Public bug reported:
What happened:
1) Installed multi-window silo for the webbrowser [0] and installed demo app [1]
2) Launched the multi window drag and drop example app, note sometimes the
windows are spawned on top of each other, so you may need to move one to see
both
3) Attempt to drag
Public bug reported:
I'm not sure this is specifically the ubuntu-ui-toolkit, but if I use a
Label vs Text seems to affect the number of windows I can open so
thought I'd check here first.
What happened:
1) Branch the demo-app [0]
2) Launch the app
3) Notice a window appears with a number
4)
Note this doesn't seem to be a memory pressure as the qmlscene process
is around 40MB.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627105
Title:
Opening a certain number of windows closes
This also occurs for me under the same conditions, therefore marking as
confirmed.
** Changed in: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473630
Title:
close [X] is mispositioned when opening many tabs
To
** Branch linked: lp:~ahayzen/music-app/fix-1510225-use-save-load-
playlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510225
Title:
load() of a QDeclarativePlaylist does not fully work
To
** Branch linked: lp:~ahayzen/webbrowser-app/fix-1473630-close-tab-
buttons-overlap
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473630
Title:
close [X] is mispositioned when opening many tabs
Public bug reported:
What happened:
1) Open the browser and private mode
2) Start typing random letters so that there are no suggestions
3) Press the down arrow
4) Notice that what you have entered into the address bar is lost
What I expected to happen:
At step 3 for the address bar to remain
Public bug reported:
What Happened:
1) Open the webbrowser-app
2) Start typing in the address bar to reveal suggestions, eg type "BBC"
3) Move the cursor/focus to the first suggested item (by pressing down arrow)
4) Start attempting to type, to edit the address bar (eg to add "News" or
"Sport")
Public bug reported:
What Happened:
1) Open a webapp, eg facebook or twitter
2) Watch the progress bar (the blue bar under the address at the top)
3) Notice that it does not move or disappear
What I expected to happen:
At step 3 for the progress bar to function correctly.
Note that this only
** Changed in: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
** Changed in: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Scenario:
The webbrowser has an address bar which the user types into, then they press
the down arrow to select a suggestion.
What happened:
1) The app is started and the user focuses the addressbar
2) The user may type something then presses the down arrow
3) Focus is lost
Public bug reported:
What happened:
1) Open the webbrowser-app
2) Navigate to a website, note that the progress bar goes blue, shows progress
and disappears
3) Open a new tab, notice there is no progress bar
4) Open a new window
5) Notice that you are on the new tab view, but there is a grey
Note: Even moving the window between the laptop screen and the external
monitor causes the UA overrides to be reloaded.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637459
Title:
Launching
** Changed in: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638337
Title:
Progress bar is shown after opening new window
To manage
** Changed in: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638337
Title:
Progress bar is shown after opening
Public bug reported:
Setup:
I have a laptop that is plugged into an external monitor via HDMI
What happened:
1) Open a terminal, move it to the laptop screen and launch the webbrowser-app
2) Notice in the console that it loads the desktop UA overrides
3) Close the webbrowser-app and move the
** Changed in: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1491279
Title:
Save image/file doesn’t actually download the file on
Public bug reported:
What happened:
1) Writing autopilot tests which are dealing with a multi-window application
2) Within a test I need to switch to the second window which is unfocused
3) Using ProcessManager.get_open_windows() [0] I am able to get a list of the
windows, filter by desktop_file
Public bug reported:
What happened:
1) Navigate to a site displaying a SVG image inline [0]
2) Notice that, in this case, the svg is actually rendered as a png (as wiki
states "Size of this PNG preview of this SVG file: 285 × 285 pixels")
3) Note that you can right click and perform "save image"
** Changed in: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633040
Title:
Missing autopilot tests for javascript dialogs
To manage
** Changed in: ubuntu-weather-app
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-weather-app
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
FWIW, this bug was stopping the webbrowser from being able to export a
PDF to the printing 'app'.
This was due to content-hub using libapparmor to check if the app was
able to read the path, and the webbrowser-app using an apparmor manifest
which generated a rule with owner in it.
It would be
Thanks for the review, we have fixed the issues you have found.
- ~phablet-team are now subscribed to package bugs
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/+packagebugs)
- I've updated the depends to not manually specify the packages you
mentioned in the linked branch
Thanks for the review, we have fixed the issues you have found.
- ~phablet-team are now subscribed to package bugs
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/+packagebugs)
- I've updated the depends to use the new style ubuntu components
package name in the linked branch
Public bug reported:
We want to add printing support into the default unity8 experience.
Adding qtubuntu-print as a recommends (which itself recommends
ubuntu-printing-app) adds:
- a printing plugin to Qt, so that when something is printed it is sent via
content-hub to a destination app that
Note, this was found while testing for bug 1672804.
I was not able to reproduce this exactly, but I was able to reproduce
the opposite - once. (I did *not* have the extra UA override but it
showed *no* warning). So I wonder if this was a caching issue somewhere,
as then after another restart I
Public bug reported:
Please consider ubuntu-printing-app for inclusion in main.
ubuntu-printing-app is part of the secure printing framework for Unity8.
It is the destination app that rendered PDFs are sent to via content-
hub. This app then allows the user to selecting job options and then
Public bug reported:
Please consider qtubuntu-print for inclusion in main.
qtubuntu-print is part of the secure printing framework for Unity8. It is a
toolkit plugin for Qt that provides a printer which creates a PDF and sends it
over content-hub to a trusted printing-app.
It can be used by
Public bug reported:
What happened:
1) Open a GNOME Shell session
2) Use the top right status indicator and select the shutdown button
3) Try to click on one of the buttons
4) Notice that the first click does not affect the button state, you have to
click twice
What I expected to happen:
At
This also occurs for me on xenial+overlay, but i have found changing the
key from "Escape" to "Esc" fixes the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671155
Title:
Autopilot tests
Public bug reported:
What happened:
1) Launch the webbrowser-app
2) Go to the history view
3) Scroll up/down and notice that the scrolling works
4) Right-click delete the first entry
5) Try to scroll up/down and notice that the scrolling doesn't work, notice you
can't click on history entries,
Public bug reported:
Currently specified page ranges are de-duplicated, sorted into ascending
order and doesn't allow reverse ordering. This means that the following
happens:
input | output
2-4,1-3 | 1,2,3,4
5-3 | invalid
Some other applications seem to allow reverse ordering and
Public bug reported:
When the inputMethodHint is set to Qt.ImhPreferNumbers it would be nice
to automatically switch to the ?123 page by default rather than the ABC.
The use case for this is within print dialog for the page range field
where the user needs to be able to type numbers, dash and
I can confirm this issue, when restoring 9 tabs at startup.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-extras (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670715
Title:
Next step:
Start brainstorming what we want. Such as having a toggle to be able to pick a
'default UA' [eg Chrome's UA] for the site/domain, which is then remembered. A
simple checkbox could be sufficient. This would then allow the user to get
around the issue of "this site does not support
** Changed in: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670715
Title:
Last browser tab not fully displayed at app startup despite being
Public bug reported:
What happened:
1) Install Ubuntu 17.04 GNOME
2) Ensure you are running a wayland session
3) Install qtcreator
4) Launch qtcreator
5) Try to do File -> Open File or Project
6) Notice that the application crashes
What I expected to happen:
At step 6 for a file dialog to appear
I tried the packages from zesty-proposed with the version 5.7.1+dfsg-
2ubuntu4~1.17.04.1 and this allowed me to open the filechooser under
QtCreator without crashing :-)
I then flipped back to the packages in the archive (5.7.1+dfsg-
2ubuntu4~1) and was able to confirm it was crashing again.
So
This has been seen on Ubuntu GNOME 17.04, under both Wayland and X11. It
appears to happen randomly after some time, sometimes a reboot can
resolve the issue, sometimes not.
Running the following command as a workaround resolves the issue:
$ sudo kbd_mode -s
FWIW, I was running on a system with
Public bug reported:
With the dash-to-dock extension enabled and intelli-hide not enabled,
the title of applications is not centre aligned with the gnome shell
clock, as shown here [0].
Possible solutions are
1) When the window is maximised to align the title to the monitor centre not
window
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
This is strange, flatpak does not depend on ostree - only libostree [0].
Our current suspicions are that there were network issues with mono-
project.org or gnome.org (for the SDK) when you first tried to install,
I have run the test plan on a Bionic VM, which passed all relevant tests
successfully - I have noted the version of flatpak used below. Therefore
I am marking this as verification-done-bionic.
$ apt-cache policy flatpak
flatpak:
Installed: 0.11.7-0ubuntu0.1
Candidate: 0.11.7-0ubuntu0.1
@Timo, Awesome thanks ! I have noted not to bump the standards version
for future SRUs and I'll test this tonight :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767215
Title:
New upstream
** Description changed:
This is a request to SRU the latest microrelease of the 0.11 series of
flatpak into bionic.
[Impact]
New upstream micro release of flatpak, which brings fixes and
improvements to the 0.11 series.
Bionic is currently at 0.11.3, whereas 0.11.7 is
Sorry for the automatic bot message, Ken is already sponsoring this
change, so please ignore the request from the bot for now. (I don't have
permission to unsubscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Attaching debdiff for bionic from 0.11.3-3 to 0.11.7
** Patch added: "Flatpak artful 0.11.3-3 to 0.11.7 debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1767215/+attachment/5137412/+files/flatpak_0.11.3_to_0.11.7.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Description changed:
- There is a new flatpak release for the 0.11.X series which should be
- SRU'd into bionic.
-
- ** This is a placeholder for a future SRU request **
-
This is a request to SRU the latest microrelease of the 0.11 series of
flatpak into bionic.
[Impact]
New
Awesome thanks! I'll close the rest of the bug.
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767215
Title:
New upstream
** Summary changed:
- New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.8
+ [SRU] New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776307
Title:
[SRU] New upstream
Attaching debdiff for bionic 0.11.7-0ubuntu0.1 to 0.11.8.3-0ubuntu0.1
** Description changed:
- Placeholder for SRU of new upstream micro-release.
+ This is a request to SRU the latest microrelease of the 0.11 series of
+ flatpak into bionic.
+
+ [Impact]
+
+ New upstream micro release of
** Summary changed:
- [SRU] New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.8
+ [SRU] New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.8.3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776307
Title:
[SRU] New
Sorry for the automatic bot message, Ken is already sponsoring this
change, so please ignore the request from the bot for now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776307
Title:
[SRU] New
Public bug reported:
Placeholder for SRU of new upstream micro-release.
** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
** Chan
Note I have tried using the .run offline installer of Qt 5.6/5.9/5.11,
what seems to happen is that they work on Ubuntu 16.04, 17.10 but fail
on 18.04 - this is the stacktrace for reference
https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Yzj5gsmwQ3/
So it seems possible that it might be some underlying change to
Public bug reported:
What happened:
1) Install a container system (eg Docker, LXD) - I'm using Docker
2) Create a container which is Ubuntu 18.04
3) Install a Qt app, eg qtcreator, inside the container
4) Run the container so that it shows the hosts X11 socket
5) Notice that the application fails
Public bug reported:
Placeholder for SRU of new upstream micro-release.
** Affects: ostree (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: ostree (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ostree (Ubu
@mitya57, Thanks for having a look at this. I have tried starting dbus
and dbus-daemon as you have described before running QtCreator - but it
still fails in the same way :-/
I have also tried installing dbus-x11 and executing $ export $(dbus-
launch)to set the env vars, but this still
This regression has been resolved in flatpak 0.11.5, therefore updating
and testing flatpak 0.11.5 now :-)
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/flatpak/2018-April/001074.html
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/flatpak/tree/debian/0.11.5-1
** Summary changed:
- New upstream microrelease flatpak
This bug has been fixed with gnome-sofware 3.28, which is found in
Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic).
I don't have permission to nominate this bug for the series artful so
don't want to close this myself, is someone with permission able to set
gnome-software (ubuntu) as fixed released and nominate this for
@Ad2, Are you using flatpak version 0.11.4 or 0.11.5 from the PPA ?
There was a regression which I found and reported here
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1632 where flatpakref's could
crash gnome-software. It has since been fixed and released in 0.11.6.
** Bug watch added:
** Summary changed:
- New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.5
+ New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.6
** Description changed:
There is a new flatpak release for the 0.11.X series which should be
SRU'd into bionic.
** This is a placeholder for a future SRU request **
+
** Description changed:
There is a new flatpak release for the 0.11.X series which should be
SRU'd into bionic.
** This is a placeholder for a future SRU request **
+
+
+ This is a request to SRU the latest microrelease of the 0.11 series of
+ flatpak into bionic.
+
+ [Impact]
+
+
The gnome-software-plugin-flatpak was known to have issues in 3.26,
would you be able to try again with Ubuntu 18.04 + gnome-software 3.28 ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1719985
/debian/0.10.10-1
** Affects: flatpak-builder (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: flatpak-builder (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
** Changed in: flatpak-builder (Ubuntu)
Sta
** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You re
** Tags added: flatpak-usability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864
Title:
Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software
on Ubuntu
To manage
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
I tried using an Ubuntu 18.04 daily image with XFS and was able to
successfully install org.gnome.Recipes with --system.
Looking at the ostree package, it looks like 2018.4-2 was synced from
Debian into bionic on
** Summary changed:
- New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.6
+ New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.7
** Description changed:
There is a new flatpak release for the 0.11.X series which should be
SRU'd into bionic.
** This is a placeholder for a future SRU request **
-
This is
To add more info, the following steps cause this issue on my machine and
are reproducible.
- Start machine login to user A
- Logout of user A
- Try to login to user B
- Now have a purple display, need to use the cancel workaround (next login will
work)
--
You received this bug notification
Found a potential regression in flatpak 0.11.4 using the test plan,
reported https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1627. Waiting to find
out if it is an app issue or a flatpak regression.
** Bug watch added: github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues #1627
@Ads2, Yup I'm preparing an SRU for the next microrelease, you can
track in bug 1767215. I am able to use flatpakref's with 0.11.3-3, if
you are still having an issue please report upstream :-) (I have also
seen issues discussed as different browsers acting differently, or the
browser
I submitted a patch for the ubuntu-reviews plugin within GNOME Software,
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/merge_requests/11, which
has now been merged by Robert. Hopefully this fix will now make it into
a stable ubuntu release (18.04?).
--
You received this bug notification because
I'm also trying to get some clarifications around why fedora 26/27 ship
0.10.X vs 0.11.X, I wonder if it was just the simplest thing to do with
the document portal move in 0.11.X. If I get any reasoning I'll update
this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
So I had a short conversation on #flatpak about this (unfortunately Alex
is on holiday so can't provide any input at this current time).
Hi, I know alex isn't around, but was wondering if anyone else would
be able to answer this question. Are the odd series numbers truely development
series
@smcv, thanks for the comment that is really useful info. I didn't
realize that debian had already split the document portal, this is good
to know.
I had some further discussions with people about the situation
https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/gvFBxNFzwN/ (it's quite long). But
interesting points
Hey, as discussed in IRC on #ubuntu-desktop, I'm happy to help out with
any SRUs and maintenance where I can :-)
If Ubuntu stays on 0.11 for bionic, assuming there are no regressions
the SRU process, I'm right in saying SRU process would allow for bionic
users to upgrade to 0.12, or 1.0 at a
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
This bug has been reported for flatpak 0.6.X and Ubuntu 16.10 (both of
which are unsupported and out of date), I have tried running a similar
command to what the crash shows was executed (flatpak install flathub
@osomon, hey o/ :-)
GNOME Web looks like it has been archived on Flathub
https://github.com/flathub/org.gnome.Epiphany and removed from the store
for now. I believe this was due to security issues, which will hopefully
be solved with the new freedesktop runtime.
Eolie, looks like there are other
@osomon, sure :-)
This was the original PR against master https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME
/gnome-software/merge_requests/48 but i believe that has been superseded
by https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/merge_requests/58 for
the stable series 3.28. (jrocha from Endless was working on the
Public bug reported:
Placeholder for SRU of new upstream micro-release.
** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
** Chan
I've spoken with upstream, for bionic we should be able to use
--without-avahi. This shouldn't have any adverse affect to flatpak or
ostree other than disabling p2p networking and removes the additional
build-depends. (I will test a build over the next few days in a PPA).
So the package in the
** Summary changed:
- New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0
+ New upstream release flatpak 1.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787917
Title:
New upstream release flatpak 1.0
To
** Description changed:
- Placeholder for SRU of new upstream micro-release.
+ This is a placeholder for a new upstream release of flatpak.
+ =
+
+
+ This is a request to SRU the latest release of flatpak into bionic.
+
+
+ [Impact]
+
+ New upstream release of flatpak, which brings fixes
Public bug reported:
What happened:
1) Install Ubuntu Cosmic daily build
2) Launch gnome-software 3.30
3) Click on the app menu, notice there is no "update preferences"
4) Install gnome-software-plugin-flatpak
5) Restart gnome-software 3.30
6) Notice there is still no "update preferences"
What I
The 2018.6 release in Debian included new rust bindings, these were then
removed in the next release - which has resulted in a smaller debdiff
than before. I have also disabled avahi so there isn't a new build-
depends.
I'm going to provisionally update the bug description to match the
changes
I have added (LP: 1791553) to the commit message (as seen in a previous
commit).
Yes, I agree it could be a good idea to mention that this is currently
flatpak only. What would you suggest? Rename "Update Preferences" to
"Flatpak Update Preferences" or mention in the dialog itself somewhere ?
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
I am a bit confused by the bug, you mention that you installed apps with
flatpak but then you mention using "mount" to check if they are visible.
Flatpak applications won't appear when you run mount under normal
To keep this bug in the loop, the merge request
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gnome-
software/merge_requests/5 landed in ubuntu-master, but ubuntu-3-30 has
different code so the patch couldn't be applied. I will create another
merge for ubuntu-3-30.
--
You received this bug
@Robie, thanks for looking at this.
So Flatpak 1.0 is currently under pre-release/release candidate, and
should hopefully be released in the next few weeks (at some point after
GUADEC). As you have pointed out it might be a good idea to submit them
together - so that they can be tested together.
I have created a merge request https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu
/gnome-software/merge_requests/7/ for the ubuntu-3-30 branch for cosmic.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553
Public bug reported:
This is a request to SRU the latest microrelease of the 0.8 LTS series
of flatpak into artful.
[Impact]
New upstream micro release of flatpak, which backports important bug
fixes and security improvements into the 0.8 LTS series.
Artful is currently at 0.8.7, whereas 0.8.9
Attaching debdiff for artful from 0.8.7-5 to 0.8.9
** Patch added: "Flatpak artful 0.8.7-5 to 0.8.9 debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1752381/+attachment/5065378/+files/flatpak_artful_0.8.7-5_0.8.9.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Sorry for the automatic bot message, Ken is already sponsoring this
change, so please ignore the request from the bot for now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752381
Title:
[SRU] New
This package has now been sponsored, therefore I'm subscribing ~ubuntu-
sru
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752381
Title:
[SRU] New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.8.9
To manage
On Ubuntu 18.04 daily with flatpak 0.11.3, gnome-software-plugin-flatpak
3.28.0 I have not been able to reproduce this issue. I did have a
separate issue, which looks like a bug in cleanups between versions of
gnome-software as removing all apps, remotes and caches resolved the
issue - I have
** Summary changed:
- Unable to install flatpak on Ubuntu artful
+ Unable to install flatpakref on Ubuntu artful
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716409
Title:
Unable to install
@jbicha, sure reported an issue here to track the potential cache
upgrade issue with 3.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
software/+bug/1756098
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
What happened
1) Open your browser, navigate to flathub.org, find an app and click to install
it
2) Open the resulting flatpakref in gnome-software.
3) Notice how the app info is correctly displayed
4) Try to click install, notice how now you get "cannot install source from
I've not yet been able to reproduce this yet, but while investigating
I've found that the cache folder for gnome-software (and therefore the
gnome software flatpak plugin) has changed from 17.10 to 18.04 - so it
might not be an issue for "real" users upgrading from 17.10?
Eg the flatpak plugin
301 - 400 of 716 matches
Mail list logo
