it was an hardware issue
** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Luca Bianchi (luca.bianchi.91)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Public bug reported:
Onboard Keyboard and touchpad stopped working, but I notice that the
Brightness controls (FN+F2/F3) still work. External USB keyboard and
mouse work properly.
luca@luca-SATELLITE-L850-1PD:~$ uname -a
Linux luca-SATELLITE-L850-1PD 5.11.0-44-generic #48~20.04.2-Ubuntu SMP Tue
Hi, this is still broken in 20.04.1.
Is it possible to easily upgrade to the groovy xfwm4, without doing the full
upgrade to 20.10?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860921
Title:
I do not have /etc/netplan directory on my ubuntu 14.04? Marco
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1676547
Title:
No network connectivity (NIC unmanaged) after upgrade
To manage
I am truly sorry to say that I have tried many of the recommended
solutions for this problem but to no avail. I am running Ubuntu 16.04 on
a AMD 8-core desktop machine and if I ever ever ever even try to give a
command like sudo apt-get update and apt-get upgrade I inevitably find
myself with an
Also not to mention that even when I use my 16.04 without ever using the
sudo apt-get update command, the wifi network is also not detected by
ubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1676547 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1676547
I have tried all the above but did not work for me? I was running Ubuntu
16.04.2 LTS Xenial with no problem until two days ago. Then, after I did
a routine software update which I was prompted to do but
I'm sure there are better options but you just have to read the file
shared in the comment #3 and replace with a simple copy/paste the things
patched there. If you don't understand the patch sytax, ask here again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
If you remove the -ansi -fpedantic option from CFLAGS during compile in
a DEBIAN 8.1 (gmt 4.5.12) the bug goes away. To test it:
% apt-get build-dep gmt
% apt-get source gmt
% cd gmt-4.5.12/
% vi debian/rules
Edit and remove the '-ansi -pedantic' from CFLAGS at line 3.
% fakeroot debian/rules
I also noticed that behaviour in debian 8.0. The psxy keeps on closing
polygons even when the -L option is not given. Also, when I recompiled
the gmt-4.5.12 supplied by debian (apt-get source) without applying the
patches everything worked. This bug renders the package unusable.
** Attachment
I have had this problems for years.
On my Acer 5930G this problem has disappeared one month ago, once I updated to
Linux Mint 16 and to kernel 3.11.
Should this bug be marked as ''solved''?
Best regards, Gabriele Bianchi
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
This is a great news indeed! It took a while ... but excellent news.
Gabriele
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578506
Title:
[Kernel] ACPI: EC: input buffer is not empty, aborting
I am seeing the same issues. Dell e5330 BCM4313.
** Description changed:
- It was working before, and reverting to the old version (5.100.82.38)
+ It was working before, and reverting to the old version (5.100.82.38)
makes WiFi run again. I am using a Dell Vostro laptop, if that helps.
A solution to the computer not passing the Post screen is to disconnect
the pc from the electric power and to remove the battery for a few
seconds. After reinserting the power and/or the battery my acer 5930G
passes the post screen and boots.
I do not remember if this has already been written in
Dear Mark, another ''thanks'' from me. Your suggestion fixed the problem
for me too. Gabriele Bianchi
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994953
Title:
[Aspire 5920, Realtek ALC1200
There are currently no plans to implement such policy in the upstart
package.
Is that an answer?
How is booting to text mode any different from booting to Unity, KDE,
Gnome, or any of a dozen other possible modes? Demanding that each of
those implement the text mode sounds wrong to me.
Public bug reported:
I get this error when executing this in the console:
gmdb2 database.mdb
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: mdbtools-gmdb 0.7~rc1-4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
** Attachment added: Crash report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010072/+attachment/3179482/+files/_usr_bin_gmdb2.1000.crash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010072
Title:
gmdb2
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 943201 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943201
Public bug reported:
error encountered when upgrading X220 (i7, SSD, 8GB) from 11.10 with all
proposed upates to 12.04 via update-manager -u
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 943201 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943201
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950657
Title:
package libclutter-imcontext-0.1-0 0.1.4-2build1
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924925
Title:
soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in X11SalGraphics::GetResolution()
To manage notifications about this
Dear all,
has anybody tried a kernel of the series 3 on a computer showing this
bug? For instance, if Stéphane Travostino (eazy87), who contributed to
this discussion, is still using Archlinux he should have such a kernel.
Does this new kernel eliminate the problem?
Thanks, Gabriele
--
You
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861575
Title:
gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
This bug affects also me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848676
Title:
[MASTER] software-center crashed with DBusException in
_convert_dbus_exception():
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 858193 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858193
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861591
Title:
** Tags added: firefox terminal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859792
Title:
Firefox crashes when I open the terminal
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I should add that on my computer all unity, however, is very unstable,
because I open and close every window that leaves behind it the
graphical effects (the trail takes several seconds rather than an
instant)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Public bug reported:
If I open firefox and close it to an icon, open the terminal and then
reopen firefox, firefox crashes, that brings up the screen, but it's
like the desktop, because clicking the left mouse button opens the menu
of desktop, even if you see the page you opened (and running)
** Package changed: ubuntu = firefox (Ubuntu)
** Description changed:
+ Ubuntu 11.10 beta 2
+
If I open firefox and close it to an icon, open the terminal and then
reopen firefox, firefox crashes, that brings up the screen, but it's
like the desktop, because clicking the left mouse button
Wow! After the long silence in this bug I figured nothing was happening.
It wasn't linked to anyplace where the ongoing discussion of Upstart's
evolution was clearly happening.
I have a lot of reading to do.
I would like acknowledgment of my contribution in the Cookbook.
I'm sure there are
Public bug reported:
ubuntu 10.04. the problem appeared while system update, updating
linux-headers-generic-pae-lts-backport-maverick (2.6.35.28.37) to 2.6.35.30.38
and
linux-image-generic-pae-lts-backport-maverick (2.6.35.28.37) to 2.6.35.30.38
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797436
Title:
package nvidia-173 173.14.22-0ubuntu11 failed to install/upgrade:
nvidia-173 kernel module failed to build
To manage notifications
We users are NOT experts in the Launchpad rules and regulations.
We just want our problems addressed.
Please do whatever is necessary to open up a bug that addresses the
long standing and still present condition of init scripts not being executed
reliably.
For Title and Description I propose:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:56:44PM -, Clint Byrum wrote:
The request to create a new bug report, marking it as possibly related,
is a common practice and it has proven useful in the past to get things
fixed.
Right now the issue that was reported originally is definitely fixed
from the
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 02:15:20PM -, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Any news on this bug? Is anyone trying to fix it?
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 12:11 +, Jens Schødt wrote:
Yeah, IMHO, upstart was wa rushed into Ubuntu. ...
I agree.
The evidence strongly suggests that Upstart still
-9]* .
I don't yet understand /etc/init/*.conf .
Mike Bianchi
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585908
Title:
Document all events (was: cross-comment events and *.conf files)
--
ubuntu
Clint Byrum wrote in comment #4 ...
Complaining loudly is different than asserting, IMO, so I may have just
misunderstood your intent.
My intent is to have a trail of crumbs when the expected events fail to happen.
If the boot sequence gets to runlevel 2 that is very different from
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:52:18AM -, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
:
Feb. 30th is an invalid date which `date` doesn't want to return, which
is why it's bumping the result into March.
This explanation does not quite square with the behavior. Witness:
date
Mon Jan 31
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 03:14:41PM -, John Edwards wrote:
David Haskins, could you run the 'runlevel' command to check if this is
related to this particular bug, or if it is another problem?
A better approach might be to put logging into /etc/init.d/apache2
and figure out:
If it is
If you do a `dpkg -l mock`, you'll see that it tries to install a bunch
of files under /var/lib/python-support/python2.5. However, it doesn't
actually create the necessary directory.
As a workaround, you can `ln -s /var/lib/python-support/python2.6
/var/lib/python-support/python2.5`. Seems to
I have the same problem with Skype (could not even login), Qtpfsgui, and some
other applications.
I have also tried with this:
cd /usr/lib32
sudo chmod ugo-r libpulse.so.0.12.2
sudo chmod ugo-r libpulse-simple.so.0.0.3
found on many forums, but does not work.
Any advise would be helpfull. Thank
I misspoke in Comment #3.
text prevents X from starting.
I believe the removal of slash and quiet prevent the normal boot graphics.
--
Services not starting on boot in 10.04.1 LTS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I'd believed this was an upstart issue and related to bug 554172
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/554172)
I tried the workarounds until an official fix was release, but neither the
workarounds nor the official patch solved the issue for me.
Please document here
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618931/+attachment/1494249/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
Buggy translatation induce wrong command line parameters
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618931
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: liferea
The program (liferea) was badly translated inducing a error on entering
a command line parameters. The argument for the '-w' was translated
hidden = oculto / shown = exibido / iconified = iconificado. When you
read the help using the -h
It occurs to me that if you want to force the /dev/console bug, it might be
as simple as adding console output to all the /etc/init/*.conf files.
If successful it could leave the installation unbootable, so I would
advise doing this in a disposable installation on a separate partition.
--
, it fails.
I did a step-by-step analysis in Bug 543506. Start at comment #54.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/543506/comments/54
--
Mike Bianchi
Foveal Systems
973 822-2085
mbian...@foveal.com
http://www.AutoAuditorium.com
http://www.FovealMounts.com
--
CUPS
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 02:38:04AM -, Lindsay Barclay wrote:
... and for some reason it worked. It has been two days and I have done 10
cold restarts and cups has loaded each time. I can't explain it, ...
This bug, which at its base is unreliable boots where scripts in
/etc/init/*.conf and
. . .Could the lack of a monitor actually plugged into
the DRAC have anything to do with it (Dell Remote Administration Card)?
I would say yes. While working out that /dev/console was part of the
problem I did many boots with verbose turned on and could see that
order of the start-up
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:24:28AM -, Robbie Williamson wrote:
:
2) It has *something* to do with when lo0 is activated, i.e. a race condition
I disagree, it has something to do with not being able to write /dev/console.
See my analysis in bugs 581291 and 543506.
3) There are
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:16:08PM -, Phil Went wrote:
Workarounds are hocus pocus and should not be distributed. They do not work
in all cases, so are at best an indicator of where to look for a developer.
Shouting even when frustrated does not solve problems faster. I will wait
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:58:54PM -, Robbie Williamson wrote:
I'm sorry if you disagree with the policy, but I feel it's a
good one to have and don't want to waste bug comment space defending it.
I made my argument and have been heard. My argument did not convince.
That's the way it is
The kernel mentioned in message #17 unfortunately does not solve the
problem here.
Gabriele
--
[Kernel] ACPI: EC: input buffer is not empty, aborting transaction
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578506
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:18:10PM -, phireph0x wrote:
RE: Mike Bianchi Yes, I tried ALL of the instructions suggested:
... I still have services that don't start on reboot,
Thanks for all your efforts.
Do you get runlevel unknown or N 2 when your services do not start
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:49:13AM -, Kai Krakow wrote:
I don't think that any workarounds could really fix this - the
workarounds just modify timing or reduce impact.
You are absolutely right.
These are workarounds.
But they are the best we can do because I, for one, do not have the time
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:04:03PM -, phireph0x wrote:
The workaround described in
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=9480172postcount=20 doesn't work
for me. I still have services that don't start on system reboot.
See
Damien, Sepero, and all ...
If you look at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/543506/comments/83 you
will see
that I also recommend
Add init='/sbin/init --verbose' to the linux boot line in grub.
I believe this helps by forcing /sbin/init to serialize starting up
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 04:42:53AM -, Andy wrote:
This is a serious problem. At this point 10.04 is not production worthy. ...
I agree.
But the evidence is that Canonical is just not paying any attention to this
line of bugs OR somehow does not think they _are_ serious.
I have a service
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 07:26:47PM -, John Edwards wrote:
So has anyone seen it on a machine which is not a 32-bit install running
a generic (not generic-pae) kernel?
In my case, I was running a quad-core AMD with a 64-bit Linux. For a while I
thought it was a problem that showed up on
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:06:52PM -, John Edwards wrote:
For Mike Bianchi - what kernel was your 64-bit machine running? To find
out run 'uname -a' and post the output.
I don't have access to that machine now, but this from a syslog kept while
debugging. You can see the Linux version
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 554172 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:16:47PM -, phireph0x wrote:
I should add to my previous comment that I've tried some of the
workarounds mentioned in this thread, including commenting out console
output in
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 04:27:35PM -, Tim Scheurenbrand wrote:
Re #131: I tried the solution stated at the other bug-report but it doesn't
work for me. First reboot after change already started in unknown runlevel
without starting services like CUPS.
runlevel returning unknown appears to
I can confirm the solution #103 too. I have a HP dv5-1260 br. Thanks a
lot! Now we can just wait for the official solution, but without too
many rush :)
--
[10.04] Touchpad stops working after login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549727
You received this bug notification because you are a
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:33:02PM -, vindex wrote:
I have this problem, too, but not only with cups, rc.local and some
custom startup-scripts are not starting, either.
Look at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/543506/comments/83
That has worked for many of us.
--
Joel, Till
Re comment #122. I believe you have it backwards.
I believe if you apply the get-around spelled out in comment #83 of
http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/543506
you will find that your CUPS starts will be reliable.
I've seen native 10.4 upstart boot go to unknown
get caught in the race condition between
/dev/console becoming writable and them running.
To my mind there should be an event when /dev/console _is_ writable,
but I don't know if one exists or how to make it happen.
--
Mike Bianchi
Foveal Systems
973 822-2085
mbian...@foveal.com
http
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 01:06:20PM -, Olivier Debon wrote:
What I could diff from syslog between a successful startup and a no runlevel
situation is that only the 2 following messages are missing in the failure
case:
For many of us, the solution is already in this Bug report. Namely:
Dear Alexey, to which 2.6.34 kernel exactly are you referring? There are
many versions Can you please indicate me the link from which you
downloaded it? Thanks a lot, Gabriele Bianchi
--
[Kernel] ACPI: EC: input buffer is not empty, aborting transaction
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578506
You
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:29:49AM -, Francisco.X wrote:
:
In the old init.d system, it was easy for me to add something like an
echo or syslog message to any script to know when it was being executed.
How can I do the same so I can know if /etc/init/rc-sysinit.conf is even
run
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:36:14PM -, Francisco.X wrote:
Sigh. I commented out the console output line in the four files in
/etc/init that had it:
/etc/init: grep console output *
mountall.conf:#console output
rc.conf:#console output
rc-sysinit.conf:#console output
ufw.conf:#console
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 03:32:25PM -, Francisco.X wrote:
/var/log/boot.log:
init: ureadahead-other main process (635) terminated with status 4
There are a number of init messages in /var/log/syslog from my last
reboot, related to ssh respawning too fast. I'll double check the
started
If this is caused by a race condition, then network-manager is not involved,
as that is not installed on my servers.
Look at earlier comments in this Bug about commenting out console
output in /etc/init/*.conf files.
--
Mike Bianchi
Foveal Systems
973 822-2085
mbian...@foveal.com
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:08:43PM -, Ash wrote:
Thanks for your debugging work Mike, but I've now replaced my rc-
sysinit.conf with the one you provided and I'm still having issues with
services like apache not starting.
Note that I had to comment out the console output line in rc.conf
, rc.conf, rc-sysinit.conf, ufw.conf.
How did I miss the mountall.conf and ufw.conf (!).
--
Mike Bianchi
Foveal Systems
973 822-2085
mbian...@foveal.com
http://www.AutoAuditorium.com
http://www.FovealMounts.com
--
Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns unknown
https
/+bug/586076/+subscribe
--
Mike Bianchi
Foveal Systems
973 822-2085
mbian...@foveal.com
http://www.AutoAuditorium.com
http://www.FovealMounts.com
--
plymouthd: ply-keyboard.c assertion failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586076
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I have found a significant difference between the syslogs of an N 2 boot and
an unknown boot.
See syslog_N2 and syslog_unknown, attached. I find using diffuse to look at
them side-by-side very useful.
I've changed times and process numbers to nn:nn:nn and nnn to make taking diffs
easier.
My final /etc/init/rc-sysinit.conf file is attached.
** Attachment added: rc-sysinit.conf
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49136524/rc-sysinit.conf
--
Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns unknown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506
You received this bug notification because
I failed to attach syslog_N2 and syslog_unknown in comment #54.
Here they are.
** Attachment added: syslog_N2
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49137470/syslog_N2
--
Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns unknown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506
You received this bug
I failed to attach syslog_N2 and syslog_unknown in comment #54.
Here they are.
** Attachment added: syslog_unknown
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49137473/syslog_unknown
--
Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns unknown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: upstart
Finding where events are asserted and which *.conf files are sensitive
to an asserted event is difficult.
As a documentation habit, it would be good to have comments in both the
*.conf files and the scripts that make assertiongs and the man
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: upstart
As shown in the attachment snipped from /var/log/syslog, the /etc/init/rc.conf
file can sometimes fail if the
console output stanza fails.
Commenting that stanza out seems to fix the problem and allow rc.conf to
run properly.
** Affects:
** Attachment added: syslog_rc_fail
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49140893/syslog_rc_fail
--
rc.conf fails due to console output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585915
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
/etc/init/rc.conf suffers from the same console output problem as
/etc/init/rc-sysinit.conf,
namely that if it looses the race with /dev/console being writable, then it
fails.
I have submitted Bug Report 585915 documenting that fact.
I have also submitted Bug Report 585908: cross-comment
I attaching a mofified /etc/init/rc.conf file and marking it as a
solution to this bug.
** Attachment added: modified rc.conf is a solution to bug 585915
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49146163/rc.conf
--
rc.conf fails due to console output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585915
You received
More that I think about it, the more I think there should be an event when
/dev/console becomes available,
and console output should imply start on /dev/console.
--
Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns unknown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506
You received this bug
Kent's analysis and repair (comment #42) sounded right,
and I thought it fixed my machine.
I got runlevel N 2 and all my /etc/rc2.d files seem to be started.
The first time.
But on reboot, I was back to runlevel unknown .
sudo telinit 2 seems to move things forward, but ...
--
Some
I am _totally_ confused by the upstart event.
I see startup on filesystem and net-device-up IFACE=lo in
/etc/inti/rc-sysinit.conf
and think I understand that filesystem and net-device-up are
events,
but I have not been able to find _anything_ that would explain where they come
The machine expressing this bug is running an AMD 4-core processor.
I see the bug with 4 or 3 cores running.
I'm wondering if all the others seeing this bug are running multi-core machines.
How say you all?
--
Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns unknown
Where does net-device-up come from?
How does IFACE get set to lo?
Check out /etc/network/if-up.d/upstart.
initctl emit is (one place) where events come from.
OK. Now the question is, where do /etc/network/if-up.d/upstart and
/etc/network/if-down.d/upstart get called from?
find /etc
In the mean time, I find that if I issue
sudo initctl emit filesystem
((initctl never exits, so I have to Ctl-C to make it die.))
sudo initclt emit net-device-up IFACE=lo
Then the boot completes and I get runlevel N 2 with all the goodies.
I have 'init=/sbin/init --verbose' on
Ben Lings -- can you turn one of the CPUs off, so the machine acts as a
single-core processor?
Does it change your boot reliability?
My AMD Phenom II X4 955 only allows me 3 cores (in two configurations:
0,1,2 or 0,1,3) or 4 cores (!?).
--
Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns
In comment #50 I ask if the filesystem and net-device-up IFACE=lo events
are not issued or
issued when /sbin/init doesn't yet know about /etc/init/rc-sysinit.conf .
I now see, in a runlevel unknown boot _AND_ a runlevel N 2 boot that each
/var/log/boot.log records that both events happen _and_
-0537):
Method parse/execution failed [\_TZ_.TZS1._TMP] (Node f70254e0), AE_TIME
This time my laptop is running without battery and connected to the
electric power line.
Gabriele Bianchi
--
[Kernel] ACPI: EC: input buffer is not empty, aborting transaction
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578506
f7022120),
AE_TIME
May 21 01:59:10 francesco kernel: [10863.365208] ACPI Exception: AE_TIME,
Evaluating _BST (20100121/battery-439)
May 21 01:59:11 francesco kernel: [10863.865124] ACPI: EC: input buffer is not
empty, aborting transaction
etc etc. Gabriele Bianchi
--
[Kernel] ACPI: EC: input
After a successful boot, with init='/sbin/init --verbose' : N 2
After a failed boot, without init= : unknown
--
upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581291
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Also, with init='/sbin/init --verbose' boots are not 100% reliable. Some
times they still fail.
I have set the number of active CPUs to 3 (was 4) in the BIOS, in desperate
hope that this will make things more reliable.
--
upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d
Scott -- sorry -- I missed the request for /var/log/boot .log
** Attachment added: boot.log.failed
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48602952/boot.log.failed
--
upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581291
You received this bug
** Attachment added: boot.log.successful
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48602977/boot.log.successful
--
upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581291
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 543506 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506
I'm moving my participation in this discussion to bug #543506.
--
upstart (/sbin/init) fails to start many /etc/init and /etc/rc2.d files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581291
You received this bug
initctl list attachment
from an AMD 64-bit quad core, running 3 cores
** Attachment added: initctl_list
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48606312/initctl_list
--
Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns unknown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506
You received this bug
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
