I can vouch for Daniel's long history working on desktop components and am
sure he'll continue to do great work on Ubuntu desktop. +1 from me makes
3/3 - adding him to the team now.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 6:47 PM Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey desktopers,
>
> I've worked with Daniel for a long t
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+git/gnome-software/+merge/358489
Your team Ubuntu Desktop is subscribed to branch
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software:ubuntu/bionic.
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
htt
The proposal to merge ~vanvugt/ubuntu/+source/mutter:fix-1809407-eoan into
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/mutter:ubuntu/master has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Rejected
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~vanvugt/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+git/mutter/+merge/368536
--
You
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572456
Title:
Software (gnome-software) icon shown twice inside Launc
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 6:33 PM Jean-Baptiste Lallement <
jean-baptiste.lallem...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Le 08/08/2017 à 06:02, Robert Ancell a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > One thing that came out of discussions at GUADEC was a request that
> >
Thanks for the feedback Paul!
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:16 PM Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 04:02 +0000, Robert Ancell wrote:
> > I've tried to summarise the status quo - feedback / changes welcome!
>
> I didn't understand the gnome-boxes / Remmina comments
There are two core GNOME apps that we do not currently ship:
- Photos (we have Shotwell instead)
- Music (we have Rhythmbox instead).
Based on in-person discussions it seems likely we will continue to ship our
existing apps for the immediate future because:
- These apps rely on Tracker, which has
gnome-contacts is an address book and is part of the core GNOME apps. It
has all dependencies in main except for folks (which used to be in main).
While this seems to work well in managing your e-d-s based contacts, I'm
not sure if there's a particular use for it in Ubuntu. Address book
functional
gnome-characters is a character browser and is part of the core GNOME apps.
All its dependencies are in main. It replaces the older gucharmap that we
continue to ship. gnome-characters has a GUI that fits in with the GNOME
style, while gucharmap has an old fashioned interface.
I found it simpler t
gnome-clocks adds world clock functionality to GNOME Shell and provides
alarm/stopwatch/timer functionality. It is part of the core GNOME apps. All
its dependencies are in main.
Based on verbal discussions most people seem keen for it to be shipped by
default, with a blocking issue being the alarm
gnome-todo is a task manager / note taker and is part of the core GNOME
apps. All its dependencies are in main.
We should ship it by default or give a reason in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DefaultApps why it should not be included.
--Robert
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.
Hi all,
One thing that came out of discussions at GUADEC was a request that Ubuntu
ship the core GNOME apps. We've also had a few discussions recently on this
list about including some of these.
I proposed that we should make a list of the reasons that we ship / do not
ship certain apps so it wou
I know we previously had issues where gnome-terminal could fail to work
reliably under certain bad driver cases (it was the case for virtual
machines for some time). I think these issues haven't been a problem for
some time though.
+1 from me for removal.
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 4:34 AM Bryan Qui
Hi all,
I've got some SRUs that need verifying, if you have a few minutes could you
have a look and check if these work for you? If you can confirm these work
then change the tag on the bug from verification-needed-xenial to
verification-done-xenial (replace xenial with zesty when testing on 17.04
Thanks for spotting that Amr! Fixed in 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.4
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:56 PM Amr Ibrahim
wrote:
> I don't see any user reviews in gnome-software 3.20.5. Neither for
> installed nor non-installed applications. Does anyone have the same issue?
>
> On 07/07/17 04:
Thanks for testing everyone, I've now uploaded this to xenial-proposed to
go through the SRU process.
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:34 AM Amr Ibrahim
wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I am also testing gnome-software 3.20.5 in Xenial. It's working well so
> far. In fact, I think it fixes this bug
> https://bugs.l
Hi Per-Inge,
Thanks for testing! So they main conclusion you came to was it was very
slow to search with the updated version in 16.04? Are you able to confirm
it is not slow with the old version in 16.04?
I'm not seeing a search delay here, though there can be a startup delay
while GNOME Software
Confirmed. The 3.20.1 -> 3.20.2 release changed the PackageKit plugin name
from "PackageKit" to "packagekit" and I didn't update the APT plugin. Fixed
in 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1.1 in the PPA.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:42 AM Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey Robert,
&g
After much frustration I've managed to rebase our version of GNOME Software
in Xenial on 3.20.5. This means we can pick up all the general improvements
that were made post-release and hopefully fix some reliability issues that
we're seeing in errors.ubuntu.com.
If you are running Xenial I would lo
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:52 AM Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> Le 08/06/2017 à 23:52, Robert Ancell a écrit :
> > I'd like to propose GNOME Maps. This uses gjs so it is include-able
> > now gnome-shell is in main. Maps is a core GNOME app.
>
> S
Jeremy pointed out that folks dropped out of main in artful, so that would
have to go back in.
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:52 AM Robert Ancell
wrote:
> I'm going to copy Jeremy [1] and propose a new default app for 17.10...
>
> I'd like to propose GNOME Maps. This uses gjs so
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:13 PM Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Robert Ancell
> wrote:
> > The functionality of Sushi seems very good but the discoverability is
> > terrible. Has this been raised with upstream at all?
>
> Not that I'm awa
GNOME Maps has been a core app since GNOME 3.20
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:52 AM Robert Ancell
wrote:
> I'm going to copy Jeremy [1] and propose a new default app for 17.10...
>
> I'd like to propose GNOME Maps. This uses gjs so it is include-able now
> gnome-shell is i
The functionality of Sushi seems very good but the discoverability is
terrible. Has this been raised with upstream at all?
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:33 AM Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Now that gnome-shell is in the default Ubuntu 17.10 daily image, I
> think we could maybe start talking about other defa
I'm going to copy Jeremy [1] and propose a new default app for 17.10...
I'd like to propose GNOME Maps. This uses gjs so it is include-able now
gnome-shell is in main. Maps is a core GNOME app.
Mapping is a standard feature of modern operating systems. By including
maps we also encourage Ubuntu u
Hi all,
Where we are today:
- GDM is undergoing a security check to be included in main [1].
- We've got GNOME Shell onto the 17.10 image, running under LightDM.
- We've attempted to get the GNOME Shell lock screen running with LightDM
and using GNOME Shell as a LightDM Greeter. Which this still s
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:42 PM Daniel van Vugt <
daniel.van.v...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> So I would log enhancement ideas in launchpad, with some tag like
> 'gnome-18.04'...
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bugs
> But that's just me.
>
>
I agree logging things in Lau
Hi all,
I've been using GNOME Shell for about a month now and I've had open a
Google Doc that I've been using to list down the things that I would like
to see resolved by 18.04 to ship a great experience.
Now I have a bit of a list, I'm wondering what the most productive way is
to use this. I'm h
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:51 PM Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> FTR, upstream systemd is currently converting to meson [1], and we
> successfully
> run builds of it both in Debian unstable as well as in Ubuntu 16.04 with
> ninja+meson backports [2]. Not having debhelper support is not a big
> blocker --
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 8:56 AM Bryan Quigley
wrote:
>
> Lastly, I wanted to know if there are any security differences in how
> the login/lock screens work?
> Specifically:
> Is their a process I can kill from a user session to break the lock?
> If I'm able to crash the lock screen, is the user
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:57 AM Tim wrote:
>
>
> On 20/04/17 00:32, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > - gnome-shell uses gdm for its lockscreen so work is needed to make it
> > work with lightdm
> That is not entirely right, the GUI for gdm is actually a cut-down
> gnome-shell session, this applies to
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:58 AM Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Sebastien Bacher
> wrote:
> > - gnome-shell uses gdm for its lockscreen so work is needed to make it
> > work with lightdm
>
> Generally, lightdm works with GNOME, but it hasn't been tested much so
> it somet
Thanks Seb,
= Disclaimer =
Firstly, I should disclose my interests - I am the founder and maintainer
of LightDM. I'll try and minimise any biases I might have. Ultimately I
want the best outcome and I'm happy with either way we go as long as it
makes sense.
= History (simplified) =
In the begin
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:34 AM Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
> On 18 April 2017 at 21:07, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> >
> > If we do include an email client, which one?
>
> I am worried about this, especially in the enterprise environment
> people do want to access corporate mail.
>
My guess is most e
Hi all,
Given the recent Ubuntu desktop changes I suspect we'll have some people
attending GUADEC 2017 [1] this year. The talk submissions close 23rd April
(i.e. in four days). Not sure if anyone knows yet if they'll be there / has
something appropriate Ubuntu / GNOME related they can write up in
I'm supportive of not including an email client by default given the
current selection. If there was a light-weight client available with good
features (e.g. Geary) I think there would be a decision but the listed
candidates are too big / old.
I think if there's no client though there should be go
It does not, please file a bug if you think that is required.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 12:34 AM Amr Ibrahim
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Does GNOME Software run lintian against third-party debs before
> installing them? I think Ubuntu Software Center used to do that.
>
> Running lintian warns user
Hi all,
As you may be aware, we're currently looking at switching from Ubuntu
Software Center to GNOME Software for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS [1].
If you're interested in playing around / helping out:
- I've set up a ppa:ubuntu-desktop/gnome-software [2] for which currently
holds PackageKit 1.0 and GNOME
For us to use GNOME Software we probably want to update to the latest
version [1]. That's currently blocked because it needs PackageKit 1.0 [2].
And that's blocked until we get a Click update. If anyone knows more
migration issues please add information to those bugs. I suspect we might
also need s
The patch looks good to me and the package builds fine. I haven't
uploaded since there's currently 2:2.99.914-1~exp1ubuntu4.2 waiting for
verification in utopic-proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of GNOME3
Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://
** Description changed:
- When using apps where client-side decorations are being used, a strange
- shadow render appears below the window. Screenshots are attached. If
- CSDs are not being used, then shadows are rendered correctly.
+ [Impact]
+ The Intel video driver has a bug that can cause to i
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of GNOME3
Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.la
We can't do this until we have gnome-themes-standard 3.14 and that
requires GTK+ 3.14 (see bug 1399046)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/142
Title:
Sync gnome-mines 1:3.1
** Changed in: gnome-screenshot (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Artur Rona (ari-tczew)
** Changed in: gnome-screenshot (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop, which is subscribed to the bug report.
Hi all,
I've just uploaded LightDM 1.10.2 [1] to the ubuntu-desktop PPA so it
can have some early testing. This release backports a number of
important features but shouldn't change any behaviour by default.
Please let me know if anyone finds any problems!
Thanks,
-_Robert
[1] https://launchpad.
Does anyone know why we still have the glade-3 package in the archive?
This just seems to be to support an old version of glade (3.8), is
that still necessary?
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 15/04/2014 04:32, Robert Ancell a écrit :
>> With 14.04 wrapping up it's time to start thinking about what we can
>> do with the desktop post LTS. I think there's one big theme we need to
>> focus on
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Jason Warner
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Robert Park
> wrote:
>> What is the solution? Will we make the desktop roll? Will we subject
>> the phone to freezes? I don't know which approach is superior but the
>> only thing that's certain is that
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Adam Dingle wrote:
> If you replace all these apps with something else, I think that will be the
> largest change in Ubuntu's history - most of these apps have been around
> since the dawn of time and are very familiar to Ubuntu users. I'd go so far
> as to say th
With 14.04 wrapping up it's time to start thinking about what we can
do with the desktop post LTS. I think there's one big theme we need to
focus on - Convergence. All the Unity 8 goodness that is going into
the phone / tablet builds is coming our way and we need to be prepared
for that migration.
ly to catch this case
but long term this dependency will go away. People upgrading using the
GUI will not have this problem as the upgrader always ensures
ubuntu-desktop is installed.
Thanks for testing
--Robert
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Robert Ancell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Ubuntu
ow. Not sure if there's
some bad interaction with the existing language packs.
--Robert
[1] $ sudo ppa-purge ppa:ubuntu-desktop/unity-control-center
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Robert Ancell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Ubuntu makes use of a heavily patched gnome-control-center (61 pat
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Robert Ancell [2013-12-11 17:42 +1300]:
>
> > Please test this PPA and post any problems in the bug report. I'd like to
> > land this change into the archive if there are no reasons to block it.
>
> The upgra
Hi all,
Ubuntu makes use of a heavily patched gnome-control-center (61 patches) and
we will in future move to the new Ubuntu System Settings [1] once we
achieve convergence. We are already running an old version of
gnome-control-center (3.6) and the value for Ubuntu in upgrading this is
low since
Instructions are here:
http://unity.ubuntu.com/mir/debug_for_xmir.html
But in short, first look at /var/log/lightdm/lightdm.log and then
/var/log/lightdm/unity-system-compositor.log and /var/log/Xorg.0.log if the
lightdm.log indicates there is a problem with either.
--Robert
On Tue, Aug 27, 201
) Remove the packaging branch for the lightdm project, since this MP merges
the packaging to be inline:
https://code.launchpad.net/~robert-ancell/lightdm/debian-packaging/+merge/180766
2) Deconfigure raring builds in the mir-team staging PPA, per Robert Ancell's
request.
3) Remove the lightdm-
On 21/11/12 07:13, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've been looking at the new ibus/g-s-d/g-c-c stack recently to update
> in raring and I'm not convinced it's a good idea to update to those.
> We have discussed the issue a bit on IRC today but I figured I would
> write an email to the list to
On 17/10/12 18:02, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Robert Ancell [2012-10-17 10:48 +1300]:
>> - By updating packages in Debian and waiting for them to flow down to
>> Ubuntu kills our velocity. It can change the time from upstream release
>> to being in Ubuntu from hours (which is too l
On 17/10/12 18:25, Allison Randal wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 03:56 PM, Robert Ancell wrote:
>> My point is we *shouldn't* take the time to update Debian as it is all
>> cost and no benefit. If you think of Debian as being directly upstream
>> from Ubuntu it sounds good b
On 17/10/12 11:28, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
>
>> - By leaving some packages to be fully maintained by Debian we easily
>> end up shipping old packages without noticing it. I was quite shocked
>> when I updated the version tracker [1] how many out of date packages we
>> ship. If we're going to ship a quali
On 16/10/12 22:36, Iain Lane wrote:
> Given the way that both projects are now design led, and the fact that
> it's design decisions / philosophies that are driving many of these
> difficulties, it would seem prudent for the respective design teams to
> try to work together a bit more closely. I wo
On 16/10/12 23:47, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 16/10/2012 06:08, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
>> On 15 October 2012 13:50, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>>> That's going to be a controversial topic but I want to suggest we
>>> stay on
>>> stable GNOME this cycle, the reasons are (in random order):
>> Well yo
On 16/10/12 08:19, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 15/10/2012 21:10, Ted Gould a écrit :
>> I don't believe that
>> happened in the Q cycle, do we think that we could get upstart
> Hey,
>
> James pinged me recently because foundation is planning work for next
> cycle and wanted to know what's the most
On 16/10/12 09:23, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 21:19 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>> Le 15/10/2012 21:10, Ted Gould a écrit :
>>> I don't believe that
>>> happened in the Q cycle, do we think that we could get upstart
>> James pinged me recently because foundation is planning work fo
On 09/10/12 03:58, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> It seems we could finally get ride of libgconf2-4 users next cycle
That would be a great package to finally bury :) +100
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
On 14/10/12 08:33, Dylan McCall wrote:
> Before talking about file managers, people should talk about how Unity
> fits with the direction GNOME applications are going. Because that is
> the problem: Unity has a very different vision for how applications
> should work than the GNOME project, which i
On 14/07/12 03:49, John Lenton wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Robert Ancell
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We're now at the point where the system compositor [1] is starting to
>> work. Any brave souls who want to start playing with this can have a
>>
On 12/07/12 23:00, Jonas Platte wrote:
> Am 12.07.2012, 06:58 Uhr, schrieb Christopher James Halse Rogers
> :
>
>> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 18:04 +1200, Robert Ancell wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We're now at the point where the system compositor [1] is st
Hi,
We're now at the point where the system compositor [1] is starting to
work. Any brave souls who want to start playing with this can have a
look at the instructions in the blueprint. Obviously THIS IS HIGHLY
EXPERIMENTAL, so play at your own risk! In saying that, early feedback
is most welcome
On 10/07/12 05:54, Iain Lane wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I think it would be beneficial if I were to join the ~ubuntu-desktop
> team. It would allow me to not block on sponsors and to be able to
> commit directly to the VCS, both of which would be very useful.
>
> I had hoped to go directly to core-dev,
On 22/06/12 10:52, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> Hey folks,
> So some of you who watch the goings on and discussions in GNOME upstream may
> have noticed this bug(1) and the surrounding discussion about enabling
> accessibility everywhere in GNOME 3.6. I've decided to start this thread for
> 2 reasons,
Hi all,
You may be aware of the "versions" web page we use in the desktop team
to keep packages up to date:
http://people.canonical.com/~platform/desktop/versions.html
The purpose of the page is to give a priority queue (rainbow coloured)
of things to work on (by anyone who wants to).
This is a t
Hi,
A change I'd like to make for 12.10 is to use a compositor to control
video from boot to shutdown.
This gives us the following benefits:
- We can have smooth transitions from the splash screen to the greeter
to the session and back again
- We don't use VT switching anymore which has been show
** Changed in: launchpad-integration
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: launchpad-integration (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: launchpad-integration
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: launchpad-integration (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided =>
On 07/12/11 21:49, Steffen Holanger wrote:
Hi.
I posted this idea on brainstorm.
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/28767/
I was told to forward it to this mailing list. The description of the
problem/idea is in the link.
Cheers
Steffen
That is the plan for 12.04:
https://blueprints.launchpa
Late topic...
In the real world there are always going to be failures, triggered by
things like software bugs, hardware failures and misconfiguration.
Ubuntu should where possible handle common failures and provide
predictable feedback to the user that the system is broken.
I think we have the i
On 06/10/11 18:35, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 03:33:32PM +1100, Robert Ancell wrote:
>> It would be nice to be able to optionally run Wayland in 12.04 to try
>> out the technology. This will involve:
>> - Modifying LightDM to support Wayland
&
It would be nice to be able to optionally run Wayland in 12.04 to try
out the technology. This will involve:
- Modifying LightDM to support Wayland
- Writing a Wayland compositor
- Running an X server that writes to the compositor
- Making it easy to enable this
- Disclaiming all responsibility
T
It would be nice to improve the authentication mechanisms in Ubuntu to
be more user friendly and make it easier to enable modern authentication
schemes. This will probably involve:
- Reviewing the messages/prompts in PAM for appropriateness
- Adding hints to PAM to allow GUIs to better display the
On 05/10/11 10:07, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:41:17AM EST, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> On 4 October 2011 14:49, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>>> We probably don't want to switch video players in a lts cycle but not
>>> sure if we should go with the new version (we staying on 3.0 which
On 09/07/11 19:23, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> 1. For users who change display language once in a while - for whatever
>reason - it provides a more convenient way for doing so than doing it
>from the Language Support UI or its successor. There is a fresh bug
>report about it, btw: https
On 05/07/11 19:11, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>
>> Note that this doesn't necessarily have to be implemented in the
>> greeter, i.e. you can run zenity in the guest accounts .profile and that
>> prompts the user on login for language. Or you can make multiple
>> sessions for each installed language, i.
On 04/07/11 17:41, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> Am Montag, den 04.07.2011, 12:44 +1000 schrieb Robert Ancell:
>> I haven't heard of any standard user requirements to switch between
>> more than two languages, or two languages that do not include English
>> (please
On 04/07/11 21:00, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> I take it that you would like to see a solid base for decision that we
> do not have access to. Given that, to me the natural conclusion is that
> Ubuntu keeps providing the feature for now.
For a feature to exist, it needs a justification. I see no r
On 04/07/11 20:11, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> Robert Ancell wrote on 04/07/11 03:44:
>
> >> If you change the display language within a session, it does not take
> >> effect in that session, but only after you have logged out and
> >> logged in again. The l
On 04/07/11 21:57, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 12:44 +1000, Robert Ancell wrote:
>> From what I've gathered talking to people the classes of user are:
>> 1. Users who set the system language at install/first boot time, and
>> never change it (the vast
I've cc'd in Mika and John, who worked on the design of the new greeter
(not the greeter that is currently delivered with Oneiric) and Charline
who does user testing as they will probably have good opinions on this
feature.
> I'm of the opinion that we should keep providing a language chooser
> wid
Nice work!
I'd recommend adding a "Development" tab that tracks development
packages. I had this problem with the versions page in that it
automatically tracks packages on the CD, but not the packages that were
used to build them. Things like intltool which are just as critical as
the applicatio
On 06/07/2011 08:03 PM, Matthew East wrote:
> On 7 June 2011 10:02, Alan Bell wrote:
>> yeah, I would very much hope that lightdm does not introduce more
>> accessibility regressions.
> I'm taking this opportunity to post a link to this comment on the
> proposed switch to lightDM from Matthew Garr
>>> This feature is just not implemented yet. It will be in Oneiric.
> Good to know, Robert. Are you able to say something about e.g. the
> keyboard layout and universal access?
>
This is an area where I'm definitely not an expert, and your help is
greatly appreciated here! Most of my knowledge
On 06/06/2011 10:30 PM, Kevin Huang wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 18:01 +1000, Robert Ancell wrote:
>> This feature is just not implemented yet. It will be in Oneiric.
>
> Any target date that loco can start to test?
>
Definitely by Beta, ideally by A2.
--
ubuntu-desktop m
ightdm' and then
> add a tracker for the upstream project (
> https://launchpad.net/lightdm)? Thanks.
>
> -Stenten
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Robert Ancell
> mailto:robert.anc...@canonical.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As LightDM is sc
#x27;s only the user language that can be set from the login
> screen. Since there is no language option in LightDM screen, I assume
> no user language that can be set in Oneric. Is it correct?
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:52 +1000, Robe
Hi all,
As LightDM is scheduled to be the default display manager in Oneric by
Alpha 2 it would be awesome if we can get as many testers as possible,
so please be a guinea pig!
If you are using Oneric you can install it from Universe:
$ sudo apt-get install lightdm lightdm-greeter-example-gtk
If
Note that aisleriot has been split out of GNOME Games for the 3.1
release, so it's important that this change is made to the new aisleriot
package when it is packaged.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad
On 04/20/2011 06:44 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Rodrigo has worked in the desktop team for several months now, and
> will continue to do so. In my experience he has picked up all the
> necessary packaging skills, is familiar with our processes, freezes,
> revision control handling, and
On 04/12/2011 05:31 AM, Javier Jardón wrote:
> On 8 April 2011 00:23, Robert Ancell wrote:
>
>> Can we get all our CD applications using GTK3? I'm thinking of Firefox
>> here, we really don't want to have one or two applications requiring
>> both packages on
On 04/11/2011 07:30 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011, Robert Ancell wrote:
>> - Speed improvements - we can run a greeter without running a full GNOME
>> session
> Running a "full" GNOME session sounds like a waste, but it kind of
> makes sense to
On 04/11/2011 01:39 PM, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:02:35 +1000, Robert Ancell
> wrote:
>> Last cycle I proposed using LightDM to replace GDM [1]. It was deferred
>> due to the Unity work, so time to repropose!
>>
>> The main reasons for switc
On 04/12/2011 06:34 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Robert Ancell [2011-04-11 10:36 +1000]:
>> - People are often ignoring the branches and uploading directly (or
>> forgetting do a bzr push) which means changes are sometimes dropped by
>> accident
>> - People often do
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
