i've finished upgrading apache to 2.4. all the active sites seem to
still be working correctly. if you see anything wrong, please let me
know asap via this thread, or file a bug if bugzilla is working :).
https://bugs.busybox.net/
enabling http/2 is causing a weird crash i need to
On 01 Feb 2016 22:00, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> enabling http/2 is causing a weird crash i need to investigate more,
> so it's disabled for now.
i've updated some of the build and config options, and http/2 seems to be
running fine on all the domains.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: D
i've deployed the new bugzilla 5.0 to bugs.busybox.net. feel free to
let me know of any issues, or just file bugs :).
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
On 23 Dec 2015 10:18, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> Is anyone else having problems accessing the uclibc mailing list
> archives on the web. I.e. seeing https://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/
>
> I get a "This Connection is Untrusted" warning and when I go to this
> page (Ubuntu 12.04, firefox 43.0)
with the demise of the cvs repo, we've moved officially to github:
https://github.com/uclinux-dev/elf2flt
this is based on the git mirror i had been previously maintaining here:
git://wh0rd.org/elf2flt.git
https://github.com/vapier/elf2flt
so if you happened to have a copy
i'm not sure how many people care since it seems to have been broken for a
while, but i'm officially turning off svn access via the webserver, as well
as the viewvcs instance. i'm leaving open the raw rsync and svn access as
both are trivial to maintain and rely on other services we want to keep.
the uclibc.org software has been languishing for quite a long time,
so i gave it a strong kick today. just about every piece of software
has been upgraded on the box including bugzilla. my various testing
looks like it still works, but if you guys notice anything weird, feel
free to let me know.
On Thursday 02 January 2014 05:16:14 Baruch Siach wrote:
Commit ee84b8b400 (linux: posix_fadvise: use new SYSCALL_ALIGN_64BIT)
removed posix_fadvise implementation for xtensa, since xtensa does not
define __NR_fadvise64. Redefine __NR_fadvise64 as __NR_fadvise64_64 to
restore posix_fadvise.
On Thursday 02 January 2014 05:16:14 Baruch Siach wrote:
Commit ee84b8b400 (linux: posix_fadvise: use new SYSCALL_ALIGN_64BIT)
removed posix_fadvise implementation for xtensa, since xtensa does not
define __NR_fadvise64. Redefine __NR_fadvise64 as __NR_fadvise64_64 to
restore posix_fadvise.
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 16:37:32 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Mike your e-mail client still sucks btw
Sorry, in what way?
the quoting style unreasonably mangles things
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
On Monday 14 October 2013 12:43:34 Steve Ellcey wrote:
I am new to building uclibc, but have experience building glibc and newlib,
and I have a question about the best way to build multiple versions of
uclibc from a script without any user interaction.
you have experience building the kernel
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 15:00:40 Khem Raj wrote:
On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
I have a question about endiness and uclibc. I am trying to build
multiple versions of uclibc for MIPS, including big and little endian
versions. What I notice is that in Rules.mak there
On Wednesday 16 October 2013 04:23:17 Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 15:00:40 Khem Raj wrote:
On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
I have a question about endiness and uclibc. I am trying to build
On Wednesday 16 October 2013 12:13:12 Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 16 October 2013 04:23:17 Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 15:00:40 Khem Raj
On Friday 04 October 2013 17:45:20 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Peter == Peter Korsgaard pe...@korsgaard.com writes:
Peter Some archs (avr32 in particular) still doesn't define __NR_pread64,
so Peter we should fall back to __NR_pread if it isn't available.
Peter The code nicely checks for it,
On Friday 04 October 2013 15:41:20 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Some archs (avr32 in particular) still doesn't define __NR_pread64, so
we should fall back to __NR_pread if it isn't available.
The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the syscall
to use __NR_pread64 afterwards,
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 19:04:12 Khem Raj wrote:
On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Peter Korsgaard pe...@korsgaard.com wrote:
Mike == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
Hi,
The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the syscall
to use __NR_pread64 afterwards
On Friday 14 December 2012 05:40:05 Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
--- a/libc/misc/elf/dl-support.c
+++ b/libc/misc/elf/dl-support.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ void (*_dl_init_static_tls) (struct link_map *) =
_dl_nothread_init_static_tls;
ElfW(Phdr) *_dl_phdr;
size_t _dl_phnum;
+size_t
On Thursday 18 April 2013 04:51:20 Hiroaki KAWAI wrote:
As in timerfd.h, eventfd.h needs arch-specific definition files.
alpha, mips and sparc needs separate file, all the other arch
will use common definition.
your patch is horribly line wrapped. please use `git send-email` to avoid
that
On Thursday 14 March 2013 01:07:43 Rich Felker wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 09:57:37PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
Files like libc/sysdeps/linux/powerpc/bits/fcntl.h have blobs like:
#ifdef __USE_GNU
# define O_DIRECT 040 /* Direct disk access. */
# define O_DIRECTORY
On Sunday 25 November 2012 00:24:26 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Michael Deutschmann wrote:
__unix_grantpt
that one is a bug
i pushed a fix for this
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Michael Deutschmann wrote:
__errno_location
__h_errno_location
probably related to linuxthreads usage. seems to be fixed in nptl,
but should be tracked down in linuxthreads too. certainly shouldn't
exist if you have threading disabled.
__unix_grantpt
that
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:09 Markos Chandras wrote:
The following patches prefer the old system call if both syscalls are
present. For example, if __NR_open and __NR_openat
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 11:29:54 Christophe Lyon wrote:
My uClibc build currently fails at
libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.o: ./ldso/include/dl-elf.h: In
function '__dl_parse_dynamic_info':
./ldso/include/dl-elf.h:173:20: error: 'RTLD_NODELETE' undeclared (first
use in this
On Wednesday 26 September 2012 10:54:10 Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
The problem is this line in Rules.mak:
ifneq ($(findstring $(TARGET_ARCH) , hppa64 ia64 mips64 powerpc64 s390x
sparc64 x86_64 ),) UCLIBC_LDSO_NAME := ld64-uClibc
ARCH_NATIVE_BIT := 64
else
UCLIBC_LDSO_NAME := ld-uClibc
merged, thanks!
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
On Friday 21 September 2012 11:29:14 Florian Fainelli wrote:
--- a/libpthread/nptl/init.c
+++ b/libpthread/nptl/init.c
@@ -401,6 +401,10 @@ __pthread_initialize_minimal_internal (void)
Use the minimal size acceptable. */
limit.rlim_cur = PTHREAD_STACK_MIN;
+ /* Do not exceed
On Friday 21 September 2012 11:29:16 Florian Fainelli wrote:
From: Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org
Avoids crazy build breakages in multiple packages.
like what ? i've never noticed a problem w/Gentoo, nor has anyone reported an
issue ...
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Thursday 25 October 2012 15:13:07 Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.uclibc.general/22411
describes problem which surfaces up when glib is upgraded.
glib depends on elfutils btw. but somehow compiles fine with
just libelf . i guess this is another
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:09 Markos Chandras wrote:
The following patches prefer the old system call if both syscalls are
present. For example, if __NR_open and __NR_openat are defined, then
open() will use the __NR_open syscall. If the __NR_open syscall is not
defined, then open()
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:10 Markos Chandras wrote:
+int chmod(const char* path, mode_t mode)
const char *path, not const char* path. seems to apply to many patches in
this series.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:10 Markos Chandras wrote:
+#if defined(__NR_fchmodat) ! defined(__NR_chmod)
also, !defined rather than ! defined
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:24 Markos Chandras wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/dup3.c
ah, i already added dup3
+#if defined(__NR_dup3)
i forgot this though ... just added
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:31 Markos Chandras wrote:
+pid_t __libc_fork(void)
+{
+ pid_t pid;
+ pid = INLINE_SYSCALL(clone, 4, SIGCHLD, NULL, NULL, NULL);
merge the definition assignment
+ if (pid0) {
if (pid 0) {
+ __set_errno(-pid);
+
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:42 Markos Chandras wrote:
+#if ! defined(__NR_ustat)
+/*
+ * ustat syscall is deprecated and statfs or fstatfs should
+ * be used instead. There is no way to provide a wrapper for the
+ * newer syscalls, so just mark this syscall as unimplemented
+ */
+int
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:47 Markos Chandras wrote:
-#if defined __NR__llseek defined __UCLIBC_HAS_LFS__
+#if (defined __NR__llseek ||defined __NR_llseek) defined
needs a space after that ||
loff_t lseek64(int fd, loff_t offset, int whence)
{
loff_t result;
+#if
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:31:55 Markos Chandras wrote:
--- a/extra/Configs/Config.in.arch
+++ b/extra/Configs/Config.in.arch
+config ARCH_HAS_NO_DEPRECATED_SYSCALLS
where is this actually used ? i didn't see it in the patches posted.
also, let's avoid xxx_NO_xxx from now on. it makes
On Thursday 15 November 2012 22:56:58 Rich Felker wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:31:54AM +, Markos Chandras wrote:
--- a/extra/Configs/Config.in.arch
+++ b/extra/Configs/Config.in.arch
+config ARCH_HAS_NO_OLD_IPC
+ bool Disable support for the old IPC interface
+ default n
On Friday 21 September 2012 01:38:41 Steve Bennett wrote:
--- a/libc/string/microblaze/memcpy.S
+++ b/libc/string/microblaze/memcpy.S
+#ifdef __MICROBLAZEEL__
+ #define BSLLI bsrli
+ #define BSRLI bslli
+#else
+ #define BSLLI bslli
+ #define BSRLI bsrli
+#endif
for
On Thursday 20 September 2012 04:38:20 Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
What might be the best solution to resolve this?
don't bother building it ? i can't see why it would be useful.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 17 November 2012 15:44:23 Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2012 22:56:58 Rich Felker wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:31:54AM +, Markos Chandras wrote:
--- a/extra/Configs/Config.in.arch
On Friday 02 November 2012 14:34:43 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 31 October 2012 20:41:50 Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com wrote:
ELFOSABI_GNU replaces ELFOSABI_LINUX, the latter is kept as a
compatibility alias, and ELFOSABI_HURD is removed. See the table on
On Wednesday 31 October 2012 09:25:16 Natanael Copa wrote:
+ifeq ($(UCLIBC_SUSV4_LEGACY),y)
i don't think these are even SUSV4 legacy. they're part of SUSV3 and marked
obsolete there and then removed from SUSV4.
+ASFLAGS-setcontext.S := -D_LIBC_REENTRANT
+ASFLAGS-getcontext.S :=
On Monday 20 August 2012 08:34:24 Natanael Copa wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 05:29:29 Timon ter Braak wrote:
I am trying to build a gccgo (go language) cross compiler targetting an
ARM system. Go uses the context control routines
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 05:29:29 Timon ter Braak wrote:
I am trying to build a gccgo (go language) cross compiler targetting an
ARM system. Go uses the context control routines for coorperative
multithreading. uClibc however does not implement them, so I am trying
to port the functions to
On Friday 18 May 2012 22:09:46 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2012 07:47:11 James Hogan wrote:
Is it always correct to cast __off_t to __u_long? I'm a bit unclear
whether it's still correct on 64bit architectures or with long file
support.
this isn't mmap64 (which uses
On Friday 18 May 2012 23:54:39 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2012 09:18:29 Sedat Dilek wrote:
This reverts commit 5dffed7dd1a413f3965af702fa7ecd79809d1988.
This breaks ldd when HARDWIRED_ABSPATH=n.
[1] http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2011-March/045048.html
[2
On Thursday 17 May 2012 07:47:11 James Hogan wrote:
Is it always correct to cast __off_t to __u_long? I'm a bit unclear
whether it's still correct on 64bit architectures or with long file
support.
this isn't mmap64 (which uses __off64_t), so it's fine. you can see that
everyone defines
On Wednesday 16 May 2012 14:23:32 Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Eugene Rudoy wrote:
After taking a look at what glibc does, I would suggest the following
(not yet tested) fix (s. attached patch)
Looks ok. send with sign-offs and preferably a testcase now that you have
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 13:16:12 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 06:04:41PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/perl/dist/threads-shared'
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/perl ./perl -f -Ilib pod/buildtoc --build-toc -q
./perl: Can't resolve symbol
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 12:29:57 Rich Felker wrote:
Would it be possible to head in the direction of not neeting
CROSS_COMPILE/CROSS? That is, make it so the build system just works
with cross compiling as long as CC is set to the right compiler? I can
think of a few potential issues like the
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 13:53:55 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
--- a/Makefile.help
+++ b/Makefile.help
- @echo ' CROSS_COMPILE= - Override CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX from
.config'
+ @echo ' CROSS_COMPILE= - Override CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX from .config'
+ @echo ' CROSS=
i've started a page:
http://uclibc.org/specs.html
and pushed out the files:
http://uclibc.org/docs/
hopefully people find these useful :)
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
On Thursday 03 May 2012 04:08:12 Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2012 14:15:54 Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Mike == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
is there still any
after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't migrated
anywhere. any suggestions on where to restore these ? i'm not sure we can
exclude subdirs when using `git archive`, so we can't add them to the main
repo. maybe start a new toplevel git repo and add it to uClibc.git as
On Wednesday 02 May 2012 14:15:54 Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Mike == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
is there still any problem with udev?
try it out and let us know ;)
Mike i just emerged it on my system and rebooted
On Monday 30 April 2012 07:27:15 Laurent Bercot wrote:
If your static app does not use stdio then it will not be linked into the
binary. If it is linked in, then you must be using a broken toolchain, so
what versions of uClibc and GCC do you use?
Hi Bernhard and list,
I was curious
On Friday 27 April 2012 14:48:11 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 3 March 2012 05:24, Ismael Luceno ismael.luc...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno ismael.luc...@gmail.com
---
extra/Configs/Config.in|7 +
include/spawn.h| 266
librt/Makefile.in
On Friday 27 April 2012 19:59:34 Rich Felker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:35:11PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2012 18:33:08 Rich Felker wrote:
But nowadays it's
just really annoying and harmful. With shared libraries, it adds bloat
and load time to every
On Saturday 28 April 2012 00:26:02 Rich Felker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:57:38PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2012 19:59:34 Rich Felker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:35:11PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2012 18:33:08 Rich Felker wrote
On Thursday 26 April 2012 16:17:11 Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote:
few more issues, package.mask in uclibc profile settings
is blocking udev above 141 - this is prohibiting new Xorg to build.
is there still any problem with udev?
try it out and let us know ;)
also glib is set hard masked
On Thursday 26 April 2012 10:14:01 Mark Salter wrote:
The test for generating generating a stub for getpgrp was wrong
generating to the max!
and would result in duplicate symbols when building without
__NR_getpgrp, but with __NR_getpgid and __NR_getpid. A closer
look at the getpgrp
On Thursday 26 April 2012 10:16:53 Mark Salter wrote:
--- a/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/getdents.c
+++ b/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/getdents.c
ssize_t __getdents (int fd, char *buf, size_t nbytes) attribute_hidden;
+#ifdef __NR_getdents
#define __NR___syscall_getdents __NR_getdents
On Thursday 26 April 2012 23:08:36 Rich Felker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:50:57PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
This patch adds a test for __UCLIBC_VFORK_USES_CLONE__ feature
definition which an architecture may define if vfork is implemented
using clone.
err, if your kernel
On Friday 27 April 2012 01:07:42 Rich Felker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:58:33AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 26 April 2012 23:08:36 Rich Felker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:50:57PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
This patch adds a test
On Thursday 26 April 2012 10:14:30 Mark Salter wrote:
A few places in the code check for existence of vfork by testing if
__NR_vfork is defined. Newer kernels don't have a vfork syscall in
which case, the library implements the vfork function using __NR_clone.
This patch adds a test for
On Thursday 26 April 2012 10:18:54 Mark Salter wrote:
--- a/ldso/include/dl-syscall.h
+++ b/ldso/include/dl-syscall.h
+#if defined(__NR_open)
#define __NR__dl_open __NR_open
static __always_inline _syscall3(int, _dl_open, const char *, fn, int,
flags, __kernel_mode_t, mode)
+#elif
On Thursday 12 April 2012 19:43:44 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 12 April 2012 19:38:08 Khem Raj wrote:
I am seeing build failure on ppc
| libc/libc_so.a(mmap64.os): In function `mmap64':
|
| /home/kraj/work/openembedded-core/build/tmp-uclibc/work/ppc603e-oe-linu
| x-
uclibc
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 09:47:10 Mark Salter wrote:
This patch updates the C6X support to work with latest uClibc code and
uses reworked DSBT support to allow using kernel FDPIC loader.
do static progs (and thus the crt code) need updating too to handle the new
kernel behavior ?
-mike
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 13:45:49 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
You can grab the current uClibc release from our download-page at
http://uclibc.org/downloads/
specifically http://uclibc.org/downloads/uClibc-0.9.33.1.tar.xz
looks like this tarball doesn't match the v0.9.33.1 tag. the
On Friday 13 April 2012 11:46:33 Khem Raj wrote:
Static inline wont work on packages like gnulib
where it will generate its own spawn.h
let's fix gnulib then. this seems like it'll add code bloat overall -- a
single memory store vs a full func call.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 07:36:17 Richard Braun wrote:
Is there a particular reason why CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW isn't defined in
libc/sysdeps/linux/common/bits/time.h ?
headers generally get synced with glibc when someone notices + posts a patch
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 15:31:20 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:19:47PM +0200, Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Hello all,
The uClibc team is happy to announce the maintenance-release of
uClibc-0.9.33.1.
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 13:06:44 Alberich de megres wrote:
After some testings, and check your script and link (thanks for both),
i'm having a different problem:
while building gcc step 2, and libgcc:
libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:29:
/opt/x/usr/include/pthread.h:25:19: fatal error: sched.h: No
On Sunday 08 April 2012 01:55:52 Kevin Cernekee wrote:
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 07 April 2012 16:31:32 Kevin Cernekee wrote:
The proposed change is to add #ifdef clauses for __mips__, similar to
what was done for SFD_NONBLOCK
thanks ... merged all 4
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
merged, thanks!
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
merged, thanks!
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
merged, thanks!
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
On Friday 06 April 2012 05:18:35 Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
The fdpic support has been broken since the prelink support was added,
because it didn't take into account DL_LOADADDR_TYPE could be a different
type of ElfW(Addr).
i fixed a typo in the mmu code and pushed it. thanks!
-mike
thanks, merged
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
On Saturday 07 April 2012 16:31:27 Kevin Cernekee wrote:
Move up the variable declaration, to fix this:
tst-sigset.c: In function 'do_test':
tst-sigset.c:28:3: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
the tests that we import from glibc i'd rather not modify
we build the rest of
On Wednesday 04 April 2012 01:54:35 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
--- a/Makefile.in
+++ b/Makefile.in
@@ -458,10 +458,7 @@ allyesconfig: $(conf)
allnoconfig: $(conf)
$(Q)$ -n extra/Configs/Config.in
-defconfig: $(conf)
- $(Q)$ -D extra/Configs/defconfigs/$(ARCH)/$@
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 04:13, Alberich de megres alberich...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to understand the toolchain creation, by building one. I
want to learn how they work.
http://embedded.gentoo.org/handbook/?part=1chap=2#doc_chap3
-mike
___
uClibc
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 00:10:16 Mike Frysinger wrote:
There's no need to export this symbol, so mark them all hidden.
merged
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 08:46:38 Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
The fdpic support has been broken since the prelink support was added,
because it didn't take into account DL_LOADADDR_TYPE could be a different
type of ElfW(Addr).
this looks much better. two things though ...
(1) this patch is
There's no need to export this symbol, so mark them all hidden.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
ldso/ldso/arm/dl-startup.h|1 +
ldso/ldso/avr32/dl-startup.h |1 +
ldso/ldso/bfin/dl-startup.h |2 ++
ldso/ldso/c6x/dl-startup.h|1
On Sunday 25 March 2012 03:23:38 Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
The _start symbol is the default entry point for ELFs, so there should be
no need to manually specify this. The background motivation is that this
causes issues
On Sunday 25 March 2012 17:52:51 Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/03/25 20:23:04:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote
On Thursday 22 March 2012 01:08:05 Rich Felker wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:16:15AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 21/03/2012 3.46, harshad poshtiwala wrote:
LinkedIn
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
Do not send this sort
On Friday 16 March 2012 07:06:47 Rob Landley wrote:
The standard:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/stpcpy.html
uClibc's include/string.h:
#ifdef __USE_GNU
...
/* Copy SRC to DEST, returning the address of the terminating '\0' in
DEST. */
# if 0 /* uClibc:
On Thursday 15 March 2012 20:45:32 Steve Bennett wrote:
for (e.g.) strace, so use this version from glibc
merged ... thanks!
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
On Monday 05 March 2012 03:43:49 Ismael Luceno wrote:
--- a/librt/Makefile.in
+++ b/librt/Makefile.in
+
+librt_filter_SRC += $(if $(UCLIBC_HAS_ADVANCED_REALTIME),,
+ spawn.c \
+ spawn_faction_addclose.c \
+ spawn_faction_adddup2.c \
+ spawn_faction_addopen.c \
+
fixed the style pushed. thanks all! it's nice we have people versed in
esoteric low level aspects nowadays.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
On Monday 12 March 2012 01:27:08 Kevin Cernekee wrote:
+ if (errno != EINTR
+ errno != EAGAIN
+ /* do we have other soft errors? */
+ ) {
+ break;
stylewise, this
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 01:58:49 Rich Felker wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:41:01AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 11 March 2012 11:12:19 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
--- a/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/bits/uClibc_stdio.h
+++ b/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/bits/uClibc_stdio.h
@@ -250,6
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 15:32:01 Rich Felker wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 07:19:35PM +, u-uclibc-q...@aetey.se wrote:
there's no correct/sane
program that would be affected by this ABI change.
Actually I suspect that stdio macros might use stuff (like __bufpos)
which is
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 16:56:13 u-uclibc-q...@aetey.se wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 04:24:33PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
It should definitely not be added near the
beginning of the structure, only past elements that could be part of
the macro ABI.
that would help only
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 17:40:38 Natanael Copa wrote:
I have seen this too and it only happens when the symlink is extracted
before the file it points to.
To reproduce:
touch myfile
ln -s myfile mylink
tar -cf testcase1.tar mylink myfile
i vaguely recall seeing this before and the
i don't have a problem with this as long as it builds warning free ;). if no
one else has feedback, or Rich wants to attempt to shrink, i'll merge it.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
1 - 100 of 580 matches
Mail list logo