Public bug reported:
Sometimes, when we are working with both Ubuntu and Debian, we need to
create a Debian chroot for build testing.
Unfortunately, mk-sbuild is UNABLE to create Debian chroots. Currently,
the first error is that "/bin/true" is nonexistent (it's in
`/usr/bin/true` now). Then,
waveform: In order to be valid each release needs to have a higher
version. Especially if its the same version then it has to have
0.ubuntuXX.YY.Z if 0 is the base. Otherwise it affects upgrading if we
have the same version in multiple releases.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Note that this is not yet released in Debian. I have a bunch of things
to fix in the packaging first such as lintian issues and copyright
files.
I can debdiff this into Ubuntu as an SRU after the Debian package is
fully functional and compliant with policy.
--
You received this bug
"Convenient applicatiom used by server admins" - a little info here on
what it does and WHY it would be useful in older LTSes is important. As
well as why "other functionality" isn't sufficient, in order to justify
the backport.
We also need confirmation that the package works as is when
You have a broken configuration file.
May 11 00:15:19 HP-Pavilion-Notebook nginx[1389]: 2024/05/11 00:15:19
[emerg] 1389#1389: unknown directive "listen" in
/etc/nginx/sites-enabled/flask_app:2
You need to refer to your configurations and make sure they're actually
valid. You are
bryce:
We will need to coordinate because an ABI change means we need a
transition of all the extra nginx source packages to have a rebuild.
Because we have ABI compliance now.
We're testing and debugging these in Experimental / Unstable now, as
part of Debian nginx policies to start in
1.26.0 is slated to land in Debian with ABI changes and rebuilds of all
third party modules, just an FYI. This will impact this merge
notice/request
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Note any Debian changes will appear in 24.10 release when merged in from
Debian. Existing releases will k
not get this unless we decide to SRU it and this doesnt generally qualify for
SRU inclusion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
You have another service listening on port 80. Figure out what it is
and either stop it or uninstall it and then attempt to run/install
nginx.
** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062058
Title:
Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC
To manage notifications
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 277 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277
The 404 issues are tracked in 277.
GPG keys updates were already uploaded, however they may be stuck in
Proposed still pending a fix for the 404 issues.
Due to how versions of software are updated in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 277 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 277
Download URLs are broken
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Your configuration is bad. Refer to the error log output in journalctl:
mar 10 19:00:41 wojciech-To-be-filled-by-O-E-M nginx[1323]: nginx:
[emerg] cannot load certificate "/etc/diaspora/ssl/localhost-
bundle.pem": BIO_new_file() failed (SSL: error:02001002:system
library:fopen:No such file or
torbrowser-launcher is only a tool to help download and update (and run)
Tor Browser. It is not actually Tor Browser.
If you are having issues with Tor Browser, I suggest you enlist the help
of the Tor community as issues with Tor Browser itself are not related
to the Launcher tool.
** Changed
Something with the debdiff broke the translations components, so the
debdiff is rejected.
However, the components provided here work, so uploaded. Both are in
building/pending state.
** Changed in: golang-github-openprinting-goipp (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received
Note ipp-usb applies cleanly, so that's "in progress", while goipp is
"Incomplete"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055346
Title:
Need sponsoring: goipp 1.1.0 and ipp-usb 0.9.24 for
Rejection on goipp 1.1.0.
Fails to apply cleanly. Please address the differences from upstream
that are returned by dpkg-buildpackage.
---
$ debuild -S -sa -d
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -ui -S -sa -d
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package golang-github-openprinting-goipp
dpkg-buildpackage:
** Changed in: ipp-usb (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055346
Title:
Need sponsoring: goipp 1.1.0 and ipp-usb 0.9.24 for noble
To manage
** Changed in: golang-github-openprinting-goipp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Thomas Ward (teward)
** Changed in: ipp-usb (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Thomas Ward (teward)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
"failed to install/upgrade" also means that a package failed to
configure. If as Simon says the packages were left unconfigured, then
that means the package is "Installed but failed to restart on upgrade"
which is an action the postinst scripts execute. So it may not be an
'installer' failure
Looks like during your upgrade a certificate went awry, but this isn't
an NGINX issue, it's the maintenance of your system on your end.
From the journalctl data:
Jun 04 14:21:05 heliopolis-aws nginx[44002]: nginx: [emerg] cannot load
certificate "/etc/ssl/certs/heliosd.crt": BIO_new_file()
NACK as is. (negative acknowledgement aka "Debdiff Rejected")
You are attempting to submit a new upstream version not in the Ubuntu
repositories. Unlike Debian, an Ubuntu backport requires a little more
work to push this in.
Jammy has 03.00.00.0423-1. Your debdiff is for 03.00.00.0429 which is
If you can give me an extra day or two (I'm suffering from COVID right
now), I can sponsor this. I'll let the other backporters handle
approval, etc. but uploading the package is something that only takes a
few minutes on my part. (Just need the patience - COVID is evil)
--
You received this
If Qt6 is dead upstream, then it's probably a candidate for removal as
soon as Qt5 is retired.
Note that because Debian has refused to even add Qt6 because QtChooser
is dead upstream by design, and I'm gathering as such should not be used
with Qt6, I opened a Debian bug suggesting that they mark
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1967572 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967572
Duplicate of #1967572 due to same traceback on failure.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1967572
torbrowser-launcher crashed with move(self, int, int) in main(): argument
1 has
Note that your Debian source target will be NGINX 1.20.2-1 once it
lands, this was uploaded to ftp-master by myself today after I was given
access to upload by Ondrej Novy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
You have a symlink in /etc/nginx/sites-enabled that points to a
nonexistent config file:
nginx[1326]: nginx: [emerg] open() "/etc/nginx/sites-
enabled/frappe.conf" failed (2: No such file or directory) in
/etc/nginx/nginx.conf:62
This is not an NGINX package bug but a local config issue.
**
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1969752 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969752
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1969752
oss4-dkms '-mfloat-abi=hard' build failure
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
FYI #1969145 has been closed as a duplicate of this bug, and sponsors
unsubscribed from that bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969752
Title:
oss4-dkms '-mfloat-abi=hard' build
YOu're welcome, that's the workaround for these cases.
Note that this exact issue was 'discussed' back in 2015 by the upstream
Debian team and they rejected changing it because IPv6 being disabled is
"non-standard", and a user/admin level decision at the endpoints of
things, so when anything
This is a pretty old issue but in Debian they made a decision to not
accomodate this back in 2015 for when IPv6 is disabled on systems on the
basis of "not only is it non-standard but it's nonsensical":
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779825#97
The workaround for this is when
CentOS uses completely different packaging than Debian. The problem
here is that the Debian and Ubuntu developers of NGINX decided to
support "the most common setups" - the Debian and thus Ubuntu default
configurations ship both IPv4 and IPv6 support. You can fix this by
changing the
How are you launching the launcher? So we can have a 'minimal
reprocudible example' to test with.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967572
Title:
torbrowser-launcher crashed with
Tested similar BTRFS root partition layout here, and it exploded as
stated here. I was testing in a VM with a fresh ZSync.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966774
Title:
btrfs
The drivers from Epson are not part of Ubuntu. You will need to obtain
support for them from Epson.
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
brscan is not part of Ubuntu. You will need to obtain support for it
from Brother.
If there is currently an issue involving the built-in drivers from the
sane-backends package, please change the status back.
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You
All currently supported versions of Ubuntu have sane-backends 1.0.27 or
later.
If this issue still occurs with a Pixma MX7600, please change the status
of this bug back.
For any device except a Pixma MX7600 that currently shows a similar
issue, please open a separate bug. Do not comment on this
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021.
Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty) reached end-of-standard-support on April 25, 2019.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty) reached end-of-standard-support on April 25, 2019.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 15.04 (vivid) reached end-of-life on February 4, 2016.
Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty) reached end-of-standard-support on April 25, 2019.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 15.04 (vivid) reached end-of-life on February 4, 2016.
Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty) reached end-of-standard-support on April 25, 2019.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 13.10 (saucy) reached end-of-life on July 17, 2014.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more.
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 13.10 (saucy) reached end-of-life on July 17, 2014.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more.
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) reached end-of-life on April 28, 2017.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more.
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) reached end-of-life on April 28, 2017.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more.
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208091
Title:
scanimage assert failure: *** Error in `scanimage': double
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 13.04 (raring) reached end-of-life on January 27, 2014.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) reached end-of-life on April 28, 2017.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more.
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) reached end-of-life on April 28, 2017.
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the
latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 10.10 (maverick) reached end-of-life on April 10, 2012.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty) reached end-of-standard-support on April 25, 2019.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 13.04 (raring) reached end-of-life on January 27, 2014.
Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) reached end-of-life on April 28, 2017.
Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) reached end-of-life on May 9, 2013.
Ubuntu 9.10 (karmic) reached end-of-life on April 30, 2011.
See this
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572246
Title:
Sane lib crashes with "buffer overflow detected"
To manage
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575090
Title:
Simple Scan detect Mustek 1200 UB Plus as Mustek BearPaw 1200
Basic support is available in Ubuntu 21.10 with sane-backends 1.0.32:
http://www.juergen-ernst.de/info_sane.html
If this version does not work, please change status.
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 9.10 (karmic) reached end-of-life on April 30, 2011.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more.
This model is recognized by libsane1 in all supported versions of
Ubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403340
Title:
Sane does not recognize Epson Corp. CX9400Fax out of the box
This model is recognized by libsane1 in all supported versions of
Ubuntu.
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403340
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 17.10 (artful) reached end-of-life on July 19, 2018.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more.
Everyone posting 'installation failure' cases, please open separate
bugs. The underlying issue that *this* bug was referring to is fixed,
and the new failures are due to other problems, so please open different
bugs.
** Summary changed:
- Ubiquity crashes Kubuntu Jammy after selecting "install
** Changed in: p7zip (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Incomplete
** Tags removed: unmetdeps
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965855
Title:
p7zip source package needs
** Changed in: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831220
Title:
Add hexchat by default on all ubuntu flavours
To manage
Like Studio, Lubuntu ships quassel. We have no intention on the Lubuntu
Team to ship hexchat instead at this time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831220
Title:
Add hexchat by
** Changed in: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831220
Title:
Add hexchat by default on all ubuntu flavours
To manage
archive admins dont think i386ing the RPM source is a good idea based on
my brief discussiom in #ubuntu-release
debugedit has splitsource in later versions, perhaps a split-source is
needed here. However I would suggest we defer to archive admins for
best approach here
--
You received this bug
I am able to build src:rpm for focal i386 using pbuilder, as long as
p7zip-full:i386 is built first.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800
Title:
debhelper in focal-backports not
Root cause: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/p7zip/+bug/1965855
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800
Title:
debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package
Public bug reported:
The p7zip:i386 and p7zip-full:i386 packages are missing in focal.
The result is that debhelper in focal-backports cannot be used to build
i386 packages. It depends on debugedit:i386, which is missing, because
p7zip-full:i386 is a build dependency.
Please apply this patch to
[ubuntu/jammy-proposed] openssl 3.0.2-0ubuntu1 (Accepted)
Uploaded to proposed, it has to go through the usual process of passing
autopkgtests and such. It shouldn't need any additional package
rebuilds because of no ABI changes but expect autopkgtests to run hot a
while
** Changed in: openssl
Public bug reported:
focal-backports contains debhelper 13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1. This is an
architecture-independent package, but it depends on debugedit, which is
architecture-dependent.
The debugedit package exists in focal-universe for amd64, but not for
i386. As a result, Launchpad is not
I've got some extra cycles later today, so I'll happily help the
Security team out and get this uploaded later today (Eastern US time for
clarity sake when I say "later today")
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Thomas Ward (teward)
** Changed in: op
Then this should be trivial to backport, if you need it backported
waveform and you don't want to handle the actual backport uploads, I'll
take this on, I have some spare cycles today this afternoon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
waveform: Paride: given this bug, wouldn't this be more suited for full
SRU and rebuilds? I'm wondering whether this is truly a backportable
case because this requires rebuild of all affected packages, and if
anyone builds with debhelper in backports (which is NOT available in
standard build envs
Whoops looks like we had some collission in terms of assignments.
Reassigning to waveform.
Once this is looked at and looks OK at the Canonical level, then the
Backports Team will take over backporting this. Keep in mind that since
the original Backports process is mostly scrapped, the Backports
Not a bug, you just have bad config.
From your logs:
> Mar 20 13:32:34 spark nginx[68287]: nginx: [emerg] a duplicate default
server for 0.0.0.0:80 in /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/embracehealth.io:209
So you need to figure out where else you've defined default_server and
remove it from the other
Sorry I don't check this forum often.
I'm on 20.04.3. When I try to update + upgrade that package, apt tells
me I'm stuck with version 68
gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock is already the newest version
(68ubuntu1~20.04.1).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Can you please submit this patch upstream as a merge request, unless
this is no longer a problem?
https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/merge_requests
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
There shouldn't be a problem here. The purpose of saned is to share
scanners that are physically attached to the local system, so that
remote systems can use them. If the scanner is already accessible over
the network, a remote system can connect to it without using saned.
See also
What happens if you run "scanimage" from the command line, and use one of:
--format=pnm
--format=tiff
--format=png
Does the image still have artifacts?
** Summary changed:
- All scans via sane deteriotad by compression artefacts for Brother MFC-L2710DW
+ Scanned images are deteriorated by
Assuming you are not in the lp or scanner groups, what happens if you
try to use scanimage to scan an image? (See "scanimage --help" for
syntax, and use the device name that appears when you run "scanimage
-L".)
If that doesn't work, can you add the --verbose flag to scanimage, and
attach the
Actually, here's a better question first. Take yourself out of the lp
and scanner groups. What do you see when you run:
$ getfacl /dev/bus/usb/001/004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Possibly related? https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/issues/499
What are you using to start the daemon (systemd, inetd, sysvinit)? Can
you add the command-line option "--debug=5" and post the same part of
the system log?
** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/issues #499
This was reported against a version of Ubuntu that is no longer
maintained. Please change status to Triaged if this is still happening
in a supported version.
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Yes, that is what I meant by physically logged in.
You shouldn't need to be in the scanner group (or the lp group) in that
case.
If you remove yourself from both of those groups, does this stop
working? If so, what is the output of "sudo scanimage -L"?
--
You received this bug notification
This was fixed upstream in sane-backends 1.0.32. Please see:
https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/issues/395
Can you please try the workaround mentioned at the beginning of that
issue, combined with adding the udev rule?
** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/issues #395
What is the output of scanimage -L?
This utility is meant to identify scanners that are not yet supported by
SANE. Your scanner is already supported.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
> do_bindings: [0] bind failed: Address already in use
This seems like you have more than one process listening for an incoming
connection to saned.
Please see the last three sections of /usr/share/doc/sane-
utils/README.Debian. These each describe a different method of enabling
the daemon
Please see the "SETUP" section of
/usr/share/libsane1/doc/README.Debian.gz. You must either be logged into
a physical console on the system (not an SSH/VNC session) - or if you
want to bypass that requirement, you must add the user to the "scanner"
group. This is expected behavior.
(Adding the
Please see the "SETUP" section of
/usr/share/libsane1/doc/README.Debian.gz. You must either be logged into
a physical console on the system (not an SSH/VNC session) - or if you
want to bypass that requirement, you must be a member of the "scanner"
group.
If either of those is the case, please
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1771068 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771068
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1771068
package libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:
trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/hwdb.d/20-sane.hwdb', which is
Multiple issues were reported upstream regarding USB 3.0. In some cases
this was power management related (placing a USB hub in between the
system and the scanner).
Marking incomplete due to age and inactivity. If this is still
reproducible (preferably with version 1.1.1-4 in jammy), then please
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1777284 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777284
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1777284
package libsane-common 1.0.27-1~experimental3ubuntu2 failed to
install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/sane-config.1.gz',
which
https://jff.email/cgit/sane-
backends.git/tree/debian/libsane1.README.Debian (under "SETUP")
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236956
Title:
sane devices should not be managed by
https://jff.email/cgit/sane-
backends.git/tree/debian/libsane1.README.Debian (under "SETUP")
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1770765 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770765
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1770765
package libsane 1.0.25+git20150528-1ubuntu2.16.04.1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1770765 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770765
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1667085
trouble installing silverlight using "sudo apt-get install
--install-recommends pipelight-multi" into terminal
** This bug has been marked a duplicate
** Description changed:
- wine installation on xubuntu 16 failed
+ This packaging error has been reported against xenial, bionic, and focal
+ (see duplicate bugs) including the latest version in focal-updates.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: libsane
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1770765 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770765
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1770765
package libsane 1.0.25+git20150528-1ubuntu2.16.04.1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1770765 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770765
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1770765
package libsane 1.0.25+git20150528-1ubuntu2.16.04.1 [modified:
lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite
1 - 100 of 3593 matches
Mail list logo
