[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574354] Re: playing .mp4 in VLC freezes machine

2018-02-07 Thread erick
Here's mine, it occurs in 16.04.3 with VLC 2.2.8 even, really bad HANG, VLC unusable! Code: $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 21 model : 2 model name : AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core Processor stepping: 0 microcode :

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1610434] Re: Ubuntu GNOME Trusty HWE upgrade fails to install libwayland-egl1-mesa-lts-xenial

2016-08-15 Thread Erick Brunzell
"This is because you didn't first upgrade update-manager." I figured something like that. I was convinced that it must have been an error on my part after repeating several more tests with no issue. Chalk that up to either too little (or too much) coffee. -- You received this bug notification

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1611982] Re: HWE upgrade from vivid to xenial removes support for r128 and mach64

2016-08-14 Thread Erick Brunzell
I've run several tests and it looks good to me, so I think we're good to go. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati-lts-xenial in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611982 Title: HWE upgrade from vivid to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1610434] Re: Ubuntu GNOME Trusty HWE upgrade fails to install libwayland-egl1-mesa-lts-xenial

2016-08-14 Thread Erick Brunzell
I've run several more tests today and all seems well. I can only assume that the failure in comment #17 was an error on my part. So I think we're good to go. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-lts-xenial in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1610434] Re: Ubuntu GNOME Trusty HWE upgrade fails to install libwayland-egl1-mesa-lts-xenial

2016-08-13 Thread Erick Brunzell
I have no idea why I had that previous failure. I've since run two more tests. One was a repeat test beginning with a fresh install of Ubuntu GNOME 14.04.3 i386 (just like above) and it worked fine. I ran another test beginning with a fresh install of Ubuntu GNOME 14.04.2 amd64 and it also worked

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1610434] Re: Ubuntu GNOME Trusty HWE upgrade fails to install libwayland-egl1-mesa-lts-xenial

2016-08-13 Thread Erick Brunzell
I still encountered a failure beginning with Ubuntu GNOME Trusty i386 w/Vivid HWE. There was a kernel upgrade prior to performing the HWE upgrade (most recent prior updates performed on 2016-08-07 followed by installing update-manager from proposed): Start-Date: 2016-08-13 09:58:41 Commandline:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1611982] Re: HWE upgrade from vivid to xenial removes support for r128 and mach64

2016-08-11 Thread Erick Brunzell
So I'd want to check for the presence of xserver-xorg-video-r128-lts- xenial and xserver-xorg-video-mach64-lts-xenial after the HWE upgrade? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati-lts-xenial in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 912044] Re: scroll lock doesn't work, which affects users of badly designed backlit keyboards

2016-07-02 Thread Erick Braganza
I have the same problem. I'm using this keyboard http://www.pccomponentes.com/nox_krom_konker_pro_gaming.html it needs the scroll lock key to turn on the backlight, so I need to put xmodmap -e "add mod3 =Scroll_Lock" everytime I log in my session. -- You received this bug notification because

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1572855] Re: libgbm.so.1: cannot open shared object file

2016-04-21 Thread Erick Brunzell
It's an umbrella rather than a specific package, so: lance@lance-AMD-desktop:~$ apt-cache policy xorg-lts* xserver-xorg-lts-vivid: Installed: (none) Candidate: 3:10 Version table: 3:10 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages xserver-xorg-lts-wily:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-04-05 Thread Erick Brunzell
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Assignee: Kyle Brophy (kylebrophy) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1507255 Title:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-03-04 Thread Erick Brunzell
@ jerrylamos, which HWE stack is in use? It mostly depends on what installation media is used (unless physical action is taken to upgrade the HWE stack): https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack#Kernel.2FSupport.A14.04.x_Ubuntu_Kernel_Support Based on my most recent results it seemed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-02-18 Thread Erick Brunzell
Xenial looks good testing Ubuntu GNOME 20160218 amd64: ubuntu-gnome@ubuntu-gnome:~$ uname -a Linux ubuntu-gnome 4.4.0-6-generic #21-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 16 20:32:27 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ubuntu-gnome@ubuntu-gnome:~$ apt-cache policy xserver-xorg-video-intel

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-02-18 Thread Erick Brunzell
It took a considerable amount of searching but the sna vs uxa issue does have at least two upstream bug reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226531 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226743 I believe that should be sufficient. It's a known issue. I'll have to look at

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-02-17 Thread Erick Brunzell
Ubuntu Trusty 20160217 amd64 is still affected so I doubt that a fix will land for 14.04.4. That will be problematic for less advanced users affected because both the Wily and the updated Trusty images offered from the main download page(s) will fail to work. To me the obvious simple "workaround"

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-02-17 Thread Erick Brunzell
As far as reporting upstream to move the status from incomplete back to confirmed - I have no idea what I'm doing :^( Is this an X bug as originally thought? Or a kernel bug as now seems to be the case? I clearly can't create a new bugzilla account and file a bug report when I have no idea what

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-02-16 Thread Erick Brunzell
I took time to check Wily and the results are similar. This bug is present with the 4.2.0-27.30 kernel but the 4.2.0-29.31 kernel is OK. So I'm guessing the updated intel driver fails to build properly with kernels prior to 4.2.0-29 -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-02-16 Thread Erick Brunzell
Looking at the 14.04.4 RC again this AM I find that the 4.2.0-29.23 kernel is OK, but this bug is present with 4.2.0-27.21. So this is apparently not so much an X bug as a kernel bug?? AFAIK Xenial is (or at least has been) affected by this also and I'll be testing the Beta 1 candidates next

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-02-15 Thread Erick Brunzell
Lubuntu Trusty is affected to a much lesser degree so I was at least able to install it. I'm going to try the newest kernel from proposed tomorrow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-02-15 Thread Erick Brunzell
The Trusty images had been good up through 20160214 but the 20160215 image is affected again. They appear to be using: xserver-xorg-video-intel-lts-wily 2:2.99.917+git20150808-0ubuntu4~trusty2 So I need to dig a bit deeper. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-02-07 Thread Erick Brunzell
I was surprised testing the Trusty Daily Ubuntu GNOME 20160207 amd64 image to find that it works OK in a live session so just making a note for my own use regarding version: xserver-xorg-video-intel-lts-wily 2:2.99.917+git20150808-0ubuntu4~trusty2 -- You received this bug notification because

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-01-24 Thread Erick Brunzell
Not surprisingly this also affects the Trusty dailies based on testing Ubuntu GNOME Trusty 20160124 amd64 since they have the Wily HWE. So the flavors participating may want to mention it in their release notes, recommending that users affected use the archived 14.04.1 images. ** Tags added:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2016-01-22 Thread Erick Brunzell
Still affects Ubuntu GNOME Xenial 20160121 amd64. So I guess I'll have to create a Bugzilla account and try to figure out their bug filing process when I have time. ** Tags added: amd64 xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] Re: Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2015-10-19 Thread Erick Brunzell
I incorrectly staed above: "The graphics are so badly garbled I can only file this bug on an unaffected OS where I've held back the update on just that one package to about Alpha 2 status" That should have said "Beta 1 status" so I'll correct that accordingly. ** Description changed: This

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1507255] [NEW] Garbled graphics in Wily with Intel GMA4500 chip

2015-10-17 Thread Erick Brunzell
Public bug reported: This affects both Ubuntu GNOME and Ubuntu Wily 20151017.1. The graphics are so badly garbled I can only file this bug on an unaffected OS where I've held back the update on just that one package to about Alpha 2 status: lance@lance-INTEL-desktop:~$ apt-cache policy

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-08-26 Thread Erick Brunzell
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Vivid) Status: Confirmed = Fix

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1432843] Re: Lubuntu failed to boot

2015-03-31 Thread Erick Brunzell
I've tested both the Lubuntu 20150330 i386 and amd64 images on two totally different sets of hardware. Both fail to boot to the live DE on this hardware: Intel Atom CPU 230 @ 1.60GHz Intel 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) Intel N10/ICH 7 Family High Definition Audio Controller

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1432843] Re: Lubuntu failed to boot

2015-03-31 Thread Erick Brunzell
No idea why the explanatory text disappeared with comment #24 but that's a pic of what the screen displays when the i386 image freezes. This pic is what the screen displays when the amd64 image freezes. ** Attachment added: freeze_amd64.JPG

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1432843] Re: Lubuntu failed to boot

2015-03-31 Thread Erick Brunzell
** Attachment added: freeze_i386.JPG https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1432843/+attachment/4361870/+files/freeze_i386.JPG -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1438605] [NEW] Apport reports xorg crash after booting Vivid live image

2015-03-31 Thread Erick Brunzell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1291644 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291644 Public bug reported: Apport just asked if I wanted to file this report after booting the Lubuntu Vivid image. I said yes in hopes that some info may be provided in regards to bug #1432843. ProblemType:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-17 Thread Erick Brunzell
No surprise but since the 14.04.2 20150217 images still have 3.16.0-30 generic they are affected. Since it's a hardware specific corner issue I don't know if it's worth mentioning in the release notes or not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1291574] Re: nouveau DRM GPU lockup, PFIFO unhandled status 0x00800000

2015-02-16 Thread Erick Brunzell
I believe I encountered the same issue while working on bug #1412602 which is unrelated to this bug. In the process of testing the nouveau driver with an nVidia C61 [GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a] chipset on Ubuntu GNOME Trusty with the Utopic HWE and 3.16.0-31-generic from trusty-proposed I

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-16 Thread Erick Brunzell
** Description changed: I've been testing the Ubuntu GNOME Vivid daily images in anticipation of Alpha 2 and I noticed that with this specific hardware I get no graphics at all other than a blank screen (see attached photo): AMD Sempron Processor LE-1250 @ 2.2 GHz nVidia C61 [GeForce

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-15 Thread Erick Brunzell
OK I did some more testing last night and this AM, so here's a quick recap to reduce any confusion (both for others and myself): Vivid: This is fixed in 3.18.0-13 generic. I verified that this AM by testing the Ubuntu GNOME Vivid 20150215 amd64 iso. Utopic: This is fixed in 3.16.0-31 generic

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-15 Thread Erick Brunzell
Regarding Trusty with the OEM 3.13 series kernel: This is NOT fixed in 3.13.0-46-generic from trusty-proposed. That can be verified because using the nouveau.config=NvMSI=0 boot parameter gets me past the screen corruption/X freeze. So evidently the upstream fix has not yet trickled down to the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-14 Thread Erick Brunzell
Sorry to take so long getting back to this. The affected PC is usually used as my media center but I've now been able to move it into my testing suite so hopefully once 14.04.2 milestone testing is out of the way I'll be able to respond more quickly and efficiently. Regarding the screen

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-14 Thread Erick Brunzell
I was encountering some issues installing 14.04.1 which I'll get into later, but for now I moved on to testing 14.04.2, this one installed w /Ubuntu-GNOME 14.04.2 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20150203), and while 3.16.0-30-generic was affected I pulled 3.16.0-31-generic from trusty-proposed

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-14 Thread Erick Brunzell
@ Tim Lunn, This is totally unrelated, but to be certain that Vivid is working properly w/3.18.0-13-generic I've been using it to post all of these messages and on the last boot apport presented me with a gdm error so I accepted the automated reporting which is bug #1421991. Poorly written for

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-14 Thread Erick Brunzell
It turns out that both 14.04 and 14.04.1 are affected by this bug. I had to look in the installer log to see what version I'd begun with (and have been running on that box as my stable OS) = Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Alpha i386 (20140129). So I was undoubtedly able to install Trusty at that

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-14 Thread Erick Brunzell
Hi Tim, As far as I can tell ATM the only difference in most of these crashes/freezes/screen-corruptions is the frequency with which they occur and the screen color depending on what point during boot and/or operation the freeze occurs. Like this is the pic I included with original bug report:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-06 Thread Erick Brunzell
I have been able to reproduce that a few times in a gnome-shell session but it's not specific to any one task. It crashed/froze twice just looking for logs and once again while launching Firefox. OTOH I can use the classic session w/o a problem - in fact I'm streaming the nightly news right now.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-06 Thread Erick Brunzell
@ Joseph Salisbury, There seemed to be some improvement in Ubuntu GNOME Utopic with the amd64 version of 3.16.7-031607-generic, at least I was able to boot that kernel w/o adding the nouveau.config=NvMSI=0 boot parameter, but then after spending a couple of minutes fiddling around when I

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-06 Thread Erick Brunzell
Perhaps oddly (perhaps not oddly at all) I decided to reboot and select GNOME Classic rather than booting into the standard GNOME Shell and it seems to work fine - no screen tearing or X-freezes under fairly heavy use. So maybe nouveau itself is simply not capable of running GNOME Shell. I find

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-02-04 Thread Erick Brunzell
@ Joseph Salisbury, I'll be glad to do that but it'll be a couple of days due to prior commitments. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-nouveau in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1412602 Title: No live

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-01-30 Thread Erick Brunzell
Trusty 3.13.0-44 was OK but 3.13.0-45 is affected. ** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-nouveau in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1412602 Title: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-01-26 Thread Erick Brunzell
The latest two daily builds are failing for what must be a totally unrelated issue because they're also failing with different hardware so I went back to testing the Ubuntu GNOME Alpha 2 live image and it does boot successfully with the boot parameter nouveau.config=NvMSI=0. So do we need to edit

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-01-26 Thread Erick Brunzell
I tried the 3.19.0-031900rc5-generic mainline kernel on that installation and both mutter and compiz based DE's work OK with nouveau, but the nvidia module fails to build properly against that kernel. I haven't yet researched what kernel we intend to ship with Vivid. I started some testing with

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-01-20 Thread Erick Brunzell
Oh, I forgot to mention that I have tried the nomodeset boot parameter to no avail. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-nouveau in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1412602 Title: No live DE in Vivid using

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] [NEW] No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-01-19 Thread Erick Brunzell
Public bug reported: I've been testing the Ubuntu GNOME Vivid daily images in anticipation of Alpha 2 and I noticed that with this specific hardware I get no graphics at all other than a blank screen (see attached photo): AMD Sempron Processor LE-1250 @ 2.2 GHz nVidia C61 [GeForce 7025 / nForce

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1412602] Re: No live DE in Vivid using nouveau w/GeForce 7025/nForce 630a

2015-01-19 Thread Erick Brunzell
Here's what Ubuntu GNOME Vivid 20150119 i386 boots to when it should display Try or Install. I was able to enter the advanced boot menu and run check disc for defects so I know it's not just a bad burn. ** Attachment added: IMG_4799.JPG

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-06-21 Thread Erick Brunzell
Can someone with authorization change the status in xserver-xorg-video- openchrome-lts-saucy from Incomplete to Won't fix? That should end any action needed on this bug report. Thanks in advance. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-04-11 Thread Erick Brunzell
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome-lts-saucy (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-openchrome in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205643 Title: VIA P4M800

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-04-10 Thread Erick Brunzell
Just setting up my test suite for Trusty final testing and I see that we've moved the xserver-xorg-video-openchrome (1:0.3.1-0ubuntu2.2) saucy from saucy-proposed to saucy-main which is great. But we should now probably update the Saucy status from won't fix to fix released. Then maybe Maarten

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-04-09 Thread Erick Brunzell
And the apt/term log ** Attachment added: term.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome/+bug/1205643/+attachment/4076654/+files/term.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-04-09 Thread Erick Brunzell
BTW if you can get this into the Precise daily I'll be glad to test them but remember we're on the brink of Trusty so testing could be delayed several days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-openchrome in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-04-09 Thread Erick Brunzell
Thanks Alberto, yes it worked but it was sloppy on my end. The vesa driver does not work well here (too much screen tearing) so I had to approach this by installing Lubuntu Saucy and then handling the rest in a chroot, but the attached apt logs should show you what I have. I will not however

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-02-09 Thread Erick Brunzell
@ Andrea, The 12.04 and 12.04.1 images use the same basic kernel and X-stack (other than bug fixes and security updates) so I suspect you're dealing with an additional issue. You should first of all rule out a bad disc/USB (depending on which you're using to install) by entering the advanced boot

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-02-07 Thread Erick Brunzell
@ Andrea, Yes, 12.04.4 ships with the Saucy Hardware Enablement Stack: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack So those images won't work with VIA P4M800 graphics. I prefer using the archived 12.04.1 images because I have too many computers spread out over too large of an area and

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-02-05 Thread Erick Brunzell
I reported this on the QA Tracker for 12.04.4 just in case the Release Team thinks it warrants a mention in the release notes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-openchrome in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-01-29 Thread Erick Brunzell
I think Saucy, and the 13.10 hardware enablement stack for Precise should both be marked won't fix because they're only supported through July of this year. But I'm not qualified to mark it as such. I will continue to test Edubuntu Trusty w/Flashback (Metacity) to watch for any regressions before

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-01-29 Thread Erick Brunzell
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome (Ubuntu Saucy) Assignee: Erick Brunzell (lbsolost) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome (Ubuntu Saucy) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-01-22 Thread Erick Brunzell
Well, I think it should show fix released for Trusty, but a dev will have to decide if Saucy and the Saucy hardware enablement stack for 12.04.4 are going to get a won't fix or what. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-01-21 Thread Erick Brunzell
Still working in Edubuntu Trusty 20140121.1 i386 :^) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-openchrome in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205643 Title: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-01-20 Thread Erick Brunzell
Hi Bartosz. I assume you want those from Saucy and and the Saucy Hardware Enablement Stack in the 12.04.4 candidates. Is that correct? I'm just preparing for Trusty Alpha 2 testing for flavors so it could be next week before I get back to this. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1057120] Re: Ubiquity screen problem during install.

2014-01-20 Thread Erick Brunzell
To the best of my knowledge this effected only Lubuntu Precise and Quantal. If so it really could be marked won't fix since neither of those images will be respun. Or we could wait and see if it pops up again in Trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-01-19 Thread Erick Brunzell
** Summary changed: - VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy Trusty + VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-openchrome in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-01-19 Thread Erick Brunzell
I recently noticed that the Saucy Hardware Enablement Stack had been added to the Precise daily builds so I tested Ubuntu Precise i386 20140118 and not surprisingly it has the same problem as Saucy with the P4M800 chips. I personally prefer using the archived Ubuntu 12.04.1 i386 images because

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy 12.04.4 candidate

2014-01-19 Thread Erick Brunzell
@ Andrea, I totally understand what you're saying. I should first say that I'm not a dev, just an end user/tester that also maintains a relatively large number of PC's. Are you aware that Saucy is only supported until July 2014? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases IMHO Precise is a much better

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1063267] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in CloseWellKnownConnections()

2014-01-07 Thread Erick Brunzell
Thanks Christopher, I'm just marking this invalid because (a) it only effected Ubuntu GNOME before it became an official flavor, and (b) I've not seen the issue in Raring, Saucy, or Trusty. ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy Trusty

2013-12-21 Thread Erick Brunzell
Also just tried Edubuntu Trusty Alpha 1 and it's working fine in flashback w/metacity mode so I think this could be marked fix released??? Any thoughts Maarten? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-openchrome in

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy Trusty

2013-12-21 Thread Erick Brunzell
Thanks for the reminder Andrea. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-openchrome in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205643 Title: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy Trusty To manage

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy Trusty

2013-12-18 Thread Erick Brunzell
Support for P4M800 seems to be OK with Xubuntu Trusty 20131218 i386. Thanks Maarten :^) I will follow up later. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-openchrome in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205643

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy

2013-12-03 Thread Erick Brunzell
@ Maarten Lankhorst, Yes. When I boot the Lubuntu Trusty 20131129 i386 DVD to the llive DE on that VIA P4M800 box I just get a blank screen, but you can tell the backlight is on. Booting the same image on my Intel box shows this version info: lubuntu@lubuntu:~$ dpkg -s

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy Trusty

2013-12-03 Thread Erick Brunzell
** Summary changed: - VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy + VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy Trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-openchrome in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy

2013-11-30 Thread Erick Brunzell
Still broken in Lubuntu Trusty 20131129 i386. ** Tags added: saucy trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205643 Title: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy To

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy

2013-10-20 Thread Erick Brunzell
Well I'd prefer finding out what broke in the openchrome driver, otherwise I prefer sticking with 12.04 which is supported until April 2017. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205643

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy

2013-09-03 Thread Erick Brunzell
It had been suggested at the Lubuntu QA mailing list the following logs might be helpful: /var/log/Xorg.0.log /var/log/dmesg /var/log/syslog So I pulled the same from a lateral install in a dual boot after a blank screen boot and I'm attaching all three. ** Attachment added: Xorg.0

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy

2013-09-03 Thread Erick Brunzell
Seems I can't add more than one at a time so here's #2. ** Attachment added: syslog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1205643/+attachment/3800609/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy

2013-09-03 Thread Erick Brunzell
And #3. ** Attachment added: dmseg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1205643/+attachment/3800610/+files/dmseg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205643 Title:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1205643] Re: VIA P4M800 graphics broken in Lubuntu/Xubuntu Saucy

2013-09-02 Thread Erick Brunzell
Things have changed just a bit between the Alpha 2 images and the first of the Beta 1 testing images. I now no longer freeze while the progress bar is showing, but I still boot to a blank screen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 992778] Re: Dual Monitor Freeze after changing Display Settings in ubuntu 12.04

2013-06-22 Thread erick abuzo
I experienced also this problem. I am using the version raring tail 13.04. Can anyone here tell me how can I see the download link for the deb files at https://launchpad.net/~sarvatt/+archive/sru1/+build/3118995 And Terry S (itsterry) #34 files seems not be working anymore. Hoping someone will

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 988290] Re: Resolution change with KVM switch on Precise

2013-02-08 Thread Erick Brunzell
Bug #1037895 may be a duplicate of this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988290 Title: Resolution change with KVM switch on Precise To manage notifications

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1057120] Re: Ubiquity screen problem during install.

2012-10-15 Thread Erick Brunzell
OK, I've been testing the Lubuntu Quantal 20121014 i386 image intensively on two sets of hardware, but I have not tested at all in a VM. On my old VIA C7 w/P4M800 graphics I can NOT reproduce this regardless of whether I choose Try or Install from the boot menu. But on my Intel Atom 230 w/Intel

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1057120] Re: Ubiquity screen problem during install.

2012-10-15 Thread Erick Brunzell
I just happened to think that my old P4M800 will not even begin to render 3D graphics so I wondered if it's possible to use a boot parameter edit to make my Intel i945 ignore 3D capability? Maybe nomodeset? Or maybe just a stupid idea ;^( -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1057120] Re: Ubiquity screen problem during install.

2012-10-14 Thread Erick Brunzell
I just installed Lubuntu Precise final in order to perform Lubuntu i386 Quantal upgrade testing and even the Lubuntu i386 Precise final will display this behavior. If you don't drag the installer windows around you can see still see window-over-window behavior. Since a picture is worth a thousand

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1057120] Re: Ubiquity screen problem during install.

2012-10-14 Thread Erick Brunzell
Just checking this again in Lubuntu Precise final and all seems well if I begin from the live desktop, but if I begin by selecting Install rather than Try I get this behavior. I did take some pics but I'm now waiting for a camera battery to recharge. And I will of course have to double check the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1057120] Re: Ubiquity screen problem during install.

2012-10-14 Thread Erick Brunzell
Here's the shots from Lubuntu Precise. I'll follow up closer with Quantal ASAP. ** Attachment added: shots.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1057120/+attachment/3398444/+files/shots.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1063267] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in CloseWellKnownConnections()

2012-10-07 Thread Erick Brunzell
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063267 Title: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in CloseWellKnownConnections() To manage notifications about

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1063267] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in CloseWellKnownConnections()

2012-10-07 Thread Erick Brunzell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1061580 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061580 I assume bug 1061580 must be marked private. Can someone with the know- how and ability please mark it public ;^) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1041625] Re: X not starting after install [openchrome]

2012-08-28 Thread Erick Brunzell
Just out of curiosity I tried installing Lubuntu QQ alpha 3 on the aforementioned hardware. All went fine other than one totally unrelated ubiquity bug. After installing I applied the available updates, I did NOT enable proposed, but then it's no longer able to boot into that old (circa 2007) VIA

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1041625] Re: X not starting after install [openchrome]

2012-08-28 Thread Erick Brunzell
Thanks Lars. It sounds like I need to file a new bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-openchrome in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041625 Title: X not starting after install [openchrome] To

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1041625] Re: X not starting after install [openchrome]

2012-08-28 Thread Erick Brunzell
OK, did you look at those pics in comment #16? Lots of font config errors followed by: Starting Mount network filesystems Stopping Mount network filesystems The third pic in that set is the easiest to read but it only shows about the left half of the screen. I'm fairly well convinced that

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1041625] Re: X not starting after install [openchrome]

2012-08-28 Thread Erick Brunzell
** Attachment added: rec_mode_errors.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome/+bug/1041625/+attachment/3281483/+files/rec_mode_errors.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1041625] Re: X not starting after install [openchrome]

2012-08-28 Thread Erick Brunzell
Oops, that attachment was supposed to be accompanied by this text: Trying to boot or even update through recovery mode after enabling networking displays these '/lib/udev/mtp-probe' errors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1041625] Re: X not starting after install [openchrome]

2012-08-28 Thread Erick Brunzell
BTW this is the box that I use for testing both ubiquity and d-i so it's really important to me. I'd really like to test all of the recent installer changes on bare metal ;^) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1041625] Re: X not starting after install [openchrome]

2012-08-28 Thread Erick Brunzell
After installing a fresh Lubuntu i386 alpha3 and upgrading only 'libmtp- common' and 'libmtp9' I get a very slow boot - I mean 3 to 4 minutes! From looking at the changelogs I seriously doubt that this is actually an xserver bug but I lack the tech knowledge to proceed so any help would be

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1041625] Re: X not starting after install [openchrome]

2012-08-27 Thread Erick Brunzell
Lars, I'm not sure this is related but I'm unable to even boot Lubuntu i386 20120827 to the live desktop on my old VIA box: VIA C7 CPU @ 1500MHz VIA CN700/P4M800 Pro/P4M800 CE/VN800 Graphics [S3 UniChrome Pro] (rev 01) VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 60) Ethernet controller: VIA

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 988290] Re: Resolution change with KVM switch on Precise

2012-08-03 Thread Erick Brunzell
I did some more fiddling and I'm fairly well convinced that this is actually a 'gnome-screensaver' bug. I first booted into an Lubuntu Precise and installed 'gnome-desktop- environment' which I know is Gnome version 3.0 rather than the Gnome version 3.2 + bits of 3.4 that Ubuntu Precise uses.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1010016] Re: When switching with a KVM, display resolution is not detected at first

2012-08-03 Thread Erick Brunzell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 988290 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988290 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 988290 Resolution change with KVM switch on Precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 988290] Re: Resolution change with KVM switch on Precise

2012-08-03 Thread Erick Brunzell
I actually didn't spend much time at all on it ;^) I've just been battling some health issues and I did a very lax job of testing over the past several months. I've been grouchy too :^( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 988290] Re: Resolution change with KVM switch on Precise

2012-08-02 Thread Erick Brunzell
I need to do more cross testing to be certain but this evening I was testing Xubuntu Precise i386 (20120801.1) and I don't see this. So maybe it's actually a 'gnome-screensaver' bug I'm guessing it's not limited to only 'xserver-xorg-video-intel' ATM but I really must do more studying. It is

  1   2   >