Re: SocketTimeOut message

2013-10-04 Thread Dave Cragg
the transaction will stop if there is a timeout. (I could be wrong, but libUrl assumes this to be the case and cleans things up when a socketTimeout message is received) I think the timeout is measured as the time between any message sent to the remote host and a subsequent response. So a large download

SocketTimeOut message

2013-10-03 Thread J. Landman Gay
I need to understand this better. The dictionary says the socketTimeoutInterval specifies how long to wait before sending back a timeout message. It sounds like the timeout doesn't affect the data transmission, it's only a warning, and the data will be sent eventually. Is that correct? The

Re: SocketTimeOut message

2013-10-03 Thread Phil Davis
On 10/3/13 2:40 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: I need to understand this better. The dictionary says the socketTimeoutInterval specifies how long to wait before sending back a timeout message. It sounds like the timeout doesn't affect the data transmission, it's only a warning, and the data will be

Re: SocketTimeOut message

2013-10-03 Thread J. Landman Gay
Thanks, that's just what I needed to know. On 10/3/13 5:11 PM, Phil Davis wrote: On 10/3/13 2:40 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: I need to understand this better. The dictionary says the socketTimeoutInterval specifies how long to wait before sending back a timeout message. It sounds like the

Re: SocketTimeOut message

2013-10-03 Thread Roger Eller
On Oct 3, 2013 5:40 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: I need to understand this better. The dictionary says the socketTimeoutInterval specifies how long to wait before sending back a timeout message. It sounds like the timeout doesn't affect the data transmission, it's only a warning, and the data will

Re: SocketTimeOut message

2013-10-03 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 10/3/13 6:01 PM, Roger Eller wrote: It saddens me to say this, but LiveCode itself has always been iffy at ftp transfers. I've set the socketTimeoutInterval all over the spectrum, and never found a solid solution. On the same network, all other FTP clients would work perfectly every time.

Re: SocketTimeOut message

2013-10-03 Thread Roger Eller
I have a project that will be downloading hundreds of 150MB+ files per day. Often the file will end with only a few bytes missing, and it doesn't go back for the rest no matter how long it waits. So, I re-download until the whole thing is accounted for. ~Roger On Oct 3, 2013 7:17 PM, J. Landman

Re: SocketTimeOut message

2013-10-03 Thread Phil Davis
, and libURL keeps trying to send until it goes through. So maybe you don't need a resend? Just for the record, the experience I described is with straight TCP sockets (open socket, read/write, close socket), not HTTP, not FTP. But I would guess a socketTimeout message probably has the same