[Bug 276899] Re: Evolution folder summary does not match server

I would be happy to, but I already switched out Cyrus for Dovecot, which appears to work without problems (unfortunately, I cannot work without reliable email notification; pretty much anything else I have a half- dozen options for, but not this). I can set up another Cyrus install on another box

[Bug 276899] Re: Evolution folder summary does not match server

The problem is *definitely* linked somehow to the Cyrus IMAP server. I just set up a test server, using Courier IMAP, and it appears to work without any problems. -- Evolution folder summary does not match server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276899 You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 279712] Re: rdesktop causes hard lockup of X server input, preventing further interaction with system

To clarify: when it locks up, the keyboard and GUI stop responding, although the mouse remains operational, though confined to whichever monitor it happened to be on (I have a dual-monitor setup, with two separate displays: ie: NOT linked as a single virtual display via Xinerama--due to gameplay is

[Bug 279712] [NEW] rdesktop causes hard lockup of X server input, preventing further interaction with system

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rdesktop rdesktop 1.6.0-2ubuntu1 Also seems to interact with: nautilus 1:2.24.0-0ubuntu1 At semi-random intervals, rdesktop appears to be responsible for locking up the entire X-server input loop; at least the keyboard stops responding altogether, until

[Bug 276899] Re: Evolution folder summary does not match server

I've never had it show a negative value (so far). Also, I do not use client-side filtering, except to tag spam messages processed by an instance of SpamAssassin; all my filtering and sorting requirements are otherwise handled by the IMAP server directly. -- Evolution folder summary does not matc

[Bug 276899] Re: Evolution folder summary does not match server

I've just had it update the item count value from 'nothing' to an incorrect value, when I right-clicked on a folder. I guess this means that all the right-click is triggering is some form of update, and not necessarily (but usually) to the correct value. -- Evolution folder summary does not matc

[Bug 276899] Re: Evolution folder summary does not match server

This definitely seems to be due to some interaction between Evolution and the IMAP server. I created a brand-new desktop user account, and linked it to the existing IMAP server. The result demonstrated exactly the same problem, on two separate IMAP accounts. Curiously, when I right-click on a fol

Re: [Bug 276899] Re: Evolution folder summary does not match server

Unfortunately, no; I cannot provide instructions on how to reproduce it, as I'm not 100% certain how it happened in the first place. I have a suspicion it has something to do with the migration to the SQLite DB backend, but I'm not certain of that. It happens for me routinely, though. And no, the

[Bug 276899] Re: Evolution folder summary does not match server

** Attachment added: "Screenshot showing behavior" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18124962/Screenshot.png -- Evolution folder summary does not match server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276899 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 276899] [NEW] Evolution folder summary does not match server

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution As shown in the attached screenshot, the summary information in the folder view does not match the actual content of the folder. This behavior was observed in evolution-2.24.0-0ubuntu1, running against an IMAP server (cyrus-imapd-2.2-2.2.13-14u

[Bug 132670] Re: [gutsy]hplip toolbox doesn't start

/usr/sbin/hpiod seems to be missing from the 2.7.7-0ubuntu3, which breaks the hplip init.d script. -- [gutsy]hplip toolbox doesn't start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubu

Re: [Bug 104936] Re: Mails tagged as Junk remain hidden, even when setting up a search filter that explicitly checks for it.

Yes; what I am trying to do is set up a search folder specifically to catch emails that I *know* are tagged incorrectly. I used to be able to do this, but I can't remember in what release (it was before I started using Ubuntu). On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:33 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > upstream

Re: [Bug 104936] Re: Mails tagged as Junk remain hidden, even when setting up a search filter that explicitly checks for it.

wrote: > doesn't using a search on the junk directory would do the trick? > -- David Breakey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Mails tagged as Junk remain hidden, even when setting up a search filter that explicitly checks for it. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104936 You received this bu

Re: [Bug 104936] Re: Mails tagged as Junk remain hidden, even when setting up a search filter that explicitly checks for it.

My specific purpose is to try and catch emails that are *definitely* being tagged incorrectly as spam (eg: work-related emails, that I can't afford to overlook). With a Search Folder, I have something that I can use for a "quick'n'dirty" first-round check, to let me know I need to tweak my spam fil

[Bug 104936] Re: Mails tagged as Junk remain hidden, even when setting up a search filter that explicitly checks for it.

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7228695/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7228696/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7228697/ProcStatus.txt -- Mails

[Bug 104936] Mails tagged as Junk remain hidden, even when setting up a search filter that explicitly checks for it.

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Trying to set up a "Search Folder" to identify emails that have been incorrectly tagged as Junk. As near as I can determine, Evolution is hiding *all* Junk emails from *everything*, even if I set up a filter that explicitly tests for the "Junk"