[Bug 239355] Re: KVM very, very slow with RedHat and Solaris guests

Just solved it by using sda / sdb for the cdrom images instead of using hdc / hdd. Maybe you guys can do the same with KVM? -- KVM very, very slow with RedHat and Solaris guests https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 239355] Re: KVM very, very slow with RedHat and Solaris guests

FYI: I got the EXACT SAME issue running CentOS 5.3 and Xen in HVM mode... Not sure how to fix yet. This looks like a CentOS bug to me. -- KVM very, very slow with RedHat and Solaris guests https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 377485] Re: SECURITY: Please upgrade to the latest SID version

FYI: I wont do more work than just warning you about the security issue, as I do not use Ubuntu at all. But I really think that someone should take care of this one. Databases often have loads of passwords in them, and this would reveal them to any user of the system. Also, please note that the pac

Re: [Bug 202882] Re: [needs-sync] Please upgrade DTC from 0.25.3-2 to current stable (0.28.2)

Richard Fairthorne wrote: > I run a web hosting company using this product on ubuntu. I'd love to > see this updated, or to participate in updating it if someone can point > me in the right direction. > > ** Changed in: dtc (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Confirmed Hi! I'd be happy if Ubuntu co

Re: [Bug 202882] Re: [needs-sync] Please upgrade DTC from 0.25.3-2 to current stable (0.28.2)

Richard Fairthorne wrote: > Hi Thomas! > > I run a small development company called "Obstacles Gone Corporation" > http://obstaclesgone.com and we use dtc to host a limited number of our > own clients. The structure of DTC allows me to treat the server as if > there is no control panel for my own

[Bug 347000] [NEW] Please sync with the new package from SID

maintenance of this package, as the old maintainer has not been seen since 2005, and the last co-maintainer said he is not interested in working on it. Any distribution that includes the version 3.2.12-1.2 shall have a qa upload ASAP, as the package is really broken with this version. Thomas Goirand

Re: [Bug 267372] [NEW] postinstall script fails on mysql error

in_vain wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Binary package hint: dtc > > after running: sudo ./install from the /usr/share/dtc/admin/install > directory the install fails with the following error message > > -> Installing or upgrading DTC database: dtc > ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user

Re: [Bug 202882] Re: [needs-sync] Please upgrade DTC from 0.25.3-2 to current stable (0.28.2)

in_vain wrote: > so the binaries are being added by entering: > echo "deb ftp://ftp.gplhost.com/debian stable main" >>/etc/apt/sources.list > (notice my, if i am wrong about this issue) > Hi, The current stable version is available in Debian SID and in Debian Testing, and in our Debian reposito

[Bug 377485] Re: SECURITY: Please upgrade to the latest SID version

We are now 4 months later, after I sent a warning about this package. Jaunty is still using version 2.5-1 that is saving backups of the server's databases world readable. Is it that nobody cares at Ubuntu? It took exactly 2 days in Debian to have this fixed. Why 4 months in Ubuntu? I'm telling you

[Bug 318782] Re: D-Bus Policy needs checking

Hi, As per upstream: http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/2010-April/006955.html yes, yum-updatesd feature should be totally killed from packaging. I have already sent a bug against the Debian BTS (as a whishlist item, because the default setup has the init script disabled by default so

[Bug 574202] Re: mysqldump: Got error: 1044: Access denied ... when using LOCAL TABLES

Hi, Fixed in version 2.5-6 that I just uploaded, please sync from Debian SID. The maintainer, Thomas Goirand -- mysqldump: Got error: 1044: Access denied ... when using LOCAL TABLES https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 500147] Re: package automysqlbackup 2.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:

Normally, your system should have a /etc/mysql/debian.cnf holding the following: r...@gplhost:xen650901>_ ~# cat /etc/mysql/debian.cnf # Automatically generated for Debian scripts. DO NOT TOUCH! [client] host = localhost user = debian-sys-maint password = socket = /var/r

[Bug 425391] Re: Deprecation warnings from tumgreyspf cleanup cron job

Hi, I hope to be soon an official Debian Developer, and be able to upload fixes. Until then, you can find an update of my package in here: http://ftparchive.gplhost.com/debian/pool/lenny/main/t/tumgreyspf/ http://ftparchive.gplhost.com/debian/pool/lenny/main/t/tumgreyspf/tumgreyspf_1.35-3.dsc Th

[Bug 426650] [NEW] Please sync with the new package from SID

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dtc-xen Hi, I'm the upstream author and Debian maintainer of DTC and DTC-Xen. Both new packages have just been uploaded into SID. Please upgrade to it for the latest unstable and testing Ubuntu: - DTC 0.30.6-1 - DTC-Xen 0.5.1-1 Note that BOTH need to

[Bug 426649] [NEW] Please sync with the new package from SID

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dtc Hi, I'm the upstream author and Debian maintainer of DTC and DTC-Xen. Both new packages have just been uploaded into SID. Please upgrade to it for the latest unstable and testing Ubuntu: - DTC 0.30.6-1 - DTC-Xen 0.5.1-1 Note that BOTH need to be u

[Bug 176654] Re: Yum doesn't find files in /usr/share

Hi, I'm the maintainer of yum in Debian, and I don't understand at all what this bug report is about. What do you mean by "Yum doesn't find files in /usr/share"??? Thomas -- Yum doesn't find files in /usr/share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176654 You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 318782] Re: D-Bus Policy needs checking

Hi, I'm the package maintainer in Debian. yum-updatesd init.d is desactivated by default in the package. I don't think that this report is relevant. Thomas -- D-Bus Policy needs checking https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318782 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 228053] Re: Yum does not work, and it is out of date anyways

Hi, I'm the maintainer of yum in Debian. We are using this version of yum in production to bootstrap CentOS from a Lenny dom0. It does work pretty well. When you say "installing it doesn't work any better than installing the one in the repositories", I don't understand what repository you are ta

[Bug 228053] Re: Yum does not work, and it is out of date anyways

After some discussion with some users, it appears that version 3.2.21 is broken, but 3.2.23 is working. This is not a surprise at all. I believe this bug entry can be closed, and maybe 3.2.23 should be migrated to Jaunty to make it work. Thomas -- Yum does not work, and it is out of date anyway

[Bug 238013] Re: yum seems to depend on python2.4, but agrees with python2.5

Hi, I'm the new maintainer of yum in Debian. All these seems to be very old bug reports for anything lower than 3.2.23, which is the only version that I consider working. You guys in Ubuntu should either upload 3.2.23 to correct the issues, or ignore these bug reports. Thomas -- yum seems to de

[Bug 1603776] Re: automysqlbackup requires postfix as depency

ommends on the mutt package, but that's not at all a hard dependency. So please close this bug. :) Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603776 Title: automysql

[Bug 1737153] [NEW] openstackdocstheme Contains minified version of bootstrap

Public bug reported: Please remove bootstrap.min.js and bootstrap.min.css, as these files are considered non-free in most (if not all) downstream distributions. ** Affects: openstack-doc-tools Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: python-openstackdocstheme (Ubuntu) Imp

[Bug 1737153] Re: openstackdocstheme Contains minified version of bootstrap

The minified version is to be considered as a .o file, ie the result of a compilation. Therefore it as nothing to do in a source tree. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737153 Title: op

[Bug 1555799] [NEW] Diff from the Debian package

Public bug reported: As per Chuck's comment on IRC, here's the diff with the Debian package (cleaned, to keep only relevant changes, for example, I removed diff in changelog). ** Affects: python-pylxd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1555799] Re: Diff from the Debian package

** Patch added: "debian.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pylxd/+bug/1555799/+attachment/4595404/+files/1.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555799 Title: D

[Bug 1605149] Re: python-jenkins depends on python-pbr

pbr does *not* depend on PIP, so I don't agree with this bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1605149 Title: python-jenkins depends on python-pbr To manage notifications about

[Bug 1632743] Re: Missing files from python-magnum 3.1.1-0~cloud0

This patch should fix the problem: https://review.openstack.org/385628 Note that this is a reoccurring issue with PBR which IMO shall be fixed there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632

[Bug 1632743] Re: Missing files from python-magnum 3.1.1-0~cloud0

FYI, the fix was uploaded to Debian unstable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632743 Title: Missing files from python-magnum 3.1.1-0~cloud0 To manage notifications about this bug go

Re: [Bug 962184] Re: FFE: Sync xen-api 1.3.2-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

On 04/24/2012 08:36 PM, Chuck Short wrote: > ** Summary changed: > > - Sync xen-api 1.3.2-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) > + FFE: Sync xen-api 1.3.2-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) > Hi Chuck, You guys would better sync from 1.3.2-5, the only difference in it are reviewed lon

[Bug 1470860] Re: requests functional API won't close sockets

Hi. FYI, I have the same issue when building the package for Debian. ** Changed in: requests (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1470860 Title: re

[Bug 1069890] Re: package websockify 0.2~20121002-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/rebind', which is also in package novnc 2012.1~e3+dfsg+1-2

** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069890 Title: package websockify 0.2~20121002-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upg

[Bug 1459961] Re: ubuntu trove packages do not properly make /var/cache/trove

Nikhil Manchanda (slicknik), thanks for adding me to the review, but I can't do anything regarding to the Ubuntu package (I only maintain packages in Debian, not in Ubuntu). FYI, the Debian packages for Trove do have the needed mkdir + chown, as I wrote that in. -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 1513599] Re: Missing option in api_paste.ini breaks keystone middleware

FYI, this was fixed in Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1513599 Title: Missing option in api_paste.ini breaks keystone middleware To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1251447] Re: weak file permission with default config/installation

Hi, No, there's no race condition for backuped files, it's not chmod that is in use. I would consider this bug as very low priority, since it only allows someone with a shell access to list the databases at most. Also, please note that there's no "upstream" but the Debian package maintainer (eg:

[Bug 997946] Re: tumgreyspf crashes on startup, wrong library path

Hi, I'm the Debian package maintainer, and I confirm that the latest version of the package include patches to fix the path. Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 1365618] Re: [MIR] python-xstatic

Hi Doko, Exactly what uninstallability are you talking about? Is the info available somewhere and I missed it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365618 Title: [MIR] python-xstatic To

[Bug 1197314] Re: xcp-xapi needs polishing/proper documentation

Hi. While all of the above is truth, some of it is clearly well documented (like the xe pif-reconfigure-ip), and isn't a problem in the package, but in upstream software, so there's nothing one can do about it at the distribution level. As for doing things automatically for the network config, it

[Bug 1069890] Re: package websockify 0.2~20121002-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/rebind', which is also in package novnc 2012.1~e3+dfsg+1-2

This bug can be cosed, as the websockify package has: Breaks: novnc (<< 1:0.4+dfsg+1-6) Replaces: novnc (<< 1:0.4+dfsg+1-6) Cheers, Thomas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069890 Titl

[Bug 995587] Re: mysqldump: Got error: 1142: SELECT, LOCK TABL command denied to user 'debian-sys-maint'@'localhost' for table 'cond_instances' when using LOCK TABLES

Hi, There's absolutely no reason why this bug is still open, with comments from users. This has been fixed a long time ago in Debian, and should be also in Ubuntu. Perhaps this is just affecting users of Ubuntu 10.04, in which case I would advise to upgrade to the latest version of automysqlbackup

Re: [Aims] [Bug 995587] Re: mysqldump: Got error: 1142: SELECT, LOCK TABL command denied to user 'debian-sys-maint'@'localhost' for table 'cond_instances' when using LOCK TABLES

On Fri Feb  1 2013 02:27:21 PM CST, Jan Groenewald wrote: > This bug persists for me on 12.04 hi, please post you /etc/default/automysqlbackup, and tell which version of automysqlbackup you use. Thomas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

Re: [Bug 849544] [NEW] remove dtc from oneiric and blacklist: multiple security and policy bugs

s, you can already use version 0.34.1 and 0.29.18, and I will be backporting bug fixes for other Ubuntu versions. > As suggested by Scott Kitterman, I therefore intend to remove dtc from > oneiric and blacklist it to prevent it from being reintroduced > accidentally. It would have been nice to

[Bug 849544] Re: remove dtc from oneiric and blacklist: multiple security and policy bugs

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #637509 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637509 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849544 Title: remove dtc from oneiric and blac

Re: [Bug 849544] Re: remove dtc from oneiric and blacklist: multiple security and policy bugs

- Original message - > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:30:08AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > By definition, if you asked for the removal of 0.30.0 from squeeze > because it was unsuitable for release, it was buggy in a > release-critical way.  That the release-critical bugs las

Re: [Bug 849544] Re: remove dtc from oneiric and blacklist: multiple security and policy bugs

On 09/14/2011 10:21 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > No, they are not marked as fixed in 0.34.1. If you believe these bugs are > fixed, then I think as the Debian package maintainer you have some bug > gardening to do. The URL I linked, >

[Bug 815334] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 814524] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 788611] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 783995 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 ** This bug has been marked

[Bug 786512] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 786388] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 783995] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 1001808] Re: package dkimproxy (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 956477] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 931214] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 929235] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 924355] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 918024] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 904607] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 897051] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 863859] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-6 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 834907] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 818698] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- You received this bu

[Bug 1022564] Re: Keyboard does not work on console with windows guest in XenCenter

Hi, While XenCenter doesn't work, OpenXenManager does, so you can use that for the console. Thomas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022564 Title: Keyboard does not work on console wi

[Bug 1022564] Re: Keyboard does not work on console with windows guest in XenCenter

Hi, I don't agree it really is *ON* topic. OpenXenManager is in both Debian and Ubuntu, while XenCenter is not. More over, XenCenter is for a non- free platform, so why should I care? Or is there a XenCenter for Linux? I don't think so. As the maintainer of Xen-API in Debian, I care more about wh

[Bug 1176256] Re: Package xcp-xapi prompts for network backend but always picks Open vSwitch

Hi, Indeed, this was fixed a long time ago in Debian, and this bug should be cleared once 1.3.2-9 migrates to Ubuntu. I would suggest to also update Precise with the latest patch release available in Wheezy. By the way, I don't agree that "it's impossible to install XCP in 12.04 since that instal

[Bug 1176256] Re: Package xcp-xapi prompts for network backend but always picks Open vSwitch

Well, one could edit the configuration file just right after the package is installed, and then the installation would be successful, no? I'm sorry, I don't test my XCP packages on Ubuntu, so I can't really tell, and that's the first time I hear about this loop. Is the above from the xcp-xapi.log

[Bug 1176256] Re: Package xcp-xapi prompts for network backend but always picks Open vSwitch

Hi, Indeed, I never had such a problem as the package never finishing to install. I'm surprised that Ubuntu cared so few about it that it never got reported. Anyway, let's not discuss the patch, and let's have the package updated... :) Thomas -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 1177058] Re: openvswitch-datapath-dkms package depends on missing kernel headers

I don't think so. If there's a package to fix, it would be dkms itself, not openvswitch-datapath-dkms. In Debian, we have: Package: dkms Depends: module-init-tools, gcc, make | build-essential | dpkg-dev, coreutils (>= 7.4), patch Recommends: fakeroot, menu | sudo, linux-headers-686-pae | linux-h

[Bug 1010568] Re: xcp-xapi problem with tun based VPN , tinc in my case

Hi, Could you please confirm that this is /etc/init.d/tinc that we're talking about? Would a: Should-Start: xen-api in the tinc init script fix the problem? Cheers, Thomas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu

[Bug 1004028] Re: package xcp-squeezed 1.3.2-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Hi, Could you please add a set -x in the postinst for xcp-squeezed and try to run it again? The output would help... Cheers, Thomas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004028 Title: pa

Re: [Bug 1010568] Re: xcp-xapi problem with tun based VPN , tinc in my case

homas On 11/13/2012 02:06 PM, Siavash Sameni wrote: > i can confirm it of course , in the end , i ended up uninstalling tinc on > the dom0 and installed it on one of the dom U's. > > > On 12 November 2012 17:28, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Coul

[Bug 907214] Re: Kronos: xcp-xapi.init should conflict with xend

e they are deprecating xm. Finally, because of the above, I believe this bug should be reassigned to the Xen hypervisor. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 907214] Re: Kronos: xcp-xapi.init should conflict with xend

** Package changed: xen-api (Ubuntu) => xen (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907214 Title: Kronos: xcp-xapi.init should conflict with xend To manage notifications about this b

[Bug 1195821] Re: xcp-xapi openvswitch cannot set a network other than /24

Hi, Could we please avoid to have another bug report? This has been fixed in Debian, there's no need to discuss it in Launchpad when this has been discussed and fixed in bugs.debian.org. This is a waste of time. If there's a bug to fill, it is only to sync from Debian, IMO. Thomas -- You receiv

[Bug 1195821] Re: xcp-xapi openvswitch cannot set a network other than /24

Hi, In that case IMO, you should open a bug for the package to be synced from Debian, and report all the bugs that it fixes. That would be more productive than sending the bugfix from upstream git. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 995587] Re: mysqldump: Got error: 1142: SELECT, LOCK TABL command denied to user 'debian-sys-maint'@'localhost' for table 'cond_instances' when using LOCK TABLES

root@host /var/lib/mysql# ls -lah performance_schema/cond_instances.frm -rw-rw 1 mysql mysql 8.5K Jun 10 03:13 performance_schema/cond_instances.frm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9

[Bug 845481] [NEW] URGENT: Please sync DTC 0.34.1 from SID

Public bug reported: Hi, Please take the latest package from SID, the current one in Ubuntu has many security issues which have been fixed. It would be quite bad to keep the old package. ** Affects: dtc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 731117] Re: package dkimproxy (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 730338] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 738032] [NEW] Please synch from SID version 1.4.1-2

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dkimproxy Hi, The last version I uploaded to SID has numerous fixes, one of them being a fallback to "localdomain" if no FQDN is set in the server prior to starting dkimproxy. This bug created a ton of report in launchpad.net, so I'd be happy to have it

[Bug 729700] Re: SQL injections in DTC

Hi, Patched versions have been made. Here's the details: Hardy: http://ftparchive.gplhost.com/pub/dtc/ubuntu-fixes/hardy/dtc_0.25.3-2ubuntu2.dsc karmic: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dtc/dtc_0.29.17-1+lenny1.dsc (directly from Debian) lucid: http://ftparchive.gplhost.com/pub/dtc/ubun

[Bug 746192] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 744547] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 813313] Re: [mir] minissdpd

Hi, I have uploaded version 1.0.20110729, which upstream is claiming to fix the above issues. Please sync from SID if you want the latest version. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: Thanks for sending a bug to my package, I wouldn't have spot it otherwise. I'll register to this pa

[Bug 836935] Re: upload rejected for files with a time stamp too far in the past

re-upload appart from fixing this tiny file date issue inside upstream tar.gz. So if I can avoid re-uploading, that'd be great! Please let me know. Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 836935] Re: upload rejected for files with a time stamp too far in the past

am file dates set to 1/1/1970, which was affecting Ubuntu (LP: #836935). * Section is now php. -- Thomas Goirand Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:13:22 +0800 So, I would suggest you to synch this last upload to SID, since it will fix your troubles. I hope you didn't mind the long explanations, but I th

[Bug 698129] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 695214] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 686337] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 677336] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 674070] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 670017] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 2 zurück

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 662769] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 657292] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subproces installed post-installation script gaf een foutwaarde 2 terug

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 655644] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 654342] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 649655] Re: Missing dependency on sunpinyin-data

Hi, FYI, there's no such an issue on the ibus-sunpinyin package in Debian (currently on the NEW queue, waiting for FTP masters approval which will come after Squeeze is released). Thomas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 696666] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 680779] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 2 zurück

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 695156] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

[Bug 661628] Re: package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 588960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 588960 package dkimproxy 1.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 * You can subscribe to b

  1   2   >