would think this is a big deal since a lot of embedded Linux systems these
days use sqlite3.
Is there any somewhat painless way to upgrade the uClibc yourself (I know this
question has been asked on this forum before, but I never saw any place where
it
was answered)?
Thanks,
--Dave Rensberger
From: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
To: uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Cc: Dave Rensberger drens...@yahoo.com
Sent: Fri, August 6, 2010 1:43:29 AM
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] Moving to a newer version of busybox
On Thursday, August 05, 2010 22:47:26 Dave Rensberger wrote:
How difficult is it to drop
How difficult is it to drop a newer version of Busybox into uClibc-dist? I
assume it's more difficult than a typical user app because of the interaction
with Busybox's own Kconfig system. Is there a straightforward formula for
doing this?
Thanks
--Dave
I would like to use POSIX semaphores (sem_open(), sem_wait(), sem_post(), etc.)
in a uClinux/uClibc system. In the 20100315 distribution, the uClibc version
is still old enough that these functions are not implemented (well, they are,
but they simply return an errno indicating function does
I did resolve this. The solution (in my case anyway) was to point uClibc to
the uClinux-dist/include directory rather than any of the include directories
within the kernel tree.
On
25/03/2010 04:04, Dave Rensberger wrote:
After I manually added
the 'asm' link, the uClibc build stopped
Greg,
Thanks for the info about the evolution of the kernel directory structure.
I'll try the Soekris/net4801 setup. If it's a more-or-less standard x86
architecture, I think it should just be able to use it's uClibc config as a
starting point and go from there.
When you regression test that
...@gentoo.org
To: uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Cc: Dave Rensberger drens...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed, March 24, 2010 6:27:15 PM
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] bzero and bcopy in 20100315 with uClibc on i386
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 17:57:12 Dave Rensberger wrote:
I just did a quick look into the source last night
uClinux-dist supports anything (MMU and !MMU).
The kernel in the latest uClinux-dist's is as close to the kernel.org
eleases as possible.
uClinux-dist even lets you add your own kernel easily. For example,
take the penguinppc kernel, extract it to a directory at in the dists top
level dir
For those who are interested, I did get samba to work with uClibc on x86
snapgear. Just dropping in the samba module from the snapgear-20080711
release into a 3.5 snapgear build produces binaries that will run without
segfaulting.
I didn't really test smbd/nmbd, but at a superficial level,
The 20080711 package is a code snapshot. It is much newer than 3.5.0.
(And IIRC it contains a newer samba package).
Try it, it should be very close to the uClinux-dist-20080808 release.
Though I suspect that the samba in there doesn't work on non-MMU
systems.
Greg,
Thanks for your reply. To
Hi,
I've been trying to build a working samba and have not been very successful so
far. The problem is that all of the samba executables (well, smbd and
smbmount, anyway) segfault shortly after they're invoked. GDB indicates that
the segfault is happening in line 113 of ./lib/iconv.c, in
Sorry if this has already been covered, but what should be considered the
latest stable snapgear release? The web page says it's the 3.5.0 release, but
the ftp site contains a newer one called snapgear-20080711.
Thanks
--Dave
___
Hi,
I posted a similar message a few days ago, but it was formatted with no line
returns, so it may have
been a little bit annoying to read.
Has anyone out there successfully built and used the Samba in Snapgear 3.5? I
am building for an
i386 platform, and the build works fine, but all of
Hi,
I'm trying to get samba built from the snapgear 3.5 package running on an x86
platform with uClibc. It builds just fine (as long as I don't try to do the
shared object build), but when I run any of the executables (smbd, nmbd, or
smbmount), I get a core dump immediately after startup.
14 matches
Mail list logo
