I'll not try to argue, but just paste a few links instead :
http://daringfireball.net/2003/03/antiantialiasing
http://modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~tuomov/b/archives/2006/03/17/T20_15_31/
http://www.sabi.co.uk/Notes/anno06-2nd.html#060429
http://avi.alkalay.net/linux/docs/font-howto/Font.html#fix
I
Public bug reported:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=377267
should be fixed in 10.050
** Affects: kernel-package (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
kernel_image target fails with kernel 2.6.18-rc
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58570
--
s/Solution/Workaround
--
Dead symlink
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58584
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Btw, this site seems to overwrite the fonts used, so the settings have no
effect unless you disable Allow web page to overwrite fonts or something like
this in firefox fonts preference.
After disabling it, (and setting Proportional to Sans Serif instead of Serif,
and decreasing size from 16 to
Hmm, I see 3 bugs against kernel-package, and 58570 is among them, I'm
not sure how you missed it :)
--
make-kpkg - fatal error: UTS Release does not match current version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59909
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Besides, your report is wrong afaik, the issue you have only happens
with 2.6.18-rc kernels, while the debian bug you gave a link to also
affected older kernels and has been fixed. I admit it was a similar
problem however, which concerns the same part of the script.
See
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 58570 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 58570
kernel_image target fails with kernel 2.6.18-rc
--
make-kpkg - fatal error: UTS Release does not match current version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59909
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Bug 59909 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
kernel_image target fails with kernel 2.6.18-rc
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58570
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
It seems like it has been reported upstream :
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2772
I think I also saw a previous report on ubuntu launchpad, but can't find
it again.
--
MPlayer receives BadAlloc when playing very large movies using Xv
https://launchpad.net/bugs/38939
--
If this problem really got fixed, then it's back in edgy, with mplayer
2:0.99+1.0pre8-0ubuntu4
--
Crashes when loading DVD
https://launchpad.net/bugs/508
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Using firefox 2.0b1 on edgy, the screen.resolution setting has been removed.
It has also been removed from the ui.
However, there is now a layout.css.dpi setting, which is set to -1 by default,
which means a minimum of 96 dpi :
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Layout.css.dpi
Since gnome is also set to
That's what happens if the user keep the gnome default settings, or if he
increases the dpi like the original reporter.
However, if a dpi lower than 96 is used, firefox will stay at 96 (since
layout.css.dpi is set to -1 by default).
Though, if this -1 value exists, and it's used by default,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 19524 ***
I assume this was using firefox 1.5 , which is using 96 dpi by default ?
In this case, you need to either tell firefox to use 120 dpi, or tell it to use
system defaults.
The behavior has changed with firefox 2.0b1 which uses a minimum dpi of 96 by
** Bug 38403 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
Firefox does not pay attention to GNOME DPI setting, nor work with its own
setting
https://launchpad.net/bugs/19524
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
imho, kde and gnome are wrong to set a fixed dpi, but I'm not sure if
it's the problem, since firefox has its own settings anyway. However,
firefox dpi can be affected by the dpi kde and gnome set, but its dpi
(and thus fonts size) shouldn't be smaller. So I'm not sure how it is
possible.
Did you
Is this still the case ?
You said the font gtk apps were using, but not kde ones. You should choose to
use the same font in gtk style and fonts to have konqueror and synaptic look
the same.
Concerning firefox, it has its own dpi settings, so you will need to check that.
--
Menu/dialog font is
I can confirm the bug using medium hinting.
When using full hinting, all fonts are not blurred.
medium hinting : some fonts blurred, some not (like above screenshot)
slight hinting or no hinting : all fonts blurred
OpenOffice seems to do its own stuff with font rendering, and is not
affected by
I would like to know what exactly happened, but well it doesn't matter.
This bug should still be closed since it has been fixed a while ago.
--
Menu/dialog font is huge in Firefox since today's update
https://launchpad.net/bugs/41453
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I don't think bug 33055 is a duplicate, as I said on it.
bug 34211 and bug 38403 are, and they should be fixed in edgy, with its current
firefox (I've no clue if a newer firefox version will get it, and if it'll
change something about dpi).
However bug 20116 show that they are actually some
I did further testing with firefox dpi settings, and I found something new,
depending whether Xft.dpi is set or not, the behavior will not be the same.
Also, firefox 1.5 seems awfully broken, while firefox 2.0 behaves much more
like I expected.
I'll just attach a text file with what I saw,
** Attachment added: firefox 1.5 vs 2.0 behavior
http://librarian.launchpad.net/4259490/firefox_dpi
--
Firefox does not pay attention to GNOME DPI setting, nor work with its own
setting
https://launchpad.net/bugs/19524
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Oh, right, just had a look at this changelog :
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase_3.5.2-0ubuntu27/changelog
kubuntu_52_gtk_qt_engine_config.diff was altered first at Mon, 24 Apr
2006 21:16:19 +0200, which probably introduced this bug, and then at
Mon, 1 May 2006
The first statement is more likely than the second. I didnt see when
sohail reported this.
--
Menu/dialog font is huge in Firefox since today's update
https://launchpad.net/bugs/41453
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
What do you mean, I think you said it was also fixed for you.
When something is wrong, like I told you, look at the gtk settings in the
control center to check both qt and gtk should use the same font, then check
the ~/.gtkrc* files it should write, then check the firefox settings, in
mp3lib/mad/ffmpeg can be chosen at runtime, just look at : mplayer -ac
help
Also, maybe it would be nicer if bugs were reported upstream instead of only
being workarounded :
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/HTML/en/bugreports.html
--
[EDGY] Regression: broken audio playing certain movies
Last two comments are bug 61222 : undefined symbol: a52_resample
This happened every time you tried to run mplayer.
It's fixed by last mplayer package : 2:0.99+1.0pre8-0ubuntu5
The current bug (508) only happens when you actually use the a52 audio
codec, like when playing dvd. It is also fixed by
isn't this a duplicate of bug 63403?
ie is it fixed if you use full hinting?
Check there aren't fontconfig settings conflict also (check that you don't have
a ~/.fonts.conf file, or that it matches gnome font settings).
--
Epiphany Font Rendering Heavily Broken
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66079
Right, epiphany behaves like gnome-terminal. When using medium hinting in Xft
resources (gnome settings), the contents look fuzzy, but not the menu.
In firefox though, both are fuzzy.
But I'm not sure how you can know how medium hinting should look. Personally, I
don't even know why it exists in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=372182
--
Ubuntu Eclipse is ridiculously slow
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59591
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
mpd (0.12.1-1ubuntu1) edgy; urgency=low
* Sync from Debian Sid
* debian/mpd.init.d:
- create /var/run/ directory if necessary and set proper permissions
(Closes Ubuntu 64293)
-- Lionel Porcheron [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:02:49
+0200
--
Init: Unable to create
** Changed in: mpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Init: Unable to create /var/run/mpd/mpd.pid
https://launchpad.net/bugs/64293
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Confirming that wesnoth and neverball music work fine with music
volume set to 100%
However in neverball, there are still a few crackles during the music
transition after clicking on a menu (like Options).
Also confirming the sdl sample app was setting music volume to 100%:
int
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 63403 ***
Well, no, it's a duplicate of bug 63403, and no one looked at it yet.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 63403
Semi-random ugly font rendering in Edgy (no font hinting)
--
Epiphany Font Rendering Heavily Broken
I don't see a difference in these; is anti-aliasing turned off by
default for KDE?
No it isn't, but does it matter?
And you really don't see the difference? It's the difference between ugly and
beautiful fonts.
Though, you're right, this screenshot is different than the others. First,
there is
That's probably the difference of autohinting vs native hinting. Could
you try sudo dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config, use autohinting, and
compare again.
--
[Edgy] font hinting does not work with libfreetype6 v. 2.2.1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/54776
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
2006/10/24, Oskar Rubinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When I use subpixel smoothing and full hinting, the menu fonts get
better, but text inside renders very strange.
In the screenshot, you see that the word text in OOo renders very bad
- parts of the letter t are not shown and e and x are
On debian, the workaround of enabling subpixel rendering in ~/.fonts.conf
didn't work, maybe because it doesn't apply the patches from fedora cvs pasted
above. (It's maybe better that way, because it didn't make any sense).
As Bernd Schubert said in the bug report, light hinting (=slow=medium)
I was also surprised when I learned these patches were applied.
They apparently don't work as expected.
--
[Edgy] font hinting does not work with libfreetype6 v. 2.2.1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/54776
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I saw this patch: ooo-build/patches/test/vcl-font-hinting.diff
If I understand correctly, it isn't applied when it's in the test directory.
Anyway, I googled for it and found this:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.ximian.openoffice/1264
--
[Edgy] font hinting does not work with
Oh right, I believe I had this issue too when I wasn't using gnome, but I'll
have to try again.
Enabling/disabling antialiasing works fine in gnome.
But anyway, I think both mode are ugly because of this bug:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/54776
--
2
just to be safe, since I just got caught myself, the .fonts.conf file is
a xml file, so its contents won't be displayed directly in firefox. just
save the file, or view the source.
--
[Edgy] font hinting does not work with libfreetype6 v. 2.2.1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/54776
--
ubuntu-bugs
Could you give more details please?
Like which dpi settings are you using in gnome?
Did you change firefox config (what is the value of layout.css.dpi in
about:config) ?
And finally, how do you notice it has no effects?
--
Firefox does not pay attention to GNOME DPI setting
layout.css.dpi=-1 - 96 dpi minimum
So you didn't need to change that.
But the dpi setting only affects the fonts sized in points, not the ones in
pixel. That must be the difference between the websites you are using, and
there is nothing you can do about that.
(that's also the reason why some
Could you look at:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/54776
and try playing with ~/.fonts.conf and tell me if it improves thing for you.
I believe that your screenshot looks like what I had initially. And I believe
there is no hinting done there at all.
After adding
That's a totally different bug.
This one may be closer :
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/62537
--
[Edgy] font hinting does not work with libfreetype6 v. 2.2.1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/54776
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
According to several users: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=244514
the medium hinting rendering of fontconfig has changed between dapper and edgy.
What is very weird is that the behavior is inconsistent depending on the app.
The only bug here is the inconsistency when using medium
According to this thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=244514page=2
Ubuntos said he reported this bug.
Then he set hinting to full, and he was happy.
It's possibly a duplicate of
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/63403
(if it's really a bug)
--
[edgy]
The font settings you chose in gnome preferences, subpixel smoothing
(subpixel + full hinting), aren't used by firefox which is apparently using
best shapes (grayscale + medium hinting)
Gnome exports Xft resources (see output of: xrdb -q |grep Xft)
You should see rgba=rgb (subpixel), and
Well, it's not your fault, the fact that you've different way to configure
fontconfig is quite odd, and I don't know how it can handled correctly, and I
don't know why all apps don't react the same way.
The ~/.fonts.conf was most likely created by kde.
Gnome only exports Xft resources. Kde does
However, I believe that it's a different issue than the original one, maybe a
different bug should be opened?
Because even when both ~/.fonts.conf and Xft resources specify medium hinting,
the rendering is still different between firefox and gnome-terminal, and the
rest.
Does anyone have an
I didn't have any problem disabling and enabling autohinting in debian or
ubuntu since I started using it.
I just do dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config
When you select native hinting, it doesn't create any symlink
When you select autohinting, it creates a symlink in /etc/fonts/conf.d/ to a
file
This is getting really confusing, that's why I was trying to sum it up.
I believe there are 4 different issues here:
1) Gnome terminal and firefox not rendering like other apps when medium hinting
is used
2) OpenOffice not using fontconfig settings : bug 54776
3) Fontconfig settings conflict
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 56786 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 56786
Nautilus uses 100% CPU when trying to create thumbnails
--
100% cpu usage when previewing videos
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66226
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Bug 66226 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
Nautilus uses 100% CPU when trying to create thumbnails
https://launchpad.net/bugs/56786
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 56786
Nautilus uses 100% CPU when trying to create thumbnails
--
100% cpu usage when previewing videos
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66226
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
This strange behaviour is issue (1), which I believe this bug report was about.
I believe you only had issue (3).
However, (1) and (3) could be different consequence of the same problem, since
it seems like the same apps are affected (contents of gnome terminal).
That is:
gnome terminal looks
Firstly, I don't think there is such a thing as bytecode autohinter. I think
that contradicts itself. You use either native hinting (with the bytecode
interpreter) or auto hinting.
Secondly, if you enable subpixel in ~/fonts.conf, openoffice will use something
similar to autohinting +
Confirming the issue, and that the patch (which I applied manually) fix the
problem. But is this a proper fix?
It seems there are several pid files in /var/run/, so it isn't specific to mpd.
Is it handled the same way in other apps? (pid file specified in a config file,
and the init script has
Since the apps where sound is crackling all seemed to use sdl mixer, I thought
the issue was with it.
But I tried the sample app from there:
http://jcatki.no-ip.org/SDL_mixer/demos/
And it played one ogg sound from wesnoth just fine, while wesnoth itself
apparently doesn't.
Same for neverball.
but is it actually using subpixel rendering now, and not just basic
grayscale antialiasing like with ubuntu libfreetype? Do you have a
screenshot?
--
[Edgy] font hinting does not work with libfreetype6 v. 2.2.1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/54776
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I do not understand what you mean by settings work.
It's the developpers who choose settings and offer them to the user,
settings just mean what they want to. Settings work when they do what
the developper meant them to do, and now it's the case.
Slight and Medium hinting are supposed to look the
The issue you describe here is even more odd. I don't understand why an empty
~/.fonts.conf makes any difference, there are no conflicts in this case.
The problem I was talking about is that it's not clear what the priority is
between Xft resources and the settings in ~/.fonts.conf . If both
You didn't answer any of my question about dpi settings (comments 11).
Note that browser.display.screen_resolution has been changed to layout.css.dpi
in firefox 2.0 which is in edgy.
--
Menu/dialog font is huge in Firefox since today's update
https://launchpad.net/bugs/41453
--
ubuntu-bugs
How did you play with screen_resolution if it doesn't exist?
As I said in my previous comment:
Note that browser.display.screen_resolution has been changed to
layout.css.dpi in firefox 2.0 which is in edgy.
The default value should be -1
Try changing it to 0
--
Menu/dialog font is huge in
Public bug reported:
In Kubuntu 6.10, if you enable the move pointer with keyboard option,
with Repeat interval:1;Acceleration time:1; Maximum speed:2000;
Acceleration profile: -1000, and move the mouse from one side of the
screen to another (with the keyboard of course) the screen will
Same problem.
I also got a warning saying that mozilla-browser should be installed.. So why
doesn't eclipse depend on it?
Installing it didn't change anything though.
--
Cannot start eclipse: libswt-mozilla-gtk-3139.so: undefined symbol:
NS_InitEmbedding
https://launchpad.net/bugs/31889
--
As stated in the duplicate (bug 31751), it works fine with sun jre.
--
Cannot start eclipse: libswt-mozilla-gtk-3139.so: undefined symbol:
NS_InitEmbedding
https://launchpad.net/bugs/31889
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
As per previous comments, this bug is back on edgy (and it's not amd64
specific, because I'm not using that)
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Needs Info
--
Cannot start eclipse: libswt-mozilla-gtk-3139.so: undefined symbol:
NS_InitEmbedding
If the maintainer is the only one who can upgrade this package, and he
doesn't have the time to do it, then it could last a while I guess.
--
kernel_image target fails with kernel 2.6.18-rc
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58570
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Maybe rather for Matthias, since he apparently fixed this issue in the
past for dapper. He probably knows what's wrong.
--
Cannot start eclipse: libswt-mozilla-gtk-3139.so: undefined symbol:
NS_InitEmbedding
https://launchpad.net/bugs/31889
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ok so I guess all I said is either wrong or not understandable, which in both
case is a waste of time. I will still have a last try :
I believe it works fine when you increase Xft dpi (like setting it to 120), but
not when you decrease it (eg 85).
If you _really_ want firefox to work at smaller
Oh my god, this is driving me nuts. Can you stop ignoring me for 5 sec ? You
either have to justify why you ignore me, or you listen to me. Pick your choice.
If it's the second one, then I'm telling you that it's already working, so
there is no bug upstream, and no need to bother them.
Thanks.
) LoadModule: freetype
(WW) Falling back to old probe method for v4l
(--) NV: Found NVIDIA RIVA TNT2 Model 64 at [EMAIL PROTECTED]:00:0
AS john said Jockey doesn't show any proprietary driver.
Xavier.
--
[Intrepid] nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: AllocateScreenPrivateIndex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
alberto :
ls -R /var/lib/dkms/nvidia
then : ls: ne peut accéder /var/lib/dkms/nvidia: Aucun fichier ou
dossier de ce type
in english ls can't access to /var bla bla bla There is no file or
folder like this
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283046/Xorg.0.log
/var/log/Xorg.0.log.old
...
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log.old
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283089/Xorg.0.log.old
--
[Intrepid] nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: AllocateScreenPrivateIndex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251107
You received this bug notification because you are a member
end last : /etc/X11/xorg.conf
** Attachment added: xorg.conf
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283120/xorg.conf
--
[Intrepid] nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: AllocateScreenPrivateIndex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251107
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Alberto,
Xavier: type: sudo apt-get install linux-headers-generic
and try to install the driver again.
I did and after reboot I could only have a console mode. :-(
Dkms status said :
Nvidia 71.86.07, 2.6.27-7 generic, installed
I had to type : envyng -t and uninstall Nvidia driver.
After
Hi !
I tried 96 and 71 on my TNT2 card. After reboot xserver won't start.
In the Xorg.0.log.old I could see :
(EE) No devices detected.
Fatal server error:
no screens found
Well... I have a screen... :-;
The message appear for the both 96 and 71.
Thank you.
Xavier.
--
[Intrepid
Alberto,
Here is the log.
This one is with 96 drivers. But with 71, there is the same message.
Xavier.
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log.old
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19401640/Xorg.0.log.old
--
[Intrepid] nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: AllocateScreenPrivateIndex
https
Alberto,
And there is the 'Xorg.conf' installed by envyng (?)
thanks for your help.
Xavier.
** Attachment added: xorg.plante
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19401690/xorg.plante
--
[Intrepid] nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: AllocateScreenPrivateIndex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251107
Alberto,
Thanks for your help.
I'm waiting that Nvidia makes this new driver.
Xavier.
--
[Intrepid] nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: AllocateScreenPrivateIndex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251107
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
oops, yeah sorry.
already did, and fix already commited apparently...
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555607
** Changed in: gst-plugins-base0.10 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
subrip subtitles typefind too strict
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280377
You received
ubuntu hardy amd64 + dell vostro 200 (ICHR9) work with dmraid and lvm :
1) do the change form Charles Duffy above
2) change /etc/udev/rules.d/85-lvm2.rules as
SUBSYSTEM==block, ACTION==add|change, ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}==lvm*|LVM*, \
RUN+=watershed sh -c '[ -x /sbin/dmraid ] /sbin/dmraid
Hi,
linux-image-virtual works fine in virtualbox 2.0.4 but i apt-get linux-
image-virtual and it install linux-image-server again
dpkg -l | grep linux-image
ii linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.14
Linux kernel image for version 2.6.27 on x86
ii
I still have the same problem with another distrib (Archlinux), which recently
upgraded to alsa 1.0.14rc3.
Since this isn't ubuntu specific, it's probably not the right place to talk
about it.
So this is an alsa issue, not a sdl mixer one? Has it been reported in alsa
bugzilla ?
I'm attaching
same pb on a Packard Bell laptop
acpi -V :
Battery 1: charging, 0%, 3293:41:15 until charged
No support for device type: thermal
AC Adapter 1: on-line
cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info
present: yes
design capacity: 28715 mAh
last full capacity: 52700 mAh
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 92742 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92742
Hello Folks!
I do have dwl-g122 rev B1. same story wep works fine, open network works fine,
wpa it's hell on earth impossible to make it work I am using Kubuntu 7.04, so I
am asuming it's the driver,
I tried
Public bug reported:
Others linux-image can boot a virtual machine with virtuals disks pluged
by virtual serial ata ports
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[HARDY] serial ata drivers for virtualbox are missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259085
** Attachment added: vbox.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16898634/vbox.png
--
[HARDY] serial ata drivers for virtualbox are missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Description changed:
Others linux-image can boot a virtual machine with virtuals disks pluged
by virtual serial ata ports
+
+ VirtualBOx 1.6.4
+ VM: hardy jeos 8.04
** Tags added: ata linux-image serial virtual virtualbox
** Summary changed:
- [HARDY] serial ata drivers for virtualbox
I'm no longer using Ubuntu, but I can confirm this makes the problem go away.
I am currently using the intel driver (2.1.1) without any particular settings
in xorg.conf ,
and the Elephants Dream movie now works fine (
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2772#c7 ).
I switched back to
I wasn't using Ubuntu anymore, but I just did a fresh install of Feisty
on another box, and this issue with eclipse is apparently fixed now. It
worked fine.
--
javadoc hover doesn't show any text
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Attachment added: lspci.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24039622/lspci.txt
--
fan always on on a sony vgn-n370e since kubutu 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: dmidecode.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24039636/dmidecode.txt
--
fan always on on a sony vgn-n370e since kubutu 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
-generic #1 SMP Thu Feb 26 07:26:43 UTC 2009 i686
GNU/Linux
lspci output attached
cp -r /proc/acpi /tmp
cp: cannot open `/proc/acpi/event' for reading: Device or resource busy
Any idea ?
Xavier
** Affects: acpi (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
fan always
I confirm this bug with package 1.0beta1+1.0-5 (up-to-date 8.10) and that the
suggested workaround from Sergei works.
Any chances to get this applied?
--
lomoco udev rule not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214226
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
my error says server can not support protocol
--
pidgin not connecting to msn messenger: Connection error from Notification
server: Unable to connect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367034
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I've deleted /etc/wifi-radar.conf and NOT work
I've made 'sudo wifi-radar' and works fine.
I've made 'sudo chmod 666 /etc/wifi-radar.conf' and NOT work.
--
wifi-radar crashed with SyntaxError in read()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414399
You received this bug notification because you are a
I can confirm that the sound events arn't working for me on 9.04 with
empathy 2.27.3.
--
Add audio/visual notifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296123
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
this problem is back again in jaunty causing confusion and pain for new
users thinking that ubuntu doesn't work properly with java apps because
of the dodgy openjdk. its a pain to have to get rid of the unstable and
incomplete openjdk and install the proper sun java.
--
Please add sun-java6-jre
1 - 100 of 2220 matches
Mail list logo
