where it
>executes "uvsh"
>and It fails just aft
>From: Vance Dailey
>It was suggested that I try to run dg_strace. I ran it on one
>of the failing
>uv processes. It generated a 1mb file. I can see where it
>executes "uvsh"
>and It fails just after the 7th occurance of "RUN APP.PROGS
>PACKAGE.INS".
>(The 7th run is just after the string
>"SPECIA
It was suggested that I try to run dg_strace. I ran it on one of the failing
uv processes. It generated a 1mb file. I can see where it executes "uvsh"
and It fails just after the 7th occurance of "RUN APP.PROGS PACKAGE.INS".
(The 7th run is just after the string "SPECIAL.EDITOR.SELECT.DATA\OLONG".)
ssion List
Subject: Re: UV command failing mystery
> It appears that Phantoms can always get into Universe but Terminal
> sessions sometimes can not.
Is there more information besides the fact that they "can't get in"? It
could mean that you're exhausting all of th
ck
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 11:42 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: UV command failing mystery
If your running Redhat,Mandrake, or Fedora, the command is strace
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Vance Dailey
ssion List
Subject: RE: UV command failing mystery
It appears that Phantoms can always get into Universe but Terminal
sessions sometimes can not.
For what it's worth, phantoms do not consume licenses, while terminals do...
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.c
> It appears that Phantoms can always get into Universe but Terminal
> sessions sometimes can not.
Is there more information besides the fact that they "can't get in"? It
could mean that you're exhausting all of the available licenses. Terminal
sessions will consume a license while phantoms
It appears that Phantoms can always get into Universe but Terminal
sessions sometimes can not.
For what it's worth, phantoms do not consume licenses, while terminals do...
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
(If this is a duplicate post I apologize - my email generated a error when I
sent it the first time)
We have a new observation. We wrote two processes. One is a universe process
which starts up a new phantom each 60 seconds. The other is a ProComm script
which logs in a terminal session each 60 sec
If your running Redhat,Mandrake, or Fedora, the command is strace
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Vance Dailey
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 11:36 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: UV command failing mystery
I c
know
what I find. Thanks for the tip.
Vance Dailey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Dave Kimmel
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 11:08 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: UV command failing mystery
On Feb 4, 2004, at 4:38 PM, Vance
problem is fixed by Monday
evening.
Thanks
again,
Vance
Dailey
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Timothy
SnyderSent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 6:43 PMTo: U2
Users Discussion ListSubject: RE: UV command failing
mystery
It's
: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 9:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: UV command failing mystery
Vance:
Is
echo $?
returning anything meaningful after uvsh fails?
Lee
--
Lee J. Leitner, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
nal Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vance Dailey)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vance Dailey)
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/05/2004 06:36 PM
Please respond to U2 Users Discussion List
To: "'U2 Users Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: R
post with the results.
Vance
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 10:21 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: UV command failing mystery
Ok. So its not an exec/fork problem. My next susp
o what data we should be capturing I would
be appreciative.
Thanks,
Vance
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Lee Leitner
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 9:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: UV command failing mystery
Vance:
Is
echo
Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:13 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: UV command failing mystery
The 'uv' command is basically a small front ender to the 'uvsh' executable,
which is really the guts of universe. The uv command does little mor
On Feb 4, 2004, at 4:38 PM, Vance Dailey wrote:
Well, it did not take long to get a chance to test trying 'uvsh'. The
problem reared its ugly head again today and we now know that uvsh
also does
not work. The command returns to the shell so quickly that whatever the
problem is it must occur near
Vance:
Is
echo $?
returning anything meaningful after uvsh fails?
Lee
--
Lee J. Leitner, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.leitner.org/~leitnerl
The world can only be grasped by action, not by
contemplation. The hand is the
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:13 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: UV command failing mystery
The 'uv' command is basically a small front ender to the 'uvsh' executable,
which is really the guts of universe. The uv
rs Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: UV command failing mystery
We upgraded our system from a 16 processor AV2 to an 8 processor AV25000. Because each block of 4 cpus can only support 4gb of memory our upgrade was going to cut our memory in half. So, th
ry 04, 2004 11:44 AMTo: U2
Users Discussion ListSubject: Re: UV command failing
mystery
The only thing that may be suspicious is some
changes we made tosome kernel and UV config settings a few weeks prior to
the first reportedproblem. The following changes were
made:(KERNEL)SDELSIM 20
The only thing that may be suspicious is some changes we made to
some kernel and UV config settings a few weeks prior to the first reported
problem. The following changes were made:
(KERNEL)
SDELSIM 2048 TO 256
SEMOPM 100 TO 64
SEMUME 1024 TO 64
SHMMNI 4096 TO 2048
SEMMNI 4096 TO 2048
(UV CONFI
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:13 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: UV command failing mystery
The 'uv' command is basically a small front ender to the 'uvsh' executable,
which is really th
The 'uv' command is basically a small front ender to the 'uvsh' executable,
which is really the guts of universe. The uv command does little more (for
universe) then to check ulimit settings, increasing them when necessary,
then issuing an execve() call to uvsh. If you bypass 'uv' and just use
We are having a very strange intermittent problem with the UV command not
working from Unix.
Occasionally, after a user logs into Unix (without noticing anything
unusual) typing "UV" simply returns the user to the UNIX shell almost
instantly. When the problem occurs it seems to affect everyone who
27 matches
Mail list logo
