We’ve had good results with Exalt ExtendAir G2, too: 11GHz, 18GHz, 23GHz.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Adair Winter
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 4:35 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance
We use
Would an AF5 be able to supply 150/150 (true throughput) @ 13mi?
We have a customer requesting a 100/100 connection who is 5 miles from one
of our tower sites. Our site is currently 3 hops from any of our fiber fed
tower sites. With some redesign work and a mile or two of fiber I can
shorten
://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Robert Haas rob-li...@bpsnetworks.com
To: ubnt users ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 11:25:27 AM
Subject: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance
Would an AF5 be able to supply 150/150 (true throughput) @ 13mi?
We have a customer
the whole
5.8ghz band.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:35 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance
http
We have one at 12.5 miles and it reports Rx Capacity at 213 Mbps, but I
don't know what that translate to reality. That is a 50 MHz channel width
at 5800 MHz with signal levels around -65 and a noise level of about -92.
We are having difficulty maintaining that 213, it wants to switch back and
.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Phil Curnutt [pcurn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 1:18 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance
We have one at 12.5 miles and it reports Rx Capacity at 213 Mbps
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance
You're not going to find much that'll do better than 100/100 at that distance
without going licensed. Maybe the PTP600\650? Anything AC based with
appropriately sized dishes will and will likely also work in 5150. However, a
100/100 customer should
To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 1:56:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance
That is what I’m thinking Mike, I’ve already shot an E-mail off to Pete @ SAF
to start looking at some licensed gear.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
*From: *Robert Haas rob-li...@bpsnetworks.com
*To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
*Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 1:56:59 PM
*Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance
That is what I'm
On 12/1/14, 12:34, Josh Luthman wrote:
Waste of time in the licensed world. They all perform as they
advertise. Modulation * channel size = megabits per second. Price
varies, GUI varies, support varies. Go SAF!
It was my understanding that there would be no math.
~Seth
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance
There's a plethora of WISPA vendor members that make (or sell) licensed links.
Few people have anything bad to say about any of them.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com http://www.ics-il.com
ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 4:13:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance
We already use SAF Lumina’s which I’ve had good luck with. A plus would be if
we can use the same band radio to minimize on the shelf spares.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
