Re: [Bug 1972939] Re: Jammy tinc incompatibile with older (e.g. Xenial) tinc nodes

2022-05-18 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 13:41:06 -, Simon Chopin wrote: > Also, does tinc work in a purely Jammy context? :-) Sorry, I just realized that I had not mentioned here on this bug the results of my tests between various Ubuntu versions. I didn't test Jammy-to-Jammy, but (briefly): * Jammy

Re: [Bug 1972939] Re: Jammy tinc incompatibile with older (e.g. Xenial) tinc nodes

2022-05-18 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 13:37:46 -, Simon Chopin wrote: > Could you give more details about what happens when using the legacy > providers? The short version is that by enabling the legacy provider and setting SECLEVEL to 1, I'm able to get past the "digital envelope routines::unsupported"

Re: [Bug 1972939] Re: Jammy tinc incompatibile with older (e.g. Xenial) tinc nodes

2022-05-18 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 13:41:06 -, Simon Chopin wrote: > Also, does tinc work in a purely Jammy context? :-) As far as I can determine the issue relates to compatibility between libssl3 and the algorithms used by the Xenial-era tinc, and thus I can't imagine Jammy-to-Jammy would be a

Re: [Bug 1972939] Re: Jammy tinc incompatibile with older (e.g. Xenial) tinc nodes

2022-05-18 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 07:42:04 -, Simon Chopin wrote: > I'm guessing there are some SSL certificates involved? If so, this issue Tinc uses openssl's implementations of specific alogorithms, but does not use either TLS or SSL certificates. (So I don't think the Tinc situation is covered by

[Bug 1972939] Re: Jammy tinc incompatibile with older (e.g. Xenial) tinc nodes

2022-05-17 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972939 Title: Jammy tinc incompatibile with older (e.g. Xenial) tinc

[Bug 1972939] Re: Jammy tinc incompatibile with older (e.g. Xenial) tinc nodes

2022-05-10 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Since the tinc version number in Focal/Impish and Jammy are the same, it might be worth adding a warning to the release notes to people don't unexpectedly loose VPN access by upgrading to Jammy. (Or explaining a workaround, if one can be determined.) ** Package changed: tinc (Ubuntu) =>

[Bug 1972939] [NEW] Jammy tinc incompatibile with older (e.g. Xenial) tinc nodes

2022-05-10 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Public bug reported: The tinc included in Jammy (1.0.36-2build1 linked with libssl3) cannot connect to tinc nodes running e.g. tinc from Xenial (1.0.26-1). (Tinc from Impish, which is also v1.0.36-2 but is linked to libssl1.1, can connect to these nodes without problems.) The symptom is a log

[Bug 1291434] Re: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT contains duplicate options

2020-09-15 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
(The change described in comment #6 was applied as a fix for LP: #1465567) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291434 Title: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT contains duplicate options To

[Bug 1764172] Re: Unable to change hostname from the one specified during Bionic server installation

2019-12-01 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
(In addition to the one mentioned by WirelessMoves, I found several other Ubuntu Forum threads as well as blog posts, etc. which recommend working around this problem by editing the /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg file to set the "preserve_hostname:" line's value to "true". However, that approach means

[Bug 1764172] Re: Unable to change hostname from the one specified during Bionic server installation

2019-12-01 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Presumably the ideal solution would be for Subiquity to hand off to cloud-init in a manner that really only ran on that very first boot of the new system. However, assuming that a true fix to that situation is too invasive to be included into Bionic at this point, it seems like it might be a good

[Bug 1764172] Re: Unable to change hostname from the one specified during Bionic server installation

2019-12-01 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
When installing Ubuntu Server using Subiquity (i.e. using the ubuntu-18.04-live-server-amd64.iso installer image), the user is prompted to enter a hostname for the new installation (along with username/password info, etc.) At the very end of the Subquity run, it writes this info into

[Bug 1764172] Re: Unable to change hostname from the one specified during Bionic server installation

2019-12-01 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764172 Title: Unable to change hostname from the one specified

[Bug 1764172] Re: Unable to change hostname specified during Bionic server installation

2019-11-30 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Summary changed: - Unable to change hostname + Unable to change hostname specified during Bionic server installation ** Also affects: subiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Unable to change hostname specified during Bionic server installation +

[Bug 1309079] Re: Running update-grub-legacy-ec2 doesn't update kernel list in /boot/grub/menu.lst

2019-09-24 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
I ran into a problem with grub-legacy-ec2 v1:1 in Bionic (on an EC2 instance built from a Canonical Bionic AMI)... but the problem I found relates to the switch from /var/run to /run, so it seems like it could be related the earlier reports as well. Specifically, what I noticed was the "The first

[Bug 1309079] Re: Running update-grub-legacy-ec2 doesn't cause /boot/grub/menu.lst

2019-09-24 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Also affects: grub-legacy-ec2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Running update-grub-legacy-ec2 doesn't cause /boot/grub/menu.lst + Running update-grub-legacy-ec2 doesn't update kernel list in /boot/grub/menu.lst -- You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 1810215] Re: for Seagate USB drive enclosures, SAT (e.g. smartmontools, hdparm) works on kernel 4.13 but not on 4.15

2019-08-08 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 23:50:14 -, James Kingdon wrote: > Hmm, you've got me curious now. It's been a while since I really looked > at the ARM boards. sources.list.d contains armbian.list which has a > single entry: > > deb http://apt.armbian.com xenial main xenial-utils xenial-desktop > >

Re: [Bug 1810215] Re: for Seagate USB drive enclosures, SAT (e.g. smartmontools, hdparm) works on kernel 4.13 but not on 4.15

2019-08-08 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 21:59:50 -, James Kingdon wrote: > source.list is using http://ports.ubuntu.com/ Okay, interesting. So I guess most of your install is the armhf architecture packages from ports.ubuntu.com. However, the the kernel you mentioned (4.14.111-odroidxu4) isn't from there;

Re: [Bug 1810215] Re: for Seagate USB drive enclosures, SAT (e.g. smartmontools, hdparm) works on kernel 4.13 but not on 4.15

2019-08-08 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 18:57:24 -, James Kingdon wrote: > Yes, hdparm -S. Okay, thanks. > Not sure if it's relevant, but the distro is 16.04.6 LTS > (Xenial Xerus) in this case. Okay, yeah, that makes a little more sense. Again, I don't know the timeline on these specific kernels, but in

Re: [Bug 1810215] Re: for Seagate USB drive enclosures, SAT (e.g. smartmontools) works on kernel 4.13 but not on 4.15

2019-08-08 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 18:05:55 -, James Kingdon wrote: > I'm not sure what kernel was there before. I was expecting to see traces > in /boot but the only references are to 4.14.133. (Weird. I'm not familiar with the kernels for odroid, but off hand I'd be suprised if the

[Bug 1810215] Re: for Seagate USB drive enclosures, SAT (e.g. smartmontools, hdparm) works on kernel 4.13 but not on 4.15

2019-08-08 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Summary changed: - for Seagate USB drive enclosures, SAT (e.g. smartmontools) works on kernel 4.13 but not on 4.15 + for Seagate USB drive enclosures, SAT (e.g. smartmontools, hdparm) works on kernel 4.13 but not on 4.15 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 1810215] Re: for Seagate USB drive enclosures, SAT (e.g. smartmontools) works on kernel 4.13 but not on 4.15

2019-08-08 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 15:27:20 -, James Kingdon wrote: > I got hit by this after a power outage cycled my file servers and > presumably activated a previous automatic kernel update (the servers > normally stay up for months at a time). > > The kernel that is currently running is: > > Linux

[Bug 1810215] Re: Smart data works on kernel 4.13 but not on 4.15

2019-08-05 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
@Mike/Robie: Actually the "uas: Always apply US_FL_NO_ATA_1X quirk to Seagate devices" patch to the kernel is (part of) the cause of the current smartmontool failure rather than a fix for it. The underlying problem is that most Seagate drive enclosures do not properly handle SAT (= "ATA

[Bug 1582365] Re: doesn't handle hot-pluggable disks

2018-11-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Upstream bug related to the first half (issue 1 in original report) is https://www.smartmontools.org/ticket/60 , "DEVICESCAN and hotplug" ** Bug watch added: www.smartmontools.org/ #60 https://www.smartmontools.org/ticket/60 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 1797872] Re: ntpd keeps Soliciting pool server

2018-10-19 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 14:36:35 -, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > $ timedatectl status > Network time on: yes > NTP synchronized: yes > > So it seems it is synchronized, it just re-tries too frequently. (I am not sure what exactly timedatectl looks at when checking the status of ntpd, but

Re: [Bug 1797872] Re: ntpd keeps Soliciting pool server

2018-10-19 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 14:36:35 -, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > Both of them work. I don't understand how the last command can work and > I may still be behind a firewall. "ntpdate -d" sends packets using an unprivileged source port, so a firewall could allow those packets but block outgoing

[Bug 1385883] Re: amdump permission denied

2017-07-21 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #775612 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775612 ** Also affects: amanda (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775612 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1257686

[Bug 1470014] systemd-udevd: Process '/lib/udev/hdparm' failed with exit code 5

2017-01-10 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
I ran into this (using hdparm 9.48+ds-1 running under Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS) with some HP Enterprise MB4000GCWLV drives that don't have APM support (i.e. hdparm -I /dev/sdb | grep "Advanced Power" returns no output, or [as mentioned in comment #5] "hdparm -B" reports "not supported"). For these

[Bug 962616] Re: mii-tool assumes NIC names of the form eth* when given no interface(s) as argument

2016-07-05 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
I'm not at all familiar with the net-tools source, but here's a quick proof-of-concept patch to pull the list of interface names out of /proc/net/dev (silently skipping any that don't support the SIOCGMIIPHY ioctl [lo, lxcbr0, etc.]). = first example = ./mii-tool_lp962616 enp4s0:

[Bug 962616] Re: mii-tool assumes NIC names of the form eth* when given no interface(s) as argument

2016-06-30 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
> Upstream fix http://net-tools.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p =net-tools/net- tools;a=commitdiff;h=9dc3a20511a409e1de1a41d715a10028d3bc1b56 This commit can be found at this updated URL: https://sourceforge.net/p/net-tools/code/ci/9dc3a20511a409e1de1a41d715a10028d3bc1b56/ Not that the

[Bug 962616] Re: mii-tool assumes NIC names of the form eth* when given no interface(s) as argument

2016-06-30 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Since Xenial now uses "predictable" interface naming schemes, mii-tool's limit will affect most systems. = first example = # mii-tool no MII interfaces found # mii-tool $(cd /sys/class/net/; ls -d en*) enp4s0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok enp6s0: negotiated 1000baseT-FD flow-control,

[Bug 1597909] Re: systemd-timesyncd unit still running after installation of ntp package

2016-06-30 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Here are my current versions of the affected packages: # dpkg -l ntp systemd | cat Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version

[Bug 1597909] [NEW] systemd-timesyncd unit still running after installation of ntp package

2016-06-30 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Public bug reported: I recently installed the ntp package on a fairly vanilla installed-from- DVD Xenial system, and noticed that after the package installation both systemd-timesyncd and ntp were running: # systemctl status ntp systemd-timesyncd.service --no-pager ntp.service - LSB: Start NTP

[Bug 1390061] Re: bash-completion tilde expansion every time

2016-06-26 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Looks like this bug is covered by debbugs #825317, "bash-completion: Un- escaped "~*" leads to spurious NSS lookups" ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #825317 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825317 ** Also affects: bash-completion (Debian) via

[Bug 1508248] Re: chkrootkit gives false positive Linux/Ebury - Operation Windigo

2016-06-25 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Summary changed: - chkrootkit gives false positive ebury + chkrootkit gives false positive Linux/Ebury - Operation Windigo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508248 Title:

[Bug 1508248] Re: chkrootkit gives false positive ebury

2016-06-25 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #796599 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796599 ** Also affects: chkrootkit (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796599 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1508248] Re: chkrootkit gives false positive ebury

2016-06-25 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
The fix implemented in Fedora is to change the invocation of "$ssh -G" to instead use "$ssh -H". See e.g. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/chkrootkit.git/commit/?h=f23=82dd537b2fd88850eb4327a80b2c9acb7dbcf2ab -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1508248] Re: chkrootkit gives false positive ebury

2016-06-25 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1234436 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234436 ** Also affects: chkrootkit (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234436 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1451477] Re: /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/90rkhunter security loss

2015-05-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
The manpage for apt.conf doesn't mention any parameters (such as the package names) that can passed to the DPkg::Post-Invoke hook. Yeah, I agree that the DPkg::Post-Invoke hook doesn't seem to be passed any useful info I see that there is a Pre-Install-Pkgs hook, which is passed the list of

[Bug 1451477] Re: /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/90rkhunter security loss

2015-05-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
(One thing not handled by the cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/$P.list approach described above is symlinks, e.g. /usr/bin/mail. These don't appear in the dpkg .list file [as the actual executable files do], but when the target of the symlink is changed then rkhunter will detect that as a property mismatch

[Bug 1451477] Re: /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/90rkhunter security loss

2015-05-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Getting the automatic update to be restricted to only the files actually part of the upgraded package certainly makes sense. However, when I experimented with this I found the package name option only works if the rkhunter.dat file was originally built using the DPKG value for the --pkgmgr, which

Re: [Bug 1410195] Re: Ctrl+Alt+F7 bypasses the light-locker lock-screen under XFCE

2015-01-16 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 18:05:04 -, Ryan Tandy wrote: will no longer be used. But switching to nss-pam-ldapd is a good recommendation anyway, since the older modules are dead upstream. (In fact there is discussion underway regarding downgrading libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap out of main; see

Re: [Bug 1410195] Re: Ctrl+Alt+F7 bypasses the light-locker lock-screen under XFCE

2015-01-16 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 18:05:04 -, Ryan Tandy wrote: will no longer be used. But switching to nss-pam-ldapd is a good recommendation anyway, since the older modules are dead upstream. (In fact there is discussion underway regarding downgrading libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap out of main; see

[Bug 1229713] Re: nslcd auto-configuration disregards existing nslcd.conf

2015-01-14 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
I was in the middle of testing this, too, when Randy posted his message. I got the same results he did for the 0.8.4 - 0.8.4ubuntu0.3 and 0.8.4 - 0.8.4ubuntu0.4 upgrades, using the uri value to test the upgrade behavior. Also, to follow up on the original report in Bug #1350778, I did an

[Bug 1362481] Re: openldap upgrade fails. chwon of olcDbDirectory, /var/lib/ldap not empty and missing backup of suffix

2014-08-29 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
If you are working on cleaning up the slapd.postinst script, you may find some of these related discussions to be interesting and/or helpful...: LP: #450645 error during slapd configuration: chown: cannot access `olcDbDirectory\nolcDbDirectory' LP: #632051 Improve slapd postinst error message in

[Bug 1362481] Re: openldap upgrade fails. chwon of olcDbDirectory, /var/lib/ldap not empty and missing backup of suffix

2014-08-29 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
If you are working on cleaning up the slapd.postinst script, you may find some of these related discussions to be interesting and/or helpful...: LP: #450645 error during slapd configuration: chown: cannot access `olcDbDirectory\nolcDbDirectory' LP: #632051 Improve slapd postinst error message in

[Bug 1229713] Re: nslcd auto-configuration disregards existing nslcd.conf

2014-08-14 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Description changed: [Impact] - * When nslcd is upgraded, the config script runs and wrongly updates -/etc/nslcd.conf with the name of the first AD server it finds. this -should not happen. +  * When nslcd is upgraded, the config and postinst scripts run and +wrongly update

[Bug 1229713] Re: nslcd auto-configuration disregards existing nslcd.conf

2014-08-13 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
I tried upgrading to nlslcd 0.8.4ubuntu0.3 on a system where the ldap- uris debconf entry was out of sync from the uri line in nslcd.conf, and confirmed that the .conf file line was overwritten with the debconf value, thus resulting in a non-working configuration. (The debconf- show nslcd did not

Re: [Bug 1229713] [NEW] nslcd auto-configuration disregards existing nslcd.conf

2014-08-13 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 13:13:32 -, Simon Fraser wrote: The guess_ldap_uri() function should only be called if /etc/nslcd.conf is not usable, to prevent it overwriting valid configuration with incorrectly guessed ones. Looking more closely at the nslcd.config script, I'm pretty sure that

[Bug 1350778] Re: Upgrading nslcd on precise rewrites /etc/nslcd.conf, leaving users with unusable systems

2014-08-13 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
The proposed nlscd package provided in LP: #1229713 successfully installed without generating a broken nslcd.conf file, at least for the case of my test server where the uri line was getting overwritten by a stale debconf value in previous upgrades. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1350778] Re: Upgrading nslcd on precise rewrites /etc/nslcd.conf, leaving users with unusable systems

2014-08-12 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Over in LP #1229713 nslcd auto-configuration disregards existing nslcd.conf there's a proposed update package (currently available from a PPA for testing) which includes the patch Arthur mentioned (in comment #6) as a fix to Debian bug 717063. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1229713] Re: nslcd auto-configuration disregards existing nslcd.conf

2014-08-11 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
I'm not sure can be considered a duplicate, but there's a similar package-upgrade bug (or set of bugs) discussed in LP#1350778 . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229713 Title: nslcd

[Bug 1350778] Re: Upgrading nslcd on precise rewrites /etc/nslcd.conf, leaving users with unusable systems

2014-08-08 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Tags added: precise regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350778 Title: Upgrading nslcd on precise rewrites /etc/nslcd.conf, leaving users with unusable systems To

[Bug 1350778] Re: Upgrading nslcd on precise rewrites /etc/nslcd.conf, leaving users with unusable systems

2014-08-08 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Just to clarify the situation, the problem is that the current nslcd.postinst script (i.e. the one in 0.8.4ubuntu0.3) unconditionally rewrites various lines in the /etc/nslcd.conf file using the parameter values pulled from the debconf database... which can lead to a non- working configuration if

[Bug 1348343] [NEW] resolvconf 1.69ubuntu1.1 includes non-Upstart /etc/init.d/resolvconf script

2014-07-24 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Public bug reported: I noticed that when my Trusty systems upgrade from resolvconf 1.69ubuntu1 to 1.69ubuntu1.1 (from trusty-updates), /etc/init.d/resolvconf is changed from a symlink pointing to /lib/init/upstart into a normal file containing the Debian sysinit startup script. Is that change

[Bug 1291434] Re: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT contains duplicate options

2014-07-24 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Also note that another set up duplicates is added to the line each time the grub-pc.postinst script is run -- on one of my Trusty systems I now see: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=nomdmonddf nomdmonisw nomdmonddf nomdmonisw nomdmonddf nomdmonisw (I see that this value is also saved in the debconf

[Bug 1291434] Re: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT contains duplicate options

2014-07-24 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Hmm, one additional thing to note is that when /boot/grub/grub.cfg is generated, each linux line created there gets an additional copy of the keywords. That is, if I run dpkg-reconfigured grub-pc and strip the Linux default command line prompt down to just nomdmonddf nomdmonisw and then let

[Bug 1291434] Re: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT contains duplicate options

2014-07-24 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
In case there isn't a some better solution, here's a quick attempt at a patch to the dmraid2mdadm.cfg script so that it only adds the keywords to the value of GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT if it doesn't already contain them. That would at least prevent the command line from accumulating any

Re: [Bug 1258597] Re: Warning: Setting GRUB_TIMEOUT to a non-zero value when GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT is set is no longer supported.

2014-04-28 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 19:11:59 -, Phill Whiteside wrote: hmm... root@build:/boot/grub# grep -r GRUB_HIDDEN * root@build:/boot/grub# No sign of GRUB_HIDDEN ? The GRUB_HIDDEN... variables are found in /etc/default/grub . Nathan

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Also affects: ntp via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691672 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: ntp (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691672 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** No longer affects: ntp

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Also affects: ntp via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691672 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: ntp (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691672 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** No longer affects: ntp

[Bug 1303893] [NEW] cron.daily/chkrootkit log filtering needs to include current names for dhcpcd and dhclient binaries

2014-04-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Public bug reported: the cron.daily/chkrootkit script's current logic for simplifying the PACKET SNIFFER lines for dhclient and dhcpcd processes needs to be updated to include the names of current versions of those binaries. ** Affects: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1303893] Re: cron.daily/chkrootkit log filtering needs to include current names for dhcpcd and dhclient binaries

2014-04-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
We have found that chkrootkit now complains after each reboot, with a message similar to: -eth0: PACKET SNIFFER(/sbin/dhclient[895]) +eth0: PACKET SNIFFER(/sbin/dhclient[888]) ---[ END: diff -u

[Bug 1303893] [NEW] cron.daily/chkrootkit log filtering needs to include current names for dhcpcd and dhclient binaries

2014-04-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Public bug reported: the cron.daily/chkrootkit script's current logic for simplifying the PACKET SNIFFER lines for dhclient and dhcpcd processes needs to be updated to include the names of current versions of those binaries. ** Affects: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1303893] Re: cron.daily/chkrootkit log filtering needs to include current names for dhcpcd and dhclient binaries

2014-04-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
We have found that chkrootkit now complains after each reboot, with a message similar to: -eth0: PACKET SNIFFER(/sbin/dhclient[895]) +eth0: PACKET SNIFFER(/sbin/dhclient[888]) ---[ END: diff -u

[Bug 1258597] Re: Warning: Setting GRUB_TIMEOUT to a non-zero value when GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT is set is no longer supported.

2014-04-06 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Patch added: debian/rules patch to generate default/grub file without GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT= line https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1258597/+attachment/4070785/+files/grub2_debian_rules.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1258597] Re: Warning: Setting GRUB_TIMEOUT to a non-zero value when GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT is set is no longer supported.

2014-04-06 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
I don't have a build environment were I can actually test it, but here's an attempt to update the debian/rules file so that (under Ubuntu) it generates a /usr/share/grub/default/grub file that uses GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=hidden instead of a GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT= line. (Note that grub-pc.config and

[Bug 1258597] Re: Warning: Setting GRUB_TIMEOUT to a non-zero value when GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT is set is no longer supported.

2014-04-06 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Patch removed: debian/rules patch to generate default/grub file without GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT= line https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1258597/+attachment/4070785/+files/grub2_debian_rules.patch ** Patch added: debian/rules patch to generate default/grub file without

[Bug 1258597] Re: Warning: Setting GRUB_TIMEOUT to a non-zero value when GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT is set is no longer supported.

2014-03-28 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
The grub-pc package generates the initial /etc/default/grub file based on /usr/share/grub/default/grub , which currently includes a GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT=0 line. There is logic in the .postinst script to comment out that line if the grub-pc/hidden_timeout debconf value is set to False, but as far

[Bug 1258597] Re: Warning: Setting GRUB_TIMEOUT to a non-zero value when GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT is set is no longer supported.

2014-03-28 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
(Some background info about this warning message and GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT's deprecation can be found in the following threads: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2013-11/msg00388.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2013-12/msg00122.html ) -- You received this bug

[Bug 1258597] Re: Warning: Setting GRUB_TIMEOUT to a non-zero value when GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT is set is no longer supported.

2014-03-28 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
It looks like the GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT line in the /usr/share/grub/default/grub file comes from the setting at about line 60 of the debian/rules file for the grub2 source package ( http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/trusty/grub2/trusty/view/head:/debian/rules ) : ifeq

Re: [Bug 1283828] Re: Cannot find any provider supporting RSA/ECB/OAEPPadding error after upgrading to openjdk-6 6b27-1.12.6-1ubuntu0.12.04.4

2014-03-17 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 21:47:26 -, Jamie Strandboge wrote: This also affect openjdk-7. ** Also affects: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New For what it's worth, I tried running the GetInstance.java test program on a Trusty sandbox machine, and it completed

[Bug 1283828] Re: Cannot find any provider supporting RSA/ECB/OAEPPadding error after upgrading to openjdk-6 6b27-1.12.6-1ubuntu0.12.04.4

2014-02-26 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
I've tried running the GetInstance.java test case pulled out of http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/c5d869453212 in a Precise development environment, and can confirm that it aborts with the Cannot find any provider supporting RSA/ECB/OAEPPadding exception when run using

Re: [Bug 1284607] Re: resolvconf ignores given dns-servers in /etc/network/interfaces

2014-02-25 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 16:10:50 -, Stéphane Graber wrote: By default, resolvconf will truncate the list of DNS servers after the loopback address. This can be overriden by putting TRUNCATE_NAMESERVER_LIST_AFTER_LOOPBACK_ADDRESS=no in /etc/default/resolvconf This behaviour is documented

[Bug 1283828] [NEW] Cannot find any provider supporting RSA/ECB/OAEPPadding error after upgrading to openjdk-6 6b27-1.12.6-1ubuntu0.12.04.4

2014-02-23 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Public bug reported: After upgrading the various openjdk-6-* packages to version 6b27-1.12.6-1ubuntu0.10.04.4 on our server, all incoming client connections started failing with the following error message at the top of the stack dump (on the client side). javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException:

[Bug 1283828] Re: Cannot find any provider supporting RSA/ECB/OAEPPadding error after upgrading to openjdk-6 6b27-1.12.6-1ubuntu0.12.04.4

2014-02-23 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
It looks like this is the JDK 6 version of the JDK 7 problem described in: http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8017173 That bug was apparently fixed in JDK 7 by this one-line commit: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/c5d869453212 In the JDK6 upstream, it

[Bug 1283828] Re: Cannot find any provider supporting RSA/ECB/OAEPPadding error after upgrading to openjdk-6 6b27-1.12.6-1ubuntu0.12.04.4

2014-02-23 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Ah, actually I see that for the 6b27-1.12.6-1ubuntu0.10.04.4 package the origin of the change was not (directly) the JDK6 upstream but rather this backport of that change in IcedTea 1.12.6::

[Bug 1199987] Re: 2.6.32-49 kernel hangs during reboot under XenServer 6.0 PV guest

2013-11-24 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
We're also seeing this hang-on-reboot problem when running linux- image-2.6.32-53-server and linux-image-2.6.32-50-server kernels in a Xen guest... but in our case our Xen hypervisor is v4.0. For what it's worth, I found this related discussion thread:

[Bug 1199987] Re: 2.6.32-49 kernel hangs during reboot under XenServer 6.0 PV guest

2013-11-24 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Additional note: Precise guests on the same Xen host don't have problems rebooting, e.g. using the latest linux-image-3.5.0-43-generic kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199987

[Bug 1221000] [NEW] logger -n option is ignored

2013-09-04 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Public bug reported: When I attempt to use logger with the -n option, the syslog messages are sent to the local rsyslog process instead of the specified remote server: $ logger -n log.example.com test message $ echo another test message | logger -n log.example.com ** Affects: util-linux

[Bug 902628] Re: Clarify man page description of -f option (patch attached)

2013-09-04 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
In bsdutils 1:2.20.1-1ubuntu3 (Precise), the man page now says: -f, --file file Log the contents of the specified file. This option cannot be combined with a command-line message. Looks like this was changed upstream:

[Bug 1221000] Re: logger -n option is ignored

2013-09-04 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
(I am running bsdutils 1:2.20.1-1ubuntu3, on a Precise box.) Looks like upstream applied a simple patch similar to the one suggested in the Debian bug: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=86248cd28a27bdd9a437e389966b0415e106802e ** Tags added: patch -- You

[Bug 1130851] Re: html2ps deprecation error message

2013-04-22 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #822117 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822117 ** Also affects: html2ps (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822117 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1130851] Re: html2ps deprecation error message

2013-04-22 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Here's a patch that comments out the line in question (applied against the Ubuntu html2ps 1.0b7-1 package). ** Patch added: comment out the deprecated line https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/html2ps/+bug/1130851/+attachment/3650902/+files/html2ps.lp1130851.patch -- You received this

Re: [Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository/apt-add-repository fails with ValueError: cannot convert float NaN to integer

2013-04-05 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 23:14:02 -, Barry Warsaw wrote: I have a horribly ugly workaround for PyCurl in the works. I'll link a branch when ready, but I want to get Matthias's input to see if a toolchain fix is more appropriate. (Since you have an environment set up to build the

Re: [Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository/apt-add-repository fails with ValueError: cannot convert float NaN to integer

2013-04-05 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 14:02:13 -, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: you to try building the package (without the workaround patch) against libssl instead of libgnutls? That might be a fairly-easy way to test the (More precisely: libcurlX-openssl instead of libcurlX-gnutls

Re: [Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository/apt-add-repository fails with ValueError: cannot convert float NaN to integer

2013-04-05 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 15:02:54 -, Barry Warsaw wrote: To be honest, I don't really have much more time to spend investigating this. The workaround fixes the problem and while a bit wasteful, seems harmless enough. Since Doko agrees, I think I'll just apply this for now, and maybe we can

Re: [Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository/apt-add-repository fails with ValueError: cannot convert float NaN to integer

2013-04-04 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 21:06:58 -, Barry Warsaw wrote: Yes, 32bit Raring has this problem, 64bit does not apparently. I'm curious if the machine you are using is also an MMX-but-not-SSE2 machine; what does grep -E name|flags /proc/cpuinfo show? Or are you saying that you found the

Re: [Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository/apt-add-repository fails with ValueError: cannot convert float NaN to integer

2013-04-04 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 23:14:02 -, Barry Warsaw wrote: when ready, but I want to get Matthias's input to see if a toolchain fix is more appropriate. Yeah, I was wondering about that too. It seems like the problem probably originates somewhere in libgnutls26 or below, since it's only

Re: [Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository/apt-add-repository fails with ValueError: cannot convert float NaN to integer

2013-03-14 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 18:36:52 -, Douglas King wrote: currently it affects ppa:n-muench/calibre2 and ppa:n-muench/calibre If you are experiencing the same bug as I am, you will get the same error no matter what PPA you are trying to add. In other words, the problem is with your local

[Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository/apt-add-repository fails with ValueError: cannot convert float NaN to integer

2013-03-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
I found a Redhat bug that seems to be related: https://bugzilla.redha t.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758446 (It's for a different Python program, but pycurl is used there, too, and in it NaNs are similarly showing up in unexpected places.) In comment #9, Zdeněk Pavlas suggests the problem might

Re: [Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository/apt-add-repository fails with ValueError: cannot convert float NaN to integer

2013-03-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:18:25 -, Paul BROWN wrote: I can confirm this patch worked for me! Cool. I'm curious if you get the same result I do when running the direct python test mentioned in comment #10. Actually, here's basically the same test, but in a format easier to cut-and-paste

[Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository and apt-add-repository fails

2013-03-05 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
The significant change between python-software-properties 0.82.7 and 0.82.7.3 is in the .3 release: softwareproperties/ppa.py: download gpg key to temporary keyring, and validate using v4 fingerprint before importing to apt keyring. (Specifically, that change is the reason that

[Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository and apt-add-repository fails

2013-03-05 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Actually, it looks like the problem is in pycurl, since calling .close() seems to cause the very next floating point operation to return NaN. (In the case of add-apt-repository, that floating point operation just happens to be in the random() call invoked from inside the tempfile.mkdtemp()

[Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository and apt-add-repository fails

2013-03-05 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Given that performing any sort of floating-point operation seems to clear the error condition, I tried simply added a dummy = 1.0/2 line to the get_ppa_info_from_lp() function immediately after the curl.close() line (see attached patch)... and after that add-apt- repository successfully processed

[Bug 1063350] Re: add-apt-repository/apt-add-repository fails with ValueError: cannot convert float NaN to integer

2013-03-05 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Summary changed: - add-apt-repository and apt-add-repository fails + add-apt-repository/apt-add-repository fails with ValueError: cannot convert float NaN to integer ** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

Re: [Bug 1086459] Re: VPN DNS Resolution Fails

2012-12-04 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:25:10 -, tdeering wrote: Still no DNS resolution when connected to the VPN. I'm fairly certain that 10.0.0.1 really is the intended/correct address of the VPN nameserver, but I will double-check with the owner. I do know, however, that the VPN network setup has

[Bug 1020285] Re: Addition of leap second causes spuriously high CPU usage and futex lockups

2012-07-12 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Red Hat bug no. 836803, RHEL6: Potential fix for leapsecond caused futex related load spikes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836803 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #836803 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836803 -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1020285] Re: Addition of leap second causes spuriously high CPU usage and futex lockups

2012-07-11 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Note that even though it's been a while since the leap second, a kernel affected by this bug could persist with its desynced internal idea of time, and the system would show no noticable symptoms until someone eventually runs an effected application. (See https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/1/203 and

[Bug 1020285] Re: Addition of leap second causes spuriously high CPU usage and futex lockups

2012-07-11 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
(Revised the script to set its exit status based on the results of the testing.) ** Attachment removed: Python script to check for post-leap-second sub-second timeouts issue

[Bug 1020285] Re: Addition of leap second causes spuriously high CPU usage and futex lockups

2012-07-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Debbugs #679882 pulls together a list of various leap-second-related kernel patches: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679882 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #679882 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679882 -- You received this bug notification because

  1   2   3   4   5   >