Re: The use-livecode list.

We did it just for you because we've all been there. :) -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On August 19, 2022 6:54:47 PM Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote: I've had a pretty shitty day. A variety of things have

Re: The use-livecode list.

No, THANK YOU! On 8/19/2022 7:53 PM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote: I've had a pretty shitty day. A variety of things have happened, or not happened, that made it not one of the good days. So I was not happy, and rather grumpy. (My apologies to Panos for being ungracious in an earlier

The use-livecode list.

I've had a pretty shitty day. A variety of things have happened, or not happened, that made it not one of the good days. So I was not happy, and rather grumpy. (My apologies to Panos for being ungracious in an earlier post - it was meant to be a plea for completeness of the product in

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

On 01/06/2017 04:29 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote: Unless there a real advantage that I can't think of, or a need, for this change, could I please plead with Heather to reverse that particular change. I believe the change that Heather (et al?) made to the MailMan configuration is

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

Bouncy, bouncy, rubber ball . . . 30 seconds . . . Not really the end of the world. Richmond. On 1/6/17 5:56 pm, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: -1 I plead with Heather to NOT reverse this recent change! Cmon, no one sees that people getting bounced is MUCH WORSE than the inconvenience

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

Thank you very much for that recipe Peter Brett; very useful as I use Thunderbird on both Mac and Linux. Returning to Macintosh I realise how much my experience on Mac has been enriched by what I learnt from a 10 year sojourn on Linux . . . Richmond. On 1/6/17 5:43 pm, Alex Tweedly via

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

-1 I plead with Heather to NOT reverse this recent change! Cmon, no one sees that people getting bounced is MUCH WORSE than the inconvenience of what your from address looks like?? Bob S > On Jan 6, 2017, at 04:29 , Alex Tweedly via use-livecode > wrote: > >

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

Yes, and Yes. That does indeed solve the problem for me - I too now see "Some Name via use-livecode" so all my functionality and preferred way of working is restored. And, as I said originally - if there's a need for this, then I would have happily put up with (sorry - "accepted") it just

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

On 06/01/2017 12:29, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote: Now that's impossible - all emails in the thread appear from the same address, and need to be individually opened to see who they were from, and so searching for a reply that I remember ws from (say) Richard is much harder. Hi Alex, Do

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

The "via" for this gmail user doesn't pose any issues, so if this change solves the unsubscribe problem, yay! On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > I don't really see what all the fuss is about. > > I have been

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

I don't really see what all the fuss is about. I have been "bounced"/"blocked" or whatever it is called 7 times: but as it takes about 30 seconds to reset things after the first one or two times I couldn't be bothered getting annoyed with it. Whether a posting i labelled as "via" or not

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

On 6 Jan 2017, at 12:55, Heather Laine via use-livecode wrote: Well. That's the problem you see. DMARC rejects mail on the basis that it does not come from the same address as the sender ie the posting person's email is not the list address. Actually, what *I* now see is emails being marked

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

On 6 Jan 2017, at 12:29, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote: > I please plead with Heather to reverse that particular change. Seconded, with bells on! :( k --- Keith Martin Senior Lecturer, LCC (University of the Arts London) Technical Editor, MacUser magazine (1997-2015)

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

On 2017-01-06 13:55, Heather Laine via use-livecode wrote: Well. That's the problem you see. DMARC rejects mail on the basis that it does not come from the same address as the sender ie the posting person's email is not the list address. Reversing this change will reinstate that issue. There is

Re: Changes to use-livecode list.

Well. That's the problem you see. DMARC rejects mail on the basis that it does not come from the same address as the sender ie the posting person's email is not the list address. Reversing this change will reinstate that issue. There is no good solution here, which is why I'm wondering if the

Changes to use-livecode list.

I know Heather has just made some changes to try to solve the 'bounce' problem. But I think in doing so a new problem has arisen. It used to be that email from the list showed up as 'from' : someu...@theiraddress.com 'reply-to' : use-livecode@lists.runrev.com They now show up as

Re: use LiveCode list

unrev.com> Sent: Fri, Jun 17, 2016 8:47 am Subject: use LiveCode list I'm noticing that the majority of the topics on this list recently concern rather advanced aspects of LC, like using JavaScript in the browser widget, mySQL and JSON calls, problems with multiple monitor display, LCB, LC

Re: use LiveCode list

Aye, and if it's "baby" stuff you're after, look no further than here: https://www.facebook.com/RMLCclasses/ Richmond. On 18.06.2016 18:03, Richard Gaskin wrote: Graham Samuel wrote: > I’m much like Peter. It takes me long enough to keep up with this > list so I don’t follow the forums. Is

Re: use LiveCode list

Graham Samuel wrote: > I’m much like Peter. It takes me long enough to keep up with this > list so I don’t follow the forums. Is this a mistake? We've entered the phase of growth in which our problem is the very one we would most want to have: there's too much discussion about LiveCode

Re: use LiveCode list

ist, I always ask my questions (which is usually of the >> Beginner variety) on the Forum. >> >> Regards, >> Sri >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://runtime-revolut

Re: use LiveCode list

> Regards, > Sri > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/use-LiveCode-list-tp4705871p4705872.html > Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ___ > use

Re: use LiveCode list

Hey: I'm always rooting around somewhere near the bottom. But I do feel that the Use-List is for everyone; that means the mavens as well as us plodders. Richmond. On 17.06.2016 15:44, Peter M. Brigham wrote: I'm noticing that the majority of the topics on this list recently concern rather

Re: use LiveCode list

Peter M. Brigham wrote: > I'm noticing that the majority of the topics on this list recently > concern rather advanced aspects of LC, like using JavaScript in the > browser widget, mySQL and JSON calls, problems with multiple monitor > display, LCB, LC server, etc. No disparagement intended at

Re: use LiveCode list

/use-LiveCode-list-tp4705871p4705872.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription