On Thursday 05 June 2008, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Thursday 05 June 2008 14:17, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
busybox_unstripped: file format elf32-bfinfdpic
Noticed this... Trying to use an FDPIC toolchain with elf2flt will
produce interesting results.
Will this
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 05 December 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: carmelo
Date: 2007-12-05 09:25:08 -0800 (Wed, 05 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 20626
Log:
Fix opendir problem when statically linked due to a missing
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 05 December 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: carmelo
Date: 2007-12-05 09:25:08 -0800 (Wed, 05 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 20626
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 05 December 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: carmelo
On Wednesday 05 December 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: carmelo
Date: 2007-12-05 09:25:08 -0800 (Wed, 05 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 20626
Log:
Fix opendir problem when statically linked due to a missing
initialization of the mutex field within DIR struct.
When linked dynamically
On Thursday 21 February 2008, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
The following definitions in getaddrinfo.c seem redundant as they _are_
defined in the public netdb.h header, contrary to the comment. AI_DEFAULT
is not, however it is not used in the file either so can be safely
removed.
looks fine;
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 10:40:57PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
A number of programs, such as busybox, contain calls to fork which may
not necessarily get executed at runtime. On nommu systems, this
currently produces link errors since
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
For gcc on pentium4 i need fenv.h which the attached patch adds.
It is completely untested, does anyone spot some obvious error?
i started to add this a while ago but then stopped ... i dont recall why ;)
if it works for you though, shouldnt
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
When doing a 'make check' in uClibc in a cross compilation environment, it
builds a number of test apps and then tries to run them, which fails if
not running on the target system. After a quick look I couldn't see
anything obvious; is there
On Friday 25 January 2008, Markus Rothe wrote:
Do I have to link to some library, or is this an error in uclibc?
Gentoo is still using 0.9.28 which does not have pselect()
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
On Saturday 12 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: carmelo
Date: 2008-01-12 00:20:18 -0800 (Sat, 12 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 20848
Log:
Make sh4 build works again adding a temporary work-around
iby redefining __always_inline to inline until gcc 4.x.x will get
fixed.
Modified:
On Friday 11 January 2008, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
I'm facing a problem when statically linking an app with
sh4-linux-uclibc-g++
caused by the missing symbol dl_iterate_phdr as below:
sh4-linux-uclibc-g++ -static main.c
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always
inline' changes, doscovered suddenly that gcc-4.1.1 (cross sh4)
On Thursday 10 January 2008, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
I intend to apply the patch below unless anyone has any objections.
The reason is that if one has used setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, x) with
x 1024, using the FD_ macros will cause memory corruptions if a
file descriptor = 1024 happens to be
On Thursday 10 January 2008, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Will Newton wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 10:14 AM, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, no, I think what I said is correct. If no underscores is NOT
defined then we prepend the underscore.
You both appear to be in agreement on the result. The patch does
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Will Newton wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 4:06 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 03:58:00PM +, Will Newton wrote:
Agreed, my question is whether or not adding the underscore is the
correct thing to do even if your architecture
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:17:02PM +, Will Newton wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 4:06 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 03:58:00PM +, Will Newton wrote:
Agreed, my question is whether or not adding
at this time, i'd consider gcc-3.4.6 the oldest version worth using with
uClibc. that means it's the oldest version i'd consider adding source code
tweaks to work around gcc bugs. for older versions of gcc, if uClibc fails
to build for you due to a bug in the compiler, the answer is upgrade
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Alexander Voropay wrote:
at this time, i'd consider gcc-3.4.6 the oldest version worth using with
uClibc.
With this small patch GCC 3.4.6 works for me.
Is it possible to make it configurable for GCC3 ?
the size of a patch does not imply its correctness. we
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Will Newton wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 10:14 AM, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ trunk/uClibc/ldso/include/dl-defs.h 2007-12-03 22:46:53 UTC
(rev 20613) @@ -175,4 +175,10 @@
# define DL_MALLOC_ALIGN
On Monday 07 January 2008, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 06:29:43PM +0300, Alexander Voropay wrote:
It seems, GCC 3.4.6 preprocessor supports ## concatenations
incorrectly. I've took ENTRY definition from the sysdeps.h of the
ia64/sysdeps.h It works.
name##: is
On Monday 07 January 2008, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:35:53AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 19 December 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
--- libc/inet/resolv.c (revision 189757)
+++ libc/inet/resolv.c (local)
@@ -1534,6 +1534,15 @@ int
On Monday 07 January 2008, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:36:01AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2008, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 06:29:43PM +0300, Alexander Voropay wrote:
It seems, GCC 3.4.6 preprocessor supports
On Sunday 06 January 2008, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:02:45PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 07 December 2007, Khem Raj wrote:
Compiling with gcc 4.3 I get a lot of warning about inlining.
with -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 GCC implements ISO C99 inline semantics
On Sunday 04 November 2007, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 10:35:48 +0100
Carmelo Amoroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
arm-softfloat-linux-uclibc-strip -x -R .note -R .comment brk.o
ioperm.c:47:22: error: asm/page.h: No such file or directory
It seems you don't have kernel
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
The help text for the sys_errlist feature says that it is deprecated and
may be removed in the future, but what is its replacement?
i guess not everyone is fluent in this stuff so i added a note in the help
text to refer them to strerror(3)
On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Brian Austin wrote:
This patch adds MAVERICK CRUNCH FPU support for the Cirrus Logic EP93XX
ARM9 Procs.
i dont think it needs another special ifdef when it can be integrated into the
existing arm mess ... ive done that in svn instead
for future reference, please
On Wednesday 21 November 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Vikas TM wrote:
Hello all,
Please help me to find answers for following questions
1. What version of uClibc supports gettext functionality?
none
If you want to add this support into uCLibc will be appreciated.
Otherwise you may
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Will Wagner wrote:
I would like support for arbitrary baud rates with serial ports with
through uclibc.
I have looked at the uclibc code and there appear to be some support for
this in kernel_termios.h but it is limited to alpha powerpc. It also
does not seem to
On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I'm using buildroot to compile for armeb on a x86-64 (little-endian) host.
please use the buildroot mailing list in the future
uclibc's readelf and ldconfig are giving confusing results reading the
headers of compiled libraries.
Programs
On Saturday 27 October 2007, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
the attached difference file addresses the problem of
better detecting a malfunctioning memcmp() call. It concerns
the file
uClibc-0.9.29/test/string/tester.c
we blatantly steal this test from glibc ... any enhancements ive made i
On Thursday 25 October 2007, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
I am in the work of submitting the AVR32 architecture fork of uClibc,
and would like to know if you have a preferd way of receiving the
patches?
My plan is to pull down the latest snapshot, do a merge in my local
repository (for the
On Saturday 05 January 2008, Alexander Voropay wrote:
Can anyone help with this issue ?
I've opened a bug in the busybox tracking system:
http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=1894
i already told you it wasnt a bug in uClibc ...
It there any way to compile uClibc for mipsel with gcc 3.4.6
On Friday 07 December 2007, Khem Raj wrote:
Compiling with gcc 4.3 I get a lot of warning about inlining.
with -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 GCC implements ISO C99 inline semantics
unless -fgnu89-inline is used.
the warnings are in gcc 4.2 as well. ive imported the extern inline defines
from glibc
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
while running more tests on this (indeed never used dladdr in the past),
which tests ? our dl tests certainly dont have the coverage anywhere close to
what i wish they did ...
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
If we can subsummize some or individual funcs depending one a certain
standard, then all is well (see bsd-compat in e.g. network or others).
If they are non-standard but just serve as glibc-compat, then please
state so both in configury as
On Thursday 18 October 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
as an experiment, i want to create an updated version of a Nios II
toolchain, and i thought i'd start with testing whether i could just
compile the latest version of uclibc with the older toolchain, and
take it from there.
first, i
On Sunday 06 January 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
buflen += i;
err, that should be -= of course ... but you get the gist of where i'm trying
to take the changes ;)
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc
On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Natanael Copa wrote:
Here is a patch for the c99 math func log2(). If this gets applied I
will look into the other c99 math funcs as well.
is this function actually needed by something ? the current working policy
has been to merge C99 functions really only on
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Jason Curl wrote:
Then sysctl() is supposed to be the successor of ioctl(). UNP talks
about using the routing sockets to get the information for each
interface (sounds similar to netlink, but different enough).
from what i've seen on lkml, they're trying pretty
On Saturday 10 November 2007, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 05:45:23PM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know a susv3/POSIX compliant way to list all ipv6
interfaces? I bet there are no. ioctl(SIOCGIFCONF) ignores ipv6
interfaces, I just tested.
I suggest
On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
stopped by mailman since it attached more than 40 kB.
side note: ive upped the ante to 100 kB.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing
On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
+#define EM_AVR32 0x18ad
you guys arent in binutils yet eh ? you planning on keeping this value, or
you going to be dropping down to a normal one ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
+ rjmp__GI_memmove
all of your .S files should be using HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET() rather than the __GI_
prefixes manually added.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ /* Inline test and set */\n
is it really a good idea to be sticking comments in the assembly output ? i
guess as long as your assembler supports it as they wont be getting
preprocessed by
On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ldso/ldso/avr32/elfinterp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+/*
+ * AVR32 ELF shared library loader suppport
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Atmel Corporation
+ *
+ * All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * Redistribution and use in
On Friday 21 September 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
the attached patch tries to optimize a bit the lookup process
into the dynamic linker postponing the string comparisons as late
as possible.
merged, cheers
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 27 September 2007, bin sun wrote:
how to solve it?
it's already been fixed in svn
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
attached patch for the ld.so checks that during symbol lookup
process, the DSO has an hash table, otherwise we need to skip
over the next into the list.
merged, thanks
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
attached patch for the ld.so checks that during symbol lookup
process, the DSO has an hash table, otherwise we need to skip
over the next into the list.
idle curiosity, how did you generate a DSO w/out a hash table ? or is this
a it's
On Thursday 16 August 2007, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
In MIPS syscall(2), .cpload was added to an the error path, but it was
not enough for ABIs other then O32. Use SETUP_GP, SETUP_GP64 and
RESTORE_GP64 to handle all ABIs. This patch fixes an error path of
MIPS pipe(2) too.
merged, cheers
-mike
On Monday 10 September 2007, Jonathan Delizy wrote:
I've used buildroot to build a toolchain based on uClibc to compile some
software for arm9 architecture. When I compile some of this software, it
doesn't found some functions like des_setparity, ecb_crypt, ... I've
checked on my local Linux
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Blue Swirl wrote:
I'm trying to compile uClibc using buildroot, but I get these error
messages: CC libc/sysdeps/linux/common/mmap64.os
libc/sysdeps/linux/common/mmap64.c: In function 'mmap64':
libc/sysdeps/linux/common/mmap64.c:66: error: '__ulong_t' undeclared
On Monday 30 July 2007, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
I don't quite understand how to do hiding of __uc_malloc and
__uc_malloc_failed. I see several different usage patterns for
XXX_hidden_XXX macros,
and also see open-coded attribute defs.
the hidden stuff is all documented in include/libc-symbols.h
On Tuesday 05 June 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
I was going to update the FAQ to mention http://uclibc.org:8010/ and such,
but the website's apparently moved to a different subversion repository,
which is sad.
there is only one svn repository
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Monday 27 August 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote:
I'm writing a chapter in the upcoming revision of Building Embedded Linux
Systems. In the chapter I talk about futexes and the new Priority
Inheritance support (robust futexes as well). This is only supported if
the libc supports it too. So my
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
I think that libc-symbols.h needs cleanup.
A few things I noticed.
NOT_IN_libc is never defined in uclibc tarball (grepping for
'define[^d].*NOT_IN_libc' gives nothing). Yet tons of #ifs check it.
Is it needed?
we took this file from
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Saturday 15 September 2007 09:19, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 30 July 2007, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
/* The following macros are used for PLT bypassing within libc.so
(and if needed other libraries similarly).
First of all, you
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Saturday 15 September 2007 20:07, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Directly after that libc-symbols.h contains libc_hidden_XXX land.
I do think that libc_hidden_def/libc_hidden_proto macros need renaming.
renaming to what ?
To a descriptive
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Blue Swirl wrote:
On 9/15/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Blue Swirl wrote:
I'm trying to compile uClibc using buildroot, but I get these error
messages: CC libc/sysdeps/linux/common/mmap64.os
libc/sysdeps/linux
On Saturday 15 September 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: trunk/uClibc/include/malloc.h
+libc_hidden_proto(__uc_malloc);
+libc_hidden_proto(__uc_malloc_failed);
erp, those cannot be put into public headers
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 09 September 2007, Kevin Day wrote:
It should not be using index()
This fails when index() is not in uClibc.
i should pull from upstream as i believe i already got them to fix this ...
i'll commit this in the meantime, thanks
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Friday 07 September 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using buildroot / uclibc to make initrd image.
do not cross-post lists ... start debugging simple and once you narrow things
down, take it up with the respective list
i'd start with the buildroot list since it is general purpose
On Saturday 26 May 2007, sapirf fersht wrote:
This is my first post to this list and i hope you will bear with me. I am
trying to install uclibc on gentoo
please use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] from now on
make: *** [wctables.h] Segmentation fault
USE=-iconv -nls
-mike
signature.asc
Description:
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Sky Ryan wrote:
do you mean 0.9.29 have been test in arm no-MMU platform
i have never tested arm no-MMU, just Blackfin
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
On Saturday 19 May 2007, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
On Saturday 19 May 2007 15:05, Paul Brook wrote:
Right. You need to separate generation of internal headers (ie. sysnum.h)
from user-visible headers (those installed by install-headers).
I'm trying to have something ready for the evening (or
On 5/21/07, Christopher Friedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
99% of my intuition tells me that this is even a stupid question to ask,
but I would probably kick myself later if my intuition was wrong.
*shrug* i look at it as there's always someone dumber than me somewhere ;)
Is there any reason one
On 5/21/07, Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason one woul need to compile the linux kernel with the
same toolchain as the userspace binaries?
no, none at all ... in fact you could take a toolchain that is just
binutils and gcc (no libc at all) and use that
Not
On 5/21/07, Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not entirely true. On some targets[1] it's not possible to use a
bare-metal elf toolchains to compile a linux kernels.
i'd be interested i knowing which ones ... ive built cross-compiled
mips kernels myself with bare toolchains and i'm
On 5/21/07, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 21 May 2007 1:22 pm, Christopher Friedt wrote:
The kernel has it's own libc
The kernel doesn't use libc. (The klibc project is yet another small
lightweight C library ala uClibc, newlib, dietlibc...)
depends how you look at it ...
On Friday 18 May 2007, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
So, to build a cross-toolchain with uClibc, we need, in order:
no
the only header that gets generated is bits/sysnum.h and the only thing that
uses that is syscall.h ... which gcc doesnt use, so it isnt really too much
of an issue ...
so the normal
first, the status of linuxthreads ... when i first introduced the latest
version of linuxthreads, the upstream status was fully maintained and no
plans for this to end ... nptl wasnt even being considered. the idea was
that the version of linuxthreads we had in our tree was pretty outdated and
On Thursday 19 April 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:14:37PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 April 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
- It calls sleep expecting a cancellation point at nanosleep. But
libc.so's sleep.c has libc_hidden_proto(nanosleep) which
On Thursday 03 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can not find anything to explain what is xmalloc with respect to uClibc
other than a few cvs checks and diffs.
you're going to have to be a little bit more clear as to what you're referring
to when you say xmalloc ... there is no such thing
On Wednesday 25 April 2007, Bertram Geck wrote:
I try to compile the mplayer for mips with buildroot uclibc. Because the
compile problem has obviously nothing to do with mplayer, I post my
question here in the hope, someone can help me:
ive seen some packages fail because in uClibc-0.9.29,
On Thursday 19 April 2007, Ahan Hsieh 謝武漢 wrote:
Above is a FAQ of uClibc (http://www.uclibc.org/FAQ.html#shared)
In my understanding, if shared library is supported,
toolchain and loader have been improved to support it.
Toolchin has to compile the shared library as PIC and
transfer it to
On Monday 16 April 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
- It calls sleep expecting a cancellation point at nanosleep. But
libc.so's sleep.c has libc_hidden_proto(nanosleep) which means it
always calls the libc.so version, never the wrapped version in
libpthread.so that's a cancellation point.
On Wednesday 11 April 2007, Trasti, Jennifer wrote:
I get: sh: ./hello: No such file or directory
you're probably missing the ldso
-mike
pgpoAI6rUtO24.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
uClibc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Xuefeng Ren wrote:
When I use buildroot build my uClinux, i got the following error
reloc type R_ARM_PC24 unsupported in this context
How to resolve this problem?
err, what ? for uClinux help, e-mail the uClinux mailing list please
-mike
pgp1fkiZJdxqM.pgp
501 - 580 of 580 matches
Mail list logo
