Richard-
Thursday, June 12, 2014, 3:45:55 PM, you wrote:
http://osxbook.com/book/bonus/ancient/procfs/
That's a dead link, and even osxbook.com just returns Hello.
I treasure my hardcopy of that book, and apparently there's an updated
version in the works. Serious geeky wonderfulness for
On 6/6/2014, 7:33 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
But even more fun, you can take a trip back to 1997 to read Scott
Raney's article in Linux Journal about using LiveCode (back then called
MetaCard) to build a GUI for top:
http://porky.linuxjournal.com:8080/LJ/043/2110.html
This looked pretty cool
J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 6/6/2014, 7:33 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
But even more fun, you can take a trip back to 1997 to read Scott
Raney's article in Linux Journal about using LiveCode (back then called
MetaCard) to build a GUI for top:
http://porky.linuxjournal.com:8080/LJ/043/2110.html
On 6/12/2014, 5:45 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Handy as it is, not all *nixes support it - this site explains more,
with some suggestions of OS X alternatives to some /proc info:
http://osxbook.com/book/bonus/ancient/procfs/
Thanks, but this would be way more work than the simple example I
Kay,
Thanks for that. It may come in handy some time.
Bill
William Prothero
http://es.earthednet.org
On Jun 6, 2014, at 4:38 AM, Kay C Lan lan.kc.macm...@gmail.com wrote:
For the first time, on OS X, I ran out of memory. Whilst Activity
Monitor is good, it doesn’t really give you a way to
Kay C Lan lan.kc.macmail@... writes:
at the bottom you’ll find a script that will output* some nice tab
formatted memory and CPU info:
Nice, but top didn't give you what you were looking for?
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote:
Nice, but top didn't give you what you were looking for?
I noticed in my search that people reported top as being quite CPU
intensive and in my own tests it went to No2, just below LC when I was
running my stacks; so a
Kay C Lan wrote:
I wanted to know what was using my memory and CPU and using top
was always going to place itself in the list. This is understandable
as top is active whilst the id, ps, and vm_stat are all static, but I
notice that even Activity Monitor with all it's bells and whistles
Thanks Richard, I strangely feel chuffed about the fact that I'm
reinventing a wheel already built by the legendary Man himself. I
might have to look into a few more of the top options: -bn1 didn't
work on my 10.9.3 but clearly there must be an OS X equivalent.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 8:33 AM,
Kay C Lan wrote:
Thanks Richard, I strangely feel chuffed about the fact that I'm
reinventing a wheel already built by the legendary Man himself.
Au contraire: I consider it one of those great GMTA moments - at least
you're in good company. :)
Besides, your layout bested top's - not bad.
Richard-
Friday, June 6, 2014, 8:25:19 PM, you wrote:
OS X ships with some surprisingly old stuff
homebrew
--
-Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
This communication may be unlawfully collected and stored by the National
Security Agency (NSA) in secret. The parties to this email do not
Kay-
Friday, June 6, 2014, 5:19:10 PM, you wrote:
I noticed in my search that people reported top as being quite CPU
intensive and in my own tests it went to No2, just below LC when I was
running my stacks; so a bit chicken and egg, I wanted to know what was
using my memory and CPU and using
Mark Wieder wrote:
Richard-
Friday, June 6, 2014, 8:25:19 PM, you wrote:
OS X ships with some surprisingly old stuff
homebrew
Homebrew is a great solution for people like you and me, but for most
Mac customers Apple hasn't been forthcoming about how outdated and
vulnerable many system
13 matches
Mail list logo
