Hi,
Alex:
and even making sure we have 1 person who is both DebianGIS and
Ubuntugis for coordination.
without getting too presumptuous, Frankie L. is an obvious person to
approach, but failing that that a crossover person could be me, but
tbh I'm not really sure how a PSC would actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/13/2013 11:58 AM, Hamish wrote:
The main strategic decision we have right now is the repo
re-naming, which I think most of us are in fair agreement about
anyway.
Thanks for Your reply. By my oppinion there are much more
responsibilities of
Rather than taking decision, I think the PSC should make sure that
decisions are made.
Whatever we call them, I think the ideal PSC could learn a lot from
the osgeo live project. I think Cameron has done/is doing an excellent
job at managing that project, which in fact is quite similar to
On 11/13/2013 02:58 AM, Hamish wrote:
Hi,
Alex:
and even making sure we have 1 person who is both DebianGIS and
Ubuntugis for coordination.
without getting too presumptuous, Frankie L. is an obvious person to
approach, but failing that that a crossover person could be me, but
tbh I'm
I agree with Hamish that, most importantly, what UbuntuGIS needs is
developers. People that are able to package. Ideally people that are
interested to also help DebianGIS. DebianGIS also need packagers. So
having a PSC without developers/packagers doesn't make sense to me. I'm
still very
4. Still at least by my opinion, the PPA naming stable, testing,
unstable
is very confusing for all newcomers which automatically expect the same
behavior as in Debian. If this schema remains the same, or it will change
to something other, it needs clearly documented workflow how
I think we should create the PSC before trying to elaborate on any
development roadmap. Then, maybe check for OSGeo incubation? Does anyone
have experience with that? What's the best way to proceed and how we
determine PSC members?
Best Regards,
Alan
On 13-11-09 04:19 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote:
for syncing some packages from experimental to universe. I'm
especially thinking about gdal, because we now have a version of gdal
in ubuntugis which is incompatible with the one in ubuntu universe.
This means effectively means that ubuntugis is currently incompatible
with all other gis
4. Still at least by my opinion, the PPA naming stable, testing,
unstable is very confusing for all newcomers which automatically expect
the same behavior as in Debian. If this schema remains the same, or it
will change to something other, it needs clearly documented workflow how
packages
Dear Alan, at first thank You for Your work (and also for work of others in
this project). I am following UbuntuGIS for some time and I started to
maintain my own PPA fork [1] some time ago, because I needed full control
of packages. I am little bit involved in packaging. Here is my opinion:
1.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Ivan Mincik ivan.min...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Alan, at first thank You for Your work (and also for work of others
in this project). I am following UbuntuGIS for some time and I started to
maintain my own PPA fork [1] some time ago, because I needed full control
On 11/06/2013 12:41 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote:
Dear Alan, at first thank You for Your work (and also for work of others in
this project). I am following UbuntuGIS for some time and I started to
maintain my own PPA fork [1] some time ago, because I needed full control
of packages. I am little bit
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.comwrote:
On 11/06/2013 12:41 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote:
Dear Alan, at first thank You for Your work (and also for work of others
in
this project). I am following UbuntuGIS for some time and I started to
maintain my own PPA
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
On 11/06/2013 12:41 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote:
Dear Alan, at first thank You for Your work (and also for work of others in
this project).
+1
1. This project definitely needs a strong leader with experience.
Or PSC, I
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Ivan Mincik ivan.min...@gmail.com wrote:
Some time ago I was pointed by somebody to that wiki page about 'OSGeo
Binary Distributions'. I have realized that until now there is no official,
up-to-date and well maintained GIS packages distribution for Linux which
...@gmail.commailto:ivan.min...@gmail.com
Date: Thursday, 7 November 2013 10:38 AM
To: UbuntuGIS Users ubuntu@lists.osgeo.orgmailto:ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Ubuntu] UbuntuGIS PSC Creation
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Frank Warmerdam
warmer...@pobox.commailto:warmer...@pobox.com wrote
.
Cheers,
Arnulf
From: Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com
mailto:warmer...@pobox.com Date: Thursday, 7 November 2013 8:55
AM To: Ivan Mincik ivan.min...@gmail.com
mailto:ivan.min...@gmail.com Cc: UbuntuGIS Users
ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org mailto:ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org Subject:
Re: [Ubuntu] UbuntuGIS
Hi,
As a few of you may already know, I've recently decided to quit my job
at Mapgears (http://t.co/aIgMAFlf2h). I'm still working at Mapgears as a
part-time job but my availability for ubuntugis is limited.
For to goodness of UbuntuGIS, I would like to create a PSC (Project
Steering
18 matches
Mail list logo
