On 17/01/2012 2.59, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 15/01/2012
On 17/01/2012 9.41, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 17/01/2012 2.59, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13
On 16/01/2012 10.36, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14,
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
and since I see the same issue on all architectures probably its not
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
and since
On 11/01/2012 8.44, Khem Raj wrote:
khem ? any news ?
no unfortunately, had no time to delve further. once I have turned a
merge into patch which was causing the regression, let me go down that
path.
let
hi Carmelo
Hi khem
Attached patch is causing the trouble. and I have
ok
#
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
and since I see the same issue on all architectures probably its not
elfinterp changes
too. Mostly it seems likely that it could be in the way the scopes are
being handled
we have reviewed several times this
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
and since I see the same issue on all architectures probably its not
elfinterp changes
too. Mostly it seems likely that it could be in the way
On 06/12/2011 11.25, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 06/12/2011 1.54, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:
yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 06/12/2011 11.25, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 06/12/2011 1.54, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On
On 06/12/2011 1.54, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:
yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
I am at
On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:
yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
which is merge commit.
so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have something working again ?
yes
Hi guys,
starting from SHA1
On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:
yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
which is merge commit.
so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have something working again ?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 05/12/2011 13.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 01/12/2011 20.40, Khem Raj wrote:
yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
which is merge
On Dec 1, 2011 8:41 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
which is merge commit.
so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have something working again ?
yes
I would
On 02/12/2011 14.45, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Dec 1, 2011 8:41 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
which is merge commit.
so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you
On 30/11/2011 22.44, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011
On 30/11/2011 22.44, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011
yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3
which is merge commit.
so if you do reset --hard HEAD~1 you have something working again ?
yes
___
uClibc mailing list
On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
If I build
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger
On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
If I build the root file system without this patch everything works
as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ?
On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
If I build the root file system without this patch everything works
as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
If I build the root file system without this patch
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
If I build the root file system without this patch everything works
as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ?
it's a merge commit that happens when
Hi Carmelo,
While trying to regress test future branch on top of master
I have been getting a regression on master on all architectures
(arm/ppc/mips/x86/x86_64) where my clutter based image does not
render the font properly after boot up ( it draws them with squares for
each character)
It has
On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote:
If I build the root file system without this patch everything works
as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ?
it's a merge commit that happens when you merge a branch that isn't a fast
forward. it isn't an actual commit
34 matches
Mail list logo
